You are on page 1of 12

KEMENTERIAN AGAMA RI

UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI MATARAM


FAKULTAS TARBIYAH DAN KEGURUAN
PROGRAM TADRIS BAHASA INGRIS
Jln. GajahMada No.100 Jempong Mataram. Telp. (0370) 620783/620784 Fax. (0370)620784,.
http://www.uinmataram.ac.id/ email: tbiftk@uinmataram.ac.id

RENCANA PEMBELAJARAN SEMESTER (RPS)


(Berdasarkan Permen Ristekdikti Nomor 44 Tahun 2015 Pasal 12)

Mata Kuliah: Language Learning Semester: VI A, B,C, Kode MK: TBI3626 Bobot (SKS): 3 SKS
Assessment D

Program Studi : S1 Tadris Bahasa Inggris Dosen Pengampu : Kasyfur Rahman, M. Pd.
Capaian Pembelajaran Lulusan 1. Master the theories of evaluation and the techniques of developing test and non-test
(CPL) assessment instruments (PK7).
2. Be able to carry out learning assessment and to develop quality assessment instruments
in ELT (KK 10).
Capaian Pembelajaran MataKuliah : By the end of this course the students will be able to
(CPMK) 1. Demonstrate understanding on the basic concepts and principles of language
assessment
2. Demonstrate understanding on various techniques of assessment instrument
development
3. Design and develop assessment instruments
4. Administer test and non-test to assess learning
5. Carry out quality assessment process
Deskripsi Matakuliah : This course is designed to equip students with the mastery of assessment and evaluation
theories and to let them put them into practices by designing and developing their own
assessment instruments and techniques (Summative and formative, test and non-test) based
on the principles of language assessment.

1
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
Mingg Kemampuan Akhir Tiap Bahan Kajian Metode Alokas Pengalaman Kriteria Daftar Referensi
u Ke- Tahap Pembelajaran (Materi) Pembelajara i Belajar Siswa Penilaian
(Kompetensi Dasar) n Waktu (Deskripsi (Indikator)
Tugas)
1 • List the course topics • Course Presentation 135 • Students • List the Course Syllabus/RPS
Orientation and dialogic menit discuss their available
Discussion prior topics in the
knowledge on course
the list of • List the
topics policies
provided related to
evaluation,
tardiness,
and
classroom.
2 • Distinguish between • Basic Presentation 135 • Students (Ss) • Define Alderson, J. C.,
evaluation, assessment, Concepts and dialogic Menit listen to the some key Clapham, C.,& Wall,
measurement and test of Discussion teacher’s terms of D. (1995). Language
Assessme presentation language test construction and
nt • Ss discuss the assessment evaluation.
nature of • Distinguish Cambridge:
assessment one term Cambridge University
• Ss discuss the from Press.
differences another. Brown, H.D., &
terms in Abeywickrama, P.
language (2010). Language
assessment. assessment: Principles
• Ss discuss and Classroom
some other Practices (2nd ed.).
types of

2
language New York: Pearson
testing. Education Inc.
• The teacher
and Ss review
the meeting
3 • Critically review the • Principles Dialogic 135 • Ss review the • List the SDA
principles of language of presentation Menit topic in the principles of
assessment. language and previous language
assessme discussion meeting assesment
nt • Ss listen to • Analyze
presentation whether the
on several principles
ubiquitous have been
approaches to applied
language
assessment
(discrete,
integrated,
communicativ
e, and
pragmatic)
• Ss discuss the
strengths and
weaknesses
of existing
language
tests based
on the
principles of
language
assessment

3
• The teacher
and Ss review
the meeting
4 • Demonstrate the Approaches Dialogic 135 • Ss review the • List and SDA
understanding on to Language presentation Menit previous describe
approaches to language Assessment and meeting and different
assessment and how discussion link it to the approaches
they are applied. current topic to language
• Ss listen to assessment
the teacher’s • Link
presentation available
on ubiquitous tests to the
approaches to approaches
language
assessment
(discrete,
integrated,
communicative
, and
pragmatic)
• Ss work in
group to check
the applicability
of the approach
• The teacher
and Ss review
the meeting
5 • Identify different types of Types of Test Dialogic 135 • Ss brainstorm • List SDA
test presentation Menit types of test common
and they already types of test
discussion know • Describe
• Ss listen to the the
teacher’s characteristi

4
presentation on cs of each
the types of test test
• Ss match
samples of test
with their types
• The teacher
and Ss review
the meeting
6 • Demonstrate the Formative Dialogic 135 • Ss listen to the • Describe Black, P., & Wiliam, D.
understanding on and presentation Menit teacher’s formative (2009). Developing the
Formative and Summative and presentation on and theory of formative
Summative Assessment Assessment discussion the two types of summative assessment. Journal of
assessment assessment Personnel Evaluation
• Ss discuss the • Describe in Education, 1(1), 1-
differences the 40
between and examples of
the advantages formative
as well as and
disadvantages summative
of formative assessment
and summative
assessment
• Ss call out the
examples of
formative and
summative
assessment.
• The teacher
and Ss review
the meeting
7 • Demonstrate the Formative Dialogic 135 • Ss discuss how • Describe Brown, H.D., &
understanding on and presentation Menit alternative formative Abeywickrama, P.
Alternative Assessment assessment and (2010). Language

5
Summative and emerges as summative assessment: Principles
Assessment discussion reaction to the assessment and Classroom
traditional • Describe Practices (2nd ed.).
assessment the New York: Pearson
• Ss discuss the examples of Education Inc.
benefits of formative
alternative and
assessment summative
• Ss discuss. assessment
• The teacher
and Ss review
the meeting
8 MIDTERM EXAM
9 • Identify different Assessing Dialogic 135 • Ss discuss the • Explain why SDA
techniques of assessing Listening presentation Menit skills assessed listening is
listening and in listening skill important
discussion • Ss listen to the • List the
teacher’s types of
presentation listening
(the importance tests and
and basic types tasks
of listening) • Design
• Ss discuss the tasks for
procedures and assessing
the design of listening
different skills
listening
assessment
tasks
• Examine
different
listening

6
assessment
tasks
• The teacher
and Ss review
the meeting

10 • Identify different Assessing Dialogic 135 • Ss listen to the • List all SDA
techniques of assessing Speaking presentation Menit teacher’s types of
speaking and presentation speaking
discussion (review of • Design
listening tasks to
assessment assess
(week6) speaking
• Ss listen to the
teacher’s
presentation
(basic types of
speaking)
• Ss examine
the different
types of
assessment
tasks of
speaking
• Ss discuss the
procedures for
how to design
speaking
assessment.

7
• The teacher
and Ss review
the meeting

11 • Identify different Assessing Dialogic • Ss listen to the • List all SDA


techniques of assessing Reading presentation teacher’s types of
reading and presentation reading
discussion (review of • Design
speaking tasks to
assessment) assess
• Ss listen to the reading
teacher’s
presentation
(basic types of
reading)
• Ss examine the
different types
of assessment
tasks of reading
• Ss discuss the
procedures and
designs for
speaking
assessment.
• The teacher
and Ss review
the meeting
12 • Identify different Assessing Presentation 135 • Ss listen to the • List all SDA
techniques of assessing Writing and Dialogic Menit teacher’s types of
writing discussion presentation writing
(review of • Design
tasks to

8
reading assess
assessment) writing
• Ss listen to the
teacher’s
presentation
(basic types of
writing)
• Ss examine the
different types
of assessment
tasks of writing
• Ss discuss the
procedures and
the designs for
writing
assessment.
• The teacher
and Ss review
the meeting
13 • Identify different Assessing Dialogic 135 • Ss brainstorm • List and
techniques of assessing grammar and Presentation Menit how their describe
grammar and vocabulary vocabulary and grammar and different
discussion vocabulary types of
were assessed tasks for
• Ss discuss assessing
different tasks grammar
used to assess and
grammar and vocabulary
vocabulary • Design
tasks fpr
assessing
grammar
and

9
vocabulary
14 • Measure test validity Test validity Dialogic 135 • Ss recall their • Describe SDA
and reliability and reliability Presentation Menit understanding what validity
and on the term and
discussion validity and reliability
Project- reliability are
based • Ss listen to the
learning teacher’s • Measure
modelling validity and
analyzing reliability of
validity and given test
reliability of a
test
• Ss practice
measuring
validity and
reliability of
given test
samples
15 • Measure discrimination Item Analysis Dialogic 135 • Ss in groups • Define what SDA
power and difficulty level Presentation Menit discuss the discriminati
of test item and term on power
discussion discrimination and
power and difficulty
difficulty level level of test
of test item item are
• Ss listen to • analyze
the teacher’s discriminati
modelling on power
analyzing and
discrimination difficulty
power and level of test
item

10
difficulty level
of test item
• Ss practice
measuring
discrimination
power and
difficulty level
of test item
16 FINAL EXAM

DAFTAR REFERENSI
1. Alderson, J. C., Clapham, C.,& Wall, D. (1995). Language test construction and evaluation. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
2. Brown, H.D., &Abeywickrama, P. (2010). Language assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices (2nd ed.). New York:
Pearson Education Inc.
3. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1(1),
1-40

PENILAIAN
1. Aspek Penilaian
a) Sikap
1. Kerjasama dalam tim atau kelompok
2. Komunikasi dengan dosen dan teman sejawat
3. Ketepatan waktu ketika mengumpulkan tugas
b) Pengetahuan
1. Menyampaikan gagasan dengan jelas dan dapat dimengerti
2. Menjawab pertanyaan baik secara lisan maupun tulisan
3. Memberikan alternatif pemecahan masalah yang berkaitan dengan topik
c) Keterampilan
1. Membuat slide presentasi
2. Melakukan tugas sesuai instruksi

3. Bobot Penilaian

11
a) Bobot Nilai Harian (NH) = 40 %
b) Bobot Nilai Ujian Tengah Semester (UTS) = 20 %
c) Bobot Nilai UjianAkhir Semester (UAS) = 40 %
4NH+2UTS+4UAS
d) Nilai Akhir (NA) =
10

VERIFIKASI RPS

Mengetahui Ketua Jurusan Mataram, 02 Pebruari 2020


Wakil Dekan I Dosen Pengampu

Dr. Abdul Quddus, M.A. Dr. Syarifudin, M.Pd. Kasyfur Rahman, M.Pd.
NIP. 19781111200501009 NIP. 196812311999031009 NIP. 198612282018011001

12

You might also like