This case brief discusses the M. Revanna Vs. Anjanamma case regarding amendments to pleadings under Order VI Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code. The case dealt with when amendments after the start of a trial may be allowed, considering whether the amendment request is made in good or bad faith and if allowing it would unfairly prejudice the other side. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled that while amendments are usually not permitted after a trial begins, in exceptional cases where the plea is convincing, a court can allow amendments to pleadings even after a trial has commenced.
This case brief discusses the M. Revanna Vs. Anjanamma case regarding amendments to pleadings under Order VI Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code. The case dealt with when amendments after the start of a trial may be allowed, considering whether the amendment request is made in good or bad faith and if allowing it would unfairly prejudice the other side. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled that while amendments are usually not permitted after a trial begins, in exceptional cases where the plea is convincing, a court can allow amendments to pleadings even after a trial has commenced.
This case brief discusses the M. Revanna Vs. Anjanamma case regarding amendments to pleadings under Order VI Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code. The case dealt with when amendments after the start of a trial may be allowed, considering whether the amendment request is made in good or bad faith and if allowing it would unfairly prejudice the other side. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled that while amendments are usually not permitted after a trial begins, in exceptional cases where the plea is convincing, a court can allow amendments to pleadings even after a trial has commenced.
M. Revanna Vs. Anjanamma(Dead) by Lrs. And Ors.; (Order VI Rule 17 of Civil Procedure Code,1908) FACTS: This case deals with the explanation as to when and on what considerations an application for an amendment of pleadings under Order VI Rule 17 CPC, filed after the commencement of trial, could be allowed. The court observed that, while dealing with such application, the courts have to consider whether the above said application is bonafide or malafide and also, whether allowing such an application causes such prejudice to other side which cannot be compensated adequately in terms of money. ISSUE: Whether an amendment of pleadings allowed after the commencement of trial? JUDGEMENT: The Hon’ble Supreme Court on 14th February, 2019, by a two judge bench of J. N V Ramana and J. M M Shantanagoudar pronounced the judgement that usually amendment of pleadings is not allowed after the commencement of trial but if in an exceptional case, the court is convinced by the plea, it can allow the amendment of pleadings even after the commencement of the trial.