You are on page 1of 1

CASE BRIEF

CASE NAME AND CASE LAW:


Dineshkumar Madhavlal Patel vs M/S Ami Corporation;(Civil
Appeal no. 190 of 2018);[Section 100 of Code of Civil
Procedure,1908]
FACTS:

The second appeal under section 100 of the CPC was filled at
the instance of the original defendant no.2 ,and is against the
judgment and order dated 11th december,2017 passed by the
Principal District judge,Mehsana in the Regular Civil Appeal no.
90 of 2005.The appellant is the resident of Visnagar .The
opponent no.1 is the partnership firm which is based at
Visnagar.The Respondent no.2 used to live at Visnagar,had
borrowed the amount from respondent no.1,which was not paid
by the respondent no.1.
ISSUE:
Whether the courts below erred in not granting unconditional
leave or conditional leave to defend to the appelant, more
particularly, when the appellant has pleaded that he has not
signed the deed of guarantee?
JUDGEMENT:
The hon’ble High Court of Gujrat in a single judge
bench,on 19th july 2018, Justice J.B.Pardiwala held that,
the applicant has been able to make out a strong prima
facie case to have an ad interim order in terms of
para.8(A),grant the relief in terms of para8(A) on the
condition that the applicant shall deposit the entire
decreetal amount with interest ason date within a period
of 6 weeks before the registery of this court.

You might also like