The case brief summarizes a case between Prabhat Ranjan Deo vs Union Public Service Commission regarding the petitioner's challenge of the empanelment and subsequent appointment of Respondent no. 4 as DGP. The petitioner qualified for the civil services in 1986 and was allocated to the Indian Police Service in Haryana cadre. The High Court of Delhi held that according to the Administrative Tribunals Act, the present petition was not maintainable in this court and dismissed the case, while noting that the petitioner could approach the Central Administrative Tribunal to have their grievances determined on the merits.
The case brief summarizes a case between Prabhat Ranjan Deo vs Union Public Service Commission regarding the petitioner's challenge of the empanelment and subsequent appointment of Respondent no. 4 as DGP. The petitioner qualified for the civil services in 1986 and was allocated to the Indian Police Service in Haryana cadre. The High Court of Delhi held that according to the Administrative Tribunals Act, the present petition was not maintainable in this court and dismissed the case, while noting that the petitioner could approach the Central Administrative Tribunal to have their grievances determined on the merits.
The case brief summarizes a case between Prabhat Ranjan Deo vs Union Public Service Commission regarding the petitioner's challenge of the empanelment and subsequent appointment of Respondent no. 4 as DGP. The petitioner qualified for the civil services in 1986 and was allocated to the Indian Police Service in Haryana cadre. The High Court of Delhi held that according to the Administrative Tribunals Act, the present petition was not maintainable in this court and dismissed the case, while noting that the petitioner could approach the Central Administrative Tribunal to have their grievances determined on the merits.
Prabhat Ranjan Deo vs Union Public Service Commission; (Civil Appeal No. 3334 of 2019); (Section 14(1) of The Administrative Tribunals Act,1985, Article 226,323B of The Constitution Of India,1949) FACTS: The petitioner successfully qualified the civil services Examination in the year 1986 and was allocated Indian Police Service(‘IPS’) and assigned Haryana cadre. Petitioner in the present petition assails the empanelment dated 18.02.2019 made by UPSC and the subsequent appointment of Respondent no. 4 as DGP. ISSUE: Whether the petition is maintainable? JUDGEMENT: The Hon’ble High Court of Delhi on 13th july,2020 by a single Judge bench of Justice Jyoti Singh held, that according to section 14(1) read with section 3(q) of administrative tribunals act, present petition is not maintainable in this court and accordingly dismissed. It would, however, be open to the petitioner to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal for determination of his grievances on merits. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of this case. The arguments were heard and judgment was reserved limited only to the jurisdiction of this court to entertain the petition.