The case involved several petitions filed against the State of Andhra Pradesh for granting mining leases to non-tribal persons in a reserved forest area including 14 villages in Borra. The appellants argued the area was a scheduled area under law. The Supreme Court held that the grant of the mining leases was in violation of the Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Area Land Transfer Regulation 1959 and ordered that the mining activities be immediately stopped.
The case involved several petitions filed against the State of Andhra Pradesh for granting mining leases to non-tribal persons in a reserved forest area including 14 villages in Borra. The appellants argued the area was a scheduled area under law. The Supreme Court held that the grant of the mining leases was in violation of the Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Area Land Transfer Regulation 1959 and ordered that the mining activities be immediately stopped.
The case involved several petitions filed against the State of Andhra Pradesh for granting mining leases to non-tribal persons in a reserved forest area including 14 villages in Borra. The appellants argued the area was a scheduled area under law. The Supreme Court held that the grant of the mining leases was in violation of the Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Area Land Transfer Regulation 1959 and ordered that the mining activities be immediately stopped.
Samatha vs. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. 4601 of 1997(Civil) Appeal ( sec 3 of Land Transfer Regulation, 1959). FACTS: The State of Andhra Pradesh granted several non-tribal persons such as M/s Kalyani Minerals, K Appa Rao, M Seetharama Swamy, etc. mining leases in the region of the Reserved Forest Area including fourteen villages in Borra. The Appellants in the case filed several petitions against the mining leaseholders and the State government. The Appellants argued that the area of contention fell under the notified scheduled area. Therefore, it was against the Forest (Conservation) Act 1980 and the Scheduled Area Land Transfer Regulation 1959 of Andhra Pradesh ISSUES: 1. Whether the government could grant mining lease to a non tribal? 2. Whether the grant of the leases violative of Environmental Protection Act 1986?
JUDGEMENT: The Honorable Supreme Court on July11, 1997 by a three judge bench K. RAMASWAMY & S. SAGHIR AHMAD & G.B. PATTANAIK held that-
1. This appeal by special l leave is therefore granted and that
the mining activities shall be immediately stopped. 2. The grant of mining leases is in contravention to the Andhra Pradesh schedule area Land Transfer Regulation 1959.