The Supreme Court ruled that mining leases granted to non-tribal persons in a reserved forest area and scheduled tribes region of Andhra Pradesh violated the Forest Conservation Act of 1980 and the State's Land Transfer Regulation. The Court found that the mining activities required permission from central government authorities under relevant Acts since it was non-forest usage of forest land. The leases were cancelled and mining stopped until proper approvals from central authorities were obtained.
The Supreme Court ruled that mining leases granted to non-tribal persons in a reserved forest area and scheduled tribes region of Andhra Pradesh violated the Forest Conservation Act of 1980 and the State's Land Transfer Regulation. The Court found that the mining activities required permission from central government authorities under relevant Acts since it was non-forest usage of forest land. The leases were cancelled and mining stopped until proper approvals from central authorities were obtained.
The Supreme Court ruled that mining leases granted to non-tribal persons in a reserved forest area and scheduled tribes region of Andhra Pradesh violated the Forest Conservation Act of 1980 and the State's Land Transfer Regulation. The Court found that the mining activities required permission from central government authorities under relevant Acts since it was non-forest usage of forest land. The leases were cancelled and mining stopped until proper approvals from central authorities were obtained.
Samatha vs. State Of Andhra Pradesh And Ors, 1997;( Appeal
(civil) 4601-02/1997); (The Forest Conservation Act, 1980)
FACTS:
The State of Andhra Pradesh granted several non-tribal
persons such as M/s Kalyani Minerals, K Appa Rao, M Seetharama Swamy, etc. mining leases in the region of the Reserved Forest Area including fourteen villages in Borra. The Appellants in the case filed several petitions against the mining leaseholders and the State government. The Appellants argued that the area of contention fell under the notified scheduled area. Therefore, it was against the Forest (Conservation) Act 1980 and the Scheduled Area Land Transfer Regulation 1959 of Andhra Pradesh.
ISSUE: Whether the leases are in violation of Environment Protection Act, 1986?
JUDGEMENT:
The Hon’ble Supreme Court on July 11, 1997 by a three-judge
bench of Justice K. Ramaswamy, Justice S. Saghir Ahmad and Justice G.B. Pattanaik the mining activities being a user of the forest land for non-forest purpose has to be stopped and in case it is intended to continue the mining activities the same can be done only after referring the matter to the appropriate authority of the Central Government and getting the permission of the same.