CASE BRIEF

CASE NAME AND CASE LAW:

Ramjit Singh Kardam & ors. v. Sanjeev Kumar & ors. ; (Civil
Appeal No. 2103 of 2020 arising out of SLP(C) No. 35373 of
2013); [Article 309 of the Constitution of India, 1949]
FACTS:
The appeal have been filed by the respondent against the
common judgment of Punjab and Haryana High Court LPA
filled by the appellants affirming the judgment of learned single
judge by which the selection of appellants on the post of
physical training has been set aside.
ISSUE:
Whether the high court was correct in affirming the judgment of
the learned single judge?
JUDGEMENT:
The Hon’ble Supreme Court on April 8th, 2020 by the divisional
bench comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice Navin
Sinha upheld the decision of the Punjab and Haryana High
Court with some modifications and the appeal was dismissed.
The commission was asked to conclude the entire selection
process including the written 200 mark test and 25 marks viva-
voce. No refund to be asked from the retired candidates for
their salary. Except for the costs imposed on the commission all
other costs have been deleted.