Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Kuya Tong Individual Performance and Review Form

    Uploaded by

    Myrna Lampa
    6 views2 pages
    Antonio Cordova's individual performance and review form summarizes his performance over a review period as a utility worker. He is rated on key responsibilities of maintaining cleanliness, acting as an alternate security guard, and performing other related functions. For maintaining cleanliness, he receives an average rating of 4.33 out of 5. For acting as an alternate security guard, he receives an average rating of 4.5 out of 5. For other related functions, he receives a rating of 4 out of 5. His overall rating is 4.365, which falls under the "Very Satisfactory" description.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    KUYA TONG INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE AND REVIEW FORM

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Antonio Cordova's individual performance and review form summarizes his performance over a review period as a utility worker. He is rated on key responsibilities of maintaining cleanliness, acting as an alternate security guard, and performing other related functions. For maintaining cleanliness, he receives an average rating of 4.33 out of 5. For acting as an alternate security guard, he receives an average rating of 4.5 out of 5. For other related functions, he receives a rating of 4 out of 5. His overall rating is 4.365, which falls under the "Very Satisfactory" description.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    Kuya Tong Individual Performance and Review Form

    Uploaded by

    Myrna Lampa
    Antonio Cordova's individual performance and review form summarizes his performance over a review period as a utility worker. He is rated on key responsibilities of maintaining cleanliness, acting as an alternate security guard, and performing other related functions. For maintaining cleanliness, he receives an average rating of 4.33 out of 5. For acting as an alternate security guard, he receives an average rating of 4.5 out of 5. For other related functions, he receives a rating of 4 out of 5. His overall rating is 4.365, which falls under the "Very Satisfactory" description.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE AND REVIEW FORM

    Name of Employee ANTONIO C. CORDOVA Name of Rater: MYRNA L. MANALANG


    Position: UTILITY WORKER Position: PRINCIPAL IV
    Review Period: Date of Review:
    Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
    TO BE FILLED DURING
    TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING EVALUATION
    PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
    WEIGHT ACTUAL
    (QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, WEIGHT SCORE
    MFOS KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per KRA RESULTS
    TIMELINESS)
    MFO: 2 Maintains 1. Maintains cleanliness at the Daily 100 % perform the task, complete, 4
    BASIC cleanliness in classroom and office corridors accurate within 8 working hours.
    school
    surrounding. 2. Maintains cleanliness and Daily 100 % perform the task, complete, 4
    50%
    sanitize offices and bathrooms accurate within 8 working hours

    3. Segregates trash and proper Daily 100 % perform the task, complete, 5
    disposal of waste accurate within 8 working hours

    (5-Outstanding, 4-Very Satisfactory,


    3-Satisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 1-
    Poor)

    AVERAGE 4.33 .50 2.165


    Act as 1. Maintains logbook for 100 % perform the task, complete, 4.5
    alternate visitors and guests accurate within 8 working hours.
    security guard
    2. Guard closely the entrance 100 % perform the task, complete, 4.5
    gate accurate within 8 working hours

    3. Implements the health and 100 % perform the task, complete, 4.5
    safety protocols in school accurate within 8 working hours

    (5-Outstanding, 4-Very Satisfactory,


    3-Satisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 1-
    Poor)

    AVERAGE 4.5 .40 1.8


    PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
    WEIGHT ACTUAL
    (QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, WEIGHT SCORE
    MFOS KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per KRA RESULTS
    TIMELINESS)
    MFO: 2 Perform other 1. Facilitates payments of Monthly 10% 100 % perform the task, complete, 4
    BASIC related utility bills accurate within 8 working hours
    function

    (5-Outstanding, 4-Very Satisfactory,


    3-Satisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 1-
    Poor)
    *To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned 100% 4 .10 .40

    OVERALL RATING 4.365

    ADJECTIVAL
    VS
    DESCRIPTION

    ANTONIO C. CORDOVA JERRY GLENN M. FEIR MYRNA L. MANALANG


    Ratee Rater Approving Authority

    You might also like