EAS EPM

ENGINEERING PROJECT MANAGEMENT

M Annas Albab Fauzi | 6010221015 | 22 DESEMBER 2022

ANSWER NO 1
1. Paula has several options, which include:

• Communicating with Frank to express her expectations and concerns about his performance and attitude toward the
project.
• Bringing in the line manager, who assured her that Frank's attitude was changing and that the line manager would intervene
if any problems arose on Paula's project.
• Reassigning Frank to another project or team, if necessary, reassign Frank to another project or team.

2. If Paula decides to try to handle the situation first by herself rather than approach the line manager, she should:

• Have a private conversation with Frank to clearly communicate her expectations and concerns about his performance and
attitude on the project.
• Listen to Frank's perspective and try to understand any issues or challenges he may be facing.
• It is important for Paula to document the issues with Frank's performance and attitude, including any conversations or
interactions that she has had with him. This will help to establish a record of the situation and may be useful if further action
is necessary. By documenting the issues with Frank's performance and attitude, Paula can provide a clear and
comprehensive overview of the situation, which can be helpful in addressing the issues and resolving the matter.

3. If Paula's efforts to change Frank's attitude fail and the line manager refuses to remove him, she may consider:

• If necessary, escalate the problem to higher management.

• Consult with human resources or legal counsel for advice on how to proceed.
• If necessary, reassign Frank to another project or team.

4. Paula has no specific rights in terms of wage and salary administration for this employee. Wage and salary decisions are
typically made by the employer and are based on several factors, including the employee's job duties, level of experience, and

PAGE 1
 performance. Paula's role as a project manager is generally focused on project management and resource management, rather
than wage and salary decisions.

ANSWER NO 2

ID DUR ES LF SL BUDGET 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
A 4 0 5 1 40 10 10 10 10
B 5 0 5 0 32 8 4 8 4 8
C 4 4 10 2 48 12 12 12 12
D 5 5 10 0 18 6 2 2 2 6
E 3 5 10 2 28 8 8 12
F 2 10 12 0 40 20 20
TOTAL 206 18 14 18 14 20 26 22 26 2 6 20 20
CUMULATIVE 18 32 50 64 84 110 132 158 160 166 186 206

PAGE 2
STATUS REPORT: ENDING PERIOD 2 *NILAI AC SUDAH ADA DARI
SOAL
Task % EV AC PV CV SV
Complet
e
A 75% 30 25 20 5 10
B 50% 16 12 12 4 4
Cumulative Totals 46 37 32 9 14

STATUS REPORT: ENDING PERIOD 4

Task % EV AC PV CV SV
Complet
e
A 100% 40 35 40 5 0
B 100% 32 24 24 8 8
Cumulative Totals 72 59 64 13 8

STATUS REPORT: ENDING PERIOD 6

Task % EV AC PV CV SV
Complet
e
A 100% 40 35 40 5 0
B 100% 32 24 32 8 0
C 75% 36 24 24 12 12
D 0% 0 0 6 0 -6
E 50% 14 10 8 4 6
Cumulative Totals 12 93 11 29 12
2 0

STATUS REPORT: ENDING PERIOD 8

PAGE 3
Task % EV AC PV CV SV
Complet
e
A 100% 40 35 40 5 0
B 100% 32 24 32 8 0
C 100% 48 32 48 16 0
D 33% 6 20 10 -14 -4
E 100% 28 20 28 8 0
Cumulative Totals 15 13 15 23 -4
4 1 8

Performances Indexes EV AC PV SPI CPI PCI BAC PCI-B ETC EACf VACf
Summary
PERIOD 2 46 37 32 1.4 1.2 1.2432 32 1.4375 - 25.739 6.2608
4 4 43 11.260 13 7
9
4 72 59 64 1.1 1.2 1.2203 64 1.125 - 52.444 11.555
3 2 39 6.5555 44 56
6
6 12 93 11 1.1 1.3 1.3118 110 1.1090 - 83.852 26.147
2 0 1 1 28 91 9.1475 46 54
4
8 15 13 15 0.9 1.1 1.1751 158 0.9743 3.4549 134.45 23.545
4 1 8 7 8 15 04 82 5 02

• The project seems to be performing well in terms of cost efficiency, as the CPI and PCI values are generally above 1.00,
indicating that the project is under budget.

PAGE 4
• The project appears to be slightly behind schedule, as the SPI values are below 1.00, indicating that the project is not
progressing as quickly as planned.
• The VAC values for the different periods are somewhat erratic, with some periods showing a positive VAC (indicating that
the project is under budget) and others showing a negative VAC (indicating that the project is over budget). This suggests
that the project's budget may be fluctuating over time.
• EACf values are consistently lower than the BAC, it may indicate that the project is likely to come in under budget. This
could be a good sign, as it suggests that the project is being managed efficiently and is on track to meet its financial goals.

PAGE 5