Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gian Karla Isidro, Ka Man Hui and Maria Kristina Camille Munar
Abstract
Visitor restriction policies have been implemented in many healthcare settings due to the
COVID-19 pandemic. The rationale behind the policies that mandate restriction family
members’ visitation is to help limit the spread of COVID. However, these policies are
among emotional distress, quality of life and decision-making. The objective of the literature
reviews is to identify the impacts of restricted visitation policies in healthcare settings and
recommend strategies to refine the ambiguity of the guidelines. A clear policy statement
provides a better communication stream to patients, families, and healthcare staff about
visitor restrictions that may prevent clinical and ethical issues in healthcare settings.
ANALYSIS OF VISITOR RESTRICTION IN HEALTHCARE SETTING
Visitation Restrictions
Restrictions for visitations in the healthcare settings became a traditional approach for
controlling the spread of infectious diseases. Medical facilities are weighing their option on
formulating policies that identify the visitors’ duty to provide support to the patient while
balancing the risk and benefits of visitation. According to the Special Bulletin by the
Department of Health from North Carolina, patients with intellectual disabilities should have
“adequate support for decision making and treatment,” including “visiting caregivers” when
they require physical or emotional support. In a social context, a visitor represents immediate
family members, personal caregivers or loved ones who provide emotional support to the
patient but are not involved in the client’s medical care (Jaswanet et al. 2022).
Nursing home residents were confined inside their bedrooms for months, causing
and worsening confusion resulting in a diminished functional ability and a significantly poor
Poor communication
Lack of explanation from the nursing home staff had significantly affected the relationship
between the participating resident and family. As families serve as socio-emotional support and a
sense of belonging, their sudden absence had caused the resident to feel withdrawn. Although the
resident cannot make decisions for themselves due to dementia, inclusion in decision-making, the
right to be informed, and proper understanding of the situation must still be respected (Hartigan et
al., 2021).
people with diminished capacity as much as possible, as specified by the Irish DoH. Although
the resident’s level of capacity has declined (due to dementia), autonomous role in decision-
making must not be disregarded, which also includes the acknowledgement of the family’s
role as advocates for the resident’s will and preferences, which is in line with the Health
Service Executive’s National Policy and the Irish Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act
2015. Furthermore, care facilities should be fully accountable and committed to protecting
Regaining Trust
To re-establish the trust that was damaged after the lack of communication, Hartigan
et al. (2021) suggests several strategies on how to compensate for the damages starting from
the nursing home’s accountability for the committed mistakes, amending the relationship by
reassuring the family about the nursing home’s devotion to standards of care and proposition
should also receive consistent, veracious and clear communication regarding the public health
Ambiguity of language
The majority of the hospitals were using the front-facing policies that relay messages
to the general public, such as no-visitors allowed but offers exemptions, and limited visitors
allowed on a case-to-case basis. The lack of language precision of the public-facing hospital
policies increased concern among the family members who wish to visit their loved ones and
resulted in policy confusion among staff trying to implement the rules. (Jaswanet et al.
2022).For example, there is no clear policy intended on how many visitors are allowed to be
at the patient’s bedside in an end-of-life setting, placing the family members in a distressful
ANALYSIS OF VISITOR RESTRICTION IN HEALTHCARE SETTING
situation. Limitations of visitors to a dying patient are attributed to ethical dilemmas in the
workplace. In addition, a vague policy statement may affect the clinician’s judgement on
when to enforce visitation rules when a patient’s condition is starting to deteriorate. Jaswanet
healthcare settings utilizing a clear, transparent and unbiased policy-making approach to meet
the needs and interests of patients and their families. To improve the ambiguity of policies,
the researcher recommends the following strategies: identifying the types of visitors that
need to be prioritized for visitations; rule-makers should provide clear guidelines and list for
confusing parts of the policy such as defining case by case exemptions; the significant role of
loved ones in the care of intellectually and physically challenged patients should be part of
the policy; provide accurate information if a COVID-positive patient may receive visitors or
not, and lastly to reference the policymaker authorities to guide the hospital staff in
Discussion
settings have been imposed throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. The policy intends to help
limit the spread of the COVID virus and protect vulnerable people, including the elderly in
nursing home facilities and frail patients susceptible to infectious disease. Despite intentions
to ensure patient, family, and healthcare safety, the restrictions result in consequences for
patients and families alike, such as emotional distress and worsening cognitive abilities,
family-centered care. Family members have an active role in improving processes of care
associated with socio-emotional support and are often act as advocates or proxies for patient
treatment decisions. Family members are the vital intermediary between patients and
ANALYSIS OF VISITOR RESTRICTION IN HEALTHCARE SETTING
healthcare providers in order to try to bring about an agreement on medical issues. As the
presence of family members is essential in inpatient care, policymakers are discussing the
criteria for family members to grant a compassionate visitor exemption in some exceptional
circumstances, for instance, allowance to stay with the terminal patient in an end-of-life
Existing evidence revealed that visitor restriction policies varied significantly among
healthcare settings. These variances lead to challenges in that their proper application may be
problematic and ethical considerations related to the application may happen. The abrupt
policy shift has imposed extra tension on healthcare workers who are trying to implement the
rules. Healthcare providers add additional burdens by spending more time on communication
and changing established ways to provide psychological support. A study by Jaswanet et al.
(2022) stated that the policy should focus on identifying the types of visitors that need to be
prioritized for visitations, clarifying the confusing parts of the guidelines, making clear
definitions for case by case exemptions, defining the role of significant others in caring for
intellectually and physically disabled patients, clarifying the visiting policy for COVID
positive patients and defining the associated authority for frontline staff in policy
implementation.
On the other hand, separating hospitalized patients from their family caregivers during
the pandemic can be highly distressing for both patient and family and healthcare providers.
A study by Hartigan et al. (2021) looked at the solutions to rebuild and re-establish the
rapport between healthcare providers, patients and family members. It is recommended that
even patient's level of capacity has declined, patients should be given autonomy in making
decisions over bodily integrity. They should be given the information in a manner that they
vulnerable adults instead of contributing to their susceptibility. Care facilities can further
reconstruct trustful relationships by reinforcing the institute's devotion to the standard of care
As the pandemic has unfolded, medical facilities should focus on managing the
present harm and preventing harm in the future. Implementing visitor restriction policies in a
should be flexible and consider all parties. Furthermore, additional support from government
References
Jaswaney, R., Davis, A., Cadigan, R. J., Waltz, M., Brassfield, E. R., Forcier, B., & Joyner
E306. https://doi-org.ezproxy.langara.ca/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001320
Hartigan, I., Kelleher, A., McCarthy, J., & Cornally, N. (2021). Visitor restrictions during
1123. https://doi-org.ezproxy.langara.ca/10.1177/09697330211005078