You are on page 1of 14

2 Preparation of sample

for analysis

2.1 Introduction necessity or not to use gloves in the chapters specifically


dealing with pathogen tests.
Most of the guidelines contained in this chapter were Prefer working inside vertical laminar flow cabinets
taken from the American Public Health Association to prevent contamination of the sample by the environ-
(APHA), as described in the 4th Edition of the Compen- ment and contamination of the environment and the
dium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of analyst by the sample. In case a vertical laminar flow
Foods (Downes & Ito, 2001). When different from or cabinet is not available, work in an area located as close
complementary to those of the Compendium, they were as possible to the flame of a Bunsen burner, which, when
completed with information and recommendations working well, will produce a steady blue flame. When
from the 21st Edition of the Standard Methods for the handling powdered samples, it is not recommended to
Examination of Water and Wastewater (Hunt and Rice, work very close to the flame of a Bunsen burner. ISO
2005), specific to the microbiological examination of 7218:2007 stipulates the use of a separated area or a
water, the 17th Edition of the Standard Methods for the laminar flow cabinet.
Examination of Dairy Products (Wehr & Frank, 2004), Avoid the formation of aerosols when opening tubes,
specific to the examination of dairy products and sev- flasks or plates after agitating or releasing the content of
eral standards developed by the International Organi- pipettes or flame-sterilizing inoculation loops.
zation for Standardization (ISO 6887-1:1999, ISO Never use a pipette by mouth, but use mechanical
6887-2:2003, ISO 6887-3:2003, ISO 6887-4:2003/ pipettes instead.
Cor.1:2004, ISO 6887-5:2010, ISO 7218:2007, ISO After use, place the pipettes and other utensils in dis-
17604:2003/Amd.1:2009), recommended for tests per- posable trays and not directly onto the surface of the
formed using ISO method(s). bench.
The preparation of samples for analysis involves three All instruments and utensils used to open packages
steps: homogenization of the content and withdrawal and withdraw analytical units (scissors, tweezers, knives,
of the analytical unit, preparation of the first dilution of spatulas, etc.) must be previously sterilized (in an auto-
the analytical unit and the preparation of serial decimal clave or sterilization oven) or immersed in ethanol 70%
dilutions, for inoculation into or onto culture media. and flame-sterilized at the time of use.
Before starting procedures certain precautions are Before opening the packages, disinfect the external
recommended, to ensure that all activities be conducted area with ethanol 70%, maintaining contact until the
under aseptic conditions: alcohol has fully evaporated. In the case of flexible pack-
Make sure that the work area is clean and that all ages, cut open with a sterile pair of scissors. In the case
doors and windows are closed to avoid air currents. of rigid packages with a screw cap, unscrew and remove
Disinfect all working surfaces with an appropriate dis- the cap aseptically. In the case of cans that come with an
infectant (ethanol 70%, 500 ppm benzalkonium chlo- “easy open” lid with wide opening, open the can asepti-
ride solution, 200 ppm sodium hypochlorite solution cally and remove the lid. In the case of cans without
or any other chlorine-based compound are adequate). an “easy open” feature, use a sterile can opener. In the
Wash and disinfect your hands with a disinfect- case of cans, glass containers, boxes and other packaging
ant appropriate and safe for skin contact. Verify the intended to be subjected to the commercial sterility test,

7007TS-DASILVA-Book.indb 9 11/26/2012 11:15:09 AM


10 Microbiological examination methods of food and water

differentiated guidelines should be followed, described in the specific chapters, the recommended amount
in a specific chapter. The objective of these procedures for most cases is 25 g or less. Thus, analytical units
is to ensure the integrity of the sealing system, for later of 25 g meet the requirements of ISO 6887-1:1999
analyses of the package, if necessary. Observe and note and, also those of the Compendium, for most tests.
any abnormality concerning either the package itself or There are differentiated cases in which the analyti-
its content, such as blowing, leakage, off-odors and/or cal unit must be greater or smaller than specified
strange or atypical appearance, the presence of foreign here. For more information on these exceptions, see
objects, and so on. Annex 2.2.

Before withdrawing the analytical unit(s), the content


2.2 Homogenization of samples and of the sample should be well homogenized, to ensure
withdrawal of the analytical unit that the portion to be removed will be representative
for the material as a whole. The procedures to achieve
The analytical unit is the amount of material with- good homogenization are different for liquid products,
drawn from a sample to be subjected to one or more solid products and products with a predominantly sur-
tests. The number of analytical units that should be face contamination, as will be further specified in the
withdrawn and the amount of material of each analyti- following sections.
cal unit depends on the number and types of tests that
will be performed on the same sample. In general, the
following items are necessary: 2.2.1 Procedure for homogenization
and withdrawal of analytical
a) Analytical units for presence/absence tests with units from liquid products
enrichment in specific broth. One analytical unit
is required for each test (Salmonella, Listeria and If the liquid product (viscosity not greater than that of
others). The quantity of material of each of these milk) is filled in containers with enough inner space
analytical units is defined in the chapters specifi- to allow for agitation, invert the packaging 25 times.
cally dedicated to these tests. If the container is filled to more than two-thirds of its
b) Analytical units for tests requiring differentiated inner space, invert the package 25 times in a 30 cm arc
treatment of the sample. One analytical unit is within seven seconds. If there is not enough free space
required for each test (commercial sterility, bacte- for agitation, then use a second, sterile container and
rial spore counts, thermoresistant mold counts and transfer the sample from one container to the other, for
others). The quantity of material of each of these three consecutive times. If foam is formed, let it sub-
analytical units is also defined in the chapters spe- side by standing until totally dispersed. As for gasified
cifically dedicated to these tests. samples (carbonated soft drinks and similar products),
c) Analytical units for general quantification tests. transfer the content to a sterile container with a wide
General quantification tests usually comprise total mouth and, with the cap slightly open, agitate using a
aerobic mesophilic or psychrotrophic counts and shaker until the gas is completely expelled (this step is
count of yeasts and molds, lactic acid bacteria, unnecessary if the analytical unit is transferred directly
enterococci, Enterobacteriaceae, coliform and/or to the filtration flask, in the tests using the membrane
Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, filtration method).
Clostridium perfringens and Pseudomonas sp. These Withdraw the analytical unit with a pipette, inserting
tests are performed with the same analytical unit, the tip of the pipette to a depth not greater than 2.5 cm
which, most commonly, consists of 25 grams or below the surface of the liquid. The measurement
milliliters of the sample. ISO 6887-1:1999 recom- should be volumetric and the time interval between the
mends that the analytical unit be, at least, 10 g for homogenization of the sample and the withdrawal of
solid samples or 10 ml for liquid samples. Chapter the analytical unit should not exceed 3 min. The Com-
2 of the Compendium (Midura & Bryant, 2001), pendium (Midura & Bryant, 2001) does not set a limit
recommends that the minimum amount or volume for the uncertainty of the measurement of the volume,
of the analytical unit be at least 50 g for solid foods which, according to ISO 6887-1:1999 should not be
and 10, 11 or 50 ml for liquid products. However, greater than 5%.

7007TS-DASILVA-Book.indb 10 11/26/2012 11:15:09 AM


Preparation of sample for analysis 11

2.2.2 Procedure for homogenization macerate. If a blender is used for homogenizing, ISO
and withdrawal of analytical 6887-4:2003/Cor.1:2004 recommends homogeniza-
units from solid or concentrated tion time not to exceed one minute, in order to avoid
liquid products excessive heating. A third option is to withdraw separate
and distinct analytical units from each layer and analyze
In the case of solid or concentrated liquid products, them, separately.
follow the guidelines contained in Annex 2.1, which If the amount of sample sent for analysis is smaller
defines the procedures most appropriate for homog- than the analytical unit(s) required, the Compendium
enizing and withdrawing the analytical unit of different (Midura & Bryant, 2001) recommends subjecting half
types of foods. The Compendium (Midura & Bryant, of the available amount of sample material for analy-
2001) recommends that the uncertainty of mass or sis and reserve the other half as a counter-sample. If
weight measurement be not greater than 0.1 g. ISO homogenization is done using a blender, the quantity of
6887-1:1999 recommends this measurement uncer- sample plus diluent (first dilution 10–1) in the jar of the
tainty not to exceed 5%. The interval between homog- blender should be sufficient to cover the cutting blades
enization and the withdrawal of the analytical unit of the apparatus. For meat products, ISO 6887-3:2003
should not surpass 15 minutes. recommends using all of the material for the tests.
If the sample is frozen, the Compendium (Midura &
Bryant, 2001) recommends thawing in the original
packaging under refrigeration temperatures (≤4.4°C) 2.2.3 Procedure for withdrawing
for no longer than 18 h. Alternatively, higher tempera- the analytical unit using the
tures may be used, but not higher than 40°C and for surface swabbing technique
no longer than 15 min. In this case, frequent agitation
of the sample is required to facilitate thawing. The use The surface swabbing technique applies to foods of
of a controlled temperature water bath and agitation is which most microbial contamination is predominantly
recommended. ISO 6887-4:2003/Cor.1:2004 recom- present or concentrated on the surface, such as bovine,
mends thawing under refrigeration (0 to 4°C) for no swine, poultry and fish carcasses. It also applies to the
longer than 24 hours, in the original packaging. Alter- analysis of the surfaces of pieces of equipment, tables,
natively, higher temperatures may be used (18 to 27°C), utensils and packaging.
but for no longer than 3 h. In the case of large blocks of Rubbing can be done with sterile swabs or, if the
frozen foods, which cannot be thawed under the condi- area to be sampled is large, with sterile sponges. This
tions described above, the procedure recommended by material can be purchased in individual, sterile pack-
ISO 6887-2:2003 for large pieces of meat may be fol- ages. The sponges may be replaced by sterile cotton
lowed. Utilize an electric drill (fitted with a previously pads, prepared in the laboratory. The swabs may also
sterilized drill bit) in combination with a sterile fun- be prepared in the laboratory, with wooden shafts of
nel. Insert the drill bit in the funnel (the lower opening approximately 15 cm long by 3 mm in diameter and the
inside diameter of which should be only slightly greater absorbent part in cotton measuring approximately 2 cm
than the diameter of the drill bit) and position the bit in length by 5 mm in diameter.
onto the point of the block from which a sample should
be taken. Turn on the drill and scrapings of the frozen
2.2.3.1 Swab sampling
food will move towards the surface and will accumulate
in the funnel, from where the required number of ana- Prepare tubes or flasks with 10 ml of an appropriate
lytical units can be taken. diluent. The Compendium (Midura & Bryant, 2001)
If the sample is heterogeneous, consisting of differ- recommends 0.1% Peptone Water (PW) or Butter-
ent layers, each of which of a distinct and clearly differ- field’s Phosphate Buffer and ISO 6887-1:1999 rec-
ent composition (filled cakes, pies, desserts, and other ommends Saline Peptone Water (SPW) or Buffered
ready-to-eat food), the analytical unit should be put Peptone Water (BPW). Remove the swab from its ster-
together using portions of the different layers, taking ile package, holding it by the shaft at the edge opposite
into account the actual proportion of each layer in the to the cotton tip. Moisten the cotton in the diluent,
product. Alternatively, homogenize the entire content pressing it against the walls of the flask to remove any
of the sample and withdraw the analytical unit from the excess liquid.

7007TS-DASILVA-Book.indb 11 11/26/2012 11:15:09 AM


12 Microbiological examination methods of food and water

Using a sterile frame of 50 cm2 in size, delimit the bottom to top. Upon completing this procedure, place
area to be sampled, holding the frame firmly against the the sponge back again into the bag and add the remain-
surface. Rub the swab with pressure, moving from left der of the diluent, until completing 25 ml.
to right and then from bottom to top. Rotate the cotton The liquid collected by the sponges can be used both
swab tip continuously as you wipe, so that the entire in general quantification tests as in presence/absence
surface of the cotton comes into contact with the sam- tests, which require enrichment in differentiated broth
ple. Upon completion of the rubbing or wiping, trans- (in the second case, follow the guidelines and instruc-
fer the swab to the tube or flask containing the diluent, tions in each of the specific chapters). This procedure
breaking off the hand-manipulated part of the wooden samples a total surface area of 100 cm2 and each millili-
shaft against the inside of the flask tube, before immers- ter of diluent, after the sponge is removed, corresponds
ing the remainder of the swab in the diluent. to 4 cm2 of the sample surface. Both the sampled surface
Repeat this procedure one more time, covering the area as the volume of diluent may vary, in accordance
same sample surface area, using a dry swab this time. with the needs or the characteristics of the sample.
Place and keep the second swab in the same flask or
tube containing diluent.
The liquid collected by the swabs can be used both in 2.2.4 Procedure for withdrawing
general quantification tests as in presence/absence tests, the analytical unit using the
which require enrichment in differentiated broth (in surface washing technique
the second case, follow the guidelines and instructions
in each of the specific chapters). This procedure samples The surface washing technique is used for taking food
a total surface area of 50 cm2 and each milliliter of dilu- samples of which most microbial contamination is pre-
ent, upon removal of the swabs, corresponds to 5 cm2 dominantly present or concentrated on the surface,
of the sampled surface. Both the sampled surface area as such as whole poultry carcasses, poultry cuts, fish, egg
the volume of diluent may vary, in accordance with the shells, grains, seeds, nuts and peanuts, which may be
needs or the characteristics of the sample. immersed in an adequate diluent contained in a sterile
For the swabbing of half bovine or swine carcasses using bag. The method is also used for the analysis of pack-
the same procedure, ISO 17604:2003/Amd.1:2009 rec- ages that can be closed and agitated with the diluent
ommends sampling the points indicated in Figures 2.1 inside, for washing the package and collecting the sam-
and 2.2. Use one swab for each point and, between one ple to be examined.
point and the next, immerse the frame in ethanol 70%
and flame-sterilize. The swabs may be placed and kept
2.2.4.1 Procedure for washing poultry
in one and the same flask containing a total volume of
carcasses
diluent corresponding to a multiple of 10 ml diluent for
each pair of swabs. The following procedure is from MLG/FSIS (2011) to
be used for the simultaneous examination of Salmonella
and other microorganisms. It is also recommended by
2.2.3.2 Sponge sampling
ISO 17604:2003/Amd.1:2009.
Prepare tubes or flasks with 25 ml of one of the dilu- Aseptically drain excess fluid from the carcass and
ents recommended for swabs. Open the plastic bag transfer the carcass to a sterile plastic bag. Pour 400 ml
containing the sterile sponge (or cotton pad) and add of Buffered Peptone Water (BPW) into the cavity of
an amount of diluent sufficient to moisten the sponge, the carcass contained in the bag. Rinse the bird inside
without leaving behind any visible excess fluid. Hold and out with a rocking motion for one minute (ca. 35
the bag by its outside surface and massage the sponge to RPM). This is done by grasping the broiler carcass in the
moisten it evenly. Thoroughly wash your hands before bag with one hand and the closed top of the bag with
putting on a pair of sterile gloves and remove the sponge the other. Rock the carcass with a reciprocal motion in
from the bag. about an 18–24 inch arc, assuring that all surfaces (inte-
Using a sterile frame measuring 10 × 10 cm, delimit rior and exterior of the carcass) are rinsed. Transfer the
the area to be sampled by holding the frame firmly sample rinse fluid to a sterile container. Use 30 ± 0.6 ml
against the surface. Rub the sponge under pressure, of the sample rinse fluid obtained above for Salmonella
moving it 10 times from left to right and 10 times from analysis. Add 30 ± 0.6 ml of sterile BPW, and mix well.

7007TS-DASILVA-Book.indb 12 11/26/2012 11:15:09 AM


Preparation of sample for analysis 13

15 9

14

10

11

12

13

Figure 2.1 Points recommended by ISO 17604:2003/Amd.1:2009 for swab sampling of bovine carcasses.

9
13

10

11

12

Figure 2.2 Points recommended by ISO 17604:2003/Amd.1:2009 for swab sampling of swine carcasses.

7007TS-DASILVA-Book.indb 13 11/26/2012 11:15:09 AM


14 Microbiological examination methods of food and water

For analyses other than Salmonella the dilutions can be The liquid obtained by this washing procedure may
made directly from the BPW rinse. Alternatively, the be used for both general quantification tests as for the
carcass may be rinsed in Butterfield’s Phosphate Buffer presence/absence tests that require enrichment in differ-
instead of BPW. In this case, for Salmonella analy- entiated broth (in the second case, follow the guidelines
sis add 30 ± 0.6 ml of double concentration BPW to and instructions in each specific chapter). In this proce-
30 ± 0.6 ml of carcass-rinse fluid and mix well. dure each milliliter of the washing liquid corresponds to
In this procedure each milliliter of washing liquid cor- the holding capacity of the package divided by the vol-
responds to the weight of the carcass divided by 400. For ume of the diluent. For example, if the holding capacity
example, if the carcass weighs 1,600 g, each milliliter of of the package is 500 ml and the volume of diluent is
the washing liquid corresponds to 4 g of the sample. equal to 100 ml, each milliliter of the washing liquid
corresponds to 5 cm3.
2.2.4.2 Procedure for washing other foods
Transfer the sample to a sterile bag and weigh. Using the 2.2.5 Keeping of counter-samples
same diluents recommended for swabs, add to the bag
the amount of diluent required for an initial 1:1 dilu- After withdrawing the analytical unit(s) store the remain-
tion (1 ml of diluent per gram of sample). Closing the ing material under the same conditions utilized prior to
mouth of the bag with one hand, agitate the sample and analysis (ISO 7218:2007). Perishable samples need to
massage the pieces inside the bag with the other hand be frozen, but it is important to know that thawing of
from the outside, taking the necessary care and precau- counter-samples for the purpose of repeating microbio-
tions to avoid that pointed or other protuberant parts logical test(s) is not an acceptable practice, due to the
come to pierce or puncture the package. In the case of possible death of part of the microbial populations that
grains, seeds, nuts, and similar products, the sample were originally present. In the case of frozen products,
may also be placed in a flask containing the diluent and this problem can be resolved by thawing for analysis
agitated for 10 min in a laboratory shaker. only the portion required for the test(s). The remaining
The liquid produced by this washing procedure may quantity, which was not thawed, may be kept frozen
be used for both general quantification tests as for pres- to be used as a counter-sample for later repetitions of
ence/absence tests which require enrichment in differ- the test(s), if necessary. In the case of refrigerated prod-
entiated broth (in the second case, follow the guidelines ucts, there is no acceptable way to keep counter-samples
and instructions in each of the specific chapters). In this without freezing. In case test(s) need to be repeated, the
procedure each milliliter of the washing liquid corre- result(s) should be interpreted taking into account the
sponds to 1 g of sample. fact that population(s) of the target microorganism(s)
The volume of diluent may vary, in accordance with may have been reduced due to freezing.
the needs or the characteristics of the sample. In the case of samples the analytical unit of which
has been collected by surface swab or sponge rubbing
technique or the surface washing technique, the part of
2.2.4.3 Procedure for washing packages
the diluent retaining the contaminants and not used for
This procedure is recommended for packages with a subsequent microbiological testing should be frozen to
leak-proof cap or closure system. In the case of packages serve as counter-sample. Also in this case, it should be
that do not have any cap/closure system or caps that are taken into consideration that the population(s) of the
not leak-proof, use the swabbing method. target microorganism(s) may have been reduced due to
Using the same diluents as those recommended for freezing.
swabs, add to the package an amount of diluent suf- The minimum time for keeping counter-samples is
ficient to wash the entire internal surface by agitation the time required for obtaining the results of the tests,
(1/5 of the package’s holding capacity, for example). but should be set at the discretion of the laboratory. The
Close the package tightly and, with the hands agitate samples may be disposed of by throwing them in a dump-
and swirl the package vigorously to remove the micro- ster, but samples deteriorated or suspected of contain-
organisms adhered to the inner surface. Try to reach all ing microorganisms that are harmful to health should
the points of the inner surface, so as to guarantee com- be decontaminated in an autoclave (121°C/30 min)
plete removal of the contaminants present. prior to final disposal (ISO 7218:2007).

7007TS-DASILVA-Book.indb 14 11/26/2012 11:15:09 AM


Preparation of sample for analysis 15

2.3 Preparation of the first dilution (BPW). ISO 6887-2:2003 and ISO 6887-3:2003 also
of the analytical unit recommend Saline Peptone Water (SPW) or Buffered
Peptone Water (BPW) for general use in the examina-
To proceed with the analysis, the analytical unit must tion of meat and meat products, and fish and fishery
be diluted and homogenized with an adequate diluent, products.
to allow inoculation into or onto culture media. The ISO 6887-5:2010 recommends, for general use in
recommended diluents and initial dilution ratios vary the examination of milk and dairy products, 0.1%
with the type of sample and the type of test that will be Peptone Water (PW), Buffered Peptone Water (BPW),
performed, as described below: Saline Peptone Water (SPW), Ringer’s Solution Quar-
ter-Strength or Phosphate Buffered Solution according
ISO 6887-5.
2.3.1 Diluents for presence/absence There are special cases for which a different diluent
tests is recommended. For more details on these exceptions
see Annex 2.2.
These tests are performed with dilution and homog-
enization directly in enrichment broth, specified in the
corresponding chapters. 2.3.4 How to prepare an initial 1:10
(10–1) dilution

2.3.2 Diluents for tests requiring The initial dilution recommended for most samples is
differentiated handling of the 1:10 (10−1), obtained by adding m grams or milliliters of
sample the sample to 9 × m milliliters of diluent. For example,
for 25 g of sample, add 9 × 25 ml of diluent (225 ml).
Also for these tests the specific chapters should be There are situations in which the diluent and the initial
consulted. dilution are different. For more details on these excep-
tions see Annex 2.2.

2.3.3 Diluents for general


quantification tests 2.3.5 How to prepare an initial
dilution different from 1:10
For these tests the following recommendations apply:
The Compendium (Midura & Bryant, 2001) recom- There are special situations in which the first dilution is
mends, for general use in the examination of foods, different from 1:10. To determine the volume of dilu-
0.1% Peptone Water (PW) or Butterfield’s Phosphate ent necessary to obtain a predetermined 1:k dilution of
Buffer. the sample, use the v = [(k.m) – m] ratio. For example,
The section 4.030 of the Standard Methods for the to obtain a 1:50 dilution of an analytical unit of 10 g,
Examination of Dairy Products (Davis & Hickey, 2004) add [(50 × 10) − 10] milliliters of diluent (490 ml).
recommends, for general use in the examination of To obtain the same dilution for an analytical unit of
dairy products, Butterfield’s Phosphate Buffer (called 20 g, add [(50 × 20) − 20] milliliters of the diluent
Phosphate Dilution Water) or Magnesium Chloride (980 ml).
Phosphate Buffer (called Phosphate and Magnesium
Chloride Dilution Water).
The Standard Methods for the Examination of Water & 2.3.6 Procedure for the preparation
Wastewater (Hunt & Rice, 2005) recommends, for gen- of the first dilution of liquid
eral use in the examination of water samples, 0.1% Pep- samples
tone Water (PW) or Magnesium Chloride Phosphate
Buffer (called Buffered Water). In the case of liquid foods, transfer the analytical unit
ISO 6887-1:1999 and ISO 6887-4:2003/Cor.1:2004 directly to tubes or flasks containing the amount of dilu-
recommend, for general use in the examination of foods, ent necessary for a 1/10 dilution. Homogenize the sam-
Saline Peptone Water (SPW) or Buffered Peptone Water ple with the diluent by agitation, inverting the container

7007TS-DASILVA-Book.indb 15 11/26/2012 11:15:09 AM


16 Microbiological examination methods of food and water

or package 25 times. To allow for perfect homogeniza- must be taken into account when doing the final calcu-
tion, use tubes or flasks with screw caps. They should be lations of the results, as described in Chapters 3 and 4.
of a size sufficiently great to ensure that no more than
2/3 of their holding capacity is taken up by the analyti-
cal unit + diluent. There are special cases that require 2.4 Serial decimal dilution
a different initial dilution. For further details on these of the sample
exceptions see Annex 2.2.
The preparation and inoculation of serial dilutions of
the sample are required for quantitative tests, to reduce
2.3.7 Procedure for the preparation the number of microorganisms per unit of volume, and
of the first dilution of solid or make it possible to count them. This series of dilutions
concentrated liquid samples is generally decimal or ten-fold for ease of calculation of
final results.
In the case of solid or concentrated liquid foods, trans- The number of dilutions necessary depends on the
fer the analytical unit to a sterile homogenization flask expected level of contamination and should be such as
or bag. Add to the sample the amount of diluent neces- to allow for, in plate counts, obtaining plates with num-
sary to obtain a 1:10 dilution. Homogenize the ana- bers of colonies varying between 25–30 and 250–300
lytical unit with the diluent, which can be achieved by (see Chapter 3) or between 15 and 150 in yeast and
manual agitation, shaking the flask in an inverted posi- mold counts. In counts by the Most Probable Number
tion 25 times through a 30 cm arc within seven seconds Method (MPN) the number of dilutions must allow for
(concentrated liquids, soluble powders), agitation in a obtaining positive tubes at the lowest dilutions and neg-
peristaltic homogenizer (better known as stomacher) atives tubes at the highest dilutions (see Chapter 4).
for 1–2 min (soft foods, pasty foods, ground or minced According to the general procedure described by the
foods, poorly soluble powders) or in a blender (hard Compendium (Swanson et al., 2001), the second dilution
foods). In the case of homogenization using a blender, is to be initiated immediately upon completion of the
the Compendium (Midura & Bryant, 2001) recom- first dilution. The duration of the complete procedure,
mends using high speed during the first few seconds from the preparation of the first dilution until inocula-
and low speed (8,000 rpm) for the remaining time, tion of all culture media, should not exceed 15 minutes
which should not exceed 2 min. If a more prolonged (except when described in case-specific chapters).
homogenization is necessary, it is important to prevent According to the general procedure described by ISO
excessive heating of the material. For that purpose, the 6887-1:1999, the duration of the complete procedure
Compendium (Midura & Bryant, 2001) recommends should not exceed 45 minutes and the time interval
cooling the diluent in an ice bath before use, while ISO between the end of the preparation of the first dilution
6887-4:2003/Cor.1:2004 recommends not homogeniz- and the beginning of the second and subsequent dilu-
ing for periods longer than 2.5 min. There are special tions should not exceed 30 minutes (except when speci-
cases that require a different initial dilution. For further fied in specific procedures).
details on these exceptions see Annex 2.2. For dehydrated or dried foods (except for milk pow-
der, egg powder, and live yeast powder) ISO 6887-
4:2003/Cor.1:2004 recommends a resuscitation step
2.3.8 Procedure for the preparation before preparing the second dilution. In general, leave
of the first dilution of samples the sample to rest for about 30 ± 5 min at laboratory
obtained by surface swabbing temperature. Do not exceed a temperature of 25°C
or surface washing before preparation of further dilutions.
In all cases in which volumes are transferred, the
The diluent retaining the contamination collected with uncertainty of the measurement must not exceed 5%
swabs, sponges or surface washing is, in itself, already (ISO 6887-1:1999).
the first dilution of the sample. The subsequent treat- How to prepare the second dilution (10−2): Transfer
ment of serial decimal dilution is performed using this aseptically 1 ml of the first dilution (10−1) to 9 ml dilu-
suspension as point of departure. Since the initial dilu- ent. The diluents are the same as those recommended
tion is not the standard 1:10 dilution, this difference for the first dilution. In the second dilution there are

7007TS-DASILVA-Book.indb 16 11/26/2012 11:15:09 AM


Preparation of sample for analysis 17

no special cases in which a different diluent is required (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA) & Water
from the one used to prepare the first dilution. Environment Federation (WEF). Part 9000, pp. 9.1–9.169.
International Organization for Standardization (1999) ISO 6887-
Do not dip the tip of the pipette to a depth of more
1:1999. Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs – Prepara-
than 1 cm when pipetting the volume from the first tion of test samples, initial suspension and decimal dilutions for
to the second dilution (ISO 6887-1:1999). If the first microbiological examination – Part 1: General rules for the prepa-
dilution does not contain suspended particles, the mate- ration of the initial suspension and decimal dilutions. Geneva,
rial may be agitated before transferring the volume from ISO.
the first to the second dilution. If there are suspended International Organization for Standardization (2003) ISO 6887-
2:2003. Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs – Prepa-
particles, ISO 6887-1:1999 recommends not to agitate ration of test samples, initial suspension and decimal dilutions for
and wait until the suspended particles settle to the bot- microbiological examination – Part 2: Specific rules for the prepara-
tom before transferring the volume. In the case of vis- tion of meat and meat products. Geneva, ISO.
cous samples, which adhere to the internal wall of the International Organization for Standardization (2003) ISO 6887-
pipette, ISO 6887-5:2010 recommends dispensing the 3:2003. Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs – Prepa-
ration of test samples, initial suspension and decimal dilutions for
volume and subsequently wash the pipette with diluent microbiological examination – Part 4: Specific rules for the prepara-
(by aspirating several times) to ensure that all the mate- tion of fish and fishery products. Geneva, ISO.
rial be transferred to the second dilution. International Organization for Standardization (2004) ISO 6887-
How to prepare subsequent dilutions: Transfer 4:2003/Cor.1:2004. Microbiology of food and animal feeding
1 ml of the previous dilution to 9 ml diluent. Before stuffs – Preparation of test samples, initial suspension and decimal
dilutions for microbiological examination – Part 4: Specific rules for
withdrawing the volume to be transferred, agitate the
the preparation of products other than milk and milk products, meat
tube vigorously, inverting it 25 times in a 30-cm arc and meat products, and fish and fishery products. 1st edition:2003,
(within 7 s) or using a laboratory vortex mixer (15 s). Technical Corrigendum 1:2004. Geneva, ISO.
International Organization for Standardization (2010) ISO 6887-
5:2010. Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs – Prepa-
ration of test samples, initial suspension and decimal dilutions for
2.5 References microbiological examination – Part 5: Specific rules for the prepara-
tion of milk and milk products. Geneva, ISO.
Davis, G.L. & Hickey, P.J. (2004) Media and dilution water prepa- International Organization for Standardization (2007) ISO
ration. In: Wehr, H.M. & Frank, J.F (eds). Standard Methods 7218:2007. Microbiology of food and animal stuffs – General
for the Examination of Dairy Products. 17th edition. Washington, requirements and guidance for microbiological examinations.
American Public Health Association. Chapter 4, pp. 93–101. Geneva, ISO.
Downes, F.P. & Ito, K. (eds) (2001) Compendium of Methods for the International Organization for Standardization (2009) ISO
Microbiological Examination of Foods. 4th edition. Washington, 17604:2003/Amd 1:2009. Microbiology of food and animal
American Public Health Association. feeding stuffs – Carcass sampling for microbiological analysis. 1st
Duncan, S.E., Yaun, B.R. & Sumner, S.S. (2004) Microbiological edition:2003, Amendment 1:2009. Geneva, ISO.
Methods for Dairy Products. In: Wehr, H.M. & Frank, J.F (eds). Laird, D.T., Gambrel-Lenarz, S.A., Scher, F.M., Graham, T.E. &
Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products. 17th edi- Reddy, R. (2004) Microbiological count methods. In: Wehr,
tion. Washington, American Public Health Association. Chapter H.M. & Frank, J.F (eds). Standard Methods for the Examination
9, pp. 249–268. of Dairy Products. 17th edition. Washington, American Public
Frank, J.F. & Yousef, A.E. (2004) Tests for groups of microrganisms. Health Association. Chapter 6, pp. 153–186.
In: Wehr, H.M. & Frank, J.F (eds). Standard Methods for Midura, T.F. & Bryant, R.G. (2001) Sampling plans, sample col-
the Examination of Dairy Products. 17th edition. Washington, lection, shipment, and preparation for analysis. In: Downes, F.P.
American Public Health Association. Chapter 8, pp. 227–248. & Ito, K. (eds). Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological
Gray, R.J.H. & Pinkas, J.M. (2001) Gums and spices. In: Downes, Examination of Foods. 4th edition. Washington, American Public
F.P. & Ito, K. (eds). Compendium of Methods for the Microbio- Health Association. Chapter 2, pp. 13–23.
logical Examination of Foods. 4th edition. Washington, American MLG/FSIS (2011) Isolation and Identification of Salmonella from
Public Health Association. Chapter 52, pp. 533–540. Meat, Poultry, Pasteurized Egg and Catfish Products. In: Micro-
Hall, P., Ledenbach, L. & Flowers, R. (2001) Acid producing micro- biology Laboratory Guidebook [Online] Washington, Food Safety
organisms. In: Downes, F.P. & Ito, K. (eds). Compendium of and Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods. 4th edition. Available from: http://www.fsis.usda.gov/PDF/MLG_4_05.pdf
Washington, American Public Health Association. Chapter 19, [Accessed 3rd November 2011].
pp. 201–207. Ricke, S.C., Birkhold, S.G. & Gast, R.K. (2001) Egg and egg prod-
Hunt, M.E. & Rice, E.W. (2005) Microbiological examination. In: ucts. In: Downes, F.P. & Ito, K. (eds). Compendium of Meth-
Eaton, A.D., Clesceri, L.S., Rice, E.W. & Greenberg, A.E. (eds). ods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods. 4th edition.
Standard Methods for the Examination of Water & Wastewater. Washington, American Public Health Association. Chapter 46,
21st edition. Washington, American Public Health Association pp. 473–481.

7007TS-DASILVA-Book.indb 17 11/26/2012 11:15:10 AM


18 Microbiological examination methods of food and water

Smittle, R.B. & Cirigliano, M.C. (2001) Salad dressings. In: a stomacher contain the sample and diluent in two or
Downes, F.P. & Ito, K. (eds). Compendium of Methods for the more sterile bags to prevent puncturing and possible
Microbiological Examination of Foods. 4th edition. Washington,
sample spillage. When using rotary homogenizer do not
American Public Health Association. Chapter 53, pp. 541–544.
Swanson, K.M.J, Petran, R.L. & Hanlin, J.H. (2001) Culture homogenize for more than 2.5 min at a time. If necessary
methods for enumeration of microrganisms. In: Downes, F.P. & to mince or to grind the sample, do not exceed 1 min at
Ito, K. (eds). Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological time to avoid an excessive increasing in temperature.
Examination of Foods. 4th edition. Washington, American Public Pieces of solid foods: ISO 6887-4:2003/Cor.1:2004
Health Association. Chapter 6, pp. 53–67. recommends using an adequate instrument (sterile knife
Wehr, H. M. & Frank, J. F (eds) (2004) Standard Methods for
the Examination of Dairy Products. 17th edition. Washington,
or pair of scissors) to break up or cut the material into
American Public Health Association. smaller parts (taken from different points of the piece in
its original shape), until obtaining the quantity required
for analysis.
Annex 2.1 Procedures for the Eggs in the shell: For analysis of the internal content,
homogenization of the Chapter 46 of the Compendium (Ricke et al., 2001) rec-
content and withdrawal ommends to wash the shell of the eggs with a brush,
of the analytical unit of water and soap, drain off the excess liquid, immerse
different types of foods the eggs in ethanol 70% for 10 min and flame-sterilize.
Using sterile gloves open the eggs aseptically and place
Powdered products: Homogenize the sample by vigor- the internal content inside a sterile flask or bag, separat-
ously agitating and inverting the package with your hands ing the yolk from the egg white if the analysis requires
until well mixed (ISO 6887-4:2003/Cor.1:2004 or stir so. Mix well and withdraw the analytical unit from the
the content with a sterile spatula or glass rod (Midura & mixture.
Bryant, 2001). If there is not enough free space inside ISO 6887-4:2003/Cor.1:2004 recommends three
the package to allow for appropriate homogenization, procedures, depending on the final purpose of the test:
transfer the whole content to a larger flask and proceed
in exactly the same way (ISO 6887-5:2010). Withdraw • To analyze only external contamination, the surface
the analytical unit with a sterile spatula. washing method may be used. Alternatively, break
Pasty or ground products: Stir the content with the eggs, dispose of the internal content, place the
a sterile spatula or glass rod until well homogenized. egg shells in a sterile bag, crumble the egg shells,
Withdraw the analytical unit with a sterile spatula mix well and withdraw the analytical unit from the
(Midura & Bryant, 2001). mixture.
Yogurts with fruit pieces: For yogurt containing • To analyze both external and internal contamina-
fruit pieces, the Standard Methods for the Examination tion, break the eggs, place the shells and the internal
of Dairy Products (Duncan et al., 2004) recommends content in a sterile flask or bag, mix well and with-
homogenizing the entire content of the sample unit in draw the analytical unit from the mixture.
a blender for 1 min, before withdrawing the analytical • To analyze only the internal content, clean the shell
unit. with moistened gauze, dry with absorbent paper,
Cheeses: The Standard Methods for the Examination immerse the eggs in Alcoholic Solution of Iodine
of Dairy Products (Duncan et al., 2004) recommends and, using sterile gloves, remove aseptically the eggs
macerating the whole content of the sample unit (with from the solution, and let them stand to dry. Using
a sterile spatula) and withdrawing the analytical unit gloves open the eggs aseptically and place the inter-
from the mixture. nal content in a sterile flask or bag, separating the
Very hard food products: ISO 6887-4:2003/ yolk from the egg white if the analysis requires so.
Cor.1:2004 recommends placing the sample inside a Mix well and withdraw the analytical unit of the
sterile plastic bag and beat the material with a sterile mixture.
hammer crumbling it into small bits and pieces. Mix
well the fragmented sample material and withdraw the Meat cuts for analysis of non-surface contamina-
analytical unit with a sterile spatula. ISO 6887-5:2010, tion: For the analysis of contamination of deep tissues of
specific for dairy products, recommends: when using carcasses or meat cuts, ISO 6887-2:2003 recommends

7007TS-DASILVA-Book.indb 18 11/26/2012 11:15:10 AM


Preparation of sample for analysis 19

exposing an area of approximately 5 × 5 cm, using a sterile it is common practice to inoculate an aliquot of the
knife or pair of scissors to remove the skin, if present, sample directly in or on the culture media, without pre-
and a surface layer of approximately 2 mm thickness. vious dilution. In this case, the first dilution may be
Cauterize the exposed surface with a flame and, using done by inoculating 1 ml of the sample in 9 ml diluent.
another sterile knife or pair of scissors, remove a second Also common are tests using the membrane filtration
layer of approximately 1 mm thick and 4 × 4 cm in size. technique, in which volumes of the sample are inocu-
From this exposed area, withdraw the analytical unit(s) lated, without any dilution.
required for the analyses. Fatty foods: For these foods, the Compendium
Bivalves: ISO 6887-3:2003 recommends rubbing (Midura & Bryant, 2001) recommends preparing the
the shells with a sterile, abrasive brush under running diluent with 1% (w/v) nonionic Tergitol 7 or an equiv-
water (drinkable). Drain off any excess water, place alent surfactant (Tween 80, for example) and homog-
onto a sterile surface and cover with sterile absorbent enize in a blender for 2 min, at low speed (8000 rpm).
paper. Open at least six shells aseptically and subse- ISO 6887-4:2003/Cor.1:2004 and ISO 6887-5:2010
quently take out the organisms, along with the inter- recommend preparing the diluent with 1 g/l to 10 g/l
valvular water and transfer everything to a sterile flask Tween 80, depending on the fat level. For products
or plastic bag. Wash and disinfect the hands before ini- containing 40% fat, for example, the diluent should be
tiating the operation. prepared with 4 g/l Tween 80. This procedure does not
Gastropods: ISO 6887-3:2003 recommends rub- apply to margarine and spreads.
bing the shells with a sterile, abrasive brush under For margarine and spreads ISO 6887-4:2003/
running water (drinkable or potable). Disinfect with Cor.1:2004 recommends an analytical unit of 40 g and
alcohol 70%, place onto a sterile surface (if necessary the following procedure: add to the analytical unit a
between two sterile gauze layers). Break the shells with volume of diluent (without any supplements) propor-
a sterile hammer and take out the meat parts aseptically tional to the fat level of the margarine. For example, for
and transfer them to a sterile bag or flask. Wash and margarines containing 82% fat and an analytical unit of
disinfect the hands before initiating the operation. 40 g, add 40 × 0.82 = 33 ml of diluent. Place the flask in
Cephalopods: ISO 6887-3:2003 recommends a temperature-controlled hot water bath at 45°C, until
removing the skin and withdrawing the analytical unit the material is completely melted. This should not take
from the dorsal muscles and tentacles. more than 20 min. Mix with the aid of a magnetic agi-
Whole crustaceans such as crabs: ISO 6887-3:2003 tator until a homogeneous emulsion is formed, which
recommends breaking the shell and claws using a sterile may take between 2 to 5 min, depending on the type
hammer and removing the maximum amount of meat of product. Allow to stand at room temperature until
as possible when withdrawing the analytical unit. complete separation of the aqueous (lower) and fatty
Sea urchins: ISO 6887-3:2003 recommends wash- (upper) phases. Continue the analysis with the aque-
ing the organisms under running water (drinkable or ous phase, 1 ml of which corresponds to 1 g margarine.
potable), open the ventral side and remove all the flesh Then prepare a 10−1 dilution by adding, for each m mil-
and internal fluids using a spatula. liliters of aqueous phase, 9 m milliliters of diluent.
The Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy
Products (Laird et al., 2004) recommends, for margarine
Annex 2.2 Special cases in which and spreads the same procedures as the one described
there are variations in for butter.
the analytical unit and/ Thickeners or products containing natural antimi-
or dilution and/or diluents crobial compounds: For thickeners and other products
recommended for the the viscosity of which increases when added to or mixed
preparation of the first with water (gums, pectin, cellulose, dried leafy herbs,
dilution of samples of such as oregano) the Compendium (Gray & Pinkas,
different types of foods 2001) and ISO 6887-1:1999 recommend working
with an initial dilution greater than 1:10, such as, for
Liquids with low levels of contamination: In quanti- instance, 1/20, 1/50, 1/100 or any other appropriate to
tative tests of liquid samples with low microbial counts, the viscosity of the material.

7007TS-DASILVA-Book.indb 19 11/26/2012 11:15:10 AM


20 Microbiological examination methods of food and water

For products containing natural antimicrobial com- at room temperature, until the material is completely
pounds, such as spices and herbs (garlic, onion, clove, melted. After that, homogenize in a stomacher.
cinnamon, oregano, pepper) and certain teas and cof- Egg white: The Compendium (Midura & Bryant,
fee, it is recommended that the first dilution be greater 2001, Ricke et al., 2001) does not mention differenti-
than 1:10 (1:100 for oregano and cinnamon, 1:1000 for ated procedures for these samples. ISO 6887-4:2003/
cloves). Alternatively, it is possible to prepare the dilu- Cor.1:2004 recommends the first dilution to be 1:40,
ent with 0.5% potassium sulfite (K2SO3) and analyze in Buffered Peptone Water (BPW), to reduce the inhib-
the sample with the normal initial dilution ratio. itory effect exerted by natural lysozyme on microorgan-
The analytical unit may be 10g and the initial dilu- isms in general. The initial dilution used must be taken
tion used must be taken into account when calculating into account when calculating the results.
the results. If the expected counts are low, one should, if Fermented products containing live microorgan-
possible, keep the inoculum at 0.1 g of the initial dilu- isms intended for the quantification of the contaminat-
tion in the culture media. For more details on how to do ing microflora (except probiotics): ISO 6887-4:2003/
this, follow the instructions and guidelines contained in Cor.1:2004, used for the determination of other micro-
Chapters 3 and 4. organisms than those responsible for the fermentation
Acid products: ISO 6887-4:2003/Cor.1:2004 and process (that is, the contaminants), recommends using
ISO 6887-5:2010 recommend that the pH value of the Saline Peptone Water with Bromocresol Purple (SPW-
first dilution be neutralized with sterile NaOH. To facil- BCP) as diluent. If the color of the diluent of the first
itate this step Saline Peptone Water with Bromocresol dilution indicates an acid pH (yellow color), add 40 g/l
Purple (SPW-BCP) may be used. When adding NaOH sodium hydroxide to return to a neutral pH (becom-
the increase in pH may be accompanied by a change in ing purple). If the microorganisms responsible for the
color of the culture medium, which may change from fermentation are yeasts, add to the culture medium on
yellow to purple when reaching pH 6.8 (neutral). The which the counts will be performed an antifungal agent
NaOH concentration (0.1 M or 1 M, for example) to be such as cycloheximide (50 mg/kg), nystatin (50 mg/kg)
used will depend on the acidity of the sample and should or amphotericin (10 mg/kg). For other microorganisms
be such that the amount added does not significantly responsible for fermentation, add another antibiotic
alter the 1+9 proportion between sample and diluent. substance that would be suitable to inhibit this micro-
A second option is to use buffered diluents but, even in flora. These modifications in the procedure, if used,
this case, the addition of NaOH is often necessary to should be reported in the analysis report.
increase the buffering capacity of the medium. Powdered dairy products (dried milk, dried sweet
Chapter 2 of the Compendium (Midura & Bryant, whey, dried acid whey, dried buttermilk, lactose):
2001) does not mention differentiated procedures for ISO 6887-5:2010 recommends an analytical unit of
these samples, as far as general quantification tests are 10 g and add the powder to the diluent and not the
concerned. However, for samples of mayonnaise, and diluent to the powder (to facilitate hydration). To dis-
other salad dressings, Chapter 53 (Smittle & Crigliano, solve the test sample, swirl slowly to wet the powder
2001) recommends that they be neutralized for colif- then shake the bottle 25 times, with a movement of
orm and S. aureus counts. See also the specific recom- about 30 cm, for about 7s. For better reconstitution
mendations for fermented dairy products. and in particular with roller-dried milk, glass beads
Fine flours or meals, cereal grains, animal feed: added to the bottle before sterilization can be helpful.
ISO 6887-4:2003/Cor.1:2004 recommends adding the A peristaltic blender may be used as an alternative to
diluent to the analytical unit, leaving to stand for 20 to shaking. Allow to stand for 5 min, shaking occasionally.
30 min at room temperature and then homogenizing. If The diluent may be pre-warmed to 45°C if a homoge-
the viscosity of the suspension becomes too high, add a neous suspension cannot be obtained even after blend-
complementary quantity of diluent, until obtaining a 1:20 ing. Mention such an additional procedure in the test
dilution ratio. This change in the initial dilution should report. For the products below different diluents are
be taken into account when calculating the results. recommended instead of the diluents for general use:
Chocolate in bars, bonbons: ISO 6887-4:2003/
Cor.1:2004 recommends pre-heating the diluent to 40°C • For acid whey – 90 ml of Dipotassium Hydrogen
before adding it to the analytical unit and subsequent Phosphate (K2HPO4) Solution with pH adjusted to
mixing by hand stirring. Leave to stand for 20–30 min 8.4 ± 0.2

7007TS-DASILVA-Book.indb 20 11/26/2012 11:15:10 AM


Preparation of sample for analysis 21

• For milk powder (roller dried) – 90 ml of Dipo- pH adjusted to 7.5 ± 0.2 or Sodium Citrate Solution
tassium Hydrogen Phosphate (K2HPO4) Solution (Na3C6H5O7 . 2H2O).
with pH adjusted to 7.5 ± 0.2 or Sodium Citrate The Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy
Solution (Na3C6H5O7 . 2H2O). Products (Laird et al., 2004) recommends an analytical
unit of 11 g and, as diluent, 99 ml of Sodium Citrate
The Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Solution (Na3C6H5O7 . 2H2O), pre-heated to 40–45°C.
Products (Laird et al., 2004) recommends Sodium Cit- Fermented dairy products: For fermented milk and
rate Solution (Na3C6H5O7 . 2H2O) with the pH adjusted sour cream (pH < 5) ISO 6887-5:2010 recommends an
to a value below 8.0 for powdered dairy products. analytical unit of 10 g and, as diluent, 90 ml of Buffered
Powdered milk-based infant foods: ISO 6887- Peptone Water (BPW) or Dipotassium Hydrogen Phos-
5:2010 recommends an analytical unit of 10 g in 90 ml phate (K2HPO4) Solution with pH adjusted to 7.5 ± 0.2.
of a diluent for general use, preparing the sample as Homogenize shaking manually or using a stomacher.
described for dried milk. However, samples with high For products on which lactic bacterial counts will be
starch content may cause problems because of the high performed, Chapter 19 of the Compendium (Hall et al.,
viscosity of the first dilution. In this case use a dilu- 2001) and Chapter 8 of the Standard Methods for the
ent with α-amylase to reduce the viscosity of the initial Examination of Dairy Products (Frank & Yousef, 2004)
solution, or use twice the quantity of the diluent. Take recommend do not use Butterfield’s Phosphate Buffer
this further dilution into consideration when calculat- to prepare the samples because it can cause damage to
ing the results. the bacterial cells. As a general rule, the diluent recom-
Butter: ISO 6887-5:2010 recommends weighing an mended for this category of food product is 0.1% Pep-
analytical unit of 10 g in a sterile flask, transferring to a tone Water (PW).
temperature-controlled hot water bath at 45°C, waiting For fermented milks and creams, in particular, Chap-
until the sample is completely melted. Add 90 ml of one ter 9 of the Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy
of the diluent for general use warmed to 45°C and mix. Products (Duncan et al., 2004) recommends an analyti-
This operation is more easily carried out in a peristaltic cal unit of 11 g and, as diluent, 99 ml of sterile distilled
blender (stomacher). water or Sodium Citrate Solution (Na3C6H5O7 . 2H2O),
Chapter 6 of the 17th Edition of the Standard Methods pre-heated to 40–45°. For yogurts and other fermented
for the Examination of Dairy Products (Laird et al., 2004) or acidified products (except milk and cream) the rec-
recommends melting the sample in a hot water bath at ommended analytical unit is 10 g and, as diluent, 90 ml
40 ± 1ºC, for a period not exceeding 15 min. Pre-heat of skim milk powder dissolved in Butterfield’s Phos-
the diluent at 40–45ºC and pipette the diluent several phate Buffer (0.1 g/100 ml).
times, returning the diluent back to the flask, to heat up Casein and caseinates: ISO 6887-5:2010 recom-
the pipette. Next, pipette 11 ml of the melted sample mends an analytical unit of 10 g and 90 ml of one of
(avoid separation of the aqueous and fatty phases), trans- the following diluents.
fer to 99 ml of the heated diluent and agitate vigorously,
inverting the flask 25 times in a 30 cm arc within 7 sec- • Caseinates – Dipotassium Hydrogen Phosphate
onds. Prepare and inoculate the serial dilutions immedi- (K2HPO4) Solution with pH adjusted to 7.5 ± 0.2.
ately while the tubes containing the diluent are still hot. Mix well manually and allow to stand at room tem-
Ice cream: ISO 6887-5:2010 recommends an analyt- perature for 15 min. Blend if necessary for 2 min
ical unit of 10 g. Homogenize the sample in a peristaltic in the peristaltic blender (stomacher) by using two
blender (stomacher) with 90 ml of one of the diluents sterile bags for granular products. Allow to stand for
for general use. The product melts during blending. 5 min.
Custard, desserts and sweet cream (pH > 5): ISO • Lactic or acid casein – Dipotassium Hydrogen
6887-5:2010 recommends an analytical unit of 10 g. Phosphate (K2HPO4) Solution with pH adjusted
Homogenize the sample by shaking with 90 ml of dilu- to 8.4 ± 0.2 and supplemented with an anti-foam
ent for general use in a flask containing glass beads. agent. Mix well manually and allow to stand at
Alternatively use a peristaltic blender (stomacher). room temperature for 15 min. Blend if necessary
Cheeses: ISO 6887-5:2010 recommends an ana- for 2 min in the peristaltic blender (stomacher) by
lytical unit of 10 g and, as diluent, 90 ml of Dipotas- using two sterile bags for granular products. Allow
sium Hydrogen Phosphate (K2HPO4) Solution with to stand for 5 min.

7007TS-DASILVA-Book.indb 21 11/26/2012 11:15:10 AM


22 Microbiological examination methods of food and water

• Rennet casein – Dipotassium Hydrogen Phosphate the water bath set at 37°C for 15 min while mixing
(K2HPO4) Solution with pH adjusted to pH from time to time.
7.5 ± 0.2 and supplemented with an anti-foaming
agent. Add the diluent to the sample, mix well, Mollusks (bivalves and gastropods) and sea
leave to stand for 15 min at room temperature and urchins: For bivalves, gastropods and sea urchins (Echi-
homogenize in a stomacher for 2 min. Leave to noidae), ISO 6887-3:2003 recommends an analytical
stand for 5 more minutes before preparing the sub- unit of six entire organisms and an initial dilution of
sequent dilutions. Rennet casein can be difficult to 1:2, adding one part of sample to two parts of diluent
dissolve. In this case the following alternative proce- (Saline Peptone Water or Buffered Peptone Water).
dure is recommended: Transfer approximately 20 g Homogenize in a blender for 30 s to 2 min, transfer to
of the test sample into a suitable container. Grind a sterile bag and complete the dilution to 1:10 with the
it using an apparatus with knives able to rotate at same diluent, homogenizing everything subsequently in
approximately 20000 rpm, equipped with a device a stomacher.
that prevents the sample from heating during grind- Sea cucumbers (Holothuroidea) and Ascidiacea:
ing (the VirTis apparatus is an example of a suit- ISO 6887-3:2003 recommends cutting up the organ-
able product available commercially cited by ISO isms into little pieces, preparing a 1:2 initial dilution,
6887-5:2010). Weigh 5 g of the thus-prepared test adding one part of sample to two parts of diluent (Saline
sample in a sterile bottle of 250 ml. Add glass beads Peptone Water or Buffered Peptone Water), homog-
for mixing and 95 ml of Sodium Tripolyphosphate enizing in a blender for 30 s to 2 min, transferring to a
Solution preheated to 37°C. Mix by leaving the bot- sterile bag and completing the dilution to 1:10 with the
tle on a mixing device for 15 min. Then place it in same diluent.

7007TS-DASILVA-Book.indb 22 11/26/2012 11:15:10 AM

You might also like