Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2-PBL BENG1413 Rubric Assignment

    Uploaded by

    AtamFixIt
    3 views1 page
    This document provides the criteria and scoring for a technical paper assessment in the BENG 1413 Digital Electronics course. It outlines 5 key criteria: introduction, methodology, results and discussion, conclusion, and references. For each criterion it describes what would score as poor, weak, basic, moderate, good, or excellent. The highest possible total score is 10 points. The assessment is aimed at evaluating students' technical papers based on essential elements like clearly introducing the topic, explaining methodology, thoroughly discussing results in relation to objectives, and providing proper references.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document provides the criteria and scoring for a technical paper assessment in the BENG 1413 Digital Electronics course. It outlines 5 key criteria: introduction, methodology, results and discussion, conclusion, and references. For each criterion it describes what would score as poor, weak, basic, moderate, good, or excellent. The highest possible total score is 10 points. The assessment is aimed at evaluating students' technical papers based on essential elements like clearly introducing the topic, explaining methodology, thoroughly discussing results in relation to objectives, and providing proper references.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views1 page

    2-PBL BENG1413 Rubric Assignment

    Uploaded by

    AtamFixIt
    This document provides the criteria and scoring for a technical paper assessment in the BENG 1413 Digital Electronics course. It outlines 5 key criteria: introduction, methodology, results and discussion, conclusion, and references. For each criterion it describes what would score as poor, weak, basic, moderate, good, or excellent. The highest possible total score is 10 points. The assessment is aimed at evaluating students' technical papers based on essential elements like clearly introducing the topic, explaining methodology, thoroughly discussing results in relation to objectives, and providing proper references.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    BENG 1413 DIGITAL ELECTRONICS SEM 2 2021/2022

    TECHNICAL PAPER ASSESSMENT (10%)

    Student Name Matric No. Course Section /


    Group

    Mohd Fakhrul Aizam Bin Mohd Norman BS01202007 BEKG MELAKA 6

    Ahmad Nizam Bin Azlan BS01191019 BEKG MELAKA


    4

    Muhammad Azmil Izwan Bin Ali BS01202011 BEKG MELAKA


    6

    No. Criteria Poor (0) Weak (1) Basic (2) Moderate (3) Good (4) Excellent (5) Marks Weight Score LO and PO Assess

    Introduction: Give a general


    introduction to the topic for
    Complete and well
    broad audience. Narrow the Very little
    Introduction is Introduction is almost written
    focus to your particular topic No introduction or
    presented but complete, introduction, all
    1 and state your research introduction Lack of introduction. information 1
    missing some missing some minor necessary
    problem and the propose . presented is
    major points. points. information are
    solution incorrect.
    presented.

    Methodology:
    The material and instrument
    used and also flow chart
    involved in conducting the
    proposed project should be
    presented. Details about the
    methods focus on 60% of the 60% of the 100% of the
    characterizing and defining 80% of the
    No methodology is methodology is methodology is
    2 them, but also explaining your contents. 80% of the methodollogy is incorrect or inaccurate. methodology is 2
    incorrect or correct and correct and
    chosen techniques, and correct and accurate.
    inaccurate. accurate. accurate.
    providing a full account on
    the procedures used for
    selecting, collecting and
    analyzing the data

    Results and Discussion: -


    Should present data that
    collected from the simulation
    and summarize the data with LO2 & PO2
    text, tables, and/or figure.
    -For each result, describe the 60% of the
    patterns, principles, results and 40% of the results 20% of the results and
    relationships the results Complete and well
    No 80% of the results and discussion discussion and discussion discussion
    3 show. Explain how the results written results 3
    contents. missing the important points. missing the missing some missing some minor
    relate to expectations and to and discussions.
    important important points. important points.
    references cited. Explain any points.
    agreements

    Conclusion: The content of


    the conclusion will be linked
    to the
    Introduction, and it my Conclusion points are
    include the the purpose of the Conclusion is
    Conclusion almost Complete and well
    4 report , the significant of the No Conclusion missing the important points. stated is
    presented but
    complete, written 0.5
    FILA , the limitations and the conclusion. inaccurate.
    missing some
    missing some minor conclusion.
    advantages of the findings. major points.
    points.

    Reference and Appendix: Moderate Moderate Acceptable reference Good reference


    Reliable reference source, reference, reference, sources, sources,
    No
    appendix is meaningful to the appendix is not appendix is appendix is appendix is
    5 reference, Poor reference source, appendix is not related to the contents. 0.5
    contents. related to the somehow related to the related to the
    no appendix. related to the
    contents. contents. contents.
    contents.
    ( / 35) X
    10% =
    TOTAL

    * If plagiarism detected, no mark will be given to the assignment's reports.

    Comment/ Suggestion:

    Evaluated by (signature) : Official Stamp :


    Date :

    You might also like