Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Combination (%) 0 50 50
Number of systems
(can only be integers
such as 1, 2, 3 etc.) 0 8
Respective output 0 36 4
Example of Solar PV
Wind system for our
purposes
Wind
Solar PV
Conclusion
Generate the
remainder units of
electricity units from
the grid daily
Cost (including
installation cost
and operation and
maintenance cost) Rs./KW MNRE Subsidy (%)
Solar PV 1 KW 100000 30
Electricity charges
per month with
Hybrid system
(buying from grid) 1028.1 894
Electricity charges
per month with
Grid only 10,281.00
Monthly Savings
with Hybrid system 9,252.90
Monthly savings
on taxes 134.1 134.1
Total CO2
Emissions saved
over the life of the
system (Tons) 317.52
Break Even in
Months (Cost
Recovery) 59.7 months
5 years
oking for: The best possible
wind and solar and buying
the grid, the break even period in
tal CO2 emissions saved
40
1200 STUDENTS HAVE TO USE THEIR OWN BILL AND DIVIDE BY 2 (IN CASE OF BI-MONTHLY BILL)
STUDENTS WILL HAVE TO MAKE USE OF THEIR JUDGEMENT WHETHER INSTALLING SOLAR
100
40
Set B20 and
C20 in .5
multiples to
adjust the
purchasing
40 system
Assuming
solar
irradiatio
n of at
least 5.5
KWh/sq.
m/day
and wind
Energy (KWh) speed of
per day; 1 Solar PV Wind greater
KWh = 1 unit hybrid system than
of electricity basic description 6m/s
1.5 KW Wind 10 KWh About 300 KWh/month at an annual average wind speed of 6.3m/ s
0 Turbine per day
1 KW Solar PV 4.5 KWh About 1600 KWh/year given area for installation of PV system and good so
36 system per day
produced by
36 Renewables 10
4.5
*Ministry of
New and
Renewable
Energy
Total System (MNRE), Govt.
Cost of India
560000
Corrected
Load
(only
small Set B20 and C20 in .5 multiples to adjust the purchasing syst
deviations
allowed;
otherwise
choose to
have a
higher
unit) 0 0 45 45
Number
of
systems
(can only
be
integers
such as 1,
2, 3 etc.) 1 5
Respecti
ve output 10 22.5 12.5
Assuming
Example solar
of Solar irradiatio
PV Wind n of at
system least 5.5
for our Solar PV KWh/sq.
Energy
purposes Wind m/day
(KWh) hybrid and wind
per day; system speed of
1 KWh = basic greater
1 unit of descriptio than
electricity n 6m/s
1.5 KW
Wind 10 KWh About 300 KWh/month at an annual avera
Wind 10 Turbine per day
1 KW
Solar PV 4.5 KWh About 1600 KWh/year given area for insta
Solar PV 22.5 system per day
produced
by
Renewa
32.5 bles 10
Conclusi
on 4.5
Generate
the
remainde
r units of
electricity
units
from the
grid daily 12.5
Cost
(includin
g
installatio *Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE), Govt. of In
n cost
and
operation
and Total
maintena MNRE System
nce cost) Rs./KW Subsidy (%) Cost
Solar PV
1 KW 100000 30 434000
Wind 1.5
KW 120000 30
Electricit
y
charges
per
month <<Amount without tax
with
Hybrid
system
(buying
from
grid) 3212.813 2793.75
Electricit
y
charges
per
month
with Grid
only 11,566.13
Monthly
Savings
with
Hybrid
system 8,353.31
Monthly
savings
on taxes 419.06 419.0625
Total
savings
per
month 8,772.38
Total
CO2
Emission
s saved
over the
life of the
system
(Tons) 286.65
System
Cost 434000
Break
Even in
Months
(Cost
Recover
y) 49.5 months
4.1 years
WN BILL AND DIVIDE BY 2 (IN CASE OF BI-MONTHLY BILL)
SE OF THEIR JUDGEMENT WHETHER INSTALLING SOLAR-WIND SYSTEM IS FEASIBLE
ear given area for installation of PV system and good solar irradiation
gy (MNRE), Govt. of India
In case one where my total monthly energy usage year 1200 kWh, my total electric charges included
government duty per month in rupees is 10,0281 . Which leads to my total monthly saving with the
hybridsystem that I chose which is 0% wind, 50%, Solar and grid being 50% as well. It gives me monthly saving
of 9252.90 and the total see CO2, a emmission saved over the life of the system year 317.52. Comparing it
with the case 2 where my total monthly energy usage in 1350 and my total electric charges is 11,566.13 and
the combination, Being wind 10%, Solar 50% and grid 40% which leads to total monthly saving with the
hybrid system being 8353.31 and total is Co2 a emmission saved over the life of the system in tons 286.65.
From this can conclude that the first module is saves us more money and co2 emmision than case2 .
Proving case 1is more efficient.
s included
with the
me monthly saving
52. Comparing it
is 11,566.13 and
ving with the
in tons 286.65.
an case2 .