Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture – 2
Regulation of Speed and Feed Rates
Introduction
• The optimum and most economical speeds for the two machining
movements—the cutting and the feed movement are determined by-
• tool materials and workpiece materials
• tool shape
• type of machining processes
• required surface quality
• Single-purpose machines often need only be designed for the one
cutting speed and feed rate required for that operation.
• The designer of multi-purpose machines has, however, to provide a
certain speed range which covers the requirements of different
operations, types and shapes of workpieces and qualities of the
surfaces that are to be machined.
Introduction
• The values of the required cutting speeds depend upon-
• technical considerations:
• cutting properties of the tools
• surface finish of the machined surfaces and
• economic considerations:
• tool life
• costs
• The greater the variety of materials used for tools and
workpiece, the wider is the required cutting speed range.
Introduction
• The cutting and feed movements may be either rotary or
rectilinear according to the machining process.
• However, in the majority of cases, the movements of the
driving elements are rotary, so that changes in speeds are
usually obtained by varying the rev/min of the driving shafts.
For this reason, the problem of varying the rev/min is very
important.
Objectives of Speed and Feed Regulation
• A machining operation should be conducted at such values of cutting
parameters (speed, feed, depth of cut etc.) that ensure the minimum
cost price of the machined component.
• The machining cost can be expressed by the equation:
C = Cmt + Cnpt + Ctc + Ct
Cmt = the cost of machining time;
Cnpt = the cost of non-productive time; such as loading and unloading, idle travel of cutting tool.
Ctc = tool changing cost per component;
Ct = the cost of the tool per component;
Objectives of Speed and Feed Regulation
• If the machining cost is optimized, it yields a particular value of tool life.
• This optimum tool life can be achieved on a particular operation only by working
at optimum values of cutting speed v, feed s, and depth of cut t.
• In order to machine a part of arbitrary diameter, the spindle rpm must be set as n =
1000v/πD, i.e., there must be a stepless regulation of v so that any desired value of
the spindle rpm may be set corresponding to the optimum cutting speed.
• By a similar logic, the machine tool should have provision for stepless variation of
the feed rate.
• Economically, viable systems of stepless speed and feed rate regulation have,
however, not yet been designed for a majority of machine tools.
• On such machine tools only certain discrete values of the spindle rpm and feed
rate are available.
Speed-range ratio
• When the specification for the working range of the machine requires
that a diameter range of 𝑑𝑚𝑎𝑥 to 𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑛 and a speed range from 𝑣𝑚𝑎𝑥 to
𝑣𝑚𝑖𝑛 be covered the obtainable rev/min must then be:
𝑛1 = 30 rpm
𝑛z = 375 rpm
Number of speed steps, z = 12
v = 20 m/min.
Assume, initial diameter = 212 mm.
Geometric Progression (GP) series
• The rpm Values Constitute a Geometric Progression
• For a particular cutting speed which is the maximum permissible under the
selected cutting conditions, the diameter range of workpieces that can be
machined by a particular spindle rpm value nx can be determined as
follows:
Arithmetic Progression (AP) series
• Hence, the diameter range served by this particular rpm is
Arithmetic Progression (AP) series
• Saw diagram (Arithmetic progression):
Arithmetic Progression (AP) series
Logarithmic Progression (LP) series
• Diameter range is a function of the diameter.
Logarithmic Progression (LP) series
• Diameter range for different rpm values in LP series:
• Consider that the optimum cutting speed 𝑣𝑜𝑝𝑡 is such that it lies between
the rpm values 𝑛𝑗 and 𝑛𝑗+1
• Obviously, of the two rpm values, 𝑛𝑗 and 𝑛𝑗+1 we select the one which
gives a cutting speed closer to 𝑣𝑜𝑝𝑡 .
• The difference between the actual cutting speed and the optimum cutting
speed is known as the loss of economic cutting speed.
Kinematic advantages of GP series
• The difference between the actual cutting speed and 𝑣𝑜𝑝𝑡 , and hence the
loss of economic cutting speed is maximum when the optimum cutting
speed lies at the middle of two speeds provided by 𝑛𝑗 and 𝑛𝑗+1 .
• Now,
Kinematic advantages of GP series
• This means that the spindle rpm values must lie in a geometric
progression.
Kinematic advantages of GP series
2) Constant loss of Productivity in the whole rpm range
• If depth of cut, t mm and feed rate, s mm/rev then material removal rate, Q
depends on only cutting speed, v m/min.
Q v n j 1 n j 1
1 -
Q max v max n j 1
Kinematic advantages of GP series
3) Better design features
• When all the rpm values of a spindle are obtained from a single
transmission i.e., by changing gears only between two shafts, then any of
the series discussed above can be utilized for designing the speed box. The
desired rpm values are obtained by using appropriate transmission ratios of
various gear pairs.
• If the rpm values are changed by mounting a new pair of gears on the shaft
every time, then changing of speeds becomes time consuming,
inconvenient and economically infeasible, especially if speeds have to be
changed frequently as in general-purpose machine tools.
Kinematic advantages of GP series
3) Better design features
• If the rpm values are obtained by mounting gear pairs of the appropriate
transmission ratio on the shafts permanently, then the axial dimensions of a
single transmission speed box become too large.
• These considerations underline the fact that speed steps in a speed box
should be obtained not through a single transmission between two shafts
but through a group of transmissions between a number of shafts.
Kinematic advantages of GP series
• 3) Better design features
• This features can be realized in an actual speed box design only if the rpm
values lie in a geometric progression and may be explained by the
following properties of a geometric progression:
Designing a Speed Box: Selection of Range Ratio
The following information is essentially
required before we can start designing a
stepped drive.
1. The highest output rpm, nmax
2. The lowest output rpm, nmin
3. The number of steps z into which the
range between nmax and nmin is divided.
4. The number of stages in which the
required number of speed steps are to
be achieved.
Designing a Speed Box: Selection of Range Ratio
• Typical values of Rn for some groups of machine tools:
• It is desirable to select a small value of ϕ so that the loss of economic cutting speed and, hence,
productivity loss is low.
• Also, for a particular value of the range ratio, the number of speed steps increases with a reduction
in the value of ϕ. On the other hand, a large number of speed steps make the drive complicated and
expensive.
• The proper value of ϕ must be selected by weighing these contradictory factors and striking a
judicial balance.
Standard values of ϕ and guidelines for selecting a proper value
• Relation between speed-range ratio Rn and no. of speed steps z at
standard progression ratios:
Standard values of ϕ and guidelines for selecting a proper value
• Recommended values of ϕ in machine tools:
Break up of Speed Steps
• The value of the number of speed steps, z is rounded off to the nearest
whole number, preference being given to the number which can be broken
into multiples of 2 and 3.
• For example,
• Since the speeds on the last shaft of the speed box must constitute a
geometric progression, the following relationship must be satisfied:
• Where,
• This equation is known as the structural formula of the speed box.
• Suppose, the number of speed steps z = 12 of a speed box are to
be realized in three stages, i.e., u = 3. The number 12 may be
written as a multiplication of 2 and 3 in three different ways.
• Z = 2 x 2 x 3 or 2 x 3 x 2 or 3 x 2 x 2
Structural formula
Combinations of Structural formula
• Let us consider one such combination, z = 2 x 3 x 2
Structural Diagram
• The structural formulae are represented in the
form of special graphs known as structural
diagrams.
• For plotting the structural diagram, we draw u + 1
vertical lines at a convenient distance from each
other; the first vertical line represents the
transmission from the motor shaft and the rest
represent the transmission groups of the speed
box.
• We now draw an array of horizontal lines
intersecting the vertical lines at a distance of log φ
from each other.
• The number of horizontal lines is equal to the
number of speed steps z of the speed box.
Structural Diagrams
The selection of the best structural diagram
• The selection of the best version is guided by the following two factors:
A. Transmission ratio restriction: The maximum value of the
transmission range of a group is ig < 8.
B. Minimum total shaft size: In a speed box,
• the nmax and nmin values on the last shaft (spindle) must necessarily
be the same in all the versions of structural diagrams. However,
• the nmin and nmax values for the intermediate shafts will differ for
each version.
• The best version is the one which ensures the minimization of the
total shaft diameter and this will be the case in which the nmin values
of the intermediate shafts are maximum and the nmax values of the
intermediate shafts are minimum.
The selection of the best structural diagram
• Besides factors (A) and (B) discussed previously the following guidelines,
which stem from rationality of the speed box design and its exploitation
can also be helpful in selecting the best diagram:
a) The number of gears on the last shaft (spindle) should be the
minimum possible.
b) The transmission ratio between the spindle and the shaft preceding it
should be the maximum possible, i.e., speed reduction should be the
maximum possible.
c) The number of gears on the shafts should not generally be more than
three, though in exceptional cases it may be four.
d) imax * imin = 1 favors the least radial dimensions of the gear box.
The selection of the best structural diagram
• Let us now analyze structural diagrams a and e that we have drawn.
• Hence, if the selected value of the progression ratio is φ = 1.26, then all the
six structural diagrams qualify for selection as far as consideration of
factor (A) is concerned.
• If φ = 1.41, then diagrams b and e are ruled out.
• If φ > 1.41, then none of the structural diagrams is suitable for designing
the speed box and an attempt must be made with a different arrangement of
the speed step distribution, e.g., z = 3 x 2 x 2.
• Finally, if all attempts fail, then it becomes necessary to design the gear
box with special structure.
The selection of the best structural diagram
• If more than one structural diagram satisfies
the transmission-range constraint, then these
must be analyzed keeping factor (B) and the
additional guidelines in mind.
• A comparison of the six structural diagrams
reveals that diagrams a and c are better than the
rest because nmin values of shaft III in both
these diagrams are maximum.
• However, diagram a scores over diagram c
when shaft II is compared; the nmin value of
shaft II in diagram a is higher as compared to
the corresponding values of diagram c.
• It may be thus seen that structural diagram a is
the best among all the considered versions.
Why Structural Diagrams?
• The structural diagram gives information about
a) the number of shafts in the speed box.
b) the number of gears on each shaft.
c) the order of changing transmissions in individual groups to
get the desired spindle speed.
d) the transmission range and characteristic of each group.
Thank You.