You are on page 1of 4

COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL

Name of School: MONE NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

KEY AREAS CRITERIA/INDICATORS YES NO REMARKS


1. Adopted/adapted/localized existing policies WinS Program implementation at
related to DRRM/CCA/EiE in education/ school the school level.
/
safety.
2. Assigned a School DRRM Focal Person with Document(s) accomplished in
designation paper/letter signed by School Head compliance to the requirements for
/
and PSDS the reopening of f2f classes as
reflected in the SSAT checklist.
3. Formed School DRRM Team consisting of Document(s) accomplished in
personnel from different offices/chairman; with compliance to the requirements for
/
defined membership and roles and the reopening of f2f classes as
responsibilities anchored in RM 14 s. 2015 reflected in the SSAT checklist.
4. School budget supports regular DRRM Reflected in the school’s WFP for
/
programs/ activities FY 2023.
5. Integrated DRRM in the Enhanced-School Pillar 4 of the revised eSIP
/
Improvement Plan
6. Conducted student-led school watching and As per requirement in the
Enabling hazard mapping (DO 23 s. 2015) and involved / formulation of eSIP
Environment students in DRRM planning
7. Incorporated results of student-led school Reflected in the WFP for FY 2023
watching and hazard mapping in the School
/
DRRM Plan and Enhanced School Improvement
Plan (E-SIP)
8. Data collection and consolidation of programs School DRRM Action Plan
and activities on DRRM, covering the 3 Pillars to /
monitor results and impact exist
9. Rapid Assessment of Damages Report RADAR submitted within 72 hours
(RADAR) is submitted to Central Office, within after calamity occurred.
/
72 hours after the onslaught of a hazard in the
area
10. 100% completion rate of DRRM related
questions in the EMIS/ EBEIS
11. School has partnerships that could be
Inclusion of school DRRM to the
tapped to support its DRRM programs and
Barangay DRRM Plan
activities including those after a disaster.

LEARNING 1. School buildings were been properly NSBI Annual Report


/
FACILITIES inventoried.
2. School conducted risk assessment of NSBI Annual Report Validation of
buildings in coordination with Physical Facilities / Division Engineer and Division
Coordinator and other support agencies. Planning Officer
3. Unsafe school building were identified. / Validated NSBI Annual Report
4. School has taken appropriate actions to Inclusion of repair and maintenance
unsafe school buildings (e.g. upgraded, / activities in the WFP of FY 2022
retrofitted, repaired, non-usage, etc.) and 2023
5. Conducted regular inspection and / As often as needed:
maintenance of facilities (state how often) Water facility inspection is done on
a weekly basis;
Building roofs are inspected during
rain downpour for leaks dripping on
ceilings;
Ground maintenance on a quarterly
basis; and
Electrical and lighting fixtures are
inspected on a weekly basis.
6. Undertaken regular repair of classroom As reflected in the WFP of FYs
/
including facilities. 2022 and 2023.
7. Roles and responsibilities for maintenance SH does the maintenance
are defined, documented and assigned. / procedures assisted by the city-paid
building guard.
8. School head has identified There are 3 safe spaces identified
classrooms/buildings to be used as an by SH (2 instructional and 1 non-
evacuation center in times of disaster. instructional buildings) for use as
/
evacuation areas in times of
disaster. (school is located in a
flood-prone area)
9. School heads are clear with the roles and Orientation on these guidelines is
function of the school in camp management vis- needed.
à-vis the LGU and DSWD as per JMC 1 s. 2013
“Guidelines on Evacuation Center Coordination
/
and Management” and RA 10821 “Children’s
Emergency Relief and Protection Act” and its
corresponding Implementing Rules and
Regulations (IRR)

Disaster Risk 1. School has a Contingency Plan, i.e. Contingency Plan on contagious
Management Preparedness Plan turned into response actions diseases is already in place as per
/
when a disaster strikes requirement for the reopening of f2f
classes.
2. School has available, accessible and Medical kit in every classroom and
/
adequate first aid kit in every instructional room. building is evident.
3. School has at least 2 necessary and Emergency tools and equipment are
functioning equipment, in case of a disaster (e.g. available such as:
fire extinguisher, handheld/base radio, 1. Fire extinguishers;
generator, etc.) 2. Two-way radio units;
3. Axe;
4. Pick mattock;
5. Power tools;
/
6. Aluminum ladder;
7. Rubber boots;
8. Back spine stretcher;
9. Megaphone;
10. Hand shovel;
11. Hand tool set; and
12. Safety whistle.
4. School has identified spaces for putting up School area is flood-prone
Temporary Learning Spaces / Shelters in the /
aftermath of disaster
5. School has ready resumption strategies and Creation of school digitally-available
alternative delivery modes to ensure education Learning Resource Portal and
continuity / inclusion in the WFP for FY 2023 of
reproduction of SLMs for use in
alternative delivery modes.
6. School has ensured that students completed / Emergency response an
the Family Earthquake Preparedness Homework preparedness of school is still at the
Plan; and school has reported completion to developing stage where DRRM-
Division Office and Central Office. related activities include
procurement of tools, materials and
equipment for use in emergency
drills; teachers and learners still
need to be properly oriented on
emergency preparedness and
response.
7. School has established a school personnel Mechanism not yet in place.
tracking system/ protocol in the event of a /
disaster
8. School has trained personnel to administer School clinic teacher is trained but
first aid to students and personnel. / needs to be reinforced with various
capacity-building activities.
9. School has psychosocial interventions for Required in the reopening of f2f
/
personnel and students classes.
10. School has trained teachers and other Required in the reopening of f2f
personnel who could provide psychosocial / classes.
support to students
11. School DRRM Plan and SIP with DRRM School DRRM Plan is aligned to
integration were reviewed annually / SIP; Reviewed and/or revisited
annually during crafting of AIP.
12. School has established functional early As required in the reopening of f2f
warning system to inform students and classes. But need reprinting and
personnel of hazards and emergencies updating of signages and IECs.
/
(protocol, warning signs, devices, IEC),
considering national and LGU warning systems
and protocols
13. School conducted regular hazard -specific Mechanism not yet in place.
drills (at least 3 hazards) with participation of
/
stakeholders (BFP, Medic, LGUs, NGOs,
community, PTA, alumni, and others)
14. School has an evacuation plan and As required in the reopening of f2f
/
procedures classes.
15. School has a student -family reunification
plan that is clearly disseminated to students, /
teachers, and parents
16. School has conducted awareness and
/
capacity building for families and learners
17. School participated in the different
/
DRRM/CCA/EiE activities of the LGU

Risk Reduction 1. School has integrated key DRRM/CCA/EiE Inclusion of data to the BEIS for CY
and Resilience concepts in at least 4 subjects based on the / 2022
Education national Curriculum Guide (Lesson Plan)
2. Grade levels and subjects where DRRM and Grade 10 Science, EsP 7-10
/
CCA been integrated
3. More than 75% of students are actively 92 of the 112 learners participated
participating in various DRRM/CCA/EiE activities / in the earthquake drill done on
March 9, 2023.
4. School has a DRRM/CCA/EiE capacity Approved School DRRM Plan
/
building plan for teachers and personnel
5. School Head and personnel have received at
least 3 DRRM/CCA/EiE trainings from division or /
region or partners
6. At least more than 10 DRRM/CCA/EiE Not yet determined.
/
resource materials are available in the school
7. Presence of DRRM corner, with updated IEC / evident
materials posted in it, in every classroom
8. School carries out monitoring and evaluation Annual conduct of monitoring and
to assess sustainable implementation. evaluation of activities implemented
/ and results are analyzed and
realigned and/or forwarded to the
next planning cycle.

JEREMY JOAN M. DE LA ROSA


Head Teacher I

You might also like