Project Project Name

Address
Report B8
GRAITEC INNOVATION Designed by Date
www.graitec.com Verified by Date
17 Burospace 91572 Bièvres Revision 0 Drawing Drawing

Reinforced concrete beam

Geometry description
Span Geometry Beam web Left flange Right flange
L
1 10 0 300 500 300 300 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 715 300 800 500 300 300 0 0 0 0 0 0

Load cases description

ID Title
1 Dead loads 1 - - - 1.1 1.35 0.9 1
2 Live loads 1 0.7 0.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 0 0

Combinations description
ID Combination Code Type
101 1x[1 G] ECELUSTR ULS
102 1.35x[1 G] ECELUSTR ULS
103 1x[1 G]+1.5x[2 Q] ECELUSTR ULS
104 1.35x[1 G]+1.5x[2 Q] ECELUSTR ULS
105 1x[1 G] ECELSCQ SLS
106 1x[1 G]+1x[2 Q] ECELSCQ SLS
107 1x[1 G] ECELSFQ SLS
108 1x[1 G]+0.5x[2 Q] ECELSFQ SLS
109 1x[1 G] ECELSQP SLS
110 1x[1 G]+0.3x[2 Q] ECELSQP SLS

Materials
Span Concrete Longitudinal reinf Transversal reinf
Type Strength Type Strength Ductility Type Strength Ductility
(MPa) (MPa) (MPa)
1 User- 25.0 B500A 500.0 A B500A 500.0 A
defined

Advance Design RC Beam 2023 Page 1 of 4

 Project: Project Name Date: 03-20-2023

Materials
Span Concrete Longitudinal reinf Transversal reinf
Type Strength Type Strength Ductility Type Strength Ductility
(MPa) (MPa) (MPa)
2 User- 25.0 B500A 500.0 A B500A 500.0 A
defined

Concrete Covers
Top Bottom Lateral
Span Cover Cover Cover
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
1 40 25 8 40 25 8 40 25 8
2 40 25 8 40 25 8 40 25 8

Creep coefficient (Annex B)

Span
1 2.92 0.49 188 mm 1.87 2.68
2 2.92 0.49 188 mm 1.87 2.68

Reinforcement is calculated considering a design bending moment which is different than the bending
moment from actions, according to article 9.2.1.3, figure 9.2, from EN1992-1-1.
Longitudinal reinforcement
Position Bending moments Reinforcement
Span - Section Abscissa Comb Face WR Theo Real Min
(mm) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (cm²) (cm²) (cm²)
1 - Right support 10 101 Top 0.00 -11.93 0.00 % 0.86 0.61 1.72
2 - Left support 0 0 Top 0.00 -33.55 0.00 % 0.00 1.88 1.72
2 - Right support 715 102 Top -0.12 -38.75 0.30 % 1.72 2.01 1.72
2 - MInf 407 101 Bottom 0.58 52.62 1.11 % 1.72 3.02 1.72

Real longitudinal reinforcement

Span Position Family Reinforcement
1 Bottom 1 4 × ø8 + 2 × ø8 (3.02 cm²)
Bottom 1 4 × ø8 + 2 × ø8 (3.02 cm²)
2
Top 1 4 × ø8 (2.01 cm²)

Real longitudinal reinforcement over supports

Support Family Reinforcement
1 1 4 × ø8 (2.01 cm²)
2 1 (0.00 cm²)

Transversal reinforcement
Span - Section Abscissa Comb WR
(kN) (cm²/m) (kN)
1 - VMax 10 102 0.05 51.62 558.90 2.40 2.40 0.00 0.00 ∞
2 - VMax 0 102 0.11 49.25 522.45 2.40 2.40 15.08 262.78 0.04 %

Real transversal reinforcement

Advance Design RC Beam 2023 Page 2 of 4

 Project: Project Name Date: 03-20-2023

Span Pack Reinforcement

1 1 × ø8 / 200 mm
2
2 1 × ø8 / 215 mm

Anticrack reinforcement
Span Real area Spacing H''
(cm²) (mm) (mm)
T1 6.54 103 1552

T2 6.54 99 1480

In the table below, data corresponding to the SLS envelopes is displayed.

Stresses verification
Span - Section Abscissa Envelope Stresses (MPa)
Type
(mm) WR WR
CRQ 1.80 11.46 0.0 0.00 % 0.0 0.00 %
1 - Max Concrete Stress 0 FRQ 1.80 11.46 0.0 0.00 % 0.0 0.00 %
QP 3.68 23.36 0.0 0.00 % 0.0 0.00 %
CRQ 1.80 11.46 0.0 0.00 % 0.0 0.00 %
1 - Max Steel Stress 0 FRQ 1.80 11.46 0.0 0.00 % 0.0 0.00 %
QP 3.68 23.36 0.0 0.00 % 0.0 0.00 %
CRQ 3.68 23.36 0.1 0.29 % 4.8 1.19 %
2 - Max Concrete Stress 407 FRQ 3.68 23.36 0.1 0.29 % 4.8 1.19 %
QP 3.68 23.36 0.1 0.29 % 4.8 1.19 %
CRQ 3.68 23.36 0.1 0.23 % 6.9 1.73 %
2 - Max Steel Stress 0 FRQ 3.68 23.36 0.1 0.23 % 6.9 1.73 %
QP 3.68 23.36
0.1 0.23 % 6.9 1.73 %
In the table below, data corresponding to the SLS envelopes is displayed.

Crack width verification

Span - Section Abscissa Section WR
(mm) Position (mm) (mm) (mm) (‰) (mm) (mm)
1 - wk Max 0 Top 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 %
2 - wk Max 0 Bottom 0.00 0.02 760 0.02 0.02 0.40 3.94 %
In the table below, data corresponding to the ULS envelopes is displayed.

Support strut verification

Span Sliding reinforcement Support strut stress
ID Position Real Minimum θ' Work Status
(cm²) (cm²) (°) (MPa) (MPa) Ratio
1 Left - - - - - - -
Right 0.00 0.11 - 0.0 15.0 0.22 % Passed
2 Left 0.93 0.75 - 0.0 15.0 0.22 % Passed
Right 2.32 0.75 0.00 0.0 12.7 0.15 % Passed

Advance Design RC Beam 2023 Page 3 of 4

 Project: Project Name Date: 03-20-2023

Intermediate values
Span d K Correction
(mm) (‰) (‰) (‰)
1 452 0.63 0.00 5.00 0.40 0.91
2 445 1.29 0.00 5.00 1.30 1.76

Deflection verification
Span Limit L/d WR
(cm²) (cm²) (cm²) (cm²)
1 0.86 0.00 0.78 0.43 131.00 0.35 0.27 %
2 1.72 0.00 3.02 2.16 270.90 2.84 1.05 %

Warnings and errors

Type Element Message Value Limit
Attention, you have imposed a reduction of support moments, but
the report of adjacent spans is not between 0.5 and 2 (article 5.5
e B8 - -
of EN 1992-1-1). Please check the consistency of your
assumptions.
Real reinforcement area for transverse bars is smaller than 0.00 2.40
e B8
required(x = 0.00 mm) cm²/m cm²/m
The effective reinforcement area at abscissa (x = 57.17 mm) is
less than the theoretical area. Increase the real reinforcement by
changing the anchorage length or diameter of bars. Providing
W 1.50 cm² 1.70 cm²
splice bars on supports (Reinforcement Assumptions - Splice Bars
dialog) may be also a possible solution for bottom reinforcement
area.

Advance Design RC Beam 2023 Page 4 of 4