Project

Address
Report
GRAITEC INNOVATION Designed by Date
www.graitec.com Verified by Date
17 Burospace 91572 Bièvres Revision 0 Drawing

Reinforced concrete beam

Table of Contents

1 Geometry description.............................................................................................................. 2
2 Loads and combinations......................................................................................................... 2
3 Global assumptions................................................................................................................. 3
3.1 Localisation...................................................................................................................................3
3.2 Units..............................................................................................................................................4
3.3 Materials........................................................................................................................................4
4 Creep coefficient...................................................................................................................... 5
5 Fire resistance minimum conditions...................................................................................... 6
6 Internal forces......................................................................................................................... 6
6.1 Envelope of ULS combinations....................................................................................................8
6.2 Envelope of SLS combinations.....................................................................................................8
7 Longitudinal reinforcement................................................................................................... 9
7.1 Detailed calculation.....................................................................................................................11
8 Transversal reinforcement................................................................................................... 22
8.1 Transversal reinforcement global assumptions...........................................................................22
8.2 Detailed calculation.....................................................................................................................24
8.3 Minimal constructive dispositions..............................................................................................26
9 Stresses verification............................................................................................................... 27
9.1 Envelope of SLS-CRQ combinations.........................................................................................27
9.2 Envelope of SLS-FRQ combinations..........................................................................................27
9.3 Envelope of SLS-QP combinations............................................................................................28
10 Crack width check................................................................................................................. 33
11 Anchorage calculation.......................................................................................................... 37
12 Support strut verification..................................................................................................... 38
12.1 Support strut stresses verification...............................................................................................38
12.2 Sliding reinforcement verification..............................................................................................40
13 Support reactions.................................................................................................................. 42
14 Deflections.............................................................................................................................. 42
15 Bill of materials..................................................................................................................... 45

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 1 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

1 Geometry description

Span: 1
Span: 2
Span: 3
Span: 4
Length
Width of the beam web
Total height of the beam
Width of the left support
Width of the right support

2 Loads and combinations

Load cases description

Title
1 Dead loads 1 - - - 1.1 1.35 0.9 1
2 Live loads 1 0.7 0.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 0 0

Uniform linear loads

Load Span Case ID f x L h'
(kN/m) (mm)
1 1 1 5.00 0 29200 -
2 1 2 3.00 0 29200 -

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 2 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Combinations description
ID Combination Code Type
101 1x[1 G] ECELUSTR ULS
102 1.35x[1 G] ECELUSTR ULS
103 1x[1 G]+1.5x[2 Q] ECELUSTR ULS
104 1.35x[1 G]+1.5x[2 Q] ECELUSTR ULS
105 1x[1 G] ECELSCQ SLS
106 1x[1 G]+1x[2 Q] ECELSCQ SLS
107 1x[1 G] ECELSFQ SLS
108 1x[1 G]+0.5x[2 Q] ECELSFQ SLS
109 1x[1 G] ECELSQP SLS
110 1x[1 G]+0.3x[2 Q] ECELSQP SLS

3 Global assumptions
Concrete design calculation:
Loadings and combinations:
Longitudinal reinforcement design:
Transversal reinforcement design:
Concrete:
Reinforcement diagram:
Seismic dispositions:
Fire resistance:
Self weight:
Calculation section type:
EN1992-1-1 / EN1992-1-2.
EN1990 / EN1991.
EN1992-1-1 / 6.1 - 'Limit reduced moment' method
Standard method (EN1992-1-1, 6.2.2 / 6.2.3).
No concrete with silica fume
No high performance concrete
Bilinear stress-strain diagram
No seismic dispositions.
R 60
Self weight considered without compression flanges.
T-section design.

3.1 Localisation

Localisation France
Element name Main beam
Element ID
Position Beam no 1 Level no. 1
Drawing -
Level 0.00 m NGF
Coordinates X₁ = 0.00 m; Y₁ = 0.00 m; Z₁ = 0.00 m
X₂ = 29.20 m; Y₂ = 0.00 m; Z₂ = 0.00 m

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 3 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

3.2 Units

Lengths mm
Forces kN
Moments kN⋅m
Stresses MPa (N/mm²)
Angles °
Reinforcement areas cm²
Crack Width mm
All the lengths are linked to the "Small lengths" unit from the GUI.

3.3 Materials
Concrete quality Span 1
(EN1992-1-1 / 3.1) Concrete class: C30/37
Span 2
Concrete class: C30/37
Span 3
Concrete class: C30/37
Span 4
Concrete class: C30/37

ULS :
ULSA:

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 4 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Steel grade Span 1

(EN1992-1-1 / Section 3 / Annex C)
Logitudinal steel class: B390A
Transversal steel class: B235A
Span 2
Logitudinal steel class: B390A
Transversal steel class: B235A
Span 3
Logitudinal steel class: B390A
Transversal steel class: B235A
Span 4
Logitudinal steel class: B390A
Transversal steel class: B235A

Ductility class: A

Horizontal plastic branch

k = 1.05
ULS:
ULSA:

Concrete covers
Top Bottom Lateral
Cover Cover Cover
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
30 25 14 30 25 14 30 25 14
Minimal cover value for durability (4.4.1.2 (5))
Execution tolerance (4.4.1.1 2(P))
Security tolerance (4.4.1.2 (6))
Reduction for stainless steel (4.4.1.2 (7))
Reduction for supplementary protection (4.4.1.2 (8))

4 Creep coefficient
The creep coefficient calculation is done according to Annex B of EN1992-1-1.
Relative Humidity
Time at initial loading (in days)
Coefficient to describe the development
of creep with time after loading

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 5 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Span 1 & 2 & 3 & 4

Notional size of the member in mm
(B.6)
Humidity influence (B.3b)

Influence of concrete resistance (B.4)

Age of loading t₀, considering the effect

of the cement type (B.9), in days

Influence of concrete maturity (B.5)

Long term creep coefficient (B.2)

Creep coefficient (B.1)

5 Fire resistance minimum conditions

Fire resistance class R60

Span 1
Minimum width verification Passed
Minimum concrete cover Passed

Span 2
Minimum width verification Passed
Minimum concrete cover Passed

Span 3
Minimum width verification Passed
Minimum concrete cover Passed

Span 4
Minimum width verification Passed
Minimum concrete cover Passed

6 Internal forces

Synthetic values table

Span - Section Abscissa Face

(m) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (kN) (kN⋅m)
1 - Left support 0.00 Top -11.52 -8.26 -7.03 -6.54 47.47 0.00
Bottom 7.30 5.25 4.52 4.23 0.00 0.00
1 - Right support 7.00 Top -70.17 -50.44 -43.52 -40.75 0.00 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -67.79 0.00
1 - MInf 2.94 Top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00
Bottom 76.79 55.05 46.84 43.55 -2.72 0.00
1 - VMax 7.00 Top -70.17 -50.44 -43.52 -40.75 0.00 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -67.79 0.00

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 6 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Span - Section Abscissa Face

(m) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (kN) (kN⋅m)
1 - wk Max 0.70 Top -0.93 -0.67 -0.44 -0.41 36.12 0.00
Bottom 36.56 26.26 22.57 21.10 0.00 0.00
1 - Max Concrete Stress 2.87 Top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.04 0.00
Bottom 76.76 55.04 46.85 43.58 -1.90 0.00
1 - Max Steel Stress 2.87 Top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.04 0.00
Bottom 76.76 55.04 46.85 43.58 -1.90 0.00
1 - Max Deflection 0.00 Top -11.52 -8.26 -7.03 -6.54 47.47 0.00
Bottom 7.30 5.25 4.52 4.23 0.00 0.00
2 - Left support 0.00 Top -71.10 -51.12 -44.15 -41.36 61.60 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 - Right support 7.00 Top -51.14 -36.47 -30.09 -27.54 0.00 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -56.16 0.00
2 - MInf 3.71 Top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 0.00
Bottom 51.83 36.85 29.88 27.10 -2.84 0.00
2 - VMax 0.00 Top -71.10 -51.12 -44.15 -41.36 61.60 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 - wk Max 0.00 Top -71.10 -51.12 -44.15 -41.36 61.60 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 - Max Concrete Stress 0.00 Top -71.10 -51.12 -44.15 -41.36 61.60 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 - Max Steel Stress 0.00 Top -71.10 -51.12 -44.15 -41.36 61.60 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 - Max Deflection 0.00 Top -71.10 -51.12 -44.15 -41.36 61.60 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 - Left support 0.00 Top -51.14 -36.47 -30.09 -27.54 56.16 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 - Right support 7.00 Top -71.10 -51.12 -44.15 -41.36 0.00 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -61.60 0.00
3 - MInf 3.29 Top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.84 0.00
Bottom 51.83 36.85 29.88 27.10 -2.50 0.00
3 - VMax 7.00 Top -71.10 -51.12 -44.15 -41.36 0.00 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -61.60 0.00
3 - wk Max 7.00 Top -71.10 -51.12 -44.15 -41.36 0.00 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -61.60 0.00
3 - Max Concrete Stress 7.00 Top -71.10 -51.12 -44.15 -41.36 0.00 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -61.60 0.00
3 - Max Steel Stress 7.00 Top -71.10 -51.12 -44.15 -41.36 0.00 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -61.60 0.00
3 - Max Deflection 0.00 Top -51.14 -36.47 -30.09 -27.54 56.16 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 - Left support 0.00 Top -70.17 -50.44 -43.52 -40.75 67.79 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 - Right support 7.00 Top -11.52 -8.26 -7.03 -6.54 0.00 0.00
Bottom 7.30 5.25 4.52 4.23 -47.47 0.00
4 - MInf 4.06 Top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.72 0.00
Bottom 76.79 55.05 46.84 43.55 -0.11 0.00

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 7 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Span - Section Abscissa Face

(m) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (kN) (kN⋅m)
4 - VMax 0.00 Top -70.17 -50.44 -43.52 -40.75 67.79 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 - wk Max 6.30 Top -0.93 -0.67 -0.44 -0.41 0.00 0.00
Bottom 36.56 26.26 22.57 21.10 -36.12 0.00
4 - Max Concrete Stress 4.13 Top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.90 0.00
Bottom 76.76 55.04 46.85 43.58 -1.04 0.00
4 - Max Steel Stress 4.13 Top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.90 0.00
Bottom 76.76 55.04 46.85 43.58 -1.04 0.00
4 - Max Deflection 0.00 Top -70.17 -50.44 -43.52 -40.75 67.79 0.00
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.1 Envelope of ULS combinations

6.2 Envelope of SLS combinations

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 8 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

7 Longitudinal reinforcement

Reinforcement is calculated considering a design bending moment which is different than the bending
moment from actions, according to article 9.2.1.3, figure 9.2, from EN1992-1-1.
Longitudinal reinforcement
Position Bending moments Reinforcement
Span - Section Abscissa Comb Face WR Theo Real Min
(mm) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (cm²) (cm²) (cm²)
1 - Left support 0 104 Top 11.52 46.41 24.82 % 2.55 3.07 2.55

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 9 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Longitudinal reinforcement
Position Bending moments Reinforcement
Span - Section Abscissa Comb Face WR Theo Real Min
(mm) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (cm²) (cm²) (cm²)
1 - Right support 7000 104 Top 70.17 90.10 77.88 % 4.85 6.16 2.55
1 - MInf 2940 104 Bottom -76.79 91.68 83.76 % 5.33 6.28 2.55
1 - wk Max 700 104 Bottom -43.79 43.47 100.74 % 2.99 3.14 2.55
1 - Max Deflection 0 104 Top 11.52 46.41 24.82 % 2.55 3.07 2.55
2 - Left support 0 104 Top 71.10 90.26 78.77 % 4.92 6.16 2.55
2 - Right support 7000 104 Top 51.14 66.79 76.57 % 3.51 4.52 2.55
2 - MInf 3710 104 Bottom -51.83 59.82 86.64 % 3.55 4.02 2.55
2 - VMax 0 104 Top 71.10 90.26 78.77 % 4.92 6.16 2.55
2 - wk Max 0 104 Top 71.10 90.26 78.77 % 4.92 6.16 2.55
2 - Max Concrete Stress 0 104 Top 71.10 90.26 78.77 % 4.92 6.16 2.55
2 - Max Steel Stress 0 104 Top 71.10 90.26 78.77 % 4.92 6.16 2.55
2 - Max Deflection 0 104 Top 71.10 90.26 78.77 % 4.92 6.16 2.55
3 - Left support 0 104 Top 51.14 66.79 76.57 % 3.51 4.52 2.55
3 - Right support 7000 104 Top 71.10 90.26 78.77 % 4.92 6.16 2.55
3 - MInf 3290 104 Bottom -51.83 59.82 86.64 % 3.55 4.02 2.55
3 - wk Max 7000 104 Top 71.10 90.26 78.77 % 4.92 6.16 2.55
3 - Max Concrete Stress 7000 104 Top 71.10 90.26 78.77 % 4.92 6.16 2.55
3 - Max Steel Stress 7000 104 Top 71.10 90.26 78.77 % 4.92 6.16 2.55
3 - Max Deflection 0 104 Top 51.14 66.79 76.57 % 3.51 4.52 2.55
4 - Left support 0 104 Top 70.17 90.10 77.88 % 4.85 6.16 2.55
4 - Right support 7000 104 Top 11.52 46.41 24.82 % 2.55 3.07 2.55
4 - MInf 4060 104 Bottom -76.79 91.68 83.76 % 5.33 6.28 2.55
4 - VMax 0 104 Top 70.17 90.10 77.88 % 4.85 6.16 2.55
4 - wk Max 6300 104 Bottom -43.79 43.47 100.74 % 2.99 3.14 2.55
4 - Max Deflection 0 104 Top 70.17 90.10 77.88 % 4.85 6.16 2.55

Real longitudinal reinforcement

Span Position Family Reinforcement
Bottom 1 4 × ø10 + 4 × ø10 (6.28 cm²)
1
Top 1 4 × ø8 (2.01 cm²)
Bottom 1 4 × ø8 + 4 × ø8 (4.02 cm²)
2
Top 1 4 × ø8 (2.01 cm²)
Bottom 1 4 × ø8 + 4 × ø8 (4.02 cm²)
3
Top 1 4 × ø8 (2.01 cm²)
Bottom 1 4 × ø10 + 4 × ø10 (6.28 cm²)
4
Top 1 4 × ø8 (2.01 cm²)

Real longitudinal reinforcement over supports

Support Family Reinforcement
1 1 4 × ø10 (3.14 cm²)
2 1 4 × ø14 (6.16 cm²)
3 1 4 × ø12 (4.52 cm²)
4 1 4 × ø14 (6.16 cm²)
5 1 4 × ø10 (3.14 cm²)

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 10 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

The value of the effective height (d) is defined automatically according to the real reinforcement in place.

7.1 Detailed calculation

Span T 1.1, Section MInf, Abscissa 2940 mm, (Bottom bars)

Combination ULS 104 : 1.35x[1 G]+1.5x[2 Q]
Design bending moment
Reduced moment value

Reduced moment limit

Compressed reinforcement is not
required
Neutral axis

Inner lever arm

Steel stress in tension

Tension reinforcement area

The minimal and maximal percentages of longitudinal reinforcement in the beam are defined by the article
9.2.1.1 from EN1992-1-1 :
Minimal percentage (9.1N)

Bending moment resistance

Bending moment verification
Work Ratio 83.76 % (Passed)

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 11 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Span T 1.1, Section Right support, Abscissa 7000 mm, (Top bars)
Combination ULS 104 : 1.35x[1 G]+1.5x[2 Q]
Design bending moment
Reduced moment value

Reduced moment limit

Compressed reinforcement is not
required
Neutral axis

Inner lever arm

Steel stress in tension

Tension reinforcement area

The minimal and maximal percentages of longitudinal reinforcement in the beam are defined by the article
9.2.1.1 from EN1992-1-1 :
Minimal percentage (9.1N)

Bending moment resistance

Bending moment verification
Work Ratio 77.88 % (Passed)

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 12 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Span T 1.1, Section Left support, Abscissa 0 mm, (Top bars)

Combination ULS 104 : 1.35x[1 G]+1.5x[2 Q]
Design bending moment
Reduced moment value

Reduced moment limit

Compressed reinforcement is not
required
Neutral axis

Inner lever arm

Steel stress in tension

Tension reinforcement area

The minimal and maximal percentages of longitudinal reinforcement in the beam are defined by the article
9.2.1.1 from EN1992-1-1 :
Minimal percentage (9.1N)

Bending moment resistance

Bending moment verification
Work Ratio 24.82 % (Passed)

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 13 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Span T 1.2, Section MInf, Abscissa 3710 mm, (Bottom bars)

Combination ULS 104 : 1.35x[1 G]+1.5x[2 Q]
Design bending moment
Reduced moment value

Reduced moment limit

Compressed reinforcement is not
required
Neutral axis

Inner lever arm

Steel stress in tension

Tension reinforcement area

The minimal and maximal percentages of longitudinal reinforcement in the beam are defined by the article
9.2.1.1 from EN1992-1-1 :
Minimal percentage (9.1N)

Bending moment resistance

Bending moment verification
Work Ratio 86.64 % (Passed)

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 14 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Span T 1.2, Section Right support, Abscissa 7000 mm, (Top bars)
Combination ULS 104 : 1.35x[1 G]+1.5x[2 Q]
Design bending moment
Reduced moment value

Reduced moment limit

Compressed reinforcement is not
required
Neutral axis

Inner lever arm

Steel stress in tension

Tension reinforcement area

The minimal and maximal percentages of longitudinal reinforcement in the beam are defined by the article
9.2.1.1 from EN1992-1-1 :
Minimal percentage (9.1N)

Bending moment resistance

Bending moment verification
Work Ratio 76.57 % (Passed)

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 15 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Span T 1.2, Section Left support, Abscissa 0 mm, (Top bars)

Combination ULS 104 : 1.35x[1 G]+1.5x[2 Q]
Design bending moment
Reduced moment value

Reduced moment limit

Compressed reinforcement is not
required
Neutral axis

Inner lever arm

Steel stress in tension

Tension reinforcement area

The minimal and maximal percentages of longitudinal reinforcement in the beam are defined by the article
9.2.1.1 from EN1992-1-1 :
Minimal percentage (9.1N)

Bending moment resistance

Bending moment verification
Work Ratio 78.77 % (Passed)

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 16 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Span T 1.3, Section MInf, Abscissa 3290 mm, (Bottom bars)

Combination ULS 104 : 1.35x[1 G]+1.5x[2 Q]
Design bending moment
Reduced moment value

Reduced moment limit

Compressed reinforcement is not
required
Neutral axis

Inner lever arm

Steel stress in tension

Tension reinforcement area

The minimal and maximal percentages of longitudinal reinforcement in the beam are defined by the article
9.2.1.1 from EN1992-1-1 :
Minimal percentage (9.1N)

Bending moment resistance

Bending moment verification
Work Ratio 86.64 % (Passed)

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 17 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Span T 1.3, Section Right support, Abscissa 7000 mm, (Top bars)
Combination ULS 104 : 1.35x[1 G]+1.5x[2 Q]
Design bending moment
Reduced moment value

Reduced moment limit

Compressed reinforcement is not
required
Neutral axis

Inner lever arm

Steel stress in tension

Tension reinforcement area

The minimal and maximal percentages of longitudinal reinforcement in the beam are defined by the article
9.2.1.1 from EN1992-1-1 :
Minimal percentage (9.1N)

Bending moment resistance

Bending moment verification
Work Ratio 78.77 % (Passed)

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 18 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Span T 1.3, Section Left support, Abscissa 0 mm, (Top bars)

Combination ULS 104 : 1.35x[1 G]+1.5x[2 Q]
Design bending moment
Reduced moment value

Reduced moment limit

Compressed reinforcement is not
required
Neutral axis

Inner lever arm

Steel stress in tension

Tension reinforcement area

The minimal and maximal percentages of longitudinal reinforcement in the beam are defined by the article
9.2.1.1 from EN1992-1-1 :
Minimal percentage (9.1N)

Bending moment resistance

Bending moment verification
Work Ratio 76.57 % (Passed)

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 19 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Span T 1.4, Section MInf, Abscissa 4060 mm, (Bottom bars)

Combination ULS 104 : 1.35x[1 G]+1.5x[2 Q]
Design bending moment
Reduced moment value

Reduced moment limit

Compressed reinforcement is not
required
Neutral axis

Inner lever arm

Steel stress in tension

Tension reinforcement area

The minimal and maximal percentages of longitudinal reinforcement in the beam are defined by the article
9.2.1.1 from EN1992-1-1 :
Minimal percentage (9.1N)

Bending moment resistance

Bending moment verification
Work Ratio 83.76 % (Passed)

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 20 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Span T 1.4, Section Right support, Abscissa 7000 mm, (Top bars)
Combination ULS 104 : 1.35x[1 G]+1.5x[2 Q]
Design bending moment
Reduced moment value

Reduced moment limit

Compressed reinforcement is not
required
Neutral axis

Inner lever arm

Steel stress in tension

Tension reinforcement area

The minimal and maximal percentages of longitudinal reinforcement in the beam are defined by the article
9.2.1.1 from EN1992-1-1 :
Minimal percentage (9.1N)

Bending moment resistance

Bending moment verification
Work Ratio 24.82 % (Passed)

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 21 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Span T 1.4, Section Left support, Abscissa 0 mm, (Top bars)

Combination ULS 104 : 1.35x[1 G]+1.5x[2 Q]
Design bending moment
Reduced moment value

Reduced moment limit

Compressed reinforcement is not
required
Neutral axis

Inner lever arm

Steel stress in tension

Tension reinforcement area

The minimal and maximal percentages of longitudinal reinforcement in the beam are defined by the article
9.2.1.1 from EN1992-1-1 :
Minimal percentage (9.1N)

Bending moment resistance

Bending moment verification
Work Ratio 77.88 % (Passed)

8 Transversal reinforcement

8.1 Transversal reinforcement global assumptions

The transversal reinforcement calculation is done according to article 6.2 of EN1992-1-1.
No direct transmission for shear force.
Calculation is done according to elementary length z(cot Ɵ) according to 6.2.3(5) from EN 1992-1-1.

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 22 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Transversal reinforcement
Span - Section Abscissa WR
(mm) (kN) (cm²/m) (kN)
1 - Left support 0 40.66 55.34 627.26 5.59 5.59 6.70 55.96 72.66 %
1 - Right support 7000 60.98 55.34 627.26 7.54 5.59 8.38 69.56 87.65 %
1 - MInf 2940 2.72 60.81 627.26 5.59 5.59 6.70 55.22 4.93 %
1 - VMax 7000 60.98 55.34 627.26 7.54 5.59 8.38 69.56 87.65 %
1 - wk Max 700 33.85 55.34 627.26 5.59 5.59 6.70 55.96 60.49 %
1 - Max Concrete Stress 2870 2.72 60.81 627.26 5.59 5.59 6.70 55.22 4.93 %
1 - Max Steel Stress 2870 2.72 60.81 627.26 5.59 5.59 6.70 55.22 4.93 %
1 - Max Deflection 0 40.66 55.34 627.26 5.59 5.59 6.70 55.96 72.66 %
2 - Left support 0 54.79 55.34 627.26 5.59 5.59 6.70 55.65 98.45 %
2 - Right support 7000 49.34 55.34 627.26 5.59 5.59 6.70 55.78 88.47 %
2 - MInf 3710 1.67 55.34 627.26 5.59 5.59 8.62 71.31 2.34 %
2 - VMax 0 54.79 55.34 627.26 5.59 5.59 6.70 55.65 98.45 %
2 - wk Max 0 54.79 55.34 627.26 5.59 5.59 6.70 55.65 98.45 %
2 - Max Concrete Stress 0 54.79 55.34 627.26 5.59 5.59 6.70 55.65 98.45 %
2 - Max Steel Stress 0 54.79 55.34 627.26 5.59 5.59 6.70 55.65 98.45 %
2 - Max Deflection 0 54.79 55.34 627.26 5.59 5.59 6.70 55.65 98.45 %
3 - Left support 0 49.34 55.34 627.26 5.59 5.59 6.70 55.78 88.47 %
3 - Right support 7000 54.79 55.34 627.26 5.59 5.59 6.70 55.65 98.45 %
3 - MInf 3290 3.32 55.34 627.26 5.59 5.59 8.62 71.31 4.66 %
3 - VMax 7000 54.79 55.34 627.26 5.59 5.59 6.70 55.65 98.45 %
3 - wk Max 7000 54.79 55.34 627.26 5.59 5.59 6.70 55.65 98.45 %
3 - Max Concrete Stress 7000 54.79 55.34 627.26 5.59 5.59 6.70 55.65 98.45 %
3 - Max Steel Stress 7000 54.79 55.34 627.26 5.59 5.59 6.70 55.65 98.45 %
3 - Max Deflection 0 49.34 55.34 627.26 5.59 5.59 6.70 55.78 88.47 %
4 - Left support 0 60.98 55.34 627.26 7.54 5.59 8.38 69.56 87.65 %
4 - Right support 7000 40.66 55.34 627.26 5.59 5.59 6.70 55.96 72.66 %
4 - MInf 4060 2.72 60.81 627.26 5.59 5.59 6.70 55.22 4.93 %
4 - VMax 0 60.98 55.34 627.26 7.54 5.59 8.38 69.56 87.65 %
4 - wk Max 6300 33.85 55.34 627.26 5.59 5.59 6.70 55.96 60.49 %
4 - Max Concrete Stress 4130 2.72 60.81 627.26 5.59 5.59 6.70 55.22 4.93 %
4 - Max Steel Stress 4130 2.72 60.81 627.26 5.59 5.59 6.70 55.22 4.93 %
4 - Max Deflection 0 60.98 55.34 627.26 7.54 5.59 8.38 69.56 87.65 %

Real transversal reinforcement

Span Pack Reinforcement
1 11 × ø8 / 300 mm
2 1 × ø8 / 240 mm
1
3 9 × ø8 / 300 mm
4 2 × ø8 / 240 mm
1 10 × ø8 / 300 mm
2 2 3 × ø8 / 233 mm
3 10 × ø8 / 300 mm
1 10 × ø8 / 300 mm
3
2 3 × ø8 / 233 mm

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 23 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

3 3 10 × ø8 / 300 mm
1 2 × ø8 / 240 mm
2 9 × ø8 / 300 mm
4
3 1 × ø8 / 240 mm
4 11 × ø8 / 300 mm

8.2 Detailed calculation

The shear verification and dimensioning of the shear reinforcement is done according to article 6.2 of
EN1992-1-1
Span T 1.1, Section VMax, Abscissa 7000 mm
Combination 104 : 1.35x[1 G]+1.5x[2 Q]
Span T 1.4, Section VMax, Abscissa 0 mm

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 24 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Combination 104 : 1.35x[1 G]+1.5x[2 Q]

Reduced design shear force
Strut angle
Inner lever arm
(6.2.2 (1))

Factor taking account the effective

height
Longitudinal reinforcement ratio, (6.2.2
(1))
Minimal resistant shear force (6.3N)

Design value for the shear resistance

(6.2.a) & (6.2.b)

Coefficient taking account of the state

of the stress in the compression chord
Strength reduction factor for concrete
cracked in shear (6.6N)

Design value of the maximum shear

force (6.9)

Concrete cross section satisfies the

crushing condition
Theoretical shear reinforcement area
(6.8)

Real shear reinforcement area

Design value for the shear resistance

with real value of shear reinforcement,
expression (6.8)

Shear force verification

Work Ratio 87.65 % (Passed)
Span T 1.2, Section VMax, Abscissa 0 mm
Combination 104 : 1.35x[1 G]+1.5x[2 Q]
Span T 1.3, Section VMax, Abscissa 7000 mm

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 25 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Combination 104 : 1.35x[1 G]+1.5x[2 Q]

Reduced design shear force
Strut angle
Inner lever arm
(6.2.2 (1))

Factor taking account the effective

height
Longitudinal reinforcement ratio, (6.2.2
(1))
Minimal resistant shear force (6.3N)

Design value for the shear resistance

(6.2.a) & (6.2.b)

Coefficient taking account of the state

of the stress in the compression chord
Strength reduction factor for concrete
cracked in shear (6.6N)

Design value of the maximum shear

force (6.9)

Theoretical shear reinforcement area

(6.8)

Real shear reinforcement area

Design value for the shear resistance

with real value of shear reinforcement,
expression (6.8)

Shear force verification

Work Ratio 98.45 % (Passed)

8.3 Minimal constructive dispositions

The minimal transversal reinforcement is defined according to 9.2.2 from NF EN1992-1-1 .

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 26 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Minimal percentage

Minimal transversal reinforcement area

The maximum spacing is calculated according to 9.2.2 from EN 1992-1-1 and 5.13 from EN 1998-1-1 .
Maximum spacing at the ends of the
beam

Maximum spacing throughout the

length of the beam

9 Stresses verification

9.1 Envelope of SLS-CRQ combinations

Concrete compressive stress

Reinforcement tension stress

9.2 Envelope of SLS-FRQ combinations

Concrete compressive stress

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 27 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Reinforcement tension stress

9.3 Envelope of SLS-QP combinations

Concrete compressive stress

Reinforcement tension stress

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 28 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Synthetic values table

Stresses verification
Span - Section Abscissa Envelope Stresses (MPa)
Type
(mm) WR WR
CRQ 2.91 17.71 1.07 3.56 % 64.32 20.61 %
1 - Left Support 0 FRQ 2.91 19.67 0.86 2.88 % 54.91 17.60 %
QP 3.39 20.64 0.78 2.61 % 51.14 16.39 %
CRQ 2.93 17.85 5.40 18.00 % 203.16 65.11 %
1 - Right Support 7000 FRQ 2.93 19.72 4.48 14.94 % 176.05 56.43 %
QP 3.39 20.64 4.12 13.75 % 165.19 52.94 %
CRQ 2.89 17.60 6.20 20.66 % 219.89 70.48 %
1 - MInf 2940 FRQ 2.89 19.62 5.08 16.93 % 188.11 60.29 %
QP 3.39 20.64 4.64 15.47 % 175.37 56.21 %
CRQ 2.93 17.85 5.40 18.00 % 203.16 65.11 %
1 - VMax 7000 FRQ 2.93 19.72 4.48 14.94 % 176.05 56.43 %
QP 3.39 20.64 4.12 13.75 % 165.19 52.94 %
CRQ 2.70 16.43 3.36 11.18 % 200.28 64.19 %
1 - wk Max 700 FRQ 2.70 19.67 2.74 9.14 % 172.67 55.34 %
QP 3.39 20.64 2.50 8.35 % 161.60 51.80 %
CRQ 2.89 17.61 6.20 20.65 % 219.85 70.46 %
1 - Max Conc Stress 2870 FRQ 2.89 19.63 5.08 16.93 % 188.17 60.31 %
QP 3.39 20.64 4.64 15.48 % 175.48 56.24 %
CRQ 2.89 17.61 6.20 20.65 % 219.85 70.46 %
1 - Max Steel Stress 2870 FRQ 2.89 19.63 5.08 16.93 % 188.17 60.31 %
QP 3.39 20.64 4.64 15.48 % 175.48 56.24 %
CRQ 2.91 17.71 1.07 3.56 % 64.32 20.61 %
1 - Max Deflection 0 FRQ 2.91 19.67 0.86 2.88 % 54.91 17.60 %
QP 3.39 20.64 0.78 2.61 % 51.14 16.39 %
CRQ 2.93 17.87 5.51 18.37 % 205.99 66.02 %
2 - Left Support 0 FRQ 2.93 19.72 4.58 15.28 % 178.69 57.27 %
QP 3.39 20.64 4.22 14.07 % 167.75 53.77 %
CRQ 2.80 17.08 4.46 14.86 % 196.49 62.98 %
2 - Right Support 7000 FRQ 2.80 19.41 3.49 11.65 % 162.97 52.23 %

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 29 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Stresses verification
Span - Section Abscissa Envelope Stresses (MPa)
Type
(mm) WR WR
QP 3.39 20.64 3.12 10.40 % 149.53 47.93 %
CRQ 2.76 16.80 4.93 16.44 % 223.77 71.72 %
2 - MInf 3710 FRQ 2.76 19.29 3.80 12.66 % 182.58 58.52 %
QP 3.39 20.64 3.36 11.20 % 166.07 53.23 %
CRQ 2.93 17.87 5.51 18.37 % 205.99 66.02 %
2 - VMax 0 FRQ 2.93 19.72 4.58 15.28 % 178.69 57.27 %
QP 3.39 20.64 4.22 14.07 % 167.75 53.77 %
CRQ 2.93 17.87 5.51 18.37 % 205.99 66.02 %
2 - wk Max 0 FRQ 2.93 19.72 4.58 15.28 % 178.69 57.27 %
QP 3.39 20.64 4.22 14.07 % 167.75 53.77 %
CRQ 2.93 17.87 5.51 18.37 % 205.99 66.02 %
2 - Max Conc Stress 0 FRQ 2.93 19.72 4.58 15.28 % 178.69 57.27 %
QP 3.39 20.64 4.22 14.07 % 167.75 53.77 %
CRQ 2.93 17.87 5.51 18.37 % 205.99 66.02 %
2 - Max Steel Stress 0 FRQ 2.93 19.72 4.58 15.28 % 178.69 57.27 %
QP 3.39 20.64 4.22 14.07 % 167.75 53.77 %
CRQ 2.93 17.87 5.51 18.37 % 205.99 66.02 %
2 - Max Deflection 0 FRQ 2.93 19.72 4.58 15.28 % 178.69 57.27 %
QP 3.39 20.64 4.22 14.07 % 167.75 53.77 %
CRQ 2.80 17.08 4.46 14.86 % 196.49 62.98 %
3 - Left Support 0 FRQ 2.80 19.41 3.49 11.65 % 162.97 52.23 %
QP 3.39 20.64 3.12 10.40 % 149.53 47.93 %
CRQ 2.93 17.87 5.51 18.37 % 205.99 66.02 %
3 - Right Support 7000 FRQ 2.93 19.72 4.58 15.28 % 178.69 57.27 %
QP 3.39 20.64 4.22 14.07 % 167.75 53.77 %
CRQ 2.76 16.80 4.93 16.44 % 223.77 71.72 %
3 - MInf 3290 FRQ 2.76 19.29 3.80 12.66 % 182.58 58.52 %
QP 3.39 20.64 3.36 11.20 % 166.07 53.23 %
CRQ 2.93 17.87 5.51 18.37 % 205.99 66.02 %
3 - VMax 7000 FRQ 2.93 19.72 4.58 15.28 % 178.69 57.27 %
QP 3.39 20.64 4.22 14.07 % 167.75 53.77 %
CRQ 2.93 17.87 5.51 18.37 % 205.99 66.02 %
3 - wk Max 7000 FRQ 2.93 19.72 4.58 15.28 % 178.69 57.27 %
QP 3.39 20.64 4.22 14.07 % 167.75 53.77 %
CRQ 2.93 17.87 5.51 18.37 % 205.99 66.02 %
3 - Max Conc Stress 7000 FRQ 2.93 19.72 4.58 15.28 % 178.69 57.27 %
QP 3.39 20.64 4.22 14.07 % 167.75 53.77 %
CRQ 2.93 17.87 5.51 18.37 % 205.99 66.02 %
3 - Max Steel Stress 7000 FRQ 2.93 19.72 4.58 15.28 % 178.69 57.27 %
QP 3.39 20.64 4.22 14.07 % 167.75 53.77 %
CRQ 2.80 17.08 4.46 14.86 % 196.49 62.98 %
3 - Max Deflection 0 FRQ 2.80 19.41 3.49 11.65 % 162.97 52.23 %
QP 3.39 20.64 3.12 10.40 % 149.53 47.93 %
CRQ 2.93 17.85 5.40 18.00 % 203.16 65.11 %

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 30 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Stresses verification
Span - Section Abscissa Envelope Stresses (MPa)
Type
(mm) WR WR
4 - Left Support 0 FRQ 2.93 19.72 4.48 14.94 % 176.05 56.43 %
QP 3.39 20.64 4.12 13.75 % 165.19 52.94 %
CRQ 2.91 17.71 1.07 3.56 % 64.32 20.61 %
4 - Right Support 7000 FRQ 2.91 19.67 0.86 2.88 % 54.91 17.60 %
QP 3.39 20.64 0.78 2.61 % 51.14 16.39 %
CRQ 2.89 17.60 6.20 20.66 % 219.89 70.48 %
4 - MInf 4060 FRQ 2.89 19.62 5.08 16.93 % 188.11 60.29 %
QP 3.39 20.64 4.64 15.47 % 175.37 56.21 %
CRQ 2.93 17.85 5.40 18.00 % 203.16 65.11 %
4 - VMax 0 FRQ 2.93 19.72 4.48 14.94 % 176.05 56.43 %
QP 3.39 20.64 4.12 13.75 % 165.19 52.94 %
CRQ 2.70 16.43 3.36 11.18 % 200.28 64.19 %
4 - wk Max 6300 FRQ 2.70 19.67 2.74 9.14 % 172.67 55.34 %
QP 3.39 20.64 2.50 8.35 % 161.60 51.80 %
CRQ 2.89 17.61 6.20 20.65 % 219.85 70.46 %
4 - Max Conc Stress 4130 FRQ 2.89 19.63 5.08 16.93 % 188.17 60.31 %
QP 3.39 20.64 4.64 15.48 % 175.48 56.24 %
CRQ 2.89 17.61 6.20 20.65 % 219.85 70.46 %
4 - Max Steel Stress 4130 FRQ 2.89 19.63 5.08 16.93 % 188.17 60.31 %
QP 3.39 20.64 4.64 15.48 % 175.48 56.24 %
CRQ 2.93 17.85 5.40 18.00 % 203.16 65.11 %
4 - Max Deflection 0 FRQ 2.93 19.72 4.48 14.94 % 176.05 56.43 %
QP 3.39 20.64 4.12 13.75 % 165.19 52.94 %

Span T 1.1, Section Max Steel Stress, Abscissa 2870 mm

Combination Envelope of SLS QP combinations
Span T 1.4, Section Max Steel Stress, Abscissa 4130 mm

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 31 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Combination Envelope of SLS QP combinations

SLS bending moment
Tensioned reinforcement area
Compressed reinforcement area
Equivalence coefficient for long term
loads
Height of compressed concrete
The moment of inertia

Reinforcement tension stress

Concrete compression stress

Concrete tension stress

Span T 1.2, Section Max Steel Stress, Abscissa 0 mm

Combination Envelope of SLS QP combinations
Span T 1.3, Section Max Steel Stress, Abscissa 7000 mm
Combination Envelope of SLS QP combinations
SLS bending moment
Tensioned reinforcement area
Compressed reinforcement area
Equivalence coefficient for long term
loads
Height of compressed concrete
The moment of inertia

Reinforcement tension stress

Reinforcement compression stress

Concrete compression stress

Concrete tension stress

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 32 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

10 Crack width check

Crack width verification

Span - Section Abscissa Section WR
(mm) Position (mm) (mm) (mm) (‰) (mm) (mm)
1 - Left support 0 Top 0.044 0.028 289 0.15 0.044 0.400 11.07 %
1 - Right support 7000 Top 0.115 0.000 232 0.50 0.115 0.400 28.70 %
1 - MInf 2940 Bottom 0.000 0.100 190 0.53 0.100 0.400 25.03 %
1 - VMax 7000 Bottom 0.115 0.000 0 0.00 0.115 0.400 28.70 %
1 - wk Max 700 Bottom 0.003 0.138 284 0.48 0.138 0.400 34.47 %
1 - Max Concrete Stress 2870 Bottom 0.000 0.100 190 0.53 0.100 0.400 25.06 %
1 - Max Steel Stress 2870 Bottom 0.000 0.100 190 0.53 0.100 0.400 25.06 %
1 - Max Deflection 0 Top 0.044 0.028 289 0.15 0.044 0.400 11.07 %
2 - Left support 0 Top 0.116 0.000 231 0.50 0.116 0.400 29.11 %
2 - Right support 7000 Top 0.116 0.000 258 0.45 0.116 0.400 28.98 %
2 - MInf 3710 Bottom 0.000 0.111 222 0.50 0.111 0.400 27.65 %
2 - VMax 0 Top 0.116 0.000 231 0.50 0.116 0.400 29.11 %
2 - wk Max 0 Top 0.116 0.000 231 0.50 0.116 0.400 29.11 %
2 - Max Concrete Stress 0 Top 0.116 0.000 231 0.50 0.116 0.400 29.11 %
2 - Max Steel Stress 0 Top 0.116 0.000 231 0.50 0.116 0.400 29.11 %
2 - Max Deflection 0 Top 0.116 0.000 231 0.50 0.116 0.400 29.11 %
3 - Left support 0 Top 0.116 0.000 258 0.45 0.116 0.400 28.98 %
3 - Right support 7000 Top 0.116 0.000 231 0.50 0.116 0.400 29.11 %
3 - MInf 3290 Bottom 0.000 0.111 222 0.50 0.111 0.400 27.65 %
3 - VMax 7000 Bottom 0.116 0.000 0 0.00 0.116 0.400 29.11 %
3 - wk Max 7000 Top 0.116 0.000 231 0.50 0.116 0.400 29.11 %
3 - Max Concrete Stress 7000 Top 0.116 0.000 231 0.50 0.116 0.400 29.11 %
3 - Max Steel Stress 7000 Top 0.116 0.000 231 0.50 0.116 0.400 29.11 %
3 - Max Deflection 0 Top 0.116 0.000 258 0.45 0.116 0.400 28.98 %
4 - Left support 0 Top 0.115 0.000 232 0.50 0.115 0.400 28.70 %
4 - Right support 7000 Top 0.044 0.028 289 0.15 0.044 0.400 11.07 %
4 - MInf 4060 Bottom 0.000 0.100 190 0.53 0.100 0.400 25.03 %
4 - VMax 0 Top 0.115 0.000 232 0.50 0.115 0.400 28.70 %
4 - wk Max 6300 Bottom 0.003 0.138 284 0.48 0.138 0.400 34.47 %
4 - Max Concrete Stress 4130 Bottom 0.000 0.100 190 0.53 0.100 0.400 25.06 %
4 - Max Steel Stress 4130 Bottom 0.000 0.100 190 0.53 0.100 0.400 25.06 %
4 - Max Deflection 0 Top 0.115 0.000 232 0.50 0.115 0.400 28.70 %

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 33 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

The crack opening calculation is done according to EN 1992-1-1, 7.3.4 (1).

Span T 1.1, Section wk Max, Abscissa 700 mm, Position: bottom
Combination Envelope of SLS QP combinations
Neutral axis position
Effective tension area, surrounding the
tension reinforcement
(7.3.4(2), Fig. 7.1)

Maximum crack spacing

(7.3.4(3), 7.11)

Secant Young modulus

Short term equivalence coefficient

Difference between average strains

(7.3.4 (2))

Crack width (7.3.4 (1))

Crack width verification
Passed

Span T 1.2, Section wk Max, Abscissa 0 mm, Position: top

Combination Envelope of SLS QP combinations
Neutral axis position
Effective tension area, surrounding the
tension reinforcement
(7.3.4(2), Fig. 7.1)

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 34 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Maximum crack spacing

(7.3.4(3), 7.11)

Secant Young modulus

Short term equivalence coefficient

Difference between average strains

(7.3.4 (2))

Crack width (7.3.4 (1))

Crack width verification
Passed

Span T 1.3, Section wk Max, Abscissa 7000 mm, Position: top

Combination Envelope of SLS QP combinations
Neutral axis position
Effective tension area, surrounding the
tension reinforcement
(7.3.4(2), Fig. 7.1)

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 35 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Maximum crack spacing

(7.3.4(3), 7.11)

Secant Young modulus

Short term equivalence coefficient

Difference between average strains

(7.3.4 (2))

Crack width (7.3.4 (1))

Crack width verification
Passed

Span T 1.4, Section wk Max, Abscissa 6300 mm, Position: bottom

Combination Envelope of SLS QP combinations
Neutral axis position
Effective tension area, surrounding the
tension reinforcement
(7.3.4(2), Fig. 7.1)

Maximum crack spacing

(7.3.4(3), 7.11)

Secant Young modulus

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 36 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Short term equivalence coefficient

Difference between average strains

(7.3.4 (2))

Crack width (7.3.4 (1))

Crack width verification
Passed

11 Anchorage calculation

Anchorage calculation
Bar Position
mark
(kN) (mm) (MPa) (mm) (mm)
1 Start 11.07 40 140.95 116 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 114
End 0.00 0 0.00 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 100
2 Start 0.00 0 339.13 279 1.00 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 195
End 0.00 0 339.13 279 1.00 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 195
8 Start 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.70 0.89 1.00 1.00 0.98 100
End 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.70 0.89 1.00 1.00 0.98 100
9 Start 0.00 0 339.13 223 1.00 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 156
End 0.00 0 339.13 223 1.00 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 156
14 Start 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.70 0.89 1.00 1.00 0.98 100
End 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.70 0.89 1.00 1.00 0.98 100
15 Start 0.00 0 339.13 223 1.00 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 156
End 0.00 0 339.13 223 1.00 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 156
20 Start 0.00 0 0.00 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 100
End 11.07 40 140.95 116 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 114
21 Start 0.00 0 339.13 279 1.00 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 195
End 0.00 0 339.13 279 1.00 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 195
3 Start 0.00 0 275.15 323 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 323
End 0.00 0 339.13 398 1.00 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 279
4 Start 0.00 0 339.13 558 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.00 462
End 0.00 0 339.13 558 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.00 462
10 Start 0.00 0 339.13 478 1.00 0.78 1.00 1.00 1.00 370
End 0.00 0 339.13 478 1.00 0.78 1.00 1.00 1.00 370

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 37 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Anchorage calculation
Bar Position
mark
(kN) (mm) (MPa) (mm) (mm)
16 Start 0.00 0 339.13 558 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.00 462
End 0.00 0 339.13 558 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.00 462
22 Start 0.00 0 339.13 398 1.00 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 279
End 0.00 0 275.15 323 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 323
Anchorage calculation: anchorage at a s0.cot(teta) distance.
Anchorage calculation is done according to EN1992-1, 8.4.

12 Support strut verification

The support strut verification and dimensioning of the sliding reinforcement is done according to article 6.5
and 9.2.1.4/ 9.2.1.5 of EN 1992-1-1.

Support strut verification

Span Sliding reinforcement Support strut stress
ID Position Real Minimum θ' Work Status
(cm²) (cm²) (°) (MPa) (MPa) Ratio
1 Left 3.14 1.40 46.99 0.84 14.96 5.65 % Passed
Right 1.13 0.00 - 17.60 8.48 % Passed
2 Left 0.90 0.00 - 1.49 17.60 8.48 % Passed
Right 0.90 0.00 - 17.60 7.40 % Passed
3 Left 0.90 0.00 - 1.30 17.60 7.40 % Passed
Right 0.90 0.00 - 17.60 8.48 % Passed
4 Left 1.13 0.00 - 1.49 17.60 8.48 % Passed
Right 3.14 1.40 0.00 14.96 5.65 % Passed
12.1 Support strut stresses verification
Span T 1.1, Section Left support, Abscissa 0 mm
Envelope ULS
Stresses verification
Maximum stress which can be applied at the
edges of the node (23.4.3)
Effective support stress

Support reaction
Compressed strut width
Distance from beam bottom edge to bottom
bars on support axis
Effective width of support
Inclination angle
Stresses verification
5.65 % (Passed)
Span T 1.2, Section Left support, Abscissa 0 mm
Envelope ULS
Stresses verification
Maximum stress which can be applied at the
edges of the node (23.4.3)

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 38 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Effective support stress

Support reaction
Stresses verification
8.48 % (Passed)
Span T 1.3, Section Left support, Abscissa 0 mm
Envelope ULS
Stresses verification
Maximum stress which can be applied at the
edges of the node (23.4.3)
Effective support stress

Support reaction
Stresses verification
7.40 % (Passed)
Span T 1.4, Section Left support, Abscissa 0 mm
Envelope ULS
Stresses verification
Maximum stress which can be applied at the
edges of the node (23.4.3)
Effective support stress

Support reaction
Stresses verification
8.48 % (Passed)
Span T 1.1, Section Right support, Abscissa 7000 mm
Envelope ULS
Stresses verification
Maximum stress which can be applied at the
edges of the node (23.4.3)
Effective support stress

Support reaction
Stresses verification
8.48 % (Passed)
Span T 1.2, Section Right support, Abscissa 7000 mm
Envelope ULS
Stresses verification
Maximum stress which can be applied at the
edges of the node (23.4.3)
Effective support stress

Support reaction
Stresses verification
7.40 % (Passed)
Span T 1.3, Section Right support, Abscissa 7000 mm
Envelope ULS
Stresses verification

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 39 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Maximum stress which can be applied at the

edges of the node (23.4.3)
Effective support stress

Support reaction
Stresses verification
8.48 % (Passed)
Span T 1.4, Section Right support, Abscissa 7000 mm
Envelope ULS
Stresses verification
Maximum stress which can be applied at the
edges of the node (23.4.3)
Effective support stress

Support reaction
Compressed strut width
Distance from beam bottom edge to bottom
bars on support axis
Effective width of support
Inclination angle
Stresses verification
5.65 % (Passed)

12.2 Sliding reinforcement verification

Span T 1.1, Section Left support, Abscissa 0 mm
Envelope ULS
Reinforcement verification
Bottom longitudinal reinforcement which is
anchored in support verification
Tensile force to be anchored in support
Reinforcement verification
224.43 % (Passed)
Additional sliding reinforcement not needed
Span T 1.2, Section Left support, Abscissa 0 mm
Envelope ULS
Reinforcement verification
Bottom longitudinal reinforcement which is
anchored in support verification
Tensile force to be anchored in support
Reinforcement verification
100.00 % (Passed)
Additional sliding reinforcement not needed
Span T 1.3, Section Left support, Abscissa 0 mm
Envelope ULS
Reinforcement verification
Bottom longitudinal reinforcement which is
anchored in support verification

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 40 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Tensile force to be anchored in support

Reinforcement verification
100.00 % (Passed)
Additional sliding reinforcement not needed
Span T 1.4, Section Left support, Abscissa 0 mm
Envelope ULS
Reinforcement verification
Bottom longitudinal reinforcement which is
anchored in support verification
Tensile force to be anchored in support
Reinforcement verification
100.00 % (Passed)
Additional sliding reinforcement not needed
Span T 1.1, Section Right support, Abscissa 7000 mm
Envelope ULS
Reinforcement verification
Bottom longitudinal reinforcement which is
anchored in support verification
Tensile force to be anchored in support
Reinforcement verification
100.00 % (Passed)
Additional sliding reinforcement not needed
Span T 1.2, Section Right support, Abscissa 7000 mm
Envelope ULS
Reinforcement verification
Bottom longitudinal reinforcement which is
anchored in support verification
Tensile force to be anchored in support
Reinforcement verification
100.00 % (Passed)
Additional sliding reinforcement not needed
Span T 1.3, Section Right support, Abscissa 7000 mm
Envelope ULS
Reinforcement verification
Bottom longitudinal reinforcement which is
anchored in support verification
Tensile force to be anchored in support
Reinforcement verification
100.00 % (Passed)
Additional sliding reinforcement not needed
Span T 1.4, Section Right support, Abscissa 7000 mm
Envelope ULS
Reinforcement verification
Bottom longitudinal reinforcement which is
anchored in support verification

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 41 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Tensile force to be anchored in support

Reinforcement verification
224.43 % (Passed)
Additional sliding reinforcement not needed

13 Support reactions

Load case / combination Support 1 Support 2 Support 3 Support 4

ID Title Fz (kN) Fz (kN) Fz (kN) Fz (kN)
1 Dead loads 1 -25.91 -71.05 -59.51 -71.05
2 Live loads 1 -8.96 -24.06 -21.40 -24.06
101 1x[1 G] -25.91 -71.05 -59.51 -71.05
102 1.35x[1 G] -34.98 -95.91 -80.34 -95.91
103 1x[1 G]+1.5x[2 Q] -40.84 -109.38 -96.35 -109.38
104 1.35x[1 G]+1.5x[2 Q] -49.90 -134.25 -117.18 -134.25
105 1x[1 G] -25.91 -71.05 -59.51 -71.05
106 1x[1 G]+1x[2 Q] -35.86 -96.60 -84.07 -96.60
107 1x[1 G] -25.91 -71.05 -59.51 -71.05
108 1x[1 G]+0.5x[2 Q] -30.88 -83.83 -71.79 -83.83
109 1x[1 G] -25.91 -71.05 -59.51 -71.05
110 1x[1 G]+0.3x[2 Q] -28.89 -78.71 -66.88 -78.71
Max(ULS) -49.90 -134.25 -117.18 -134.25
Max(SLS) -35.86 -96.60 -84.07 -96.60

Load case / combination Support 5

ID Title Fz (kN)
1 Dead loads 1 -25.91
2 Live loads 1 -8.96
101 1x[1 G] -25.91
102 1.35x[1 G] -34.98
103 1x[1 G]+1.5x[2 Q] -40.84
104 1.35x[1 G]+1.5x[2 Q] -49.90
105 1x[1 G] -25.91
106 1x[1 G]+1x[2 Q] -35.86
107 1x[1 G] -25.91
108 1x[1 G]+0.5x[2 Q] -30.88
109 1x[1 G] -25.91
110 1x[1 G]+0.3x[2 Q] -28.89
Max(ULS) -49.90
Max(SLS) -35.86

14 Deflections
The deflections are calculated with the curvature integration method.

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 42 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

The total deflection is calculated according to 7.4.3 from EN 1992-1-1.

Span 1
Distance between support axes
Modular ratio
Mean flexural tensile strength of
reinforced concrete
Modulus of elasticity of concrete
Uncracked moment of inertia
Cracked moment of inertia
Bottom reinforcement area
Top reinforcement area
Deflection calculated for the uncracked
conditions
Deflection calculated for the fully
cracked conditions
Distribution coefficient
Span 2
Distance between support axes
Modular ratio
Mean flexural tensile strength of
reinforced concrete
Modulus of elasticity of concrete
Uncracked moment of inertia
Cracked moment of inertia
Bottom reinforcement area
Top reinforcement area
Deflection calculated for the uncracked
conditions
Deflection calculated for the fully
cracked conditions
Distribution coefficient

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 43 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Span 3
Distance between support axes
Modular ratio
Mean flexural tensile strength of
reinforced concrete
Modulus of elasticity of concrete
Uncracked moment of inertia
Cracked moment of inertia
Bottom reinforcement area
Top reinforcement area
Deflection calculated for the uncracked
conditions
Deflection calculated for the fully
cracked conditions
Distribution coefficient
Span 4
Distance between support axes
Modular ratio
Mean flexural tensile strength of
reinforced concrete
Modulus of elasticity of concrete
Uncracked moment of inertia
Cracked moment of inertia
Bottom reinforcement area
Top reinforcement area
Deflection calculated for the uncracked
conditions
Deflection calculated for the fully
cracked conditions
Distribution coefficient
Interpolation is done between inertias in
the uncracked and fully cracked states

Total deflection
Span f Ratio Status
(mm) (mm) (%)
1 -6 mm 15 mm 41.90 % Passed
2 -3 mm 15 mm 22.92 % Passed
3 -3 mm 15 mm 22.92 % Passed
4 -6 mm 15 mm 41.90 % Passed
f Total deflection EN 1992-1-1
Total allowable deflection
The peak deflection is calculated applying the Professional Rules.
Characteristics
Span αₑ ϕ L Eᵥ E Reinf. (cm²)
(MPa) (m) (MPa) (MPa) (m⁴) (m⁴)
1 15.00 2.0 3.19 7.00 10945.52 32836.57 6.28 0.00 0.00347 0.00117
2 15.00 2.0 3.19 7.00 10945.52 32836.57 4.02 0.00 0.00336 0.00083

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 44 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Characteristics
Span αₑ ϕ L Eᵥ E Reinf. (cm²)
(MPa) (m) (MPa) (MPa) (m⁴) (m⁴)
3 15.00 2.0 3.19 7.00 10945.52 32836.57 4.02 0.00 0.00336 0.00083
4 15.00 2.0 3.19 7.00 10945.52 32836.57 6.28 0.00 0.00347 0.00117

Maximum bending moments

Span
(kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m)
1 15.58 15.58 36.75 53.10 46.43
2 9.63 9.63 22.71 36.63 44.15
3 9.63 9.63 22.71 36.63 44.15
4 15.58 15.58 36.75 53.10 46.43

Total deflection
Span
(cm) (cm) (cm)
1 0.06 -1.617 -0.544 -0.614
2 0.00 -1.477 -0.365 -0.365
3 0.00 -1.477 -0.365 -0.365
4 0.06 -1.617 -0.544 -0.614

Initial deflection
Span
(cm) (cm) (cm) (cm) (cm) (cm)
1 0.00 -0.199 -0.067 -0.067 0.00 -0.597 -0.201 -0.201
2 0.00 -0.173 -0.043 -0.043 0.00 -0.520 -0.128 -0.128
3 0.00 -0.173 -0.043 -0.043 0.00 -0.520 -0.128 -0.128
4 0.00 -0.199 -0.067 -0.067 0.00 -0.597 -0.201 -0.201

Initial deflection
Span RH
(%) (mm) (days) (days) (cm)
1 50 188 521.207 30 28 0.188 0.000 -0.07
2 50 188 521.207 30 28 0.188 0.000 -0.04
3 50 188 521.207 30 28 0.188 0.000 -0.04
4 50 188 521.207 30 28 0.188 0.000 -0.07

Peak Deflection
Span
(cm) (cm)
1 -0.547 1.400
2 -0.322 1.400
3 -0.322 1.400
4 -0.547 1.400

15 Bill of materials

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 45 of 46

 Project: Date: 03-23-2023

Beam Dimensions
Level 1 L r b
(mm) (mm) (mm)
T 1.1 7450 500 300
T 1.2 7300 500 300
T 1.3 7300 500 300
T 1.4 7450 500 300

Beam Concrete Formwork Steel Reinf. Ratio

Level 1 Quantity Price Quantity Price Quantity Price
(m³) (€) (m²) (€) (kg) (€) (kg/m³)
T 1.1 1.12 0.00 9.10 0.00 91.34 0.00 62.73
T 1.2 1.10 0.00 9.10 0.00 68.93 0.00 42.58
T 1.3 1.10 0.00 9.10 0.00 76.67 0.00 49.65
T 1.4 1.12 0.00 9.10 0.00 69.96 0.00 43.59
Total 4.43 0.00 36.40 0.00 306.90 0.00 49.64
Total Price 0.00 €

Average Diameter: 10 mm

RC Beam Designer 2018 Page 46 of 46