Design Calculation of PT-SOG (LOGISTICS VINH LOC) - BASE SLAB 180.250mm

Logistics Vinh Loc
Design Calculation Note
A 17/08/2020 2nd issued NVQ NVQ

0 23/07/2020 1st issued NVQ NVQ
Rev. Date Description Prepared Checked
PROJECT
LOGISTICS VINH LOC
TITLE
DESIGN CALCULATION OF POST-TENSIONED SLAB ON GRADE –

1F
DOCUMENT NO.
VNDE20038.R001
Prepared : Date :
Nguyen Vu Quang 17/08/2020
Checked : Approved :
VSL VIETNAM CO., LTD.

R0212 Etown Building, 364 Cong Hoa Street, Ward 13, Tan Binh
Dist.
Ho Chi Minh City, VIETNAM
Phone: +(84 8) 8106817 Fax: +(84 8) 8106818
© Copyright Reserved No. of pages including this page:
©Copyright Reserved
This document must not be copied, reproduced, duplicated nor disclosed totally or partially to any Third Party, nor used in any purpose other than
originally intended without written permission of VSL VIETNAM CO. Ltd.
Logistics Vinh Loc
CONTENT
NO. PAGE
1. OBJECTIVE
2. GENERAL
2.1 Reference document and Code
2.2 Design Model
3. DESIGN CHECKING ASSUMPTIONS
3.1 Material
3.2 Load Cases
4. DESIGN CALCULATIONS
4.1 Cedrus Model
4.2 Load cases
4.3 Design moment
4.4 Design checking
APPENDIX A : Assessment of equivalent uniform soil layer –

Subgrade reaction
APPENDIX B : Bearing Stresses Output
Logistics Vinh Loc
1. OBJECTIVE
This note presents the design calculation of the PT slab on grade of 1F (frozen storage)
of Logistics Vinh Loc project.
2. GENERAL
2.1 Reference document and Code

- Design specification and Reference document:
The Post-tensioned Slab on Ground Pavement designed will be based on
Design Loads Criteria, Sub-grade, Ground and Material Properties provided by
ICC.
 Slab thickness 180/250 mm
- Code: AS3600 – 2009 : Concrete Structures
TR 34: Concrete industrial ground floors ( a guide to design
and construction)
AASHTO 1998: Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges
22TCN223-95: “ Áo Đường Cứng Đường Ô Tô – Tiêu Chuẩn
thiết kế”
2.2 Design Model

The slab has been modeled with the Cedrus program, finite element software for
plate analysis. The program has a built in design, which is used only to provide the
bending moment due to loads. Detail calculations are done manually to account
for other load conditions.
The element mesh, boundary conditions and attributes are shown on the graphs
on next pages.
Plate element
Isotropic is chosen for post-tensioned slab on grade.
Support:
In program, supports are in form of area supports (see next pages).
Area support is used to model the support for vertical deformation of sub-grade
indicated by sub-grade reaction (k).
3. DESIGN CHECKING ASSUMPTIONS
3.1 Materials
Concrete
i. f’c = Concrete Compression Strength at 28 Days = 30Mpa
ii. f’y = flexural tensile strength at 28 Days = 3.2Mpa
iii. f’y = flexural tensile strength at 96 Days = 3.2Mpa
iv. Concrete Shrinkage Rate at 56 Days = 700 Microstrain
v. Concrete Elastic Modulus = 29000Mpa
vi. Concrete Poisson Coefficient = 0.15
vii. Coefficient of thermal expansion = 0.0000108
Sub-grade properties
The current 1F is SOG with RC design, as confirmed by client the current 1F
can carry the live load of 30 KPa. The new design, client want to change the
level of 1F by adding 1m thick well compacted sand. Considered Subgrade of
Logistics Vinh Loc
the sub-base under the Post-tensioned Slab is 320mm thick well compacted
sand : CBR = 20%,
Design CBR = 20 % (Refer Figure 6.2 of TR34); The Modulus of Subgrade
Reaction (kpa/mm) = 70 kpa/mm.
Conservatively adopt a modulus of Subgrade Reaction of 0.5 by 70 = 35
KPa/mm.
Equivalent subgrade modulus (k): 35 Kpa/mm
Prestressing Steel
High strength low relaxation seven wire strand class 1860

According to ASTM A416-88 Grade 270.
Nominal diameter Ø = 15.2 mm
Nominal area Ap = 140.0 mm2
E-modulus Ep = 195’000 N/mm2
Nominal tensile strength fpu = 1860 N/mm2
Nominal yield strength fpy = 1670 N/mm2
Relaxation after 1’000h at 70% Pult 2.5 %
Minimum breaking strength Pu = 260.0 kN
Wedge draw-in = 6 mm
Friction coefficient, µ = 0.2 rad-1
Wobble factor,  = 6.6 E - 4 m -1
Australian value = K/ µ = 3.3 x 10-3
Reinforcement
For PT slab on grade high yield deformed bars shall be used for all bars with:
Nominal yield strength fy = 390Mpa
Elastic Modulus of steel Es = 200 000 N/mm2
3.2 Load Cases (LC)
The following load cases are considered:
LC1: Dead Load 24 kN/m3 (on whole plate area)
LC2: Dead Load 8.0 kN/m2 (20cm thick concrete slab & 18cm
insulation layer on top of SOG - on whole plate area)
LC3: Distributed Load 30 KPa or concentrated load of 100kN over 0.9x0.9m.
(We have the 18cm insulation layer and 20cm RC slab on top of SOG, assumed
the concentrated load of 10 tons over 0.9x0.9m for SOG design)
Temperature Gradient/Effects
Temperature gradient between top and base of slab = 0.02 degree C/mm.
Ground/Slab Friction Factor
A nominal 25mm bedding sand with 1 layer polythene is detailed under the
concrete slab.
Hence Friction Factor adopted = 0.5
Post-Tensioning
Tendon type: VSL S6-n bonded slab Post-tensioning system.
Logistics Vinh Loc
The initial stressing force at active anchorage is 80% Pu for S6-n slab tendons. A
wedge draw-in of 6 mm is considered.
Logistics Vinh Loc
4. DESIGN CALCULATIONS
4.1 Cedrus Model
2019-CUBDATA Page 25
Slab on grade 17.08.20, 09:50
VSL VIETNAM, Hanoi, S.R. Vietnam qui.nguyenvan Cedrus-6 - Version 1.08
Structure Scale 1 :236.2
I2:
h = 0.200 m
I4:
h = 0.180 m
F1: elastic
ks= 35000.00 kN/m 3
I3:
h = 0.225 m
I1:
h = 0.250 m
Nr.:
C:\QUI\2020-CUBDATA\VNDE-20038-Logistics Vinh Loc-Slab on grade.C6P

Logistics Vinh Loc
4.2 Load cases
Slab on grade 17.08.20, 09:50
Loading SW: Self weight Scale 1 :233.7
R1 F1
a=10.00 m/s 2 p=-8.000 kN/m 2
Nr.:

Slab on grade 17.08.20, 09:50
Loading LC2: Rack Scale 1 :233.7
F162 F163 F164 F165 F166 F167 F168

p=-100.000 p=-100.000
kN/mF156 2 p=-100.000
kN/m 2 p=-100.000
kN/mF158 2 p=-100.000
kN/m 2 p=-100.000
kN/mF160 2 p=-100.000
kN/m 2 kN/m 2
F155
F148 F149 F157
F150 F151 F159
F152 F153 F161
F154
ptot=-81.000
p=-100.000 pkN/m
totkN
=-81.000
p=-100.000 pkN/m
totkN
=-81.000
2 p=-100.000 pkN/m
tot=-81.000
kN 2 p=-100.000
2 p=-100.000 pkN/m
totkN
=-81.000
pkN/m
tot=-81.000
kN 2 p=-100.000
2 p=-100.000 pkN/m
totkN
=-81.000
2 kN 2
kN/m
p=-100.000 p=-100.000
kN/mF142 2 p=-100.000
kN/m 2 p=-100.000
kN/mF144 2 p=-100.000
kN/m 2 p=-100.000
kN/mF146 2 p=-100.000
kN/m 2 2
F141
F134 F135 F143
F136 F137 F145
F138 F139 F147kN/m
F140
p
ptot =-81.000
p totkN
=-81.000
p totkN
=-81.000
p tot=-81.000
kN p totkN
=-81.000
p tot=-81.000
kN p totkN
=-81.000 kN
tot=-81.000
p=-100.000 pkN/m
totkN
=-81.000
p=-100.000 pkN/m
totkN
=-81.000
2 p=-100.000 pkN/m
tot=-81.000
kN 2 p=-100.000
2 p=-100.000 pkN/m
totkN
=-81.000
pkN/m
tot=-81.000
kN 2 p=-100.000
2 p=-100.000 pkN/m
totkN
=-81.000
2 kN 2
kN/m
p=-100.000 p=-100.000
kN/mF128 2 p=-100.000
kN/m 2 p=-100.000
kN/mF130 2 p=-100.000
kN/m 2 p=-100.000
kN/mF132 2 p=-100.000
kN/m 2 kN/m 2
F127
F120ptotkN F121 F129
F122ptot=-81.000
F123 F131
F124ptot=-81.000
F125 F133
F126 kN
p
p tot
tot
=-81.000
=-81.000
p tot
=-81.000
kN p
=-81.000
p tot
tot
kN
=-81.000
kN
=-81.000
p tot
kN p
=-81.000
kN p tot
tot
kN
=-81.000
kN
=-81.000
p tot
kN p
=-81.000
kN p tot
tot
kN
=-81.000
kN
=-81.000 kN 2
p=-100.000 p=-100.000
kN/m 2 2 2 2 2 2
p=-100.000 p=-100.000
kN/mF114 2 p=-100.000
kN/m
p=-100.000
kN/m 2 p=-100.000
kN/m
p=-100.000
kN/mF116 2 p=-100.000
kN/m
p=-100.000
kN/m 2 p=-100.000
kN/m
p=-100.000
kN/mF118 2 p=-100.000
kN/m
p=-100.000
kN/m 2 kN/m
kN/m 2
F113
F106ptotkN F107 F115
F108ptot=-81.000
F109 F117
F110ptot=-81.000
F111 F119
F112 kN
p tot=-81.000
ptot=-81.000
pkN/m =-81.000
p totkN
=-81.000 kN p totkN
=-81.000 kN p totkN
=-81.000
p=-100.000 totkN
=-81.000
p=-100.000 pkN/m
totkN
=-81.000
2 p=-100.000 pkN/m
tot=-81.000
kN 2 p=-100.000
2 p=-100.000 pkN/m
totkN
=-81.000
pkN/m
tot=-81.000
kN 2 p=-100.000
2 p=-100.000 pkN/m
totkN
=-81.000
2 kN 2
kN/m
p=-100.000 p=-100.000
kN/mF100 2 p=-100.000
kN/m 2 p=-100.000
kN/mF102 2 p=-100.000
kN/m 2 p=-100.000
kN/mF104 2 p=-100.000
kN/m 2 kN/m 2
F99
F92ptotkN F93p totkN F101
F94ptot=-81.000
F95p totkN F103
F96ptot=-81.000
F97p totkN F105
F98 kN
p tot=-81.000
ptot=-81.000
pkN/m =-81.000
totkN
=-81.000
pkN/m=-81.000
totkN
=-81.000
pkN/m kN
tot=-81.000
=-81.000
kN 2 p=-100.000
pkN/m
totkN
=-81.000
pkN/m kN
tot=-81.000
=-81.000
kN 2 p=-100.000
pkN/m
totkN
=-81.000 kN 2
p=-100.000 p=-100.000 2 p=-100.0002 p=-100.000 2 p=-100.000 2 kN/m
p=-100.000 2 p=-100.0002 p=-100.000 2 p=-100.0002 p=-100.000 2 p=-100.0002 kN/m 2
F79 F80 F81 F82 F83 F84 F85 F2p=-100.000
kN/mF86 kN/mF87 kN/mF88 kN/mF89 kN/mF90 kN/mF91
p
ptot =-81.000
p totkN
=-81.000
p totkN
=-81.000
p tot=-81.000
kN p totkN
=-81.000
p tot=-81.000
kN p totkN
=-81.000 kN
p=-100.000 p=-100.000
kN/mF73 2 p=-100.000
kN/mF74 2 p=-100.000
kN/mF75 2 p=-100.000
kN/mF76 2 p=-100.000
kN/mF77 2 p=-100.000
kN/mF78 2 kN/m 2 tot=-81.000
p=-100.000 pkN/m
totkN
=-81.000
p=-100.000 pkN/m
totkN
=-81.000
2 p=-100.000 pkN/m
tot=-81.000
kN 2 p=-100.000
2 p=-100.000 pkN/m
totkN
=-81.000
pkN/m
tot=-81.000
kN 2 p=-100.000
2 p=-100.000 pkN/m
totkN
=-81.000
2 kN 2
kN/m
F72
F65 F66 F67 F68 F69 F70 F71 kN
p tot=-81.000
p=-100.000 pkN/m
tot=-81.000
kN 2 p=-100.000
p=-100.000 pkN/m
totkN
=-81.000
pkN/m
tot=-81.000
kN 2 p=-100.000
2 p=-100.000 pkN/m
totkN
=-81.000
pkN/m
tot=-81.000
kN 2 p=-100.000
2 p=-100.000 pkN/m
totkN
=-81.000
2 2 ptot=-81.000
ptotkN=-81.000
p totkN
=-81.000
ptot=-81.000
kN p totkN
=-81.000
ptot=-81.000
kN p totkN
=-81.000 kN
p=-100.000 p=-100.000
F58 kN/mF59 2 p=-100.000
kN/mF60 2 p=-100.000
kN/mF61 2 p=-100.000
kN/mF62 2 p=-100.000
kN/mF63 2 kN/mF64 kN/m
p=-100.0002 kN/m 2
p F51ptot=-81.000
tot=-81.000 kNF52p totkN F53ptot=-81.000
=-81.000 kNF54p totkN F55ptot=-81.000
=-81.000 kNF56ptotkN F57 kN
=-81.000
p tot=-81.000
p=-100.000 p tot=-81.000
kN
p=-100.000
kN/m 2 p totkN
=-81.000
2 p tot=-81.000
kN 2 p totkN
=-81.000
2 p tot=-81.000
kN 2 p totkN
=-81.000
2 kN 2
p=-100.000 p=-100.000
kN/mF45 2 p=-100.000
kN/m
p=-100.000
kN/mF46 2 p=-100.000
kN/m
p=-100.000
kN/mF47 2 p=-100.000
kN/m
p=-100.000
kN/mF48 2 p=-100.000
kN/m
p=-100.000
kN/mF49 2 p=-100.000
kN/m
p=-100.000
kN/mF50 2 kN/m
kN/m 2
F44
F37 F38 F39 F40 F41 F42 F43
p tot=-81.000
p
p tot=-81.000tot
pkN/m=-81.000
kN p
tot=-81.000
totkN
=-81.000
kN 2 p=-100.000
pkN/m
totkN
p
=-81.000 tot
pkN/m=-81.000
kN p
tot=-81.000
totkN
=-81.000
kN 2 p=-100.000
pkN/m
totkN
p
=-81.000 tot
pkN/m=-81.000
kN p
tot=-81.000
totkN
=-81.000
kN 2 p=-100.000
pkN/m
totkN
=-81.000 kN
kN 2
p=-100.000 p=-100.000 2 p=-100.000 2 p=-100.000 2 kN/m
p=-100.000 p=-100.000
kN/mF31 2 p=-100.000
kN/mF32 2 p=-100.000
kN/mF33 2 p=-100.000
kN/mF34 2 p=-100.000
kN/mF35 2 p=-100.000
kN/mF36 2 kN/m 2
F30
F23ptot=-81.000
F24p totkN F25ptot=-81.000
F26p totkN F27ptot=-81.000
F28ptotkN F29 kN
p tot=-81.000
p tot=-81.000
pkN/m kN =-81.000 kN =-81.000 kN =-81.000
p=-100.000 tot=-81.000
kN 2 p=-100.000
p=-100.000 pkN/m
totkN
=-81.000
pkN/m
tot=-81.000
kN 2 p=-100.000
2 p=-100.000 pkN/m
totkN
=-81.000
pkN/m
tot=-81.000
kN 2 p=-100.000
2 p=-100.000 pkN/m
totkN
=-81.000
2 kN 2
kN/m
p=-100.000 p=-100.000
kN/mF17 2 p=-100.000
kN/mF18 2 p=-100.000
kN/mF19 2 p=-100.000
kN/mF20 2 p=-100.000
kN/mF21 2 p=-100.000
kN/mF22 2 kN/m 2
F16
F9 p
p
p tot=-81.000
tot=-81.000
p=-100.000 pkN/m kNF10
tot=-81.000
kN p
tot=-81.000
p=-100.000
totkN
pkN/m
totkN
F11p
=-81.000
=-81.000
2 p=-100.000 pkN/m kNF12
tot=-81.000
kN p
tot=-81.000
2 p=-100.000
totkN
pkN/m
totkN
F13p
=-81.000
=-81.000
2 p=-100.000 pkN/m kNF14
tot=-81.000
kN p
tot=-81.000
2 p=-100.000
totkN
pkN/m
totkN
F15 kN
=-81.000
=-81.000
2 p=-100.0002 kN 2
kN/m
p=-100.000 2 p=-100.0002 p=-100.0002 p=-100.0002 p=-100.0002 p=-100.0002 kN/m 2
F1p=-100.000
kN/m F3 kN/m F4 kN/m F5 kN/m F6 kN/m F7 kN/m F8
p tot=-81.000
p =-81.000
ptot=-81.000
p =-81.000
kN p p totkN
kN
=-81.000
ptot=-81.000
=-81.000
kN p p totkN
kN
=-81.000
ptot=-81.000
=-81.000
kN ptotkN
kN
=-81.000 kN
kN
tot
p=-100.000 totkN 2 p=-100.000
p=-100.000
kN/m tot=-81.000
kN/m p totkN 2 p=-100.000
2 p=-100.000
kN/m tot=-81.000
kN/m p totkN 2 p=-100.000
2 p=-100.000
kN/m p tot=-81.000
kN/m 2 kN/m 2
p tot=-81.000
ptot=-81.000
kN p totkN =-81.000
ptot=-81.000
kN p totkN =-81.000
ptot=-81.000
kN ptotkN
=-81.000 kN
Nr.:

Slab on grade 17.08.20, 10:51
Loading LC2: Rack Scale 1 :233.7
Nr.:

Logistics Vinh Loc
4.3 Design moment
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
-0.18
-0.18 -0.18 -0.18 -0.16
Slab on grade
2019-CUBDATA
-0.02 0.02
-0.03
0.19 0.23 -0.03

0.07
-0.03 0.00
-0.02 0.00
VSL VIETNAM, Hanoi, S.R. Vietnam
-5.45 -6.37 -0.32

-0.02 0.00
15.32 16.27 -0.02 0.00
S3
S8
S7
S9
S30
-6.52 -7.37 -0.48 -0.02 0.00
b= 0.830 m
b= 0.830 m
b= 0.830 m
b= 0.830 m
b= 0.830 m
10.96 11.09
-0.01
-7.82 -8.93 -0.52
0.00
-0.18
-4.64
-4.66
-0.12
Beam section(s): Moments [kNm], Result combination SW+Rack
0.00

10.94
S1 11.07
-0.01 0.00
b= 0.830 m -7.64 -8.71 -0.48
0.00
0.00
0.19
7.50
4.56
4.63
7.50
0.14
0.00
-0.01
10.89 11.03 0.00
-7.60 -8.67 -0.48 -0.01
-0.18
-4.64
-4.66
-0.12
0.00
10.75 10.87 -0.02 -0.01
S2
-0.02
b= 0.830 m
-7.72 -8.82
0.00
0.00
0.19
7.55
3.17
4.71
7.59
0.13
0.01
-0.53
10.69 10.79
-0.40
-6.55 -7.39
0.49
0.15
15.29 16.30 0.19
-5.44 -6.35
-6.36 -4.98 -4.87
0.20 0.18 16.44 9.45

14.47
-7.35 -5.90 -2.24

-0.37
11.22 4.70
10.49
-0.50 -8.93 -7.20 -4.34

-0.18
-0.01
-4.64
-0.31
-0.43
11.20 4.59
10.42
S7
-0.44 -8.71 -7.03 -3.91

b= 0.830 m
0.00
0.01
0.19
7.51
4.55
3.01
7.97
11.17 4.81
10.39
0.02 -0.44 -8.66 -6.99 -3.88
-0.18
-0.01
-4.64
-0.33
-0.43
0.00
11.00 4.53
10.24
S6
0.02
-8.79 -7.12 -4.27
b= 0.830 m
0.00
0.01
0.19
7.56
4.63
3.08
8.07
-0.49
10.90 10.25
4.61
-0.46 -7.41 -5.93 -2.33
16.37 9.46
14.43
qui.nguyenvan
Nr.:
Page 30
Scale 1 :234.3
17.08.20, 09:50
Cedrus-6 - Version 1.08
Slab on grade 17.08.20, 10:51
Beam section(s): Moments [kNm], Result combination SW+Rack Scale 1 :139.1 (7.75,6.86..33.98,27.54)
b= 0.830 m
-0.03
-0.03
-0.02
-0.02
-0.02
-0.02
-0.01
-0.01
-0.01
-0.01
-0.02
-0.02
-4.98
0.14 0.13
-0.32
-0.48
-0.52
-0.48
-0.48
-0.53
-0.40
-6.36
S8
b= 0.830 m
0.07
0.19
16.44
-4.66 -4.66
7.50 7.59
-6.37
-7.37
-8.93
-8.71
-8.67
-8.82
-7.39
-6.35
S30 4.63 4.71
b= 0.830 m
0.23
16.27
11.09
11.07
11.03
10.87
10.79
16.30
0.18
3.17
4.56
-5.45
-6.52
-7.82
-7.64
-7.60
-7.72
-6.55
-5.44
S3
b= 0.830 m 7.50 7.55
0.19
15.32
10.96
10.94
10.89
10.75
10.69
15.29
0.20
S1 S2
b= 0.830 m b= 0.830 m
-4.64 -4.64
0.19 0.19
Nr.:

Slab on grade 17.08.20, 10:51
Beam section(s): Moments [kNm], Result combination SW+Rack Scale 1 :95.9 (28.99,17.40..51.50,31.66)
-4.87
-2.24
-4.34
-3.91
-3.88
-4.27
-2.33
-0.43 -0.43
9.45
4.70
4.59
4.81
4.53
4.61
9.46
14.47
10.49
10.42
10.39
10.24
10.25
14.43
7.97 8.07
-4.98
-5.90
-7.20
-7.03
-6.99
-7.12
-5.93
-0.31 -0.33
3.01 3.08
-6.36
-7.35
-8.93
-8.71
-8.66
-8.79
-7.41
4.55 4.63
16.44
11.22
11.20
11.17
11.00
10.90
16.37
7.51 7.56
-4.64 -4.64
-6.35
-0.37
-0.50
-0.44
-0.44
-0.49
-0.46
0.18
Nr.:

Logistics Vinh Loc
4.4 Design checking
The criteria must be satisfied: under the most adverse load conditions the tensile stress in
the slab is not sufficient to cause cracking.
ft  fp  fF  fs  - ( fT  fL)
ft = maximum allowable concrete tensile stress
f p = effective prestress
fF = subgrade friction stress loss
fT = stress due to temperature differential
f L = stress due to concentrated load
fs = stress due to differential shrinkage
Two load conditions will be considered:

(A) Post load P = 6 tons on 0.75m x 0.75m inside main body of slab.
(B) Post load P = 6 tons on 0.75m x 0.75m adjacent to Movement Joint. Slab edge
modelled as free edge.
Use Finite Element Analysis Program (Cedrus) to model the loads and get Design
Bending Moment Stresses and Bearing Stresses as output
Use VSL Design Program to work out the quantity of Prestress required.
Summary of Input into FEM program as follows:
 Slab Thickness = 180mm

 Modulus of Subgrade Reaction = 35 KPa/mm
 Concrete Properties as detailed in Section 3
 Design Loads as detailed in Section 3
 Strip Width = Radius of Relative Stiffness = L
The Radius of Relative Stiffness is an estimation of the “area” of the ground that is
affected by the loads.
L = { Eh3/12(1-√2)k}0.25
H = 180mm Thick Slab
√ = 0.15 Poisson’s ratio for concrete
k = 35KPa/mm Subgrade Reaction
E = Elastic Modulus of Concrete = 29000 Mpa
L = 833mm
Logistics Vinh Loc
Output Summary From Finite Element Analysis (Cedrus)
(A) 180 thick slab – Internal Slab Loading Case

Direction Strip width Top fibre Bot fibre Top fibre Bot fibre Page
(m) Moment Moment moment Moment
KNm KNm KNm/m KNm/m
- 0.83 8.8 16.4 10.6 19.8 -
(B) 250 thick edge slab – Edge Slab Loading Case

Load Strip Top fibre Bot fibre Top fibre Bot fibre Page
Case width Moment Moment moment Moment
(m) KNm KNm KNm/m KNm/m
1 0.83 7.2 14.4 8.7 17.3 -
Design Output Summary from VSL Slab on Ground Design Program

Design Input into VSL Slab on Ground Program.
 Concrete Slab Thickness
 Concrete Properties as per Section 3
 Post-tensioning Properties as per Section 3
 Assumed unlimited load repetitions: Stress Ratio = 0.5
 Subgrade Friction Factor = 0.5
Slab length No. Strands per m 3 strand tendon

m (15.2mm diameter spacing
strand)
45- GRID LINE 1.9 1.58
X01 TO X27
43.5- GRID 1.9 1.58
LINE Y11A TO
Y22
Note: Only Internal Slab considered. The design moments are 1.4 the
internal moments . This is catered for by the edge thickening increasing the
capacity at the edge. There is no temperature gradient stresses as at the
edge the slab is free to “curl”.
VSL SLAB ON GROUND DESIGN - VERSION 1.3
PROJECT Logistic Vinh Loc
Slab Length 45 m Results Bottom Top
Slab Thickness 180 mm Fibre Fibre
Concrete Strength at 28 day f'c 30 MPa Distance to critical section 22.50 22.50 m
Subgrade Friction 0.5 P/A : Min required after subgrade friction 1.59 1.53 MPa
Design Moment for Bottom Fibre 19.8 kNm/m P/A : Min provided after subgrade friction 1.60 1.60 MPa
Design Moment for Top Fibre 10.6 kNm/m
Temperature Gradient 0.02 deg C/mm Live Load Stress tension 3.67 1.96 MPa
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion 1.08E-05 per degree C Subgrade Friction Stress tension 0.27 0.27 MPa
Poisson's Ratio 0.15 Temperature Gradient Stress tension 0.63 0.63 MPa
Required Stress Ratio 0.5 Moisture Gradient Stress: Btm-comp'n.,Top-tension 0.21 0.87 MPa
Relative Humidity : Arid=45, Interior=50, 67 % Calculated Stress Ratio 0.50 0.48
Temperate=55, Tropical/coastal=67
k1 (C & CA), wheel=1.0, post/UDL=0.9 1 Radius of Relative Stiffness 792 mm
Factor of Safety: Moisture gradient-Btm 3
Factor of Safety: Moisture gradient-Top 1
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction 35 kPa/mm
Concrete Strength at Transfer f'c 22 MPa Steel Relaxation
Live End Curvature (rads) 0.02 rads Basic Relaxation Rb 2.00%
Live End Curvature Distance 2 m k4 factor 30 years 1.41
Minimum P/A 1.00 MPa k6 factor 1.00
Tensile Strength of Concrete (at 90 days) 3.20 MPa
Concrete Density 2400 kg/m3 Shrinkage
Basic Free 56 day Shrinkage Strain 700 microstrain k1 factor figure 6.1.7.2 for long term PT losses 0.35
Elastic Modulus of Strand 195,000 MPa
Area of One Strand 140 mm2 Creep
Minimum Breaking Load of One Strand 260.7 kN Basic Creep Factor Phi.cc.b Table 6.1.8.1 3.4
Anchorage Friction 2.00 % k2 Creep factor figure 6.1.8.2A long term 0.7
Draw-in of Wedges 6 mm k3 Maturity coefficient figure 6.1.8.2B 1.45
Friction Curvature Coefficient of Duct 0.2 Design creep factor Phi.cc.b long term 3.45
Wobble Factor 0.0033 rad/m Elastic Modulus of Concrete, long term 27,691 MPa
Tendon Stressed Both Ends (Y or N) N Elastic Modulus of Concrete, transfer 23,714 MPa
Number of Strands/m 1.90 Aging Coefficient (0.6-0.9) 0.8
Mass of Strands /sq m 2.09 kg/m2
VSL SOG Design - Version 1.2 1 of 3 17/08/2020

Stress due to Moisture Gradient (differential shrinkage & creep)
"Free" Shrinkage
Layer k1 Strain k1 Strain
at 1 day at 1 day at 3 yrs at 3 yrs
Top half 0.02 14 0.45 318
Btm half 0.01 5 0.28 193
"Free" Creep
Layer k2 at Creep Strain at k2 Creep Strain
transfer Factor transfer at 3 yrs Factor at 3 yrs
Top half 0.02 0.11 9 0.51 2.53 206
Btm half 0.01 0.05 4 0.37 1.80 147
"Actual" Creep+Shrinkage
Aging Coefficient (0.6-0.9) 0.8
Mean Age Adjusted Elastic Modulus 8,878 MPa
Average Elastic Strain at Transfer 82 microstrain
Mean creep strain between transfer to 3 years 170 microstrain
Force req'd to prevent creep between transfer to 3 yrs 272 kN/m
Mean shrinkage strain between 1day to 3 years 246 microstrain
Force req'd to prevent shrinkage 1day to 3 years 393 kN/m
Actual creep+shrinkage strain up to 3 years 403 microstrain
Top fibre stress creep+shrinkage up to 3 years 0.87 MPa Tension
Bottom fibre stress creep+shrinkage up to 3 years -0.64 MPa Comp'n

Friction Loss Edge Movement mm (max.each end) Extension of Strand
Pjacking 204.4 kN Elastic shortening 1.9 320 mm
P at end of Live End Curvature 203.3 kN Elastic (subgrade Friction) 0.3
P at L/2 200.6 kN Deferred (shrinkage, creep) 11.0
Draw-in Deferred (Subgrade Friction) 0.9
Draw-in distance 37.058 m Temperature 10 degrees C 2.4
P at end of Draw_in Distance 198.7 kN TOTAL mm 16.5
PT Tendon Forces
Distance Force After Subgrade Elastic After Shrinkage Creep Relaxation Final Final
after Drawin Friction Loss Immediate Loss Loss Loss Force Stress
Friction Concrete per strand Losses per strand per strand per strand per strand Concrete
m kN kN MPa kN kN kN kN kN kN MPa
0 204.4 192.9 0.000 1.172 191.747 6.77946 6.886 5.836 172.246 1.818 0
2.25 203.3 194.0 0.027 1.164 192.874 6.77946 6.836 5.976 173.282 1.803 2.25
4.5 203.0 194.3 0.053 1.150 193.189 6.77946 6.757 6.018 173.634 1.780 4.5
6.75 202.7 194.6 0.080 1.137 193.504 6.77946 6.679 6.059 173.986 1.757 6.75
9 202.4 194.9 0.106 1.123 193.818 6.77946 6.600 6.101 174.337 1.734 9
11.25 202.1 195.2 0.133 1.110 194.131 6.77946 6.521 6.143 174.688 1.711 11.25
13.5 201.8 195.5 0.159 1.097 194.445 6.77946 6.442 6.185 175.039 1.689 13.5
15.75 201.5 195.8 0.186 1.083 194.758 6.77946 6.363 6.227 175.389 1.666 15.75
18 201.2 196.1 0.212 1.070 195.070 6.77946 6.284 6.269 175.738 1.643 18
20.25 200.9 196.4 0.239 1.056 195.382 6.77946 6.205 6.311 176.087 1.620 20.25
22.5 200.6 196.7 0.265 1.043 195.693 6.77946 6.126 6.353 176.435 1.597 22.5
24.75 200.3 197.0 0.239 1.060 195.974 6.77946 6.226 6.385 176.583 1.625 24.75
27 200.0 197.3 0.212 1.077 196.254 6.77946 6.326 6.417 176.731 1.653 27
29.25 199.7 197.6 0.186 1.094 196.534 6.77946 6.427 6.449 176.878 1.681 29.25
31.5 199.4 197.9 0.159 1.111 196.813 6.77946 6.527 6.482 177.025 1.710 31.5
33.75 199.1 198.2 0.133 1.128 197.092 6.77946 6.627 6.514 177.172 1.738 33.75
36 198.8 198.5 0.106 1.145 197.370 6.77946 6.727 6.546 177.318 1.766 36
38.25 198.5 198.5 0.080 1.160 197.338 6.77946 6.816 6.538 177.204 1.791 38.25
40.5 198.2 198.2 0.053 1.174 197.030 6.77946 6.895 6.496 176.859 1.814 40.5
42.75 197.9 197.9 0.027 1.187 196.722 6.77946 6.975 6.454 176.514 1.837 42.75
45 196.8 196.8 0.000 1.196 195.631 6.77946 7.026 6.314 175.512 1.853 45

VSL SLAB ON GROUND DESIGN - VERSION 1.3
PROJECT Logistic Vinh Loc
Slab Length 43.5 m Results Bottom Top
Slab Thickness 180 mm Fibre Fibre
Concrete Strength at 28 day f'c 30 MPa Distance to critical section 21.75 21.75 m
Subgrade Friction 0.5 P/A : Min required after subgrade friction 1.59 1.53 MPa
Design Moment for Bottom Fibre 19.8 kNm/m P/A : Min provided after subgrade friction 1.60 1.60 MPa
Design Moment for Top Fibre 10.6 kNm/m
Temperature Gradient 0.02 deg C/mm Live Load Stress tension 3.67 1.96 MPa
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion 1.08E-05 per degree C Subgrade Friction Stress tension 0.26 0.26 MPa
Poisson's Ratio 0.15 Temperature Gradient Stress tension 0.63 0.63 MPa
Required Stress Ratio 0.5 Moisture Gradient Stress: Btm-comp'n.,Top-tension 0.21 0.87 MPa
Relative Humidity : Arid=45, Interior=50, 67 % Calculated Stress Ratio 0.49 0.47
Temperate=55, Tropical/coastal=67
k1 (C & CA), wheel=1.0, post/UDL=0.9 1 Radius of Relative Stiffness 792 mm
Factor of Safety: Moisture gradient-Btm 3
Factor of Safety: Moisture gradient-Top 1
Modulus of Subgrade Reaction 35 kPa/mm
Concrete Strength at Transfer f'c 22 MPa Steel Relaxation
Live End Curvature (rads) 0.02 rads Basic Relaxation Rb 2.00%
Live End Curvature Distance 2 m k4 factor 30 years 1.41
Minimum P/A 1.00 MPa k6 factor 1.00
Tensile Strength of Concrete (at 90 days) 3.20 MPa
Concrete Density 2400 kg/m3 Shrinkage
Basic Free 56 day Shrinkage Strain 700 microstrain k1 factor figure 6.1.7.2 for long term PT losses 0.35
Elastic Modulus of Strand 195,000 MPa
Area of One Strand 140 mm2 Creep
Minimum Breaking Load of One Strand 260.7 kN Basic Creep Factor Phi.cc.b Table 6.1.8.1 3.4
Anchorage Friction 2.00 % k2 Creep factor figure 6.1.8.2A long term 0.7
Draw-in of Wedges 6 mm k3 Maturity coefficient figure 6.1.8.2B 1.45
Friction Curvature Coefficient of Duct 0.2 Design creep factor Phi.cc.b long term 3.45
Wobble Factor 0.0033 rad/m Elastic Modulus of Concrete, long term 27,691 MPa
Tendon Stressed Both Ends (Y or N) N Elastic Modulus of Concrete, transfer 23,714 MPa
Number of Strands/m 1.90 Aging Coefficient (0.6-0.9) 0.8
Mass of Strands /sq m 2.09 kg/m2

Stress due to Moisture Gradient (differential shrinkage & creep)
"Free" Shrinkage
Layer k1 Strain k1 Strain
at 1 day at 1 day at 3 yrs at 3 yrs
Top half 0.02 14 0.45 318
Btm half 0.01 5 0.28 193
"Free" Creep
Layer k2 at Creep Strain at k2 Creep Strain
transfer Factor transfer at 3 yrs Factor at 3 yrs
Top half 0.02 0.11 9 0.51 2.53 207
Btm half 0.01 0.05 4 0.37 1.80 147
"Actual" Creep+Shrinkage
Aging Coefficient (0.6-0.9) 0.8
Mean Age Adjusted Elastic Modulus 8,878 MPa
Average Elastic Strain at Transfer 82 microstrain
Mean creep strain between transfer to 3 years 171 microstrain
Force req'd to prevent creep between transfer to 3 yrs 273 kN/m
Mean shrinkage strain between 1day to 3 years 246 microstrain
Force req'd to prevent shrinkage 1day to 3 years 393 kN/m
Actual creep+shrinkage strain up to 3 years 404 microstrain
Top fibre stress creep+shrinkage up to 3 years 0.87 MPa Tension
Bottom fibre stress creep+shrinkage up to 3 years -0.64 MPa Comp'n

Friction Loss Edge Movement mm (max.each end) Extension of Strand
Pjacking 204.4 kN Elastic shortening 1.8 309 mm
P at end of Live End Curvature 203.3 kN Elastic (subgrade Friction) 0.2
P at L/2 200.7 kN Deferred (shrinkage, creep) 10.6
Draw-in Deferred (Subgrade Friction) 0.8
Draw-in distance 37.054 m Temperature 10 degrees C 2.3
P at end of Draw_in Distance 198.7 kN TOTAL mm 15.9
PT Tendon Forces
Distance Force After Subgrade Elastic After Shrinkage Creep Relaxation Final Final
after Drawin Friction Loss Immediate Loss Loss Loss Force Stress
Friction Concrete per strand Losses per strand per strand per strand per strand Concrete
m kN kN MPa kN kN kN kN kN kN MPa
0 204.4 192.9 0.000 1.172 191.749 6.77946 6.886 5.836 172.247 1.818 0
2.175 203.3 194.0 0.026 1.164 192.864 6.77946 6.839 5.975 173.271 1.803 2.175
4.35 203.0 194.3 0.051 1.151 193.169 6.77946 6.763 6.015 173.612 1.781 4.35
6.525 202.7 194.6 0.077 1.138 193.473 6.77946 6.686 6.055 173.952 1.759 6.525
8.7 202.4 194.9 0.103 1.125 193.777 6.77946 6.610 6.096 174.292 1.737 8.7
10.875 202.1 195.2 0.128 1.112 194.080 6.77946 6.534 6.136 174.631 1.715 10.875
13.05 201.8 195.5 0.154 1.099 194.383 6.77946 6.458 6.177 174.970 1.693 13.05
15.225 201.5 195.8 0.179 1.086 194.686 6.77946 6.381 6.217 175.308 1.671 15.225
17.4 201.2 196.1 0.205 1.073 194.988 6.77946 6.305 6.258 175.646 1.649 17.4
19.575 201.0 196.3 0.231 1.060 195.290 6.77946 6.228 6.299 175.983 1.627 19.575
21.75 200.7 196.6 0.256 1.047 195.591 6.77946 6.152 6.339 176.320 1.605 21.75
23.925 200.4 196.9 0.231 1.064 195.862 6.77946 6.249 6.370 176.463 1.632 23.925
26.1 200.1 197.2 0.205 1.080 196.133 6.77946 6.346 6.401 176.606 1.659 26.1
28.275 199.8 197.5 0.179 1.097 196.404 6.77946 6.443 6.432 176.749 1.686 28.275
30.45 199.5 197.8 0.154 1.113 196.674 6.77946 6.540 6.463 176.891 1.713 30.45
32.625 199.2 198.1 0.128 1.130 196.943 6.77946 6.637 6.494 177.033 1.741 32.625
34.8 199.0 198.4 0.103 1.146 197.213 6.77946 6.734 6.525 177.174 1.768 34.8
36.975 198.7 198.6 0.077 1.163 197.482 6.77946 6.830 6.556 177.316 1.795 36.975
39.15 198.4 198.4 0.051 1.176 197.204 6.77946 6.908 6.518 176.999 1.817 39.15
41.325 198.1 198.1 0.026 1.189 196.907 6.77946 6.984 6.477 176.666 1.839 41.325
43.5 197.0 197.0 0.000 1.197 195.825 6.77946 7.033 6.338 175.674 1.854 43.5

Logistics Vinh Loc
APPENDIX A
Assessment of equivalent Subgrade reaction
Concrete industrial ground floors
Materials closer to the ground surface have more effect on California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests are sometimes used to
the measured subgrade properties than those at larger depths. assess soils performance although the results are less repre-
The near-to-surface property of the subgrade that is used in sentative of long-term potential soils performance. Figure
the thickness design of a slab is the modulus of subgrade 6.2 shows the approximate relationship between CBR and k
reaction, k. values. The CBR is the ratio of resistance to penetration
developed by a subgrade soil to that developed by a
Elastic k values do not reflect long-term settlements due to
specimen of standard crushed rock. The test was developed
soil consolidation under loading. However, low values of k
as a laboratory test, but where used, determinations of CBR
are indicative of plastic behaviour of the near-to-surface
should be carried out in situ.
soils. Checks should be made on the likely deformation of
the subgrade, particularly for soils with low k values.
MODULUS OF SUBGRADE REACTION, /t-N/mm3

0.22
To estimate long-term or differential settlements a geo- 0.20
technical engineer should be consulted with regard to 0.18
appropriate site investigation, soil testing and interpretation. 0.16
6.3.2 Soil surveys 0.14
0.12
A soil survey must address the above design considerations
0.10
and a geotechnical engineer should interpret the results. The
responsibility for the scope, commissioning and execution of 0.08
the soil survey should be clearly established. 0.06
0.04
Information on site investigations and methods of testing
soils are given in BS 5930, Code of practice for site investi- 0.02
gations (29), and BS 1377, Methods of test for soils for civil 0
2 3 4 5 6 7 8910 15 20 30 40 5060
engineering purposes (30).
CBR - %
For floor construction, it is strongly recommended that Figure 6.2: Relationship between modulus of subgrade reaction and in situ
values of k are determined from a plate-loading test. Larger CBR.
plates give greater accuracy and it is preferable to use a plate
of the British Standard diameter of 750 mm. If other loading In some cases, reliance will be placed on a soil-type assess-
plate diameters are used it is necessary to employ a con- ment of k. Table 6.2 gives an indication of typical values of
version factor, as shown in Figure 6.1. The minimum size k related to soil type.
plate used should be 300 mm. Values of k should be read at 6.3.3 Subgrade construction
a fixed settlement of 1.25 mm.
Subgrades may be either natural ground or some form of fill.
They should provide uniform support and so hard and soft
spots should be removed; the excavated material should be
CONVERSION FACTOR TO STANDARD 750 mm DIAMETER PLATE
3.0
replaced with material placed and compacted to achieve
properties as nearly as possible conforming to the sur-
rounding soil.
2.5
Table 6.2: Typical values of modulus of subgrade reaction k
related to soil type.
2.0 k value (N/mm3)

Soil type
Lower value Upper value
1.5 Fine or slightly compacted sand 0.015 0.03

Well compacted sand 0.05 0.10
Very well compacted sand 0.10 0.15
1.0
Loam or clay (moist) 0.03 0.06
Loam or clay (dry ) 0.08 0.10
Clay with sand 0.08 0.10
0.5
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Crushed stone with sand 0.10 0.15
DIAMETER OF BEARING PLATE USED - mm Coarse crushed stone 0.20 0.25
Well compacted crushed stone 0.20 0.30
Figure 6.1: Conversion factors for different loading plate sizes.
Note: The k value obtained with the plate used should be divided by the Note: Cold store construction must take into account both the sub-
appropriate conversion factor on the y-axis.
grade conditions and the compressibility of the insulant layer .
34
Logistics Vinh Loc
APPENDIX B
Bearing Stress Output
Slab on grade 17.08.20, 10:36
Area reactions [kN/m 2], Equidistance: 2.00 [kN/m 2], Reference line: 0.00 Scale 1 :233.7
Result combination SW+Rack
20.00 20.0022.00 26.00

34.00 30.00
38.00
46.00
58.00
66.00 66.00 66.00
68.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 68.00
12.00 72.00 72.00 70.00
10.00
72.00 72.00 72.00
9.58
70.00
14.00 64.00 70.00 70.00
18.00 16.00 68.00 68.00 68.00
20.00 22.00
24.00 60.00
32.00
38.00 40.00
60.00 24.0028.00
66.00 66.00 66.00 20.00
68.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 70.00 68.00 16.0018.00 14.00
72.00 10.00
70.00
72.00 73.45
72.00 72.00
70.00
70.00
68.00 68.00
40.00
30.00 26.00
12.00
14.00
Nr.:

Logistics Vinh Loc
APPENDIX C
Racks layout and racks load

Design Calculation of PT-SOG (LOGISTICS VINH LOC) - BASE SLAB 180.250mm

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Design Calculation of PT-SOG (LOGISTICS VINH LOC) - BASE SLAB 180.250mm

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Logistics Vinh Loc

Design Calculation Note

A 17/08/2020 2nd issued NVQ NVQ

LOGISTICS VINH LOC

DESIGN CALCULATION OF POST-TENSIONED SLAB ON GRADE –

VSL VIETNAM CO., LTD.

4.2 Load cases

4.3 Design moment

4.4 Design checking

APPENDIX A : Assessment of equivalent uniform soil layer –

APPENDIX B : Bearing Stresses Output

2.1 Reference document and Code

2.2 Design Model

3. DESIGN CHECKING ASSUMPTIONS

High strength low relaxation seven wire strand class 1860

Ground/Slab Friction Factor

Structure Scale 1 :236.2

C:\QUI\2020-CUBDATA\VNDE-20038-Logistics Vinh Loc-Slab on grade.C6P

4.2 Load cases

Loading SW: Self weight Scale 1 :233.7

C:\QUI\2020-CUBDATA\VNDE-20038-Logistics Vinh Loc-Slab on grade.C6P

Loading LC2: Rack Scale 1 :233.7

F162 F163 F164 F165 F166 F167 F168

C:\QUI\2020-CUBDATA\VNDE-20038-Logistics Vinh Loc-Slab on grade.C6P

Loading LC2: Rack Scale 1 :233.7

C:\QUI\2020-CUBDATA\VNDE-20038-Logistics Vinh Loc-Slab on grade.C6P

4.3 Design moment

0.19 0.23 -0.03

-5.45 -6.37 -0.32

15.32 16.27 -0.02 0.00

-6.52 -7.37 -0.48 -0.02 0.00

C:\QUI\2020-CUBDATA\VNDE-20038-Logistics Vinh Loc-Slab on grade.C6P

-6.36 -4.98 -4.87

0.20 0.18 16.44 9.45

-7.35 -5.90 -2.24

-0.50 -8.93 -7.20 -4.34

-0.44 -8.71 -7.03 -3.91

C:\QUI\2020-CUBDATA\VNDE-20038-Logistics Vinh Loc-Slab on grade.C6P

C:\QUI\2020-CUBDATA\VNDE-20038-Logistics Vinh Loc-Slab on grade.C6P

4.4 Design checking

Two load conditions will be considered:

Summary of Input into FEM program as follows:

 Slab Thickness = 180mm

Output Summary From Finite Element Analysis (Cedrus)

(A) 180 thick slab – Internal Slab Loading Case

- 0.83 8.8 16.4 10.6 19.8 -

(B) 250 thick edge slab – Edge Slab Loading Case

1 0.83 7.2 14.4 8.7 17.3 -

Design Output Summary from VSL Slab on Ground Design Program

Slab length No. Strands per m 3 strand tendon

VSL SOG Design - Version 1.2 1 of 3 17/08/2020

VSL SOG Design - Version 1.2 2 of 3 17/08/2020

VSL SOG Design - Version 1.2 3 of 3 17/08/2020

VSL SOG Design - Version 1.2 1 of 3 17/08/2020

VSL SOG Design - Version 1.2 2 of 3 17/08/2020

VSL SOG Design - Version 1.2 3 of 3 17/08/2020

MODULUS OF SUBGRADE REACTION, /t-N/mm3

To estimate long-term or differential settlements a geo- 0.20

technical engineer should be consulted with regard to 0.18

appropriate site investigation, soil testing and interpretation. 0.16

6.3.2 Soil surveys 0.14

the soil survey should be clearly established. 0.06

2.0 k value (N/mm3)