Wind Load Sheet

PROJECT: DESIGN OF 8M POLE WITH ARM
TITLE: DESIGN REPORT
CLIENT:- CMS COMPUTERS LTD.

70, Lake Road, Kaycee Industries
Compound,Behind Hind Rectifier
Company,Sonapur, Bhandup West,
Mumbai, Maharashtra 400078
CONSULTANT:- CAPSTONE CONSULTANT PVT.LTD.
Civil & Structural Consultants
203 Elecon Chamber
Near Sakinaka Telephone Exchange
Kurla Andheri Road Andheri (E), Mumbai - 400 072
R0 12/29/2018 FOR APPROVAL SB DG RA

REV DATE DESCRIPTION DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED
Wind load calculation as per IS 875 (Part -3) and NBC 104
1 Design wind pressure
Select "Wind region (as per NBC 104)" The mountains
Basic wind speed (VB) 47 m/s
Select "Terrain options" Category 2
Class of Structure General Buildings
Probability factor,risk coeff. (k1) 1
Upwind Slope (θ) <3
Topography Factor (k3) 1
Is the region under cyclone (Yes/No)? No
Importance factor for cyclonic region (K 4) 1
Select "Structure type" Rectangular or traingular or square
Wind directionality factor (Kd) 0.9
Area averaging factor (Ka) 0.9
Select "Open or closed structure" Closed
Combination factor (Kc) 0.9
Design Wind
Terrain, Ht factor (K 2) Wind pressure pressure (Pd),
S.N Height Design wind speed (Vz)
(Pz), KN/m2 KN/m2
1 10 1 47 1.33 0.966
Vz = K1*K2*K3*K4*Vb
Pz = 0.6*Vz^2
Pd = Pz*Ka*Kd*Kc
2 Wind load on Structure

Percentage of opening area >20
Internal pressure Coeff. (Cpi+) 0.7
Internal pressure Coeff. (Cpi-) -0.7
Height of structure, h 2.25
width of building (Lower horizontal dim.), w 6.25
Length of building, l 14.40
h/w 0.36
l/w 2.30
Pressure Coefficients
Wind angle Cpe-Cpi
Cpe Cpi
EF/EG GH/FH H L
0 -0.4 -0.4 0.5 -0.9 -0.9
-0.4 -0.4 -0.5 0.1 0.1
90 -0.7 -0.6 0.5 -1.2 -1.1
-0.7 -0.6 -0.5 -0.2 -0.1
8 Meter Pole Design
DESIGN REPORT
2) Design of 8M pole with arm as per BS EN 40-3-3:2013
For reinforced openings in regular octagonal c/s,the strength of sections shall be calculated
from the following formulae for pole type 1 as per code:
Design steps :
Dia. of pole at top of door opening dia. 240 mm

Mean Radius R 117.50 mm
Thickness of member t 5.00 mm
Yield strength of materials fy 250.00 N/mm2
Elastic modulus of steel E 210000.00 N/mm2 (Table:3,EN:40-3-3)
є 0.81 (Ref -CL:5.6.2.1,EN:40-3-3)
Partial Material factor ϒm 1.15 (Ref- Table 2,EN:40-3-3)
Effective Length of door opening L 396.78 mm (Ref -CL:5.6.2.2,EN:40-3-3)
Corner radius of door opening N 7.50 mm
Factor for Octagonal c/s F 2.16 (Ref -CL:5.6.2.2,EN:40-3-3)
Half angle of door opening ө 23.00 deg (Ref: Fig 5,EN:40-3-3)
Door reinforcement (plate) L 60.00 mm Provided door Reinforcement
(Thickness of member) T 5.00 mm
Radius of gyration of door reinforcement v 17.32 mm (Ref-CL:5.6.2.3.2,EN:40-3-3)
Distance from centroid of actual door

mox 107.00 mm (Ref-CL:5.6.2.3.2,EN:40-3-3)
reinforcement to the x-x axis
Distance from centroid of actual door

moy 52.50 mm (Ref-CL:5.6.2.3.2,EN:40-3-3)
reinforcement to the y-y axis
Distance from center of column wall at the

edge of opening to the x-x axis mx 115.00 mm (Ref-CL:5.6.2.3.2,EN:40-3-3)
Distance from center of column wall at the my 50.00 mm

edge of opening to the y-y axis (Ref-CL:5.6.2.3.2,EN:40-3-3)
Bx 0.48 (Ref-CL:5.6.2.3.2,EN:40-3-3)
By 0.54
(Ref-CL:5.6.2.3.2,EN:40-3-3)
(From graph) ᶲ1 1.00
ᶲ6 0.94
Plastic modulus of section including effective

door reinforcement, about the plastic neutral Zpnr 304995.71 mm3
axis n-n
Plastic modulus of section including effective

door reinforcement, about the plastic neutral Zpyr 317596.34 mm3
axis y-y
8 Meter Pole Design
DESIGN REPORT
Bending moment of resistance in X-Direction :

Mux 62353 Nm
62.35 kNm
Bending moment of resistance in Y-Direction :

Muy 30516 Nm
30.52 kNm
Acceptance of design for strength :
Mx = 27.265 KNm From staad For load case as per Tender document (load case - 4 )
My = 1.368 KNm From staad For load case as per Tender document (load case - 4 )
(Mx/Mux)+(My/Muy) < 1 0.482 < 1 Safe

(Mx/Muy)+(My/Mux) < 1 0.915 < 1 Safe
As per BS EN 40-3-3:2013 :- Figure 6 a) Type 1
As per BS EN 40-3-3:2013 :- Figure 7

8 Meter Pole Design
DESIGN REPORT
Support reactions from staad :-
Using for design of base plate at pedestal top :-
Horizontal Vertical Horizontal Moment

Node L/C
Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kNm My kNm Mz kNm
1*DL 0 12.034 0 0 0 1.19
1
1*DL + 1*WL 0 12.034 -5.43 -21.812 1.446 1.19
Using for design of pole at pedestal top :-

Node L/C
1.15*DL 0 13.84 0 0 0 1.368
1
1.15*DL + 1.25*WL 0 13.84 -6.787 -27.265 1.808 1.368
Using for design of foundation at base of footing :-

Node L/C
1*DL 0 15.922 0 0 0 1.19
3
1*DL + 1*WL 0 15.922 -5.43 -29.957 1.446 1.19
Acceptance of design for deflection :-
a) Horizontal deflection
0.04 (h + w) As per BS EN 40-3-3:2013, Table- 4
0.04 ( 8 + 0.15) Ref -CL:6.5.1,EN:40-3-3
Where , h = height of pole

w = Bracket projection
Allowable deflection of pole - 0.04*(h + w) 326 mm

Actual deflection from staad is = 101.019 - 81.183 = 19.836 mm
For load combination 1*DL + 1*WL
Safe in horizontal deflection
b) Vertical deflection
0.025w As per BS EN 40-3-3:2013, Cl:6.5.2
Where , w = Bracket projection
Allowable deflection of pole - 0.04*(h + w) 326 mm

Actual deflection from staad is = 101.019 - 81.183 = 19.836 mm
For load combination 1*DL
Safe in vertical deflection
8 Meter Pole Design
DESIGN REPORT
3) Anchor Bolt and base plate design for VMS gantry of 22m span
Designing for the worst load combination Note:
Moment about the X axis 21.81 kNm (From staad software)
Moment about the Z axis 1.19 kNm (From staad software)
Compression/Tension Force on the 12.03 kN (From staad software)

column (+ve is compression)
Shear in X direction 0.00 kN (From staad software)
Shear in Z direction 5.43 kN (From staad software)
3.1) Bolt Design

Nos of anchor bolt 4.00 Nos
Bolt Line 2.0 Nos
Max tension in achor bolt 29.8 kN
Max shear in anchor bolt 1.4 kN
Using M 24 bolts 24 mm dia As per tender document
Allowable Tension 115.3 kN

120*(640/235) is the allowable stress in
tension EN 8 grade
Allowable Shear 76.8 kN 80*(640/235) is the allowable

stress in tension EN 8 grade
Anchor Bolt Length 750 mm
Checking for shear plus tension 0.277 1.4 OK
3.2) Base Plate Design

a) Assuming the following size for the base plate:
Length (L) 500 mm

Width (B) 500 mm
Thickness (t) 16 mm
Area of plate (A) 250000 mm2
8 Meter Pole Design
DESIGN REPORT
C/C Spacing(S) along Depth C/C Spacing(S) along Extra Side

width
350 350 60
Pedestal edge dist(K) 125 125
Pedestal Size 600 600
D B
D B
Column size 250 250
prvided edge for bolt 50 50
requried edge 48 48
ok ok
Required space -2 -2 Value should be zero or -ve
b) Resultant Loads on the base plate
Axial Load (P) 12.0 kN
21.8 kNm
Bending Moment (about X axis),Mx
1.2 kNm
Bending Moment (about Z axis),Mz
Eccentricity ex = Mx / P 1813 mm
Eccentricity ez = Mz / P 99 mm
Stress due to Axial Force (σa) = P/A 0.05 MPa
Max Stress due to bending about X axis =

6Mx / BL2 1.05 MPa
Max Stress due to bending about Z axis =

6Mz / B2L 0.06 MPa
8 Meter Pole Design
DESIGN REPORT
Stress due to Axial force = P/A
2
6M/BL
2
6M/BL
Stress due to Bending Moment
2
6M/BL - P/A
2
P/A+ 6M/BL
Resultant Stress
c) Calculating base plate bending moments for bending about X axis:

Maximum bending moment will occur at the face of the column
Cantilever length 120.0 mm
Moment due to Axial stress 0.35 kNm / m
7.5 kNm / m
Moment due to stress developed by Mx
Total Moment 7.9 kNm / m
Bending stress σbx 184.8 MPa
d) Calculating base plate bending moments for bending about Y axis:

0.4 kNm / m
Moment due to stress developed by My
Bending stress σby 9.6 MPa
σbx + σby = 194.4

Allowale bending stress = 246 OK
e) Checking for bearing stress in concrete pedestal

Max bearing stress = 1.15 MPa
Grade of concrete Fck = 25 Mpa
Allowable bearing stress = 0.25 * fck 6.25 MPa Ok
8 Meter Pole Design
DESIGN REPORT
4) Staad output for frequency analysis
PAGE NO. 1
_x0002_
****************************************************
* *
* STAAD.Pro V8i SELECTseries5 *
* Version 20.07.10.64 *
* Proprietary Program of *
* Bentley Systems, Inc. *
* Date= DEC 28, 2018 *
* Time= 18:20:10 *
* *
* USER ID: *
****************************************************
1. STAAD SPACE
INPUT FILE: 8 m pole for frequency R0.STD
2. START JOB INFORMATION
3. ENGINEER DATE 30-MAY-17
4. END JOB INFORMATION
5. INPUT WIDTH 79
6. UNIT METER KN
7. JOINT COORDINATES
8. 1 0 0 0; 2 0 8 0; 3 0 -1.5 0; 4 0 4 0; 5 0 2 0; 6 0 6 0; 7 3 6 0; 8 3 8 0
9. MEMBER INCIDENCES
10. 1 6 2; 2 3 1; 3 5 4; 4 1 5; 5 4 6; 6 6 7; 7 2 8
11. DEFINE MATERIAL START
12. ISOTROPIC STEEL
13. E 2.05E+008
14. POISSON 0.3
15. DENSITY 76.8195
16. ALPHA 1.2E-005
17. DAMP 0.03
18. TYPE STEEL
19. STRENGTH FY 253200 FU 407800 RY 1.5 RT 1.2
20. ISOTROPIC CONCRETE
21. E 2.17185E+007
22. POISSON 0.17
23. DENSITY 23.5616
24. ALPHA 1E-005
25. DAMP 0.05
26. TYPE CONCRETE
27. STRENGTH FCU 27579
28. END DEFINE MATERIAL
29. ***********************************************
30. MEMBER PROPERTY AMERICAN
31. 2 PRIS YD 0.5 ZD 0.5
32. MEMBER PROPERTY TATASTRUCTURA
33. 6 7 TABLE ST 50X50X2.6SHS
34. **************
36. 4 PRIS OCT STA 0.25 END 0.21875 THI 0.005
8 Meter Pole Design
DESIGN REPORT
STAAD SPACE -- PAGE NO. 2

40. **********************************************
41. CONSTANTS
42. MATERIAL CONCRETE MEMB 2
43. MATERIAL STEEL MEMB 1 3 TO 7
44. SUPPORTS
45. 3 FIXED
46. ***************************
47. LOAD 1 FREQUENCY CALCULATION
48. SELFWEIGHT Z 1
49. MODAL CALCULATION REQUESTED
50. PERFORM ANALYSIS
_x0002_
P R O B L E M S T A T I S T I C S
-----------------------------------
NUMBER OF JOINTS 8 NUMBER OF MEMBERS 7

NUMBER OF PLATES 0 NUMBER OF SOLIDS 0
NUMBER OF SURFACES 0 NUMBER OF SUPPORTS 1
SOLVER USED IS THE OUT-OF-CORE BASIC SOLVER
ORIGINAL/FINAL BAND-WIDTH= 6/ 6/ 36 DOF

TOTAL PRIMARY LOAD CASES = 1, TOTAL DEGREES OF FREEDOM = 42
TOTAL LOAD COMBINATION CASES = 0 SO FAR.
SIZE OF STIFFNESS MATRIX = 2 DOUBLE KILO-WORDS
REQRD/AVAIL. DISK SPACE = 12.0/ 29980.3 MB
NUMBER OF MODES REQUESTED = 6

NUMBER OF EXISTING MASSES IN THE MODEL = 7
NUMBER OF MODES THAT WILL BE USED = 6
*** _x0003_EIGENSOLUTION_x0004_: SUBSPACE METHOD ***
CALCULATED FREQUENCIES FOR LOAD CASE 1
MODE FREQUENCY(CYCLES/SEC) PERIOD(SEC) ACCURACY

1 3.055 0.32737 4.629E-16
2 4.160 0.24036 1.664E-16
3 4.668 0.21421 7.929E-16
4 16.943 0.05902 9.245E-14
5 40.465 0.02471 1.096E-12
6 68.086 0.01469 4.097E-11
8 Meter Pole Design
DESIGN REPORT
MODAL WEIGHT (MODAL MASS TIMES g) IN KN GENERALIZED
MODE X Y Z WEIGHT
1 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 8.191943E-01 1.271641E-01

2 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 7.807990E-03 7.521317E-02
3 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 3.572822E-01 1.841273E-01
4 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 5.332702E-01 5.705344E-01
5 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 6.950049E-01 1.124709E+00
6 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 2.773471E+00 1.947732E+00
_x0003_PARTICIPATION FACTORS_x0004_
MASS PARTICIPATION FACTORS IN PERCENT
--------------------------------------
MODE X Y Z SUMM-X SUMM-Y SUMM-Z
1 0.00 0.00 12.60 0.000 0.000 12.605

2 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.000 0.000 12.725
3 0.00 0.00 5.50 0.000 0.000 18.223
4 0.00 0.00 8.21 0.000 0.000 26.428
5 0.00 0.00 10.69 0.000 0.000 37.122
6 0.00 0.00 42.68 0.000 0.000 79.797
C O M P O S I T E D A M P I N G SUMMARY
MODE STRAIN ENERGY DAMP*ENERGY COMPOSITE DAMPING

1 1.363752E-02 4.147308E-04 0.0304
2 1.496335E-02 4.489490E-04 0.0300
3 4.611936E-02 1.398501E-03 0.0303
4 1.882512E+00 5.856063E-02 0.0311
5 2.116701E+01 6.888056E-01 0.0325
6 1.037784E+02 4.263429E+00 0.0411
51. FINISH
*********** END OF THE STAAD.Pro RUN ***********
**** DATE= DEC 28,2018 TIME= 18:20:15 ****
************************************************************
* For technical assistance on STAAD.Pro, please visit *
* http://selectservices.bentley.com/en-US/ *
* *
* Details about additional assistance from *
* Bentley and Partners can be found at program menu *
* Help->Technical Support *
* *
* Copyright (c) 1997-2014 Bentley Systems, Inc.
* http://www.bentley.com *
************************************************************
8 Meter Pole Design
DESIGN REPORT
5) Staad analysis output for pole design

PAGE NO. 1
_x0002_
****************************************************
* *
* STAAD.Pro V8i SELECTseries5 *
* Version 20.07.10.64 *
* Proprietary Program of *
* Bentley Systems, Inc. *
* Date= DEC 29, 2018 *
* Time= 11: 7:50 *
* *
* USER ID: *
****************************************************
1. STAAD SPACE
INPUT FILE: 8 m pole design R0.STD
2. START JOB INFORMATION
3. ENGINEER DATE 30-MAY-17
4. END JOB INFORMATION
5. INPUT WIDTH 79
6. UNIT METER KN
7. JOINT COORDINATES
8. 1 0 0 0; 2 0 8 0; 3 0 -1.5 0; 4 0 4 0; 5 0 2 0; 6 0 6 0; 7 3 6 0; 8 3 8 0
9. MEMBER INCIDENCES
10. 1 6 2; 2 3 1; 3 5 4; 4 1 5; 5 4 6; 6 6 7; 7 2 8
11. DEFINE MATERIAL START
12. ISOTROPIC STEEL
13. E 2.05E+008
14. POISSON 0.3
15. DENSITY 76.8195
16. ALPHA 1.2E-005
17. DAMP 0.03
18. TYPE STEEL
19. STRENGTH FY 253200 FU 407800 RY 1.5 RT 1.2
20. ISOTROPIC CONCRETE
21. E 2.17185E+007
22. POISSON 0.17
23. DENSITY 23.5616
24. ALPHA 1E-005
25. DAMP 0.05
26. TYPE CONCRETE
27. STRENGTH FCU 27579
28. END DEFINE MATERIAL
29. ***********************************************
30. MEMBER PROPERTY AMERICAN
31. 2 PRIS YD 0.5 ZD 0.5
8 Meter Pole Design
DESIGN REPORT
33. 6 7 TABLE ST 100X100X4.0SHS
34. **********************************************

40. **********************************************
41. CONSTANTS
42. MATERIAL CONCRETE MEMB 2
43. MATERIAL STEEL MEMB 1 3 TO 7
44. SUPPORTS
45. 1 FIXED
46. DEFINE WIND LOAD
_x0002_
*** NOTE: If any floor diaphragm is present in the model Wind Load definition
should be defined after Floor Diaphragm definition. Otherwise wind
load generation may be unsuccessful during analysis.
47. TYPE 1 WIND 1

48. INT 2.067 HEIG 8
49. EXP 1 JOINT 1 2 4 TO 6
50. TYPE 2 WIND 2
51. INT 1.34 HEIG 8
52. EXP 1 JOINT 2 6 TO 8
53. ***************************
54. LOAD 1 LOADTYPE NONE TITLE DEAD
55. SELFWEIGHT Y -1
56. JOINT LOAD
57. 8 FY -0.015
58. 7 FY -0.037
59. MEMBER LOAD
60. 1 3 TO 5 UNI GY -0.023
61. 4 CON GY -0.412 1.2 0
62. *******************************
63. LOAD 2 LOADTYPE WIND TITLE WL+Z
64. JOINT LOAD
65. 7 FZ 0.06
66. 8 FZ 0.02
67. MEMBER LOAD
68. 4 CON Z 0.36 1.2 0
69. 1 3 TO 5 UNI Z 0.032
70. WIND LOAD Z 1.17 TYPE 1 XR 0 1 YR 0 8 OPEN
71. WIND LOAD Z 1 TYPE 2 XR 0 3 YR 6 6 OPEN
72. WIND LOAD Z 1 TYPE 2 XR 0 3 YR 8 8 OPEN
73. **************************
74. LOAD COMB 3 1.15X(D.L)
75. 1 1.15
8 Meter Pole Design
DESIGN REPORT
76. LOAD COMB 4 (1.15DL+1.25WL+X)
77. 1 1.15 2 1.25
78. LOAD COMB 5 1.5X(D.L)
79. 1 1.5
80. LOAD COMB 6 1.5X(DL+WL+X)
81. 1 1.5 2 1.5

82. LOAD COMB 7 1X(DL)
83. 1 1.0
84. LOAD COMB 8 1X(DL+WL+X)
85. 1 1.0 2 1.0
86. ******************************
87. PERFORM ANALYSIS PRINT ALL
_x0002_
P R O B L E M S T A T I S T I C S
-----------------------------------
NUMBER OF JOINTS 8 NUMBER OF MEMBERS 7

NUMBER OF PLATES 0 NUMBER OF SOLIDS 0
NUMBER OF SURFACES 0 NUMBER OF SUPPORTS 1
SOLVER USED IS THE OUT-OF-CORE BASIC SOLVER
ORIGINAL/FINAL BAND-WIDTH= 6/ 6/ 42 DOF

TOTAL PRIMARY LOAD CASES = 2, TOTAL DEGREES OF FREEDOM = 42
TOTAL LOAD COMBINATION CASES = 6 SO FAR.
SIZE OF STIFFNESS MATRIX = 2 DOUBLE KILO-WORDS
REQRD/AVAIL. DISK SPACE = 12.0/ 29971.2 MB
LOADING 1 LOADTYPE NONE TITLE DEAD

-----------
SELFWEIGHT Y -1.000
ACTUAL WEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE = 11.386 KN
JOINT LOAD - UNIT KN METE
JOINT FORCE-X FORCE-Y FORCE-Z MOM-X MOM-Y MOM-Z
8 0.00 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

7 0.00 -0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MEMBER LOAD - UNIT KN METE

8 Meter Pole Design
DESIGN REPORT
MEMBER UDL L1 L2 CON L LIN1 LIN2
1 -0.0230 GY 0.00 2.00

3 -0.0230 GY 0.00 2.00
4 -0.0230 GY 0.00 2.00
5 -0.0230 GY 0.00 2.00
4 -0.412 GY 1.20 CONCENTRATED MOMENT
LOADING 2 LOADTYPE WIND TITLE WL+Z
-----------
JOINT LOAD - UNIT KN METE
7 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00

8 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 0.360 Z 1.20 CONCENTRATED MOMENT

1 0.0320 Z 0.00 2.00
3 0.0320 Z 0.00 2.00
4 0.0320 Z 0.00 2.00
5 0.0320 Z 0.00 2.00
1 0.3779 PZ 0.00 2.00

3 0.5290 PZ 0.00 2.00
4 0.6046 PZ 0.00 2.00
5 0.4534 PZ 0.00 2.00
6 0.1340 PZ 0.00 3.00
7 0.1340 PZ 0.00 3.00

8 Meter Pole Design
DESIGN REPORT
FOR LOADING - 1
APPLIED JOINT EQUIVALENT LOADS
1 0.00000E+00-4.91833E+00 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00
2 0.00000E+00-3.54036E-01 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00-8.61339E-02
3 0.00000E+00-4.41780E+00 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00
4 0.00000E+00-5.11566E-01 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00
5 0.00000E+00-8.32011E-01 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00
6 0.00000E+00-6.04188E-01 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00-8.61339E-02
7 0.00000E+00-2.09268E-01 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 8.61339E-02
8 0.00000E+00-1.87268E-01 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 8.61339E-02
STATIC LOAD/REACTION/EQUILIBRIUM SUMMARY FOR CASE NO. 1

LOADTYPE NONE TITLE DEAD
CENTER OF FORCE BASED ON Y FORCES ONLY (METE).

(FORCES IN NON-GLOBAL DIRECTIONS WILL INVALIDATE RESULTS)
X = 0.988499339E-01
Y = 0.523059618E+00
Z = 0.000000000E+00
_x0003_TOTAL APPLIED LOAD 1_x0004_
***TOTAL APPLIED LOAD ( KN METE ) SUMMARY (LOADING 1 )

SUMMATION FORCE-X = 0.00
SUMMATION FORCE-Y = -12.03
SUMMATION FORCE-Z = 0.00
SUMMATION OF MOMENTS AROUND THE ORIGIN-

MX= 0.00 MY= 0.00 MZ= -1.19
_x0003_TOTAL REACTION LOAD 1_x0004_
***TOTAL REACTION LOAD( KN METE ) SUMMARY (LOADING 1 )

SUMMATION FORCE-Y = 12.03

MX= 0.00 MY= 0.00 MZ= 1.19
MAXIMUM DISPLACEMENTS ( CM /RADIANS) (LOADING 1)

MAXIMUMS AT NODE
X = 1.07557E+00 8
Y = -1.27954E+00 8
Z = 0.00000E+00 0
RX= 0.00000E+00 0
RY= 0.00000E+00 0
RZ= -4.58253E-03 8
EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL JOINT LOAD SUMMARY ( KN METE )-

8 Meter Pole Design
DESIGN REPORT
JT EXT FX/ EXT FY/ EXT FZ/ EXT MX/ EXT MY/ EXT MZ/
INT FX INT FY INT FZ INT MX INT MY INT MZ
SUPPORT=1
1 0.00 -4.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 -7.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1.19 111111
FOR LOADING - 2
APPLIED JOINT EQUIVALENT LOADS
1 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 7.89303E-01 3.07896E-01 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00
2 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 5.91921E-01-1.18401E-01-1.00500E-01 0.00000E+00
4 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 1.04697E+00 1.08607E-02 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00
5 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 1.42264E+00-8.52852E-02 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00
6 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 1.09705E+00 1.21445E-02-1.00500E-01 0.00000E+00
7 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 2.61000E-01 0.00000E+00 1.00500E-01 0.00000E+00
8 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 2.21000E-01 0.00000E+00 1.00500E-01 0.00000E+00
STATIC LOAD/REACTION/EQUILIBRIUM SUMMARY FOR CASE NO. 2

LOADTYPE WIND TITLE WL+Z
CENTER OF FORCE BASED ON Z FORCES ONLY (METE).

(FORCES IN NON-GLOBAL DIRECTIONS WILL INVALIDATE RESULTS)
X = 0.266304475E+00
Y = 0.401703750E+01
Z = 0.000000000E+00
_x0003_TOTAL APPLIED LOAD 2_x0004_
***TOTAL APPLIED LOAD ( KN METE ) SUMMARY (LOADING 2 )


MX= 21.81 MY= -1.45 MZ= 0.00

_x0003_TOTAL REACTION LOAD 2_x0004_
***TOTAL REACTION LOAD( KN METE ) SUMMARY (LOADING 2 )
SUMMATION FORCE-Z = -5.43

MX= -21.81 MY= 1.45 MZ= 0.00
MAXIMUM DISPLACEMENTS ( CM /RADIANS) (LOADING 2)

MAXIMUMS AT NODE
X = 0.00000E+00 0
Y = 0.00000E+00 0
Z = 1.01019E+01 8
RX= 1.58013E-02 8
RY= -6.99800E-03 8
RZ= 0.00000E+00 0
8 Meter Pole Design
DESIGN REPORT
EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL JOINT LOAD SUMMARY ( KN METE )-
JT EXT FX/ EXT FY/ EXT FZ/ EXT MX/ EXT MY/ EXT MZ/
INT FX INT FY INT FZ INT MX INT MY INT MZ
SUPPORT=1
1 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.31 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 4.64 21.50 -1.45 0.00 111111
LOAD COMBINATION NO. 3

1.15X(D.L)
LOADING- 1.
FACTOR - 1.15

(1.15DL+1.25WL+X)
LOADING- 1. 2.
FACTOR - 1.15 1.25

1.5X(D.L)
LOADING- 1.
FACTOR - 1.50

1.5X(DL+WL+X)
LOADING- 1. 2.
FACTOR - 1.50 1.50

1X(DL)
LOADING- 1.
FACTOR - 1.00
8 Meter Pole Design
DESIGN REPORT
1X(DL+WL+X)
LOADING- 1. 2.
FACTOR - 1.00 1.00
************ END OF DATA FROM INTERNAL STORAGE ************
88. LOAD LIST 7 8

89. ******************************
90. PARAMETER 1
91. CODE INDIAN
92. BEAM 1 MEMB 6 7
93. FYLD 250000 MEMB 6 7
94. KY 2 MEMB 6 7
95. KZ 2 MEMB 6 7
96. MAIN 180 MEMB 6 7
97. RATIO 1 MEMB 6 7
98. TRACK 0 MEMB 6 7
99. CHECK CODE MEMB 6 7
_x0003_STEEL DESIGN _x0004_
_x0002_
STAAD.Pro CODE CHECKING - (IS-800:1984) v1.1

***********************
_x0002_
ALL UNITS ARE - KN METE (UNLESS OTHERWISE Noted)
MEMBER TABLE RESULT/ CRITICAL COND/ RATIO/ LOADING/

FX MY MZ LOCATION
=======================================================================
6 ST 100X100X4.0SHS (TATA STRUCTURA SECTIONS)

PASS IS-7.1.1(A) 0.204 8
0.00 T 0.78 0.63 0.00
7 ST 100X100X4.0SHS (TATA STRUCTURA SECTIONS)
PASS IS-7.1.1(A) 0.178 8
0.00 T 0.66 0.56 0.00
************** END OF TABULATED RESULT OF DESIGN **************

8 Meter Pole Design
DESIGN REPORT
100. *******************************
101. LOAD LIST 5 6
102. START CONCRETE DESIGN
_x0003_CONCRETE DESIGN_x0004_
103. CODE INDIAN
104. BRACE 3 MEMB 2
105. ELY 2 MEMB 2
106. ELZ 2 MEMB 2
107. FC 25000 MEMB 2
108. FYMAIN 500000 MEMB 2
109. FYSEC 500000 MEMB 2
110. MAXMAIN 16 MEMB 2
111. MINSEC 8 MEMB 2
112. MINMAIN 16 MEMB 2
113. MAXSEC 16 MEMB 2
114. RATIO 4 MEMB 2
115. REINF 0 MEMB 2
116. RFACE 4 MEMB 2
117. CONCRETE TAKE
118. DESIGN COLUMN 2
============================================================================
C O L U M N N O. 2 D E S I G N R E S U L T S
M25 Fe500 (Main) Fe500 (Sec.)
LENGTH: 1500.0 mm CROSS SECTION: 500.0 mm X 500.0 mm COVER: 40.0 mm
** GUIDING LOAD CASE: 5 END JOINT: 1 TENSION COLUMN
REQD. STEEL AREA : 30.47 Sq.mm.

REQD. CONCRETE AREA: 0.00 Sq.mm.
MAIN REINFORCEMENT : Provide 8 - 16 dia. (0.64%, 1608.50 Sq.mm.)
(Equally distributed)
TIE REINFORCEMENT : Provide 8 mm dia. rectangular ties @ 255 mm c/c
SECTION CAPACITY BASED ON REINFORCEMENT REQUIRED (KNS)

------------------------------------------------------
Puz : -699.70 KNS
SECTION CAPACITY BASED ON REINFORCEMENT PROVIDED (KNS)

------------------------------------------------------
END JOINT: 3 Puz : 3022.76 KNS IR:0.00
END JOINT: 1 Puz : 699.70 KNS IR:0.02
============================================================================
********************END OF COLUMN DESIGN RESULTS********************
8 Meter Pole Design
DESIGN REPORT
119. END CONCRETE DESIGN
************** CONCRETE TAKE OFF **************

(FOR BEAMS, COLUMNS AND PLATES DESIGNED ABOVE)
NOTE: CONCRETE QUANTITY REPRESENTS VOLUME OF CONCRETE IN BEAMS, COLUMNS, AND PLATES DESIGNED ABOVE.
REINFORCING STEEL QUANTITY REPRESENTS REINFORCING STEEL IN BEAMS AND COLUMNS DESIGNED ABOVE.
REINFORCING STEEL IN PLATES IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE REPORTED QUANTITY.
TOTAL VOLUME OF CONCRETE = 0.4 CU.METER
BAR DIA WEIGHT

(in mm) (in New)
-------- --------
8 38
16 186
------------
*** TOTAL= 224
120. *************************************
121. FINISH
*********** END OF THE STAAD.Pro RUN ***********
**** DATE= DEC 29,2018 TIME= 11: 7:55 ****
************************************************************
* For technical assistance on STAAD.Pro, please visit *
* http://selectservices.bentley.com/en-US/ *
* *
* Details about additional assistance from *
* Bentley and Partners can be found at program menu *
* Help->Technical Support *
* *
* Copyright (c) 1997-2014 Bentley Systems, Inc.
* http://www.bentley.com *
************************************************************
8 Meter Pole Design
DESIGN REPORT
Dead load on pole :-

Self weight of pole Included in Staad model
Gross Weight of camera :-

Camera weight + Camera housing + Camera 3.75 kg 0.037 kN As per client data sheet
housing mount
LED light weight 1.5 kg 0.015 kN As per client data sheet
Weight of junction box :- 42 kg 0.412 kN Assumed
Weight of ladder :-
16mm dia rod 0.016 m As per tender document
Spacing between rod 0.300 m As per tender document
Length of bar 0.450 m As per tender document
Weight per bar 0.710 kg
Total bars 27 Nos
Total load of ladder ( 27 Nos x 0.710) 18.930 kg
UDL on pole (19/8/101.971) 0.023 kN/m Included in Staad model
Dynamic wind load on pole:- IS 875 (Part -3) 2015 :-

Basic wind speed (3 sec Gust) (Vb) 50 m/s As per tender document
K1 ( Probability factor ) 0.9 clause 6.3.1
K2,i ( Factor for hourly wind speed ) 0.76 clause 6.4
K3 ( Topography Factor ) 1 clause 6.3.3
K4 ( Importance factor for cyclonic region ) 1 clause 6.3.2
Hourly wind speed (Vzd=Vb*k1*k2,i*k3*k4) 34.248 m/s

Wind pressure (Pzd=0.6*Vzd2 *gust factor (G) ) 2.129 kN/m2
Dynamic loading calculation ( Gust factor G) :-

By using IS : 875 - 2015 , Part 3, Clause 10
To Calculate Gust factor :- G =
Where,
* r = 0.32
Turbulance Intensity =
a ) Terrain category - 1
Iz,1 = 0.16
where , z= 8
Z0,1 = 0.002
b ) Terrain category - 2
Iz,2 = 0.19
where , z= 8
Z0,2 = 0.02
8 Meter Pole Design
DESIGN REPORT
c ) Terrain category - 3
Iz,3 = 0.25
where , z= 8
Z0,3 = 0.2
d ) Terrain category - 4
Iz,4 = 0.38
where , z= 8
Z0,4 = 2
* Peak factor for upwind velocity fluctuation

gv = 3
* Background factor
Bs = 0.998
Where ,
bsh = 0.1875 m
h = 8 m
s = 8 m
Lh = 80.388
* second order turbulence intensity factor :-
g = 0.237
* Height factor for resonance response :-
Hs = 2
* Size reduction factor given by :-
S = 0.287
where,
boh = 0.1875 m
8 Meter Pole Design
DESIGN REPORT
* E = 0.0258
Where ,
N = 6.54
fa = 1/T 2.787 Refer staad analysis
Hourly mean wind speed factor
K2,i = 0.76
Vzd 34.25 m/s
* β = 0.01
* gr = 4.29
* Gust Factor :- G = 3.02
UDL on pole due to dynamic wind and gust effect :-
Cf for tubes as per table 25 -IS 875 :-2015

300 dia tube 3.000 mm thick
Hourly design wind speed (Vz) 10.274
H/b 26.667
Reduction factor ( table - 28 ) 0.788 [ Clauses 7.4.2.2 and 7.4.3.2(a) ]
Cf of octagon* reduction factor = Actual Cf 1.103
UDL on pole (Cf*Pzd*bottom dia.of tube) 0.587 kN/m

UDL on pole (Cf*Pzd* top dia.of tube) 0.294 kN/m
8 Meter Pole Design
DESIGN REPORT
Wind load calculation for camera , ladder , junction box :- IS 875 (Part -3) 2015 :-
Design wind pressure

VB 50 m/s
k1 0.9 ...... Refer Table 1
k2 1.05 ...... Refer Table 3
k3 1 ...... Refer Clause 6.3.3
K4 1 ...... Refer Clause 6.3.4
Pz = 1339.538 N/m2
1.340 kN/m2
Kd 1 m/s ...... Refer Clause 7.2.1
Ka 1 ...... Refer Clause 7.2.2
Kc 1 ...... Refer Clause 7.3.3.13
Pd = 1.34 kN/m2
0.7*Pz = 0.938 ...... Refer Clause 7.2
Pd = 1.340 kN/m2
Box camera wind load :-

Projected area of camera (385mm × 100mm) 0.04 m2
Wind pressure (Pd) 1.34 kN/m2
Load on top node (Pd*A* cf) 0.06 kN
Cf = table-27 IS 875 (Part 3):2015
LED light wind load :-

Projected area of camera (100mm × 100mm x 100mm) 0.01 m2
Wind pressure (Pd) 1.34 kN/m2
Load on top node (Pd*A* cf) 0.02 kN
Cf = table-27 IS 875 (Part 3):2015
Wind load on ladder :-

16mm dia rod 0.016 m
Length of bar 0.45 m
Wind load on 1 rod ( Pd X Dia.X Length ) 0.00964 kN
Total bars 27 Nos
Total load ( 25 Nos x 0.00652) 0.257 kN
Udl on pole (0.257/8) 0.032 kN/m
Wind load on junction box :-

Overall dimension
Area of junction box = 450 mm X 600 mm 0.27 m2
(Pd x area of junction box) 0.36 kN Load act 1.2m from FFL
8 Meter Pole Design
DESIGN REPORT
8 m pole design as per BS EN 40-3-3:2013
For reinforced openings in regular octagonal c/s,the strength of

Type 1
sections shall be calculated from the following formulae :
Bending moment of resistance,(N-m) (cl.5.6.2.3.2)
Design steps :
1) Dia of pole dia. 250 mm

2) (Mean Radius) R 122.5 mm
3) (Thickness of member) t 5 mm
4) Yield strength of materials fy 250 N/mm2
5) (Elastic modulus of steel) E 210000 N/mm2 (Table:3,EN:40-3-3)
6) є 0.85 (Ref -CL:5.6.2.1,EN:40-3-3)
7) (Partial Material factor) ϒm 1.15 (Ref- Table 2,EN:40-3-3)
8) (Effective Length of door L 396.78 mm (Ref -CL:5.6.2.2,EN:40-3-3)
opening)
9) Corner radius of door opening N 7.5 mm
10) (Factor for Octagonal c/s) F 2.16 (Ref -CL:5.6.2.2,EN:40-3-3)
11) Half angle of door opening ө 22 deg (Ref: Fig 5,EN:40-3-3)
Door reinforcement(plate) L 20 mm Provided door
12)
(Thickness of member) T 3 mm Reinforcement
Radius of gyration (Ref-CL:5.6.2.3.2,EN:40-3-3)
13) v 5.77 mm
door reinforcement
distance from centroid of
14) actual door reinforcement mox 122 mm (Ref-CL:5.6.2.3.2,EN:40-3-3)
to the x-x axis
distance from centroid of

15) actual door reinforcement moy 51.5 mm (Ref-CL:5.6.2.3.2,EN:40-3-3)
to the y-y axis
distance from center of
16) column wall at the edge of mx 124.66 mm (Ref-CL:5.6.2.3.2,EN:40-3-3)
opening to the x-x axis
distance from center of
17) column wall at the edge of my 50 mm (Ref-CL:5.6.2.3.2,EN:40-3-3)
opening to the y-y axis
18) Bx 0.10 (Ref-CL:5.6.2.3.2,EN:40-3-3)
19) By 0.10
(Ref-CL:5.6.2.3.2,EN:40-3-3)
8 Meter Pole Design
DESIGN REPORT
20) (From graph) ᶲ1 0.981
21) ᶲ6 0.64
Plastic modulus of section

including effective door
22) Zpnr 274503.601 mm3
reinforcement, about the
plastic neutral axis n-n
Plastic modulus of section
including effective door
23) Zpyr 318468.405 mm3
reinforcement, about the
plastic neutral axis y-y
24) Bending moment of resistance in X-Direction :
Mux 38003 Nm
38.003 kNm
25) Bending moment of resistance in Y-Direction :
Muy 21604 Nm
21.604 kNm
26) Acceptance of design for strength :
Mx = 22.238 KNm From staad For load case as per Tender document (load case - 4 )
My = 1.446 KNm Because wind coming from one direction
(Mx/Mux)+(My/Muy) < 1 0.59 < 1 henece safe

1.07
8 Meter Pole Design
DESIGN REPORT
As per BS EN 40-3-3:2013 :- Ref fig no :- Figure 6 a) Type 1
As per BS EN 40-3-3:2013 :- Ref fig no :- Figure 7

Reinforcement projecting beyound the door opening :-
3) Anchor Bolt Design For Inclined Wire Rope
Designing for the worst load combination Note:
Moment about the X axis 21.81 kNm

Moment about the Z axis 1.19 kNm
Compression/Tension Force on the column 12.03 kN (+ve is compression)
Shear in X direction 0.00 kN
Shear in Z direction 5.43 kN
Nos anchor bolt 4.0 Nos
Bolt Line 2.0 Nos
Max tension in achor bolt 29.8 kN
Max shear in anchor bolt 1.4 kN
Using M 24 bolts: 24 mm dia
120*(640/235) is the
Allowable Tension 115.3 kN allowable
80*(640/235) is the allowable

Allowable Shear 76.8 kN
Anchor Bolt Length 750 mm

Checking for shear plus tension 0.277 1.4 OK
Base Plate Design

Assuming the following size for the base plate:
Length (L) 500 mm
Width (B) 500 mm
Thickness (t) 16 mm
Area of plate (A) 250000 mm2
Input for bolt ---see 1.dwg file C/C Spacing along(S) Depth C/C Spacing along(S) Width Extra Side
350 350 60
Pedestal edge dist(K) 125 125

Pedestal Size 600 600
D B
D B
Column size 250 250
prvided edge for bolt 50 50
requried edge 48 48
ok ok
Required space -2 -2 Value should be zero or -ve
Resultant Loads on the base plate
Axial Load (P) 12.034 kN
Bending Moment (about X axis), Mx 21.8 kNm
Bending Moment (about Z axis), Mz 1.190 kNm
eccentricity ex = Mx / P 1812 mm
eccentricity ez = Mz / P 99 mm
Stress due to Axial Force (σa) = P/A 0.05 MPa

Max Stress due to bending about X axis = 6Mx / BL2 1.05 MPa
Max Stress due to bending about Z axis = 6Mz / B2L 0.06 MPa
Stress due to Axial force = P/A
2
6M/BL
2
6M/BL
Stress due to Bending Moment
2
6M/BL - P/A
2
P/A+ 6M/BL
Resultant Stress
Calculating base plate bending moments for bending about X axis:
Maximum bending moment will occur at the face of the column
Cantilever length 120 mm

Moment due to Axial stress 0.35 kNm / m
Moment due to stress developed by Mx 7.5 kNm / m
Bending stress σbx 184.8 MPa
Calculating base plate bending moments for bending about Y axis:

Moment due to stress developed by My 0.4 kNm / m
Bending stress σby 9.6 MPa
σbx + σby = 194.4 OK

Allowale bending stress = 246
Checking for bearing stress in concrete pedestal

Max bearing stress = 1.15 MPa
Grade of concrete Fck = 25.00 Mpa
Allowable bearing stress = 0.25 * fck 6.25 MPa Ok
Brick Wall load
Density of brick 18 kN/m3
Wall thickness 0.15 m
Height of wall 2.7 m
UDL of brick on beams 7.29 kN/m
Slab thickness 0.15 m

Density of concrete 25 kN/m3
Dead weight 3.75 kN/m2

Wind Load Sheet

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Wind Load Sheet

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PROJECT: DESIGN OF 8M POLE WITH ARM

TITLE: DESIGN REPORT

CLIENT:- CMS COMPUTERS LTD.

R0 12/29/2018 FOR APPROVAL SB DG RA

2 Wind load on Structure

2) Design of 8M pole with arm as per BS EN 40-3-3:2013

Dia. of pole at top of door opening dia. 240 mm

Distance from centroid of actual door

Distance from centroid of actual door

Distance from center of column wall at the

Distance from center of column wall at the my 50.00 mm

Plastic modulus of section including effective

Plastic modulus of section including effective

Bending moment of resistance in X-Direction :

Bending moment of resistance in Y-Direction :

Acceptance of design for strength :

(Mx/Mux)+(My/Muy) < 1 0.482 < 1 Safe

As per BS EN 40-3-3:2013 :- Figure 6 a) Type 1

As per BS EN 40-3-3:2013 :- Figure 7

Support reactions from staad :-

Using for design of base plate at pedestal top :-

Horizontal Vertical Horizontal Moment

Using for design of pole at pedestal top :-

Horizontal Vertical Horizontal Moment

Using for design of foundation at base of footing :-

Horizontal Vertical Horizontal Moment

Acceptance of design for deflection :-

Where , h = height of pole

Allowable deflection of pole - 0.04*(h + w) 326 mm

Allowable deflection of pole - 0.04*(h + w) 326 mm

Designing for the worst load combination Note:

Moment about the X axis 21.81 kNm (From staad software)

Moment about the Z axis 1.19 kNm (From staad software)

Compression/Tension Force on the 12.03 kN (From staad software)

Shear in X direction 0.00 kN (From staad software)

Shear in Z direction 5.43 kN (From staad software)

3.1) Bolt Design

Bolt Line 2.0 Nos

Max tension in achor bolt 29.8 kN

Max shear in anchor bolt 1.4 kN

Using M 24 bolts 24 mm dia As per tender document

Allowable Tension 115.3 kN

Allowable Shear 76.8 kN 80*(640/235) is the allowable

Anchor Bolt Length 750 mm

Checking for shear plus tension 0.277 1.4 OK

3.2) Base Plate Design

Length (L) 500 mm

C/C Spacing(S) along Depth C/C Spacing(S) along Extra Side

b) Resultant Loads on the base plate

Axial Load (P) 12.0 kN

Stress due to Axial Force (σa) = P/A 0.05 MPa

Max Stress due to bending about X axis =

Max Stress due to bending about Z axis =

Stress due to Axial force = P/A

c) Calculating base plate bending moments for bending about X axis:

Cantilever length 120.0 mm

Moment due to Axial stress 0.35 kNm / m

Total Moment 7.9 kNm / m

Bending stress σbx 184.8 MPa

d) Calculating base plate bending moments for bending about Y axis:

Total Moment 0.4 kNm / m

Bending stress σby 9.6 MPa

σbx + σby = 194.4

* _x0003_EIGENSOLUTION_x0004_: SUBSPACE METHOD *

DATE= DEC 28,2018 TIME= 18:20:15