Munyaka BEAM 01 July 2023

UTMOST CONSULTING Job no: 08 sheet no: 1/2 rev: 01
ENGINEERS UTM-PT 14/02/ 2021

consultation sheet RC BEAM DESIGN
JOB TITTLE: PROPOSED MIXED USE COMMERCIAL BUILDING AT Org. ref. STR/UTM-PT/14/02/2021
MUGUTHA, RUIRU KIAMBU COUNTY: PLOT 1/10246 made by MMM date: 14/11/21 chd FMG
1st, 2nd,3rdand 4th. floor typical beams Signature…………… Signature…………………….
Analysis & Beam Design
Fy 460N/mm2
Fcu 30N/mm2
B 200mm
H 500mm
Cover 25mm
References Calculations Output
Preliminary sizing
(i) to fire resistance
span L
(ii) to , ratio = = 26
Depth D
4500
Maximum longest span = =¿ 173.1mm
26
8
Overall depth 173+50+25+ = 256.1 mm
2
Take, D=450 mm
H=600mm
Width =450 x 0.4=240 mm
Take width=300mm
Analyze the slab;

ly
=one way slab or two-way slab
lx
Analyze beam loading;
slab s/w = 0.15x24=3.6kN/m2
Ceiling & services=0.75 kN/m2
Finishes =1 kN/m2
Total = 4.1kN/m2
Imposed load =1.5kN/m2
Load on beam
Load combination
Type of slab Load on beam Load on beam

(long span) (short span)
One way slab nlx ² nlx ²
2 5
Two-way slab nlx 1 nlx
[1− 2 ]
2 3k 5
12
lx
B ly B
`
1st, 2nd,3rdand 4th. floor typical beams Signature…………… Signature……………
BEAM DESIGN
Load transfer from slab to beam on yield line method
slab loading on long span (ly) and short span (lx)
Type of slab Load on beam (long Load on beam (short span)

span) kN/m KN/m
One way slab nlx
2
Two-way slab nlx k
2
nlx
{1− }
2 3 3
Efficient flange method for beams
Assumed points of zero moments for beams
flange width for T-beams and L-beams

1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th. floor typical beams Signature…………… Signature…………………….
Effective flange width parameters
Assume weight of machine cut blocks =1.8kN/m3
Wall height=2.75mm
DESIGN OF BEAM 01
SKETCH
DESIGN OF BEAM 12 (AXIS 12:A-I)

Loading from panel 36,37,38,39,40,41,43,45 and 46
Assume all cantilever loads fully loaded on beam
Load from panel 39,49 & 46 (cantilever)
Load from panel 36
n=10.94kN/m
ly 3341
K= = = 1.13
lx 2964
nlx 1
P= {1− 2 }
2 3k
P=11.98 KN/m
self-wt. of beam (ULS)=1.4x0.6X0.3x24=6.05 kN/m

=18.48kN/m
Weight of block work (ULS)2.5x1.4x2.75=9.63kN/m
Load from panel 39{cantilever}

nlx
P=
2
P=8.14X0.5x0.917=3.73 KN/m
nlx
Primary beam P =
3
P =10.94/3x2.964=10.81X0.5=5.4 KN/m
Block work on partions=9.63 KN/m
s/w of beam=0.45x0.2x24x1.4=3.02 KN/m
load on panel 37
nlx =16.05kN/m
P=
2
P =10.94x1.014x0.5=5.54x0.5=2.8 KN/m
Total load on span K-M/12/11

{ULS]11.98+4.54+9.63+3.73+5.4+9.63+3.02+2.8=50.73 kN/m
Unfactored=40.92 kN/m
Load on span12/ C”-E
Load from panel 38
ly 3920
K= = = 1.32
lx 2964
nlx 1
P= {1− 2 }
2 3k
P=13.1 KN/m

nlx
P=
2
P=8.14X0.5x0.917=3.73 KN/m

nlx
P=
2
P=8.14X0.5x0.69=2.15 KN/m
self-wt. of beam (ULS)=1.4x0.45X24x0.3=4.54 kN/m
Total load on span 12/ E-F’
{ULS] 13.1+3.73+2.15+4.54+9.63=33.15 kN/m

Load on span12/ C”-F’
Load from panel 41
ly 3414
K= = = 1.36
lx 2517
nlx 1
P= {1− 2 }
2 3k
P=11.3 KN/m

nlx
P=
2
P=8.14X0.5x0.69=2.15 KN/m

nlx
P=
2
P=8.14X0.5x0.917=3.73 KN/m
{ULS] 11.3+2.15+4.54+3.73+9.63=31.38 kN/m

Load on span12/”-F’-I

nlx
P=
2
P=8.14X0.5x0.917=3.73 KN/m
nlx
Primary beam P =
3
P =10.94/3x2.964=10.81X0.5=5.4 KN/m
Block work on partions=9.63 KN/m
s/w of beam=0.45x0.2x24x1.4=3.02 KN/m
load on panel 45
ly 3414
K= = = 1.36
lx 2517
nlx 1
P= {1− 2 }
2 3k
P=11.3 KN/m
{ULS] 3.73+5.4+9.63+3.02+11.3+4.54+9.63=47.25 kN/m

BEAM DESIGN
Fy 460N/mm2
Fcu 30N/mm2
B 200mm
H 500mm
Cover 25mm
Moments distribution table

Relative stiffness
DFAD = 0
DFDA = 0.4731
DFDG = 0.4794
DFGD = 0.4794
DFKG=0.5544
DFGK=0.5544
DFKM=0.453 =3
DFED=0 9.5
3k
Wl ² N/
FEM= m
l²
=2
5k
N/
m

BEAM DESIGN
Fy 460N/mm2
Fcu 30N/mm2
B 200mm
H 500mm
Cover 25mm
References Calculations Ou
tp
ut
Membe AC” C”A C”E E”C’ ’E”F’ F’E” F’I I F’
r
DF 0 0.4731 0.5269 0.5440 0.4560 0.5647 0.535 0
3
FEM -80.18 +80.18 -46.62 +46.62 -34.12 +34.12 - +79.63
79.73
Bal 0 - 15.88 -17.68 -6.8 -5.7 +25.76 +25.4 0
2
CO -7.94 0 -3.4 +8.84 +12.88 -2.80 0 +12.71
Bal 0 +1.79 +1.79 -2.198 +1.842 +1.581 +1.22 0
CO +0.895 0 -1.098 +0.895 +0.790 -0.921 0 +0.61
5
bal 0 +0.5195 +0.579 -0.9170 -0.690 -0.520 -0.52 0
CO +0.2598 0 -0.4185 +2.90 -0.260 - 0 -0.274
0.3845
Total -86.97 +66.61 -66.61 +29.05 -29.05 +58.7 -58.7 +92.8

BEAM DESIGN
Fy 460N/mm2
Fcu 30N/mm2
B 200mm
H 500mm
Cover 25mm
tp
ut
SPAN (A-D)
Let ΣMD=0
3.45 VAD
=
25 X 3.45²
=-37.39
2
VA = 48.64kN
Let Σfy=0
VA.x-VD=86.25-48.64=37.61KN
VD=37.61
Maximum span moment

25 X x ²
MX= VA.x- =32.29x-12.5x2
2
δm x
=Qx=32.29-12.5x
δx
Maximum bending moment at zero shear point :32.29-12.5x=0 X=
1.9
Bm max=32.29(1.9456)-12.5(1.9456) =28.94kNm 45
SPAN D-G 6m

1st, 2nd,3rdand 4th. floor typical beams Signature…………… Signature………………
BEAM DESIGN
Fy 460N/mm2
Fcu 30N/mm2
B 200mm
H 500mm
Cover 25mm
tp
ut
Let ΣMG=0
29.53 x 3.5²
3.5VD-37.39- = - 27.59KN
2
VD=71.93kN
Let fy=0
VD+VG=(39.53X3.5)=130.36KN
VG =138.36-71.98=66.43KN
Maximum span moment
39.53 x ²
Mx= VDX - 37.39 - = 71.98x2-37.39-19.8x2
2
δm x
=Qx =71.98-19.8x
δx
Maximum Bending moment at zero shear
71.98-19.8x=0
x=1.68 m
Bmmax=71.98(1.68)-37.39-19.8(1.682) =-28.22kNm
SPAN (G-K)
Let ΣMk=0
3.45VG -
27.59 -
25 x 3.45²
2
= - 49.63
VG = 36.74 kN
Let Σfy=0
VG+VK=(25x3.45)=86.25
VK = 86.25 - 36.74 =49.51kN

1st, 2nd,3rdand 4th. floor typical beams Signature…………… Signature……………………
BEAM DESIGN
Fy 460N/mm2
Fcu 30N/mm2
B 200mm
H 500mm
Cover 25mm
Maximum span Bending moment
25 x ²
Mx=VGX-27.59- =36.74x-27.59-12.5x2
2
δm x
=Qx =36.74-12.5x
δx X=1.9052m
Maximum Bending Moment at zero shear point

=21.44kNm
36.74(1.9052)-27.59-12.5(1.90522) =21.44 KNm
SPAN (K-M)
Let ΣMV=0
41.82 x 4.6²
4.6VK -49.63- = 0
2
VK=104.15KN
Let fy=0
VK+VM=(41.82x4.6)=192.372KN
VM=192.372-106.98=88.22KN
Span Moment
41.82 x ² 106.98 41.82 x ²
Bm .max=Vkx-49.63- = -49.63-
2 2 2
δm x 106.98
=Qx = -20.91x
δx 2
Bm.Max=80.1kNm
X=2.558m
BEAM DESIGN
Fy 460N/mm2
Fcu 30N/mm2
B 200mm
H 500mm
Cover 25mm
tp
ut
Critical Design Moments

SPAN K-M
Maximum Support moment = 44.5 kNm
Design of hogging moment at RHS support K

Cl 3.4.1.3
3.4.1,5 M=44.5 kNm
3.6 Beam size=600x300mm
Table 3.4 Cover to reinforcement=25mm
3.3 Assume T16 &T8 bars
16
Effective depth=450 -25-8 - =¿409mm
2
m 44.5 x 10⁶
k= = = 0.0296
fcu .bd ² 30 x 300 x 409²
Cl 3.4.4.4
z k 0.0
=0.5+√ (0.25− )=0.97>0.95
d 0.9 88
Z=0.95x409=388.6 m 1<
m 0.1
Ast=
0.95 fyz
56
44.5 x 10⁶ 2
Ast = =262.05 m m /m He
0.95 x 460 x 388.6
nce
Provide 3T12 {339 mm2 /m}
no.
co
Minimum steel area check
mp
100 As 100 x 442
¿ = =0.65
bh 200 x 350 res
0.65 > 0.13 sio
Cl 3.12.6
Hence steel provided is ok n
Maximum Area of steel check rei
Tension nor compression reinforcement should not exceed 4% cross section area of concrete nfo
rce
me
nt
req
uir
ed
Pro
vid
e
3T
12(
To
p
{3
39
m
m2/
m}

BEAM DESIGN
Fy 460N/mm2
Fcu 30N/mm2
B 200mm
H 500mm
Cover 25mm
tp
ut
Cl 3.4.1.5 SPAN 12/11/K-M T-BEAM
3.4.4.4
Maximum span moment{sagging} =94.92 kNm
effective width of flange (T-Beam)
Le=0.7x4600=3220mm
bw=3220/5+220=844mm
Moment of resistance
hf
M=0.45fcu. bw. hf. (d− )
2
150
=0.45x30x844x150x (404− )=562.3 kNm
2
562.3 kNm>94.92kNm
Neutral axis lies in the bottom flange (stress block Inside the slab)
Pro
Beam size=350x200mm
vid
Cover to reinforcement=25mm
e
Assume T16 &T8 bars
3T
16
Effective depth=350 -25-8 - =¿309mm 12
2 +1
m 94.92 x 10⁶ T1
k= = =0.0392<0.156{ singly reinforced}
fcu .bd ² 30 x 844 x 309² 6
Bot
No compression reinforcement required. to
z k m(
=0.5+√ (0.25− )=0.954>0.95 54
d 0.9
0
Z=0.95x309=293.6 m m
m 94.92 x 10⁶ m2/
Ast= = =739.81m m2 /m m)
0.95 fyz 0.95 x 460 x 293.6
Provide 3T12+2T16{741 mm2/m)
Cl 3.12.6
100 As 100 x 741
Minimum reinforcement: = =1.059>0.13
bh 200 x 350
Hence steel provided is OK.
Maximum reinforcement: tension nor compression reinforcement should not exceed 4%
(cross sectional area of concrete.}

BEAM DESIGN
Fy 460N/mm2
Fcu 30N/mm2
B 200mm
H 500mm
Cover 25mm
tp
ut
Design Shear links
BS-8100-1997 SPAN:12/ A-D,12/D-G.12/G-K,12/K-M
Minimum tensile area at any point=2T12=226 mm2

100 As 100 x 262 , 30 1/3
Cl 3.4.5.4 . = =0.323 N/mm2, Vc=0.49x{ } .=0.52 from table 3.8
bh 200 x 350 25
Provide nominal links where,
He
VC ={VC+0.4}bd={0.52+0.4}200x309x10-3==56.9 KN
` nce
Table 3.8 , A Sv 0.4 b 0.4 x 200 pro
. = = =0.34
Sv 0.95 fyy 0.95 x 250
vid
Maximum allowable spacing 0.75d=231.75 mm
e
, A Sv
Provide T8 at 225 mm c/c.{ }=0.447 N/mm2 > 0.34 0K T8
Sv
@
225
Table 3.7
mm
Cl 3.4.5.5 c/c
{no
Cl 3.4.1.6 min
al}
BEAM DESIGN
Fy 460N/mm2
Fcu 30N/mm2
B 200mm
H 450mm
Cover 25mm
tp
ut
Cl 3.4.6 Check for deflection
Mid span of flange designed as a flange section
b 200
= =0.237<0.3
bw 844
Table 3.9
span
Basic [ ] =16
effectiv depth
Continuous beam
Cl 3.4.6.4 span
Basic [ ] =20.8
effectiv depth
Span of beam=4600mm
14.9
Modification factor of span [ ]=3.24
4.6
In this beam; the condition at support M is simply supported and continuous at K
Cl 3.4.6.4
Basic [ span
effectiv depth]= [
20.8+16
2
]==18.4
span 4600
Actual [ ]= [ ]=14.9
effectiv depth 309
span span
Allowable [ ] = Basic [ ] x F1x F2
effectiv depth effectiv depth
F1=modification factor for tension reinforcement
F2= modification factor for compression reinforcement
2 As rep 1
F S= fy x x
3 As provided Bb
2 739.81 1
F S= x460 x x =306.17 N/mm2
3 741 1
M 94.92 x 10⁶ =¿
= 1.18 N/mm2
bd ² 3092 x 844
477−Fs
(477−307.18)
F1=0.55+ 120(0.9+ m ) =0.55+ =1.24 < 2
2 120(0.9+1.18)
bd
span span
span
Allowable [ ] = 14.9 x1.24 x1= 18.5
effectiv depth
span span
Allowable [ ] > Actual [ ]
Hence deflection check is satisfied.
The allowable deformation is ok in general to avoid cracking of brittle partition walls.
Check for cracking

0.18 bh 0.18 x 200 x 450
Min. area of steel provide = = =162mm2/m
100 100
4 x 200 x 450 2
Maximum Area of steel = =3600 m m /m
100
Area of steel provided is adequate
(200 x 3 x 16)−2 x 8
Spacing of bars = =28.7 m
3
SPAN:12/ A-D,12/D-G.12/G-K,12/K-M : Support K
Maximum shear force=104.15kN{Rectangular section}

10415 x 10³
Vmax= =1.29 N/mm2
200 x 404
Vd=104.15-(41.82x0.1) =99.97kN
99.97 x 103
V= = 1.62N/mm2
200 x 309
Concrete shear stress
Area of tension reinforcement at a distance ‘d’ from face of support{50% of 741 mm 2=370.5
mm2/m provide 402 mm2}
100 As 100 x 402

= =¿0.57 N/m² < 3
bh 200 x 350
400 400
[ ] ¼=[ ] ¼=1.067 >1
d 309
Shear reinforcement required
100 As 400 1 fcu
VC=0.79x[ ]⅓ x [ ] ¼ x1.067x x[ ¿⅓
bh d δm 25
1
=0.79x0.60x0.9975x x1.06=0.429 N/mm2
1.25
Spacing of nominal shear links

VC+0.4=0.402+0.4=0.829 N/mm2
VC+0.4<VD<0.8√fcu
Assume T8 links at supports, number of shear legs is 2
πx 8 2
ASV=2 x [ ]=100.48mm2
4
Hence maximum possible shear link spacing at support
Asv x 0.95 xfyv 100.48 x 0.95 x 250
SV ≤ = =100.18 mm take,100 mm
( 4 v −vc )bv ( 1.62−0.429 } 200
Provide T8@100mm c/c nominal links
Maximum possible spacing of links is 0.75d=303mm hence maximum spacing is satisfied.
Check for slenderness limit for lateral stability
Clear distance between restraints=4600mm
60bc=60x200=12000mm>4600mm
250 bc ² 250 x 200²
= = 24752mm2>4600mm2
d 404
Hence slenderness limit for lateral stability is satisfied.
BEAM DESIGN
Fy 460N/mm2
Fcu 30N/mm2
B 200mm
H 500mm
Cover 25mm
tp
ut
No compression reinforcement is provided. Ok
Hence F1=1 in
defl
span span ecti
on
span
Allowable [ ] = 14.9 x1.24 x1= 18.5
effectiv depth
span span
Allowable [ ] > Actual [ ]
Hence deflection check is satisfied.
The allowable deformation is ok in general to avoid cracking of brittle partition walls.

Check for cracking
0.18 bh 0.18 x 200 x 450
Min. area of steel provide = = =162mm2/m
100 100
4 x 200 x 450
Area of steel = =3600 m m2 /m
100
Area of steel provided is adequate
(200 x 3 x 16)−2 x 8
Spacing of bars = =28.7 m
3

Munyaka BEAM 01 July 2023

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Munyaka BEAM 01 July 2023

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

UTMOST CONSULTING Job no: 08 sheet no: 1/2 rev: 01

ENGINEERS UTM-PT 14/02/ 2021

Analyze the slab;

Type of slab Load on beam Load on beam

slab loading on long span (ly) and short span (lx)

Type of slab Load on beam (long Load on beam (short span)

Efficient flange method for beams

Assumed points of zero moments for beams

flange width for T-beams and L-beams

DESIGN OF BEAM 12 (AXIS 12:A-I)

self-wt. of beam (ULS)=1.4x0.6X0.3x24=6.05 kN/m

Load from panel 39{cantilever}

Total load on span K-M/12/11

Load on span12/ C”-E

Load from panel 38

Load from panel 39{cantilever}

Load from panel 40{cantilever}

self-wt. of beam (ULS)=1.4x0.45X24x0.3=4.54 kN/m

Weight of block work (ULS)2.5x1.4x2.75=9.63kN/m

Total load on span 12/ E-F’

{ULS] 13.1+3.73+2.15+4.54+9.63=33.15 kN/m

Load on span12/ C”-F’

Load from panel 41

Load from panel 40{cantilever}

self-wt. of beam (ULS)=1.4x0.45X24x0.3=4.54 kN/m

Weight of block work (ULS)2.5x1.4x2.75=9.63kN/m

Total load on span 12/ E-F’

{ULS] 11.3+2.15+4.54+3.73+9.63=31.38 kN/m

Load from panel 46{cantilever}

self-wt. of beam (ULS)=1.4x0.45X24x0.3=4.54 kN/m

Weight of block work (ULS)2.5x1.4x2.75=9.63kN/m

Total load on span 12/ E-F’

{ULS] 3.73+5.4+9.63+3.02+11.3+4.54+9.63=47.25 kN/m

Moments distribution table

UTMOST CONSULTING Job no: 08 sheet no: 1/2 rev: 01

UTMOST CONSULTING Job no: 08 sheet no: 1/2 rev: 01

Maximum span moment

UTMOST CONSULTING Job no: 08 sheet no: 1/2 rev: 01

UTMOST CONSULTING Job no: 08 sheet no: 1/2 rev: 01

Maximum Bending Moment at zero shear point

Critical Design Moments

Design of hogging moment at RHS support K

UTMOST CONSULTING Job no: 08 sheet no: 1/2 rev: 01

UTMOST CONSULTING Job no: 08 sheet no: 1/2 rev: 01

Minimum tensile area at any point=2T12=226 mm2

Hence deflection check is satisfied.

The allowable deformation is ok in general to avoid cracking of brittle partition walls.

Check for cracking

SPAN:12/ A-D,12/D-G.12/G-K,12/K-M : Support K

Maximum shear force=104.15kN{Rectangular section}

100 As 100 x 402

Spacing of nominal shear links

Hence deflection check is satisfied.

The allowable deformation is ok in general to avoid cracking of brittle partition walls.

You might also like