Shrimp Production Review

James L. Anderson, Director, Institute for Sustainable Food Systems

University of Florida
Diego Valderrama, University of los Andes, Colombia

Darryl Jory, Global Aquaculture Alliance

 Shrimp  Aquaculture  Produc3on  by  World  Region:    
1995  -­‐  2018  
Million MT 2015- 2018
Other
Projected annual
5.0
Middle East / Northern Africa growth rate: 4.2%
2006 - 2011
4.5 Americas
-­‐6%
Annual growth rate: 5.2%
India
4.0
China
3.5 Southeast Asia

3.0 In response to higher prices, increased production in

India, Vietnam, Ecuador and Mexico led to an overall
2.5 increase in world production in 2014. Production has
fallen again in 2015.
2.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Sources: FAO (2016) for 1995-2011; FAO (2016) and GOAL (2014) for 2012-2014; GOAL (2016) for 2014-2018.

Southeast Asia includes Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Malaysia, Philippines, Myanmar and Taiwan.
M. rosenbergii is not included.
 Shrimp  Aquaculture  by  Major  Producing  Regions:  2011  –  2018  

Million MT

2.0

Impact of EMS: China, Thailand and Mexico reported declines in

production in 2012/2013. China, Thailand, Vietnam, and Indonesia
1.5 reported lower production in 2015 relative to 2014.

1.0

0.5

0.0
Southeast Asia China India Americas Middle East / North
Africa
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Sources: FAO (2016) for 2011; FAO (2016) and GOAL (2014) for 2012-2014; GOAL (2016) for 2014-2018.

Southeast Asia includes Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Malaysia, Philippines, Myanmar and Taiwan.
M. rosenbergii is not included.
Thousand  MT   Shrimp  Feed  (MT)  
SHRIMP  FEED:  
1800   2012  to  2014  down  15%  
1600  

1400  

1200  

1000  

800  

600  

400  

200  

0  
2008   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013   2014  

Source:  Chinese  Fisheries  Yearbook  (2006-­‐2016);  Chinese  Feed  Industry  Yearbook  

(2009-­‐2012);  Freetrade.com.cn  (2012-­‐2014)           4  
 Shrimp  Exports  from  China  
600  
Shrimp  Exports  (Product  Weight)  
500   Shrimp  Exports  (Product  Weight)  

400  
2011-­‐2015  down  37%  
300  

200  

100  

0  
2005   2006   2007   2008   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013   2014   2015  

Source:  FAO  (2013);  World  Integrated  Trade  SoluTon  Database  (2005-­‐2015):  

hUp://wits.worldbank.org   5  
China  –  Es3mated  Domes3c  Shrimp  Consump3on    (Round  Weight)  
Thousand  MT  
1,800  

1,600   Domes3c  Consump3on  

+60%  2010-­‐15  
1,400  
+123%  2005-­‐15  
1,200  
 
1,000  

800  

600  

400  

200  

0  
2005   2006   2007   2008   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013   2014   2015  

Source:  Chinese  Fisheries  Yearbook;  FAO  (2013);  World  Integrated  Trade  SoluTon  Database  (2005-­‐2015):  hUp://
wits.worldbank.org  
Note:  EsTmated  ConsumpTon  =  ProducTon  +  Import  -­‐  Export   6  
Marine  Shrimp  Aquaculture  in  China    
by  Region  –  2015  and  2006  
 450    
Thousand  MT  
 400     Share: 36.4%
 350    

 300    

 250    

 200     20.1%  

 150     15.9%  
9.3%   9.1%   9.1%  
 100    

 50    

 -­‐        
Guangdong   Guangxi   Shandong   Hainan   Fujian     Other  

2015  Total  =  1,161,340  MT.   2006  Total  =  732,315  MT.   Source:  Chinese  Fisheries  Yearbook     7  
 Shrimp  Aquaculture  by  Major  Producing  Regions:    
2011-­‐2014    vs.    2014-­‐2018  
Average Annual Growth
Rate
40%
2011-2014 2014-2018 32.90%

30%

20%
13.70%
10.30%
10%
4.90% 4.20%
1.60% 2.50%
0%
-0.20% -1.70%-0.50%

-10%
Southeast Asia China India Americas Middle East / North
Africa

Sources: FAO (2016) for 2011; FAO (2016) and GOAL (2014) for 2012-2014; GOAL (2016) for 2014-2018.

Southeast Asia includes Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Malaysia, Philippines, Myanmar and Taiwan.
M. rosenbergii is not included.
 Shrimp  Aquaculture  in  Asia:  2011  –  2018  

Million MT

1.8

Both China and Thailand expect to make a partial recovery by 2018.

1.5
Thailand moved from second to fifth place in the region.
1.2

0.9

0.6

0.3

0.0
China Thailand Vietnam Indonesia India
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Sources: FAO (2016) for 2011; FAO (2016) and GOAL (2014) for 2012-2014; GOAL (2016) for 2014-2018.
M. rosenbergii is not included.
 Shrimp  Aquaculture  in  Asia:  2011  –  2018  

Thousand MT

120
Malaysia has been heavily impacted by disease but a partial recovery is expected
100 by 2018. Strong growth is expected in Bangladesh.

80

60

40

20

0
Bangladesh Malaysia Philippines Taiwan

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Sources: FAO (2016) for 2011; FAO (2016) and GOAL (2014) for 2012-2014; GOAL (2016) for 2014-2018.
M. rosenbergii is not included.
 Shrimp  Aquaculture  in  La3n  America:  2011  –  2018  

Thousand MT

400

The most significant growth is expected in Ecuador, reaching nearly 400

300
thousand tons by 2018. Production in Brazil will remain more or less flat.

200

100

0
Ecuador Mexico Brazil
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Sources: FAO (2016) for 2011; FAO (2016) and GOAL (2014) for 2012-2014; GOAL (2016) for 2014-2018.
M. rosenbergii is not included.
 Shrimp  Aquaculture  in  La3n  America:  2011  –  2018  

Thousand MT

40

35 Disease issues are affecting and will affect growth in Honduras and
Nicaragua. Venezuela is projecting steady growth through 2018
30

25

20

15

10

0
Honduras Nicaragua Guatemala Peru Venezuela
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Sources: FAO (2016) for 2011; FAO (2016) and GOAL (2014) for 2012-2014; GOAL (2016) for 2014-2018.
M. rosenbergii is not included.
 Shrimp  Aquaculture  in  La3n  America:  2011  –  2018  

Thousand MT

10
Uneven growth is expected in the minor producing nations
of Latin America.
8

0
Panama Belize Costa Rica El Salvador Colombia
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Sources: FAO (2016) for 2011; FAO (2016) and GOAL (2014) for 2012-2014; GOAL (2016) for 2014-2018.
M. rosenbergii is not included.
 Shrimp  Aquaculture  in  Other  Repor3ng  Countries:  2011  –  2018  

Thousand MT

35

30 Saudi Arabia is expected to ramp up production of P. vannamei.

25

20

15

10

0
Saudi Arabia Egypt Madagascar Australia New Caledonia
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Sources: FAO (2016) for 2011; FAO (2016) and GOAL (2014) for 2012-2014; GOAL (2016) for 2014-2018.
M. rosenbergii is not included.
 World  Shrimp  Aquaculture  (including  M.  rosenbergii)    
by  Species:  1995  -­‐  2018  
Million MT

5.0 77%  
74%  
75%  
4.5 72%  
71%  
4.0 64%  
Percentages  indicate  the  share  of  P.  vannamei.  
65%  
3.5

3.0 52%  
2.5

2.0

1.5 12%  
16%  
1.0

0.5

0.0
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
P. vannamei P. monodon M. rosenbergii Other

Sources: FAO (2016) for 1995-2011; FAO (2016) and GOAL (2014) for 2012-2014; GOAL (2016) for 2014-2018.
 Shrimp  Aquaculture  (including  M.  rosenbergii)  in  Asia  by  
Species:  1995  -­‐  2018  
Million MT
72%  
4.0 70%  
70%  
68%  
3.5 67%  
59%  
3.0 Percentages  indicate  the  share  of  P.  vannamei.   60%  

2.5 45%  

2.0

1.5
0.2%  
1.0 0%  

0.5

0.0
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
P. vannamei P. monodon M. rosenbergii Other

Sources: FAO (2016) for 1995-2011; FAO (2016) and GOAL (2014) for 2012-2014; GOAL (2016) for 2014-2018.
 World  Landings  of  Wild-­‐Caught  Shrimp  by  Species  
Othe rs
Million MT
4.0 Northe rn w hite s hrim p
(Pe nae us s e tife rus )

Com m on s hrim p
3.5 (Crangon crangon)

Northe rn brow n s hrim p

(Pe nae us azte cus )
3.0
Banana praw n (Pe nae us
m e rguie ns is )
2.5 Arge ntine re d s hrim p
(Ple oticus m ue lle ri)

2.0 Fle s hy praw n (Pe nae us

chine ns is )

Giant tige r praw n

1.5 (Pe nae us m onodon)

Northe rn praw n
(Pandalus bore alis )
1.0
Southe rn rough s hrim p
(Trachipe nae us
curviros tris )
0.5 Ak iam i pas te s hrim p
(Ace te s japonicus )

0.0
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014

Source: FAO (2016).

 World  Produc3on  of  Shrimp    
Capture  Fisheries  &  Aquaculture  
Million MT
8.0 54%  
52%  

7.0 53%  
49%   51%  
Aquaculture accounted for 54%
6.0
of world shrimp supplies in 2014.
5.0
28%  
4.0

3.0 26%  

2.0

1.0

0.0
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014

Capture Fisheries Aquaculture

Sources: FAO (2016); GOAL (2014, 2016).

Notes: M. rosenbergii is not included.
China includes freshwater production of P. vannamei.
 World  Produc3on  of  Shrimp  by  Species  
Capture  Fisheries  &  Aquaculture  Combined  
The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been corrupted. Restart your computer, and then open the file again. If the red x still appears, you may have to delete the image and then insert it again.

42%  
40%  
P. vannamei is the most important species in the world, 39%  
with virtually all production coming from aquaculture.
28%  
Percentages  indicate  the  share  of  P.  vannamei.  

4%  

Sources: FAO (2016); GOAL (2014, 2016).

Notes: M. rosenbergii is not included. China includes freshwater production of P. vannamei.
 Composi3on  of  Shrimp  Aquaculture  Produc3on  by    
Size  Categories  –  Aggregate  2015  

100% 4%
4% 10% 9% 10% >70
8% 8%
13% 12% 61-70
80% 12% 13%
51-60
19% 18%
19% 41-50
60% 21%
31-40
21% 21%
15%
26-30
40%
29% 21-25
17% 16% 18%
15-20
20%
12% 9% 9% 9%
<15
6% 8% 6%
9%
0%
US Imports - HLSO Asia Americas World

Source: GOAL (2015).

 Expected  Trends  in  Shrimp  Aquaculture    
Size  Categories  -­‐  GOAL  Survey  2016  

Size  Category   Asia   Americas   World  

<15   Decrease/Stable   Stable   Decrease/Stable  

15-­‐20   Decrease/Stable   Decrease/Stable   Decrease/Stable  

21-­‐25   Stable   Stable   Stable  

26-­‐30   Stable   Increase   Stable  

31-­‐40   Increase/Stable   Increase   Increase/Stable  

41-­‐50   Increase   Stable   Increase  

51-­‐60   Increase   Stable   Increase  

61-­‐70   Increase/Stable   Increase   Increase  

>70   Increase   Decrease   Increase/Stable  

India, Indonesia and Vietnam expect increased production of smaller counts.

 GOAL  2016  Survey  
Composi3on  of  Shrimp  Aquaculture  Produc3on  by    
 Product  Form  –  Aggregate  2016  
 
100% 2%
8% 10% 4% 9% Other
7% Forms
7%
13% 10%
80% Breaded
16%
15% 32%
Cooked
60% 40% 21%
23%
Peeled

40% 19%
Green /
20%
56% Head-off

20% 38% Green /

29% Head-on
22%

0%
US Imports Asia Americas World
 Expected  Trends  in  Shrimp  Aquaculture    
Product  Form  -­‐  GOAL  Survey  2015  

Product  Form   Asia   Americas   World  

Green  /  Head-­‐on   Stable/Decrease   Stable/Increase   Stable  

Green  /  Head-­‐off   Increase   Stable/Decrease   Stable/Increase  

Peeled   Stable/Increase   Stable   Stable/Increase  

Cooked   Stable   Stable   Stable  

Breaded   Increase   Stable/Decrease   Increase  

Other  Forms   Increase   Decrease   Increase  

For a number of years there has been a trend for increased production of green / head-on
shrimp in Ecuador for the European and Asian markets.
 GOAL  2016  Survey  
Issues  &  Challenges  in  Shrimp  Aquaculture    
All  Countries  
Diseases
***Production costs - Feed/Fishmeal
Seed stock quality & availability
Access to disease-free broodstock
***International market prices
Production costs - Others
Product quality control
Environmental management
Feed quality and availability
Production costs - Fuel
Access to Credit
Banned chemicals / antibiotic use
***International trade barriers
Market coordination
Infrastructure
Public Relations Management
Conflicts with other users

Moderately Extremely
Not Important
Important Important

Asterisk indicates a Top 3 issue in GOAL 2007 Survey

Worldwide  Top  Issues  &  Challenges  in  Shrimp  Aquaculture:      
2016  Survey  vs.  2015  Survey  

International market prices

Diseases
Production costs - Feed/Fishmeal

Environmental management
Access to disease-free broodstock
Seed stock quality & availability
International trade barriers

Production costs - Fuel

Access to Credit
Production costs - Others

Not Important Moderately Extremely

Important Important

2016 2015
 GOAL  2016  Survey  
Issues  &  Challenges  in  Shrimp  Aquaculture    
Asia  
Diseases
Seed stock quality & availability
***Production costs - Feed/Fishmeal
Access to disease-free broodstock
Product quality control
***International market prices
Environmental management
Feed quality and availability
Production costs - Others
Banned chemicals / antibiotic use
Production costs - Fuel
***International trade barriers
Access to Credit
Infrastructure
Market coordination
Conflicts with other users
Public Relations Management

Moderately Extremely
Not Important
Important Important

Asterisk indicates a Top 3 issue in GOAL 2007 Survey

 GOAL  2016  Survey  
Issues  &  Challenges  in  Shrimp  Aquaculture    
La3n  America  
***Production costs - Feed/Fishmeal
***International market prices
Diseases
Access to disease-free broodstock
Production costs - Others
Access to Credit
Production costs - Fuel
Seed stock quality & availability
***International trade barriers
Market coordination
Feed quality and availability
Banned chemicals / antibiotic use
Infrastructure
Environmental management
Product quality control
Public Relations Management
Conflicts with other users

Moderately Extremely
Not Important
Important Important

Asterisk indicates a Top 3 issue in GOAL 2007 Survey

 GOAL  2016  Survey  
Top  Issues  &  Challenges  in  Shrimp  Aquaculture      
Asia  vs.  La3n  America  
Diseases
International market prices

Production costs - Feed/Fishmeal

Seed stock quality & availability

Product quality control

Access to disease-free broodstock
Production costs - Others
Environmental management
Feed quality and availability
Production costs - Fuel

Not Important Moderately Extremely

Important Important

Asia Americas
 GOAL  2016  Survey  
Global  economic  condi3ons  will  be  be`er  in  2017  compared  to  2016  

Outlook   Asia   Americas   Others   Americas:  more  

posi3ve  than  
Strongly  Agree   Philippines   last  year  
Brazil,  Ecuador,  Mexico,  
 
Agree   Bangladesh,  Taiwan,  Vietnam  
Venezuela   Asia:    li`le  less  
Australia,   posi3ve  than  
Madagascar,  New  
Neutral/No  Opinion  
China,  India,  Indonesia,  South  
Korea,  Thailand  
Honduras,  Nicaragua   Caledonia,  
last  year  
Saudi  Arabia  

Disagree   Malaysia   Panama,  Peru   Egypt

Strongly  Disagree  
 GOAL  2016  Survey  
Feed  prices  will  be  lower  in  2017  compared  to  2016  

Outlook   Asia   Americas   Others  

About  
Strongly  Agree   same  
perspec3ve  
Agree   Madagascar  
as  last  year  
Malaysia,  Philippines,     Brazil,  Ecuador,  Mexico,  
Neutral/No  Opinion  
South  Korea   Nicaragua,  Venezuela  

Bangladesh,  China,  India,   Australia,  Egypt,  New  

Disagree   Indonesia,  Taiwan,  Thailand,   Honduras,  Panama,  Peru   Caledonia,  Saudi  
Vietnam   Arabia

Strongly  Disagree  
 GOAL  2016  Survey  
The  global  shrimp  market  will  strengthen  in  2017  compared  to  2016  

Americas:  Same  
Outlook   Asia   Americas   Others   perspec3ve  as  
last  year  
Strongly  Agree   Philippines    
Bangladesh,  China,  Indonesia,  
Madagascar,  New   Asia:  More  
Agree  
South  Korea,  Taiwan,  Vietnam  
Ecuador,  Peru,  Venezuela   Caledonia,  Saudi  
Arabia  
market  
strengthening  
Brazil,  Honduras,  Mexico,  
Neutral/No  Opinion   India,  Malaysia,  Thailand  
Nicaragua,  Panama  
than  last  year  

Disagree   Australia,  Egypt

Strongly  Disagree  
Trends in Trade
 U.S. Shrimp Imports
Down 12% between 2011-13, Up 17% between 2013-16
650
Other
600
550 Malaysia
500
Peru
Thousand MT

450
400 Mexico
350
China
300
250 Vietnam
200
Thailand
150
100 Ecuador
50
Indonesia
-
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016* India

Imports from Thailand declined sharply (by 68%) between 2010 and 2014, with a slight recovery taking place in 2015 (from 65
to 74 thousand tons). India and Indonesia have become the top exporters to the U.S. market, accounting for 44% of imports in
2016.

Source: USDC/NMFS (2016)

* Estimate
 Thousand MT

100
150
200

0
50
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987

Source: USDC/NMFS (2016)

1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
U.S.  Landings  of  Wild-­‐Caught  Shrimp  

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Pink
White
Brown
Others
 Trends in U.S. Shrimp Import Prices
10  
9  
8  
7  
2000  USD/lb  

6  
5  
4  
3  
2  
1  
0  
1990  

1995  
1996  

1998  
1999  
2000  

2005  
2006  

2008  
2009  
2010  

2015  
2016  
1991  
1992  
1993  
1994  

1997  

2001  
2002  
2003  
2004  

2007  

2011  
2012  
2013  
2014  
<15/lb   31-­‐40   >70/lb   Peeled   Composite  

Real prices increased sharply during 2013 but returned to previous levels in 2014 and
early 2015. Real prices have remained stable over the last 12 months.
Source: USDC/NMFS (2016).
 P. Monodon vs. P. vannamei
U.S. Wholesale Prices
 9.00    
 8.00    
 7.00    
 6.00    
 5.00    
 4.00    
USD/lb  

 3.00    
 2.00    
 1.00    
 -­‐        
 (1.00)  
 (2.00)  
Jan-­‐99  
Jul-­‐99  
Jan-­‐00  
Jul-­‐00  
Jan-­‐01  

Jan-­‐02  

Jan-­‐03  

Jan-­‐04  

Jan-­‐05  
Jul-­‐05  
Jan-­‐06  
Jul-­‐06  
Jan-­‐07  

Jan-­‐08  
Jul-­‐08  
Jan-­‐09  
Jul-­‐09  
Jan-­‐10  
Jul-­‐10  
Jan-­‐11  

Jan-­‐12  

Jan-­‐13  

Jan-­‐14  

Jan-­‐15  
Jul-­‐15  
Jan-­‐16  
Jul-­‐16  
Jul-­‐01  

Jul-­‐02  

Jul-­‐03  

Jul-­‐04  

Jul-­‐07  

Jul-­‐11  

Jul-­‐12  

Jul-­‐13  

Jul-­‐14  
Farmed,  C&SA  White,  26-­‐30   Farmed,  Southeast  Asian,  26-­‐30   Premium,  White  -­‐  Tiger  

Coinciding with falling supplies from Thailand, wholesale shrimp prices began rising in 2010 with the sharpest increase taking place in
2013. Prices declined during 2014 and 2015 as other countries (India, Indonesia, Ecuador, Vietnam) increased their exports to the U.S. The
increase in prices during 2016 is partially driven by low harvests from the Gulf of Mexico shrimp fisheries.

Source: Urner Barry (2016).

 European Shrimp Imports from Extra-EU Countries
Down 9% between 2011-13, Up 7% between 2013-16
650
Others
600
550 Morocco
500
China
Thousand MT

450
400 Bangladesh
350
Canada
300
250 Greenland
200
Vietnam
150
100 Argentina
50
India
-
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016* Ecuador

Source: Eurostat (2016).

* Estimate
 Spanish Shrimp Imports
Down 16% between 2011-13, Up 9% between 2013-16
200
Others
180
Tunisia
160
Morocco
Thousand MT

140
120 Belgium

100 Peru

80 India
60
Nicaragua
40
China
20
Ecuador
-
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016* Argentina

Source: Eurostat (2016).

* Estimate
 French Shrimp Imports
Down 9% between 2010-14, Up 10% between 2014-16
120
Others

100 Nicaragua

Spain
Thousand MT

80
Venezuela

60 Madagascar

Vietnam
40
Netherlands

20 Belgium

India
-
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016* Ecuador

Imports from Ecuador and India have increased dramatically since 2000,
currently accounting for nearly 38% of the import market.

Source: Eurostat (2016).

* Estimate
 Japanese Shrimp Imports
Down 25% between 2011-15, Up 4% in 2016
350
Others

300 Myanmar

250 Canada
Thousand MT

Russia
200
Argentina
150
China

100 India

50 Indonesia

Thailand
-
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016* Vietnam

Declining imports were caused primarily by lower shipments from Thailand, which went down from
80 thousand tons in 2012 to 36 thousand tones in 2015, with no substantial increase in 2016.

Source: Japan Customs (2016).

* Estimate
  
Conclusions    
 
2014  to  2015  -­‐5%  
 2015  to  2016  +2%    
 
Expected  global  growth  rate  2015-­‐18  about  +4%  per  year  
(Less  bullish  about  than  recovery  last  year)  
 
Disease  -­‐  Biggest  Constraint  Esp.  Asia  
Followed  by  cost  and  availability  of  quality  seed  stock  
 
2017  -­‐  Expecta3ons  
Higher  feed  prices;    
Stronger  shrimp  markets  (esp.  in  Asia)  
Leaning  bullish  on  global  economic  condi3ons      
(Asia  less  bullish  &  Americas  more  bullish  than  last  year)  
  
 

Thank  You    
James.anderson@ufl.edu  
h`p://isfs.ins3tute.ifas.ufl.edu  
  
 
BONUS  SLIDES  
 Shrimp  Aquaculture  in  Asia:    
2011-­‐2014    vs.    2014-­‐2018  
Average Annual Growth
Rate

20%
2011-2014 2014-2018 14.40% 13.70%
15%
11.50%
10% 7.10% 4.90%
5%
2.30%
0%
-0.50%
-1.70% -2.30%
-5%

-10%

-15%

-20%

-25% -22.70%
China Thailand Vietnam Indonesia India

Sources: FAO (2016) for 2011; FAO (2016) and GOAL (2014) for 2012-2014; GOAL (2016) for 2014-2018.
M. rosenbergii is not included.
 Shrimp  Aquaculture  in  Asia:    
2011-­‐2014    vs.    2014-­‐2018  
Average Annual Growth
Rate
20%
18% 2011-2014 2014-2018 16.30%
16%
14%
12%
10% 9.30%
7.10%
8% 6.80%
6%
3.80%
4% 2.50%
2% 1.70%
0%
-2%
-4% -1.60%
-3.10%
-6%
-8% -7.00%
-10%
Bangladesh Malaysia Philippines Taiwan South Korea

Sources: FAO (2016) for 2011; FAO (2016) and GOAL (2014) for 2012-2014; GOAL (2016) for 2014-2018.
M. rosenbergii is not included.
 Composi3on  of  Shrimp  Aquaculture  Produc3on  
by  Size  Categories  –    
Comparison  of  Survey  Data  for  Asia  

100% 7% 5% 5%
8% 12% 12% 13% 11% 10% >70
6% 7% 7%
7%
27% 11% 13% 61-70
10% 12% 15% 15% 16%
80% 10% 41% 14% 42%
46% 42% 51-60
48%
18% 19%
22% 19% 20% 15% 41-50
21% 19% 21%
60%
31-40
25% 18% 21%
19% 17% 26-30
40% 29% 69%30% 65% 30% 23%
64% 61%
39% 46%
50% 13%
43% 42% 21-25
15% 16% 15% 16%
8%
20% 16% 17% 15-20
18% 14% 9% 6% 9%
9% 10%
6% 7% 5% 5% 5% 6% <15
7% 7%
0%
GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Disease problems in Asia led to the harvesting of smaller sizes since 2011.
 Composi3on  of  Shrimp  Aquaculture  Produc3on  
by  Size  Categories  –    
Comparison  of  Survey  Data  for  the  Americas  

100% 4%
6% 7% 8% 6%
10% 10% 9% >70
10% 14% 4%
11% 10% 10% 10% 8%
30%
80% 15% 30% 13% 10% 30% 11%
25% 61-70
15% 13% 12% 40% 42% 14% 13%
51-60
17% 18% 19%
60% 16% 19% 22% 18% 21% 41-50
23%
31-40
24% 21%
16% 25%
40% 20% 20% 59% 26-30
25% 60%
22% 60% 61% 29%
18% 54% 19% 50% 21-25
19% 15% 22% 16%
20% 15-20
15% 18% 9%
10% 9%
16% 11% 8% 8%
10% 9% 4% 7% 6% <15
0%
GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

There was also a temporary trend towards smaller sizes in Latin America in 2011 and 2012.
 Composi3on  of  Shrimp  Aquaculture  Produc3on  
by  Product  Form  –    
Comparison  of  Survey  Data  for  Asia  

100% 3% 4% 6%
8% 10% 10% Other
12% 13% 8% 7%
11% 8% Forms
12% 9% 10%
80% 9% 16%
20% Breaded
19% 18%
22% 20% 18% 15%
15%
Cooked
60% 24%
23% 25% 23%
28% 18% 24%
30% Peeled
35%
40% 10% 18%
18% 20% 20% Green /
22% 17%
Head-off
20% 22% 42%
19% 33% 30% Green /
25% 24% 23% 22% 22%
17% Head-on
6% 9%
0%
GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
 Composi3on  of  Shrimp  Aquaculture  Produc3on  
by  Product  Form  –    
Comparison  of  Survey  Data  for  China  

5% 4% 5%
100% 9% Other
10% 9% 9%
10% 17% 15% Forms
10% 18% 21% 8%
27% 15% 20% 4% Breaded
80% 13% 14%
13% 13%
15% 11% 25%
20% 16% 11% Cooked
22% 17%
60% 14% 5%
22% 27%
5%
31% Peeled
30% 20%
40% 35% 33%
15% 24%
25% Green /
5% 9%
13% 54% 3% Head-off
48%
20%
14% 28% Green /
17% 15% 25% 22% 25%
20% Head-on
4% 5% 9%
0%
GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

There has been a trend in China towards the production of green head-on/head-off
and peeled shrimp relative to processed forms in recent years.
 Composi3on  of  Shrimp  Aquaculture  Produc3on  
by  Product  Form  –    
Comparison  of  Survey  Data  for  the  Americas  
100% 3% 3% 3% 4%
6% 7% 6% 4% Other
7% 6% 7%
14% Forms
12%
15%
80% Breaded
34% 26%
32%
46% 45% 30%
53% 31% 24% Cooked
60%

Peeled
40%
63% Green /
57% 53% 56% Head-off
50% 52%
44% 46%
20% 40%
Green /
Head-on
0%
GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL GOAL
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

The growing share of the green head-on form reflects an increased presence of
Ecuadorian shrimp in European and Asian markets.