Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Tes Skrining

    Uploaded by

    iwanaanny rakhmawati
    5 views1 page
    The document contains a cross-tabulation table showing the results of a screening test compared to actual medical diagnoses for 1000 patients. 80 patients tested positive on the screening and were actually sick, while 100 tested positive but were not sick. 20 patients tested negative and were actually sick, while 800 tested negative and were not sick. The sensitivity of the screening test was 80%, specificity was 88.9%, positive predictive value was 44.4%, and negative predictive value was 97.6%.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Tes skrining

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document contains a cross-tabulation table showing the results of a screening test compared to actual medical diagnoses for 1000 patients. 80 patients tested positive on the screening and were actually sick, while 100 tested positive but were not sick. 20 patients tested negative and were actually sick, while 800 tested negative and were not sick. The sensitivity of the screening test was 80%, specificity was 88.9%, positive predictive value was 44.4%, and negative predictive value was 97.6%.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views1 page

    Tes Skrining

    Uploaded by

    iwanaanny rakhmawati
    The document contains a cross-tabulation table showing the results of a screening test compared to actual medical diagnoses for 1000 patients. 80 patients tested positive on the screening and were actually sick, while 100 tested positive but were not sick. 20 patients tested negative and were actually sick, while 800 tested negative and were not sick. The sensitivity of the screening test was 80%, specificity was 88.9%, positive predictive value was 44.4%, and negative predictive value was 97.6%.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Tes skrining * Kodisi klinis Crosstabulation

    Kodisi klinis
    Sakit Tidak sakit Total
    Tes skrining Positive Count 80 100 180
    Expected Count 18,0 162,0 180,0
    % within Tes skrining 44,4% 55,6% 100,0%
    % within Kodisi klinis 80,0% 11,1% 18,0%
    % of Total 8,0% 10,0% 18,0%
    negative Count 20 800 820
    Expected Count 82,0 738,0 820,0
    % within Tes skrining 2,4% 97,6% 100,0%
    % within Kodisi klinis 20,0% 88,9% 82,0%
    % of Total 2,0% 80,0% 82,0%
    Total Count 100 900 1000
    Expected Count 100,0 900,0 1000,0
    % within Tes skrining 10,0% 90,0% 100,0%
    % within Kodisi klinis 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
    % of Total 10,0% 90,0% 100,0%

     Sensitifitas = TP/ (TP+FN) x 100% = 80 / 100 x100% = 80%


    Artinya test skrining positive mampu mendeteksi kodisi pasien sakit sebesar 80%.

     Spesifisitas = TN/ (TN+FP) x 100% = 800 / 900 x100% = 88,9%


    Artinya test skrining dengan negative mampu mendeteksi mereka yang benar-benar tidak
    sakit sebesar 88,9%.

     PVP = TP/ (TP=FP) x 100% = 80 /180 x100% = 44,4%


    Artinya mereka yang memiliki hasil test skrining positive, kemungkinan 44% benar-benar
    sakit.

     PVN = TN/ (TN+FN) x 100% = 800 / 820 x100% = 97,6%


    Artinya meraka yang memiliki hasil tets negative, kemungkinan 97,6% benar-benar tidak
    sakit.

    You might also like