Important: To use this spreadsheet without issue you must set your computer's

Otherwise the calculations will not work correctly!!

1. LOW Which will force no cautions with respect to Macros a
2. MEDIUM Which will allow you to "ENABLE" the Macros to run.

IMPORTANT NOTE: This setting will be the default setting for ALL
Not resetting to a higher level can leave you vulnerable to Macro virus's with oth

Directions on how to set up Macro Security.

1. Open Excel………..

2. Go to TOOLS, OPTIONS
3. Click on "MACRO SECURITY"

4. Set Macro security to either Low or Medium.

5. Click OK and close Excel.

6. Re-open the file and use spreadsheet.

st set your computer's Macro security to one of the following:
rrectly!!
with respect to Macros and allow all Macros with this spreadhseet to run.
BLE" the Macros to run.

etting for ALL Spreadsheets that you open with EXCEL until changed.
ble to Macro virus's with other spreadhseets!
 PPAP Submission Requirements Submission Level
Production Part Approval Process Supplier Checklist (Please Type 1-5) 3

Cooper Part Number Part Description Supplier Name

Revision Level Cooper Purchasing Rep. Submission Date
Primary Manufacturing Site Purchasing Rep Phone # PPAP Due Date

PPAP Requirements

Included
AIAG PPAP Fourth Edition
Element

Level 4
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3

Level 5
Order

Important: Submit your

documents in this order.
Required Documents Assigned to Internal Due Date Comments/Concerns/Questions

Part Submission Warrant

1 AR Cooper PSW Required YES
(PSW)

2
Design Records & AR
TWO Cooper Divisional Parts
YES
Bubbled part print(s). Prints

Approved Engineering
Various engineering
3 Change Documentation AR AR
documentation YES

4
Customer Engineering Not Required for Cooper
Approvals Submissions YES

Can be Cooper FMEA Format or

5 Design FMEA, AR AR AR
an AIAG compliant DFMEA. YES

6 Process Flow Diagrams AR Any standard flowchart format. YES

Can be Cooper PFMEA Format or

7 Process FMEA AR
an AIAH compliant PFMEA. YES

Can be Cooper supplied format or

8 Control Plan AR
AIAG compliant format. YES

Cooper GRR format or any

Measurement System YES
9 AR AR statistical package format for
Analysis Studies gage R&R.

Must be on Cooper Dimensional

10 Dimensional Results AR
report format YES

Material, Performance Industry Standard reports or test

11 Test Results AR AR result formats designated by
YES
Cooper Industries.

Initial Process Study Process Capability Study using

12 (Cpk) AR AR any statistical package or Cooper YES
Capability Studies Capability Data Forms.

13
Qualified Laboratory AR
Lab Scope and outside lab proof
Documentation of accreditation. YES

Appearance Approval
14 Report AR AR AR AR AR AIAG format AAR YES

Parts tagged in accordance with

15 Sample Product Parts AR
Cooper PPAP reference manual
YES

16 Master Samples Required only for level 5 YES

Checking aid design prints and

17 Checking aids AR
GRR for checking fixtures.
YES

18
Customer Specific Documents as specified by
Requirements Cooper Industries

YES
Specific document required by
a Tooling Information Form AR
Cooper Industries.

YES
Specific document required by
b Packaging Form AR
Cooper Industries.

c Inspection Plan IA IA IA IA Specific ASC Format e YES

(ASC Suppliers only)

YES
d
Specification Deviation IA IA IA IA
Specific document required by
Form Cooper Industries.

YES
Specific document required by
e Supplier PPAP Checklist AR
Cooper Industries.

Required for PPAP submission Not required Documents on a case by case basis are marked AR for "As Requested" AR IF Applicable IA
 Part Submission Warrant
Part Name Cooper Part Number

Safety and/or
Government Regulation Yes No Engineering Drawing Revision Level Dated

Additional Engineering Changes Dated

Shown on Drawing Number Purchase Order No. Weight (kg)

SUPPLIER MANUFACTURING INFORMATION SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Supplier Company Name Supplier Vendor Number Customer Name:

Additional Manufacturing Sites Cooper Manufacturing Locations using the part (list all)

Street Address Purchasing Representative Purchasing Office

City State Zip PPAP Due Date: SOP Date

Does this part utilize Cooper owned tooling? Is it properly identified? Yes No If yes, P.O. #

Does this part contain any restricted substances or require IMDS submission? Yes No Substance(s)?

IMDS Number
Are plastic or polymeric parts identified with appropriate ISO marking codes?
Yes No

REASON FOR SUBMISSION

Initial submission (New Parts and Part Number Changes) New Supplier, New material or new source for existing material
Engineering Change: New/Revised drawing or other specification Change of supplier, material or non-equivalent materials/services
Tooling: transfer, replacement (new), refurbishment, modified or additional New process or a change in production process or method
Correction of Non-conformance or discrepancy Change of manufacturing location, sub-supplier or additional location
Change to optional construction, material or component Other - please specify

REQUESTED SUBMISSION LEVEL (Check one)

Level 1 - Warrant only submitted to the customer (Applied to non-critical parts and raw bulk material)
Level 2 - Warrant with product samples amd limiting supporting data. (Applied to critical bulk product and simple changes)
Level 3 - Warrant with product samples and complete supporting data. (Applied to new parts on Cooper programs) DEFAULT COOPER SUBMISSION LEVEL
Level 4 - Warrant and other requirements as defined by Cooper.(Applied only with prior approval from Cooper…special situations only!)
Level 5 - Warrant with product samples and complete supporting data reviewed at supplier's manufacturing location. (Applied to parts requiring onsite review )

SUBMISSION RESULTS
The results for dimensional measurements material and functional tests appearance criteria statistical process package

These results meet all drawing and specification requirements: YES NO (If "NO" - Explanation Required in Explanation/comments section below )

Is this a multicavity tool? YES NO How many Cavities/Spindle (for molds or dies) ? Number of parts submitted by cavity/spindle

DECLARATION
I affirm that the samples represented by this warrant are representative of our parts, have been made to the applicable Production Part Approval Process Manual 4th Edition
requirements. I further warrant these samples were produced with the specified materials on regular production tooling with no operations other then the regular production
process. The data and samples were produced at the production rate of in on Any deviations to this warrant submission
are noted below in the explanation/comments section. #parts # hours date

EXPLANATION/COMMENTS:

Print Name: Job Title Phone No. Fax No.

Supplier Authorized Signature Date Email

FOR COOPER INDUSTRIES USE ONLY

Quality/Supplier Quality Date

Initial Part Warrant Disposition:
Quality/Supplier Quality Management Date

Interim Expires:

Final Part Warrant Disposition:

Quality or Supplier Quality Date
Approved Rejected
Print Approver Name: Cooper PPAP Tracking Number:
 Control Plan
Protot Pre- Product
ype
Control Plan Number
Launch ion
Key Contact / Phone Date (Orig.) Current Release Level Current Release Date

Part Number/ Latest Change (Rev) Level Part Description Supplier Code Plant Location

Core Team Supplier Name Quality Department Approval

Customer Engineering Approval / Date (If Req'd) Supplier Plant Approval Other Approval / Date (If Req'd)

METHODS
CHARACTERISTICS
SAMPLE
PROCESS
NUMBER

PROCESS NAME / MACHINE DEVICES / JIG / SPECIAL PRODUCT / PROCESS / EVALUATION/

PART /

FREQ
OPERATION TOOLS FOR CHAR. SPECIFICATION / MEASUREMENT

SIZE
DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURING NO. PRODUCT PROCESS CLASS TOLERANCE TECHNIQUE CONTROL METHOD REACTION PLAN

Note: All part print CTQ's must be clearly identified on this control plan. Page 6 of 26
 Page 7 of 26

Please indicate EITHER:

Potential Failure Modes and Effects Analysis 1.) A designated RPN threshold for this process
Design FMEA 2.) A target percentage of steps to be addressed.
Check One

Print # Design Responsibility FMEA Number

Item Name Contact Number Prepared By
Rev # Key Date FMEA Date (Orig.)
Core Team Customer Manufacturing Site FMEA Date

Current Product Controls Action Results

Item Number

C
Responsibility
S l O D R
Item/ Potential Potential Effects Potential Cause(s)/ Recommended and
Requirements E a C E P S O D R
Function Failure Mode of Failure Failure Mechanisms Action(s) Completion
V s C Prevention Detection T N Actions Taken E C E P
Date
s V C T N

0 0
0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0
0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0
0 0

0 0

0 0
0 0

0 0
0 0

0 0

0 0
0 0

0 0

0 0
0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0
0 0

0 0
 Page 8 of 26

Please indicate EITHER:

Potential Failure Modes and Effects Analysis 1.) A designated RPN threshold for this process
Design FMEA 2.) A target percentage of steps to be addressed.
Check One

Print # Design Responsibility FMEA Number

Item Name Contact Number Prepared By
Rev # Key Date FMEA Date (Orig.)
Core Team Customer Manufacturing Site FMEA Date

Current Product Controls Action Results

Item Number

C
Responsibility
S l O D R
Item/ Potential Potential Effects Potential Cause(s)/ Recommended and
Requirements E a C E P S O D R
Function Failure Mode of Failure Failure Mechanisms Action(s) Completion
V s C Prevention Detection T N Actions Taken E C E P
Date
s V C T N

0 0

0 0
0 0
 Page 9 of 26

Please indicate EITHER:

Potential Failure Modes and Effects Analysis 1.) A designated RPN threshold for this process
Process FMEA 2.) A target percentage of steps to be addressed.
Check One

Print # Process Responsibility FMEA Number

Item Name Contact Number Prepared By
Rev # Key Date FMEA Date (Orig.)
Core Team Customer Manufacturing Site FMEA Date

Current Process Controls Action Results

Process Number

C
Responsibility
S l O D R
Process/Step Potential Potential Effects Potential Cause(s)/ Recommended and
Requirements E a C E P S O D R
Function Failure Mode of Failure Failure Mechanisms Action(s) Completion
V s C Prevention Detection T N Actions Taken E C E P
Date
s V C T N

0 0

0 0
0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0
0 0

0 0

0 0
0 0

0 0

0 0
0 0

0 0
0 0

0 0

0 0
0 0

0 0

0 0
0 0

0 0
0 0

0 0

0 0
0 0

0 0

0 0
0 0
 Page 10 of 26

Please indicate EITHER:

Potential Failure Modes and Effects Analysis 1.) A designated RPN threshold for this process
Process FMEA 2.) A target percentage of steps to be addressed.
Check One

Print # Process Responsibility FMEA Number

Item Name Contact Number Prepared By
Rev # Key Date FMEA Date (Orig.)
Core Team Customer Manufacturing Site FMEA Date

Current Process Controls Action Results

Process Number

C
Responsibility
S l O D R
Process/Step Potential Potential Effects Potential Cause(s)/ Recommended and
Requirements E a C E P S O D R
Function Failure Mode of Failure Failure Mechanisms Action(s) Completion
V s C Prevention Detection T N Actions Taken E C E P
Date
s V C T N

0 0

0 0
0 0

0 0
 Date of Measurement:

DIMENSIONAL DATA SHEET Page #: of

Reason for Data Submission (check all that apply): Supplier Representative: Supplier Signature
Supplier Name:

Part Name: Initial submission New/revised item, material or product component Name Title

Part Number Correction of Non-conformance New Supplier

Judgement Legend

Drawing Number: New/Revised drawing or other specification New or significantly modified process or routing Phone Number Email: OK Meets Requirements

Revision Level: Change to optional construction or material Change of location, sub-supplier or material
OKNI OK But Needs Improvement

Revision Date: Tooling: Transfer, replacement, refurbishment Other - please specify Date: Supplier Code: NG Does Not Meet Requirements
or additional tool.

Data for Sample Number….. Judgement

A=Attribute
V=Variable
Cpk (Y/N)

Data Type:
Required
ITEM #

REQUIREMENT: REQUIREMENT: Bonus

Measurement Method Min Max Comments/Action Plan
Description of Check Target Applied (Y/N)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Average Range Supplier

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

0.00
0.00

0.00
0.00

0.00
0.00

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

0.00
0.00
0.00

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

NOTE: Any out of specification data will require corrective action.

 Supplier Change Request
This approved form must accompany your PPAP submission
Supplier Information

Supplier Name Date of Request

Supplier Number Cooper Purchasing Contact
Supplier Location(s) Supplier Contact Name
Supplier Contact Phone #
Supplier Contact Email

Date of Proposed FUTURE Change

Description of Change (Please describe in detail the nature of the change)

This section is reserved for parts sourced through CES (Cooper Electric Shaghai)
CES Product? Yes No Name of CES SQE

Customer Information: (Please list additional part numbers on a separate sheet if necessary)
Customer Part Number(s) Affected Customer Location(s) Affected (city,state)

Type of Change (Note:) You are required to notify and receive approval from Cooper for any of these types.
(Select One) Designations in ( ) are the recommend PPAP Level submissions for this type of change

1. Change to construction, material or component (L3)
2. New, additional or modified tools (L3)
3. Upgrade or rearrangement of existing tools (L2)
4. Tooling, production or equipment transferred to different site (L3)
5. Change of supplier or non-equivalent materials/services (L3)
6. Product when tooling has been inactive for 12 months (L2)
7. Product/process changes on components of the product (L4)
8. Change in test or inspection method (L4)
9. Bulk Material: New source of raw material (L2)
10. Change in product appearance attributes (L2)
11. Change in production process or method (L4)
12. Change of Sub Supplier or material source (L3)

Reference: Section 3 Table 3.1 on Page 13 of AIAG PPAP 4th edition (May 2006)
ALL Information Below is to be filled out by Cooper Industries.
Cooper Requirements (Plant Quality, Supplier Quality and Puchasing)
Purchasing
Timing Plan Received Yes No Date SCR Received

Quality or Supplier Quality

PPAP Required? Yes No Level Due Date

Process Audit Yes No Engineering Consulted

Engineer Date
Additional Requirements

Approval Signatures Signature Date

Purchasing Representative

Quality Representative

Mandatory Distribution: Plant Operations, Plant Quality, Purchasing, Supplier Quality and Engineering
 Page 13 of 26

Tooling Information Form Cooper Tooling reference number.

(if applicable)
XXXXX

Supplier Name PPAP Submission Level Affected Feature Number(s) Part Description

Date PPAP Due Date Part Number Tool Location

Facility
Date of Tooling Change Part Name Machine
Station
New Tooling Modified Tooling ✘ Required for PPAP Note: This document must be completed for all Cooper owned tooling.

Complete Supplier Tooling Action Item List to ensure all items are completed.
TOOLING ACTION ITEMS Who What When Status
Tooling Images
Diagram or Strip Layout
Tool Drawings
Tool Cost Breakdown
Design Cost
Material Cost
Labor Cost
Tool Description
Tool Dimensions
Length
Width
Height
Daylight Opening
Weight
Press Size
Tool Material
Tool Capacity
Hourly
Daily
Annual
Life Expectancy

Comments
 Page 14 of 26

Tooling Information Form Cooper Tooling reference number.

(if applicable)
XXXXX

Supplier Name PPAP Submission Level Affected Feature Number(s) Part Description

Date PPAP Due Date Part Number Tool Location

Facility
Date of Tooling Change Part Name Machine
Station
New Tooling Modified Tooling ✘ Required for PPAP Note: This document must be completed for all Cooper owned tooling.

Fig. 1 Top View Fig. 2 Bottom View

Fig. 3 Left View Fig. 4 Right View

 Page 15 of 26

Tooling Information Form Cooper Tooling reference number.

(if applicable)
XXXXX

Supplier Name PPAP Submission Level Affected Feature Number(s) Part Description

Date PPAP Due Date Part Number Tool Location

Facility
Date of Tooling Change Part Name Machine
Station
New Tooling Modified Tooling ✘ Required for PPAP Note: This document must be completed for all Cooper owned tooling.

Fig. 5 Front View Fig. 6 Back View

Fig. 7 Tool Tag View Fig. 8 Example

 Page 16 of 26

Tooling Information Form Cooper Tooling reference number.

(if applicable)
XXXXX

Supplier Name PPAP Submission Level Affected Feature Number(s) Part Description

Date PPAP Due Date Part Number Tool Location

Facility
Date of Tooling Change Part Name Machine
Station
New Tooling Modified Tooling ✘ Required for PPAP Note: This document must be completed for all Cooper owned tooling.

Additional Comments
 Packaging Form
Date Packaging Contact Part Number Supplier Responsibilities Completed?
Packaging Design
Supplier Name Phone Number Print Revision Level Packaging that prevents
shipping and material handling
Supplier Code Fax Number Part Description defects

Electronic storage of submitted

Supplier Production Facility E-Mail Address HAZMAT?
Packaging Data Form
Yes No

Part In Packaging Position Container With Label Shown

DIGITAL IMAGES

Component L (mm) W (mm) H (mm) Component Wt (kg) Quantities

PACKAGE DATA

Part Size Part Qty Parts per Container

Container Only Dunnage (Tare) Container(s) per Layer on Pallet
Pallet Only Container (Tare) Later per Pallet
Unit Load As Shipped Pallet (Tare) Container(s) per Pallet
In to MM Lbs to Kg Container Gross (Inc Parts) Stacking Rule
0 0 Unit Load Gross (Inc Parts)
 Packaging Form
Date Packaging Contact Part Number Supplier Responsibilities Completed?
Packaging Design
Supplier Name Phone Number Print Revision Level Packaging that prevents
shipping and material handling
Supplier Code Fax Number Part Description defects

Electronic storage of submitted

Supplier Production Facility E-Mail Address HAZMAT?
Packaging Data Form
Yes No

Dunnage In Container Position Unit Load As Shipped With Label Shown

DIGITAL IMAGES

Description Manufacturer Material Lead Time RET/EXP COMMENTS

Dunnage
PACKAGING

Container Color
MATERIALS

Container Type
Cover/Top Cap
Pallet
Stretch/Shrink Film
Banding
 Packaging Form
Date Packaging Contact Part Number Supplier Responsibilities Completed?
Packaging Design
Supplier Name Phone Number Print Revision Level Packaging that prevents
shipping and material handling
PACKAGING
MATERIALS

Supplier Code Fax Number Part Description defects

Supplier Production Facility E-Mail Address HAZMAT? Electronic storage of submitted

Packaging Data Form
Yes No
Other
 Specification Deviation Form
Existing Production Deviation PPAP Submission Check Here to Request Print Changes

Part Name Part No: Expiration Date

Drawing or Spec No. Revision Revision Date

Purchase order number Initiated By Maximum Units to be Deviated

Requirement Stated on Drawing or Actual Observed Results or Deviation from Specification to be

Specification Condition Allowed

Interim Action

Interim Action Status Effect on Cost, Quality and/or Delivery

Rework
Choose One

Due Date

Corrective Action(s)
# Action Item Responsible Party Due Date Status

Cooper Internal Use Only- Engineering and Quality comments

Approval Signatures
Route To Approve Reject Signature Date
Manufacturing Engineer
Manufacturing
Purchasing
Project Engineer
Quality

Engineering or Quality Final Disposition Approve Reject

 GR&R Study - Multiple Operators
For use with testing gage systems meant to evaluate features or processes whose output measured numerically, and for which two
to three operators are expected to conduct the evaluation. Rev. 11/1/07 Dave
Olson
Part Number: Supplier Name: Date
Drawing Number: Supplier Address:
Drawing Rev.: Supplier Contact
Rev. Date:
Drawing Location: PCA Supplier Name: GR&R Contact
Part Feature: PCA Address:
Feature Symbol: PCA Contact
Other Information

Calibration Date: Gage Type: Gage ID: Unit of Measure:

Operator 1 Name Operator 2 Name Operator 3 Name

0 0 0
USL LSL Number of Trials: Number of Operators:

Operator 1 Operator 2 Operator 3

Part # 1st Trial 2nd Trial 3rd Trial Range 1st Trial 2nd Trial 3rd Trial Range 1st Trial 2nd Trial 3rd Trial Range
1 Error Error Error
2 Error Error Error
3 Error Error Error
4 Error Error Error
5 Error Error Error
6 Error Error Error
7 Error Error Error
8 Error Error Error
9 Error Error Error
10 Error Error Error
* A minimum of six samples for each trial is required for these results to be valid

Gage R&R Summary Gage R&R Disposition

Measurement Unit Analysis
Repeatability: EV= #VALUE!
Reproducability: AV= #VALUE! Disposition #VALUE!
R&R= #VALUE!
Part Variation: PV = #N/A
Total Variation: TV= #VALUE! GR&RTOL% < 10 Pass - Gage System is Useable

% Process Variation (TV) / % Tolerance Variation (TOL)

% Equipment Variation (EVTV) #VALUE! %EVTOL #VALUE! Gage System is useable but
10 ≤ GR&RTOL% ≤ 30 marginal
% Appraiser Variation (AVTV) #VALUE! %AVTOL #VALUE!
%GR&R (GR&RTV) #VALUE! %GR&RTOL #VALUE!
%Part Variation (PVTV) #N/A GR&RTOL% > 30 Fail - Gage System is Unstable
Operator X Values

Part Operator Average Repeatability Range (All Operators)

Most part averages should be outside the con-
1 2 3 4 5 trol
6 limits
7 8 9 10
12
12.000

10
10.000
Bar R

8
8.000

6
6.000

4.000

2.000
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0.000
UCLr
Sample
Bar-R
Number
Op1 Range Op2 Range
UCLx LCLx Bar-X Op1 X Op2 X
Op3 X Op3 Range
Operator X Values

Part Operator Average Repeatability Range (All Operators)

Most part averages should be outside the con-
1 2 3 4 5 trol
6 limits
7 8 9 10
12
12.000

10
10.000

Bar R
8
8.000

6
6.000

4.000

2.000
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0.000
UCLr
Sample
Bar-R
Number
Op1 Range Op2 Range
UCLx LCLx Bar-X Op1 X Op2 X
Op3 X Op3 Range
 Process Capability Analysis - Ppk
Use when: (a) You are a new supplier to Cooper that has already been manufacturing the specified part, or (b) you are an existing
supplier who has been found to have supplied a large number of nonconforming parts.

Are the Design Characteristics Safety Related, or Functional?

Safety Related (Ppk ≥ 1.67) Functional (Ppk ≥ 1.33)

Part Number: Supplier Name: Date

Drawing Number: Supplier Address:
Drawing Rev.: Supplier Contact
Rev. Date:
Drawing Location: PCA Supplier Name:
Part Feature: PCA Address:
Feature Symbol:
Other Information

Limits PCA Summary

USL Process Data Potential Capability

LSL LSL = 0.000 Ppku = Error in STDEV

USL = 0.000 Ppkl = Error in STDEV

Mean = No Data Ppk = Error in STDEV

Test Data StDev = 0.000 Pp = Error in STDEV

Test No. Test %Cr = Error in STDEV

1 Max = 0.000

2 Min = 0.000

4 Spec Frequency Distribution

5 1 0.000 #VALUE!
6 2 0.000 #VALUE!

7 3 0.000 #VALUE!
Frequency

8 4 0.000 #VALUE!

9 5 0.000 #VALUE!
10 6 0.000 #VALUE!

11 7 0.000 #VALUE!

12 8 0.000 #VALUE!

13 9 0.000 #VALUE!
14 10 0.000 #VALUE!

15

16

17
18
0.000

0.000

0.000
0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

19 Values

20

21
22 Disposition Invalid PPK

23 Ppk < 1.33 Reject, Corrective Action Needed

24 Ppk ≥ 1.33 Accept

25
 Cpk for Subgroups
Use when: (a) new part, (b) part with revised specifications, (c) part in which the materials, processes, manufacturing location, or production equipment have significantly changed, or (d)
part in which the material suppliers have changed.

Part Number: Supplier Name: Date of Study

Drawing Number: Supplier Address:
Drawing Rev.: Supplier Contact
Rev. Date:
Drawing Location: PCA Supplier Name: GR&R Contact
Part Feature: PCA Address:
Feature Symbol: PCA Contact
Other Information

PCA Summary
Subgroup Sizes Limits Process Data Potential Capability
30 Subgroups of Size 2 USL USL= 0.000 Cp = Error in STDEV
25 Subgroups of Size 5 LSL LSL= 0.000 CpkL = Error in STDEV
50 Subgroups of size 5 Mean= Error CpkU = Error in STDEV
StDevE= Error Cpk = 0.000
UCLx= %Cr = Error in STDEV
LCLx= Max =
UCLR= Min =

Subgroup Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 4 Test 5 Average Range

Frequency
1 0.000 Spec Frequency
Histogram
2 0.000 1 #VALUE!
3 0.000 2 #VALUE!
4 0.000 3 #VALUE!
5 0.000 4 #VALUE!
6 0.000 5 #VALUE!
7 0.000 6 #VALUE!
8 0.000 7 #VALUE!

#VALUE!

#VALUE!

#VALUE!

#VALUE!

#VALUE!
#VALUE!

#VALUE!

#VALUE!

#VALUE!
9 0.000 8 #VALUE!
Test Values
10 0.000 9 #VALUE!
11 0.000
Averages Chart
12 0.000 12

13 0.000
Sample Value

14 0.000
10
15 0.000
16 0.000
17 0.000 8

18 0.000
19 0.000
6
20 0.000
21 0.000
22 0.000 4

23 0.000
24 0.000
2

25 0.000
26
27 0
17
1

11

13

15

19

21

23

25

27

29

31

33

35

37

39

41

43

45

47

49
Sample Number
28
X X-Bar LCLx UCLx
29
30
31
32 Control Chart
33 1

34
0.9
35
36 0.8
Range

37 0.7
38
0.6
39
40 0.5
41
0.4
42
43 0.3
44
0.2
45
46 0.1

47
0
48
13

17

23

27

29

33

37

39

43

49
1

11

15

19

21

25

31

35

41

45

47

Sample Number
49 Range R-Bar UCLr
50
0.1

11

13
Range

15

17

19

21

23

25
R-Bar

27

29
Sample Number

31

33

35

37
UCLr

39

41

43

45

47

49
 Cpk for Moving Range
Use when: (a) new part, (b) part with revised specifications, (c) part in which the materials, processes, manufacturing location, or production equipment have
significantly changed, or (d) part in which the material suppliers have changed AND testing is too expensive to be conducted by subgroups.

Part Number: Supplier Name: Date

Drawing Number: Supplier Address:
Drawing Rev.: Supplier Contact
Rev. Date:
Drawing Location: PCA Supplier Name: GR&R Contact
Part Feature: PCA Address:
Feature Symbol: PCA Contact
Other Information

USL
PCA Summary Distribution
LSL
Process Data Potential Capability

Frequency
Subgroup Test Value Range LSL= 0 Cp=

1 USL= 0 CpkL=
2 0.00 Mean= CpkU=

3 0.00 StDev 0 Cpk= 0

4 0.00 UCLX= %Cr=

5 0.00 LCLX= Max= 0.0000

6 0.00 UCLR= 0 Min= 0.0000

7 0.00
8 0.00 Spec Frequency

9 0.00 1 0.0000 #VALUE!

10 0.00 2 0.0000 #VALUE!

11 0.00 3 0.0000 #VALUE!

12 0.00 4 0.0000 #VALUE!

13 0.00 5 0.0000 #VALUE!

14 0.00 6 0.0000 #VALUE!

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
0.0000
15 0.00 7 0.0000 #VALUE!
Test Values
16 0.00 8 0.0000 #VALUE!

17 0.00
18 0.00 Averages
12
19 0.00
20 0.00
10
Test Value

21 0.00
22 0.00
8
23 0.00
24 0.00

25 0.00 6

26 0.00

27 0.00 4

28 0.00

29 0.00 2
30 0.00

31 0.00
0
32 0.00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
Sample Number X X-Bar Upper Control Limit Lower Control Limit
33 0.00

34 0.00

35 0.00 Range Chart

36 0.00
1

37 0.00

38 0.00
39 0.00
Range

40 0.00

41 0.00

42 0.00
1
43 0.00

44 0.00
45 0.00

46 0.00
47 0.00

48 0.00
49 0.00 0
1 3 5 7 9 1 3 5 7 9 1 3 5 7 9 1 3 5 7 9 1 3 5 7 9
50 0.00 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4
Sample
Average 0.00 Range UCL Range Average Moving Range Average