Supplier Quality Assurance

Production Part Approval Process (PPAP) Submission Checklist

Part Number: Part Description:

Vendor Code: Supplier:

Drawing Number: Revision:

Tool/Cavity #

Date Reviewed: Reviewed By:

Check Box as
PPAP LEVEL
Appropriate Reason for Submission:
LEVEL 1 (Sections 1 & 2 only) NOTICE: PPAP submission is to be made according to the AIAG Production Part Approval Process (PPAP) manual. Refer to Retention/Submission requirements table 4.2 in AIAG
LEVEL 2 (Sections 1-8) PPAP manual section for detailed submission requirements for each level. This document should be used as a reference guide only and does not supersede the requirements set
forth in the AIAG PPAP manual.
LEVEL 3 (All Sections)
LEVEL 4 (As defined)
* Please allow a minimum of one week for processing. Ensure you have adequate inventory to support shipment until the PPAP is processed and approved.
LEVEL 5 (All Sections)

Documentation Evaluation Criteria: If that specific evaluation criteria is highlighted in yellow and the supplier's results are not acceptable, this constitutes as a PPAP REJECTION. A limited/interim approval will not be authorized. It will be at the Supplier
Quality Engineer's direction as to whether the remaining items constitute a rejection or limited/interim approval.

SECTION 1 - WARRANT FORM

Acceptable Not Acceptable Not Required
DOCUMENTATION EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS
(YES) (LPA or REJ) (N/R)
1.1 There is a supplier Part Submission Warrant Form included in the submission.
1.2 Current revision of the AIAG warrant form is used

1.3 The heading is accurately & fully completed. Include multiple buyer & application information if available.

1.4 The “Results” and “Declaration” are properly completed (e.g. all applicable blocks must be check marked) and
the form is signed and dated. Electronic submissions require an authorized signature.

1.5 Identifies applicable tool/cavity number

SECTION 2 – INTERNATIONAL MATERIAL DATA SYSTEM (IMDS)
Acceptable Not Acceptable Not Required
DOCUMENTATION EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS
(YES) (LPA or REJ) (N/R)
2.1 ID version number from IMDS system and printed report detailing tree specifics is included in the package.

SECTION 3 - APPEARANCE APPROVAL REPORT (AAR)

Acceptable Not Acceptable Not Required
DOCUMENTATION EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS
(YES) (LPA or REJ) (N/R)

3.1 If part is an appearance item, there is an AAR included in the package and includes the following:
a. Tool Source b. Type of Tool Steel c. No. Tools d. No. of Cavities
e. Texture Type f. Texture Source g. Gloss h. Material
i. Material Spec j. Paint Spec k. Performance Spec l. Painter (if outsourced)

Location and Doc.#: file:///conversion/tmp/activity_task_scratch/579376411.xls

Sheet: MDNQT1017
Attachment to AWI 3-15-SQA-007
Form Rev. Date: 4/6/10
Page 1 of 5
 SECTION 4 – SAMPLES
Acceptable Not Acceptable Not Required
DOCUMENTATION EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS
(YES) (LPA or REJ) (N/R)
4.1 There are two samples of each process stream and/or cavity which represent the production part Quality
capabilities (unless otherwise directed by the appropriate Magna Mirrors SQA representative). These samples must
be properly identified in the package (e.g. tagged or marked with Magna Mirrors part number, revision level, cavity
number, etc.).

4.2 Samples provided are not visually different when compared to the previous level or supplied component.

4.3 A sufficient number of samples have been run through Newaygo’s assembly operation in a Manufacturing Line
Trial with no issues or concerns. (Magna Mirrors use only)

SECTION 5 - CHECKED DRAWINGS OR SKETCHES

Acceptable Not Acceptable Not Required
DOCUMENTATION EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS
(YES) (LPA or REJ) (N/R)

5.1 A Magna Mirrors approved drawing (i.e. as stated on P.O.) which matches the Magna Mirrors Engineering
release level is included in the package. All Dimensions, characteristics, and notes are numbered for use with the
inspection reports. (If the drawing does not match the part revision level of the submission reference Section 6).

SECTION 6 - CHANGE DOCUMENTS

Acceptable Not Acceptable Not Required
DOCUMENTATION EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS
(YES) (LPA or REJ) (N/R)
6.1 If drawing is “marked up” to a part revision level different than the submission level it must be signed by a
Magna Mirrors Project Engineer and include the Magna Mirrors Engineering Change Order number (EO#). A copy
of the approved EO should be included in the submission.

SECTION 7 – DIMENSIONAL RESULTS

Acceptable Not Acceptable Not Required
DOCUMENTATION EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS
(YES) (LPA or REJ) (N/R)
7.1 There is a signed and dated Dimensional Inspection Report included in the submission. Use of the AIAG format
is recommended.
7.2 The heading is accurately & fully completed.
7.3 All dimensions on the appropriate blueprint are listed exactly as stated (i.e. in the metric system) under
“Dimension/Specification”. All notes must be included. Reference and basic dimensions do not need to be listed
on the report.
7.4   Results for all dimensions are reported on 3 to 6 parts per cavity as agreed upon with the appropriate Magna
Mirrors SQA representative.
7.5 All dimensions meet print requirements or change documents per section 5.

7.6 The supplier’s results are consistent with Magna Mirrors' findings. (Magna Mirrors' use only)

SECTION 8 – CHECKING AIDS

Acceptable Not Acceptable Not Required
DOCUMENTATION EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS
(YES) (LPA or REJ) (N/R)
8.1 If checking aids (fixtures, etc.) were requested by the appropriate Magna Donnelly SQA representative, they are
included with submission package.

8.2 Gage certification is provided if requested by the appropriate Magna Mirrors SQA representative.

Location and Doc.#: file:///conversion/tmp/activity_task_scratch/579376411.xls

Sheet: MDNQT1017
Attachment to AWI 3-15-SQA-007
Form Rev. Date: 4/6/10
Page 2 of 5
 SECTION 9 – LABORATORY/FUNCTIONAL RESULTS
Acceptable Not Acceptable Not Required
DOCUMENTATION EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS
(YES) (LPA or REJ) (N/R)

9.1 There are actual test results for all chemical, physical, metallurgical, and performance requirements as
specified on the print provided on a signed and dated report, unless otherwise agreed upon with the appropriate
Magna Mirrors SQA representative. All applicable notes and specifications must be included in the report as well.

9.2 Supplier will summarize material and performance test results utilizing the forms as found in appendix D and
appendix E of the AIAG PPAP manual. A copy of the specification is to be included in the PPAP package and each
section of the specification is to be ballooned to match each line item as indicated on the results form.

9.3 The results are from an “Accredited”, TS 16949 or QS 9000 compliant Laboratory” (evidence may be required).

9.4 The results from a commercial laboratory shall be submitted on the laboratory’s letterhead, or on the normal
laboratory report format.
9.5 All laboratory and test results are less than one year old.

9.6 For all heat treated components, a CQI 9 audit form is completed and shows compliance to the Heat Treat
System Survey Guidelines. A copy of the CQI-9 Ford Specific Requirements must also be completed for all Ford
heat treated components, to ensure compliance to Ford's Heat Treat Specification W-HTX. The audits must be
uploaded onto Supplier Connection and updated on an annual basis. If supplier does not meet the requirements,
all nonconformances are documented and action plans are in place. To reduce the risk of embrittlement, heat-
treated steel components are required to conform with Ford material specification WSS-M99A3-A.

9.7 For all plated components, a CQI 11 audit form has been completed and shows compliance to the Plating
System Survey Guidelines. The supplier survey must be uploaded onto supplier connection and updated on an
annual basis. All nonconformances are documented and action plans are in place.

9.8 For all coated and painted components, a CQI 12 audit form has been completed and shows compliance to the
Coating System Survey Guidelines. The supplier survey must be uploaded onto supplier connection and updated
on an annual basis. All nonconformances are documented and action plans are in place.

9.9 All sub-suppliers of base materials and finishings (heat treat, plating, coating, etc.) must be on the approved
supplier list for the appropriate OEM.

SECTION 10 - PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM

Acceptable Not Acceptable Not Required
DOCUMENTATION EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS
(YES) (LPA or REJ) (N/R)
10.1 There is a Process Flow Diagram included in the submission.
10.2 The heading is accurately & fully completed. Should conform to the AIAG format.
10.3 Based on the blueprint and parts, the operation descriptions are clear & the process steps are all there &
follow a logical sequence.
10.4 Operation/Process steps correlate with PFMEA & Control Plan.
10.5 If PPAP is for transfer of part to new supplier or same supplier producing at a different location, SQE has
reviewed old and new process flow to ensure critical processes and characteristics have been considered.
(Magna Mirrors use only)

Location and Doc.#: file:///conversion/tmp/activity_task_scratch/579376411.xls

Sheet: MDNQT1017
Attachment to AWI 3-15-SQA-007
Form Rev. Date: 4/6/10
Page 3 of 5
 SECTION 11 - FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (FMEA)
Acceptable Not Acceptable Not Required
DOCUMENTATION EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS
(YES) (LPA or REJ) (N/R)
11.1 There is a PFMEA (and Design FMEA if supplier has design responsibility) included in the submission which
conforms to the AIAG requirements, rating scales, etc.
11.2 All areas listed in the supplier’s Process Flow Diagram are included for failure analysis.
11.3 The heading is accurately & fully completed.

11.4 When the severity of a failure mode is 9 or 10, special attention must be given to ensure that the risk is
addressed through existing design actions/controls or process preventive/correction action(s), regardless of the
RPN. Once all severity rankings are lowered, then the supplier team should address other failure mode rankings in
occurrence, then detection.

11.5 All of the Magna Mirrors Safety and Critical Characteristics (MDS/MDC) identified on the drawing have been
listed on the FMEA.
11.6 If PPAP is for transfer of part to new supplier or same supplier producing at a different location, SQE has
reviewed old and new FMEA to ensure critical processes and characteristics have been considered. (Magna Mirrors
use only)

11.7 PFMEA Ratings for severities match the DFMEA. If the DFMEA is not available, ensure that all MDS and MDC
characteristics are scored appropriately (reference section 11.4). Ratings for occurences and detection may be
reduced through actions taken. Ratings for severities can not be reduced unless a failure mode is eliminated
through a design change.

SECTION 12 – PROCESS CONTROL PLAN

Acceptable Not Acceptable Not Required
DOCUMENTATION EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS
(YES) (LPA or REJ) (N/R)
12.1 A process control plan is included in the submission.
12.2 The heading is accurately & fully completed. Should conform to the AIAG Advanced Product Quality Planning
and Control Plan Reference Manual
12.3 All of the Magna Mirrors Safety and Critical Characteristics (MDS/MDC) identified on the drawing have been
listed on the Control Plan.
12.4 All columns are completed for each item.
12.5 The type and frequency of controls are adequate to ensure product quality.
12.6 The Control Plan covers all parts of the process from receiving inspection through processing/assembly
including final packaging and any required annual validation.
12.7 If PPAP is for transfer of part to new supplier or same supplier producing at a different location, SQE has
reviewed old and new process flow to ensure critical processes and characteristics have been considered. (Magna
Mirrors use only)
12.8 All specification requirements are included on the control plan, and are checked at a minimum, on an annual
basis.

SECTION 13 – PROCESS PERFORMANCE CAPABILITY RESULTS

Acceptable Not Acceptable Not Required
DOCUMENTATION EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS
(YES) (LPA or REJ) (N/R)
13.1 Process Potential Studies have been performed for all agreed-upon Magna Donnelly Safety and Critical
Characteristics (MDS/MDC). The parts studied must be from production tooling, gauging, process, materials and
operators at the production intended site.

13.2 Unless otherwise approved by the appropriate Magna Mirrors SQA representative, a 100 part minimum study
has been conducted with at least 25 subgroups containing consecutively produced parts from a 300-piece or larger
run. Each subgroup should be consecutive or at short intervals & the time-order relationship maintained. This
applies per process stream (i.e. cavity).

13.3 (Variable Studies) The studies have all been properly displayed on a Control Chart and demonstrate process
control.
13.4 (Variable Studies) Process Potential has been calculated correctly for each study. Process Control is
demonstrated and Ppk > 1.67.
13.5 (Variable Studies) For each study not in control or with a Ppk < 1.67 a Corrective Action Plan with timing has
been submitted and approved by Magna Mirrors SQA.
13.6 (Attribute Studies) Attribute studies showing a defect percent >0 must be approved with the appropriate
Magna Mirrors SQA representative.

Location and Doc.#: file:///conversion/tmp/activity_task_scratch/579376411.xls

Sheet: MDNQT1017
Attachment to AWI 3-15-SQA-007
Form Rev. Date: 4/6/10
Page 4 of 5
 SECTION 14 – MEASUREMENT SYSTEM STUDIES (R&R)
Acceptable Not Acceptable Not Required
DOCUMENTATION EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS
(YES) (LPA or REJ) (N/R)
14.1 A repeatability and reproducibility (R & R) study has been performed for all control items identified on the
Control Plan.

14.2 Methods conform to those described in the AIAG Measurement Systems Analysis Reference Manual.
For variable gage studies, the ANOVA method must be used. (10 parts, 3 operators, and 3 trials).
Attribute gage studies should utilize 50 parts, 3 operators, and 3 trials.

14.3 Gauge error is less than or equal to 10%. Gauge error over 10% must be approved by the appropriate Magna
Donnelly SQA representative.

SECTION 15 – MISCELLANEOUS MAGNA MIRRORS SPECIFICS

Acceptable Not Acceptable Not Required
DOCUMENTATION EVALUATION CRITERIA COMMENTS
(YES) (LPA or REJ) (N/R)
15.1 A completed Team Feasibility Form is included to the proper revision level. All areas are completed, and are
feasible.

15.2 A completed and approved Magna Mirrors Newaygo packaging declaration is included. Weight, size, and
quantity information is completed. Sign off from the appropriate parties is included.

15.3 Box barcode labels are included in the package and include scannable bar codes for the part number,
quantity, and lot information. The part revision level is included on the label. Reference the Magna Mirrors
Packaging & Shipping Requirements Manual for further details.

15.4 A completed run @ rate form is submitted. If the OEM utilizes a specified format (Chrysler Process Sign-Off,
General Motors Run-at-Rate, Honda Are-You-Ready, etc.), supplier will submit the run @ rate utilizing this format. If
the OEM does not specify a format, the Magna Mirrors of America Run-at-Rate form will be utilized. A link to the
Magna Mirrors of America Run-at-Rate format is provided in Appendix A of the SQR manual or electronically via
Supplier Connection.

PPAP Status: Resubmission Due Date:

Acceptable Not Acceptable Not Acceptable
(YES) (LPA) (REJ) PPCA Number:

PPCA Expiration Date:

A Production Parts Change Authorization (PPCA) allows shipment of parts, at or above the quality level of the parts reviewed for this PPAP submission, until the expiration date as listed above. Any
parts shipped after this date will require an approved PSW or an additional deviation from Magna Mirrors. IF A PPCA IS ISSUED, IT MUST BE REFERENCED ON EACH CONTAINER UNTIL THE PPAP IS
APPROVED OR A NEW DEVIATION IS ISSUED.
LPA = With Magna Mirrors approved corrective action plan, a "Limited Production Approval" may be issued allowing temporary production shipment.
REJ = The Submission is rejected & production shipments are not authorized until corrective action is implemented.

Location and Doc.#: file:///conversion/tmp/activity_task_scratch/579376411.xls

Sheet: MDNQT1017
Attachment to AWI 3-15-SQA-007
Form Rev. Date: 4/6/10
Page 5 of 5