ENV521-Week 3 – Tutorial activities

• Welcome, catch-up, questions

• Assignment 1 – who is your audience? What do you want them to do?

• Categorising stakeholders
• Schmeer (1999) – stakeholder characteristics, positions, power, leadership, interest etc
• Kruger et al. (2012) – stakeholders, intermediaries, target groups
• Novoa et al. (2018) – NEW reference – influence, affect, willingness, perceptions
• Varvarsovczky and Brugha (2000) – actors, present/future, positions
• Gilmour et al. (2009) – mapping, interest, influence, characteristics
• In each paper we will look at:
• Structure of the documents
• How stakeholders are categorized
• The approach taken – descriptive, instrumental, normative elements
• How it relates to Assignment 1
ENV521 – Week 3

Novoa et al. (2018)

• How are stakeholders
categorised?
• What is the approach
taken to stakeholder
categorisation?
ENV521 – Week 3

Ways to think about institutional

stakeholders – Schmeer et al. (2018)
• How are stakeholder categorised?
• What is the approach taken to
stakeholder categorisation?

This is a document targeting the

health sector – don’t be put off by
that; target your reading for what
you want out of it.
ENV521 – Week 3

Kruger et al. (2012)

• How are stakeholder
categorised?
• What is the approach
taken to stakeholder
categorisation?
ENV521 –
Week 3

Varvarsovczky and Brugha

(2000) –
• How are stakeholders
categorised?
• What is the approach
taken to stakeholder
categorisation?
ENV521 – Week 3

Ways to think about institutional

stakeholders – Gilmour et al. (2009)
• How are stakeholder categorised?
• What is the approach taken to
stakeholder categorisation?
References

• Gilmour J., Beilin R. and Sysak T. (2009). Using stakeholder mapping and analysis with a mental
models approach for biosecurity risk communication with peri-urban communities.
ACERA Project No 08/01. Australian Centre of Excellence for Risk Analysis, University of
Melbourne. This document can be found by inserting the citation details into Google Scholar.
• Kruger H., Stenekes N., Clarke R. and Carr A. (2012). Biosecurity engagement guidelines:
Principles and practical advice for involving communities, pp 6-13. ABARES report to client
prepared for the Office of the Chief Plant Protection Officer, Department of Agriculture,
Fisheries and Forestry, Canberra.
• Novoa, A., Shackleton, R., Canavan, S., Cybele, C., Davies, S. J., Dehnen-Schmutz, K., ... &
Wilson, J. R. (2018). A framework for engaging stakeholders on the management of alien
species. Journal of environmental management, 205, 286-297.
• Schmeer, K. (1999). Guidelines for Conducting a Stakeholder Analysis. Bethesda, MD:
Partnerships for Health Reform, Abt Associates Inc. Accessed June 2016 at
http://www.who.int/management/partnerships/overall/GuidelinesConductingStakeholderAnal
ysis.pdf
• Varvasovszky Z. and Brugha R. (2000). How to do (or not to do) a stakeholder analysis. Health
Policy and Planning 15 (3): 338- 445. Accessed June 2016 at
dess.fmp.ueh.edu.ht/pdf/Zsuzsa_Varvasovsky_2000_stakeholder_analysis.pdf or search for
this citation in Google Scholar.