PRACTICAL RESEARCH 1

LORENZE RANDY M. GAYOLA

What was previous
discussion?
COW-HEAR-AINT
COHERENT

LATE-EAR-CHORE
LITERATURE

REAL-ATE-AID
 RELATED

INN-THROW-DUCK-SHONE
 INTRODUCTION

RACE-ORE-CEASE
RESOURCES
ACTIVITY

COKE:LIQUID,BREAD:______
ACTIVITY

NEWSPAPER:_______,E-BOOKS:MODERN
ACTIVITY

AIDS;DISEASE,MEDICINE:_______
ACTIVITY

BREAD:FLOUR,_______:OIL
1. DISCUSS THE BASIC NECESSITIES IN WRITING A
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2. REALIZE THE IMPORTANCE OF REVIEW OF
RELATED LITERATURE WRITING
3. PRODUCE A WELL-THOUGHT CHAPTER OF A
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE.

COHERENT
MARKED BY AN ORDERLY, LOGICAL,
AND AESTHETICALLY CONSISTENT
RELATION OF PARTS.
INTRODUCTION
DEFINE YOUR TOPIC AND PROVIDE AN
APPROPRIATE CONTEXT FOR REVIEWING THE
LITERATURE;
ESTABLISH YOUR REASONS – I.E. POINT OF VIEW –
FOR
REVIEWING THE LITERATURE;
EXPLAIN THE ORGANISATION – I.E. SEQUENCE – OF
THE REVIEW;
INTRODUCTION
STATE THE SCOPE OF THE REVIEW – I.E. WHAT IS
INCLUDED AND WHAT ISN’T INCLUDED. FOR EXAMPLE,
IF YOU WERE REVIEWING THE LITERATURE ON OBESITY
IN CHILDREN YOU MIGHT SAY SOMETHING LIKE: THERE
ARE A LARGE NUMBER OF STUDIES OF OBESITY TRENDS
IN THE GENERAL POPULATION. HOWEVER, SINCE THE
FOCUS OF THIS RESEARCH IS ON OBESITY IN
CHILDREN, THESE WILL NOT BE REVIEWED IN DETAIL
AND WILL ONLY BE REFERRED TO AS APPROPRIATE.
BODY
ORGANISE THE LITERATURE ACCORDING TO
COMMON THEMES;
PROVIDE INSIGHT INTO THE RELATION BETWEEN
YOUR CHOSEN TOPIC AND THE WIDER SUBJECT
AREA E.G. BETWEEN OBESITY IN CHILDREN AND
OBESITY IN GENERAL;
MOVE FROM A GENERAL, WIDER VIEW OF THE
LITERATURE BEING REVIEWED TO THE SPECIFIC
FOCUS OF YOUR RESEARCH.
CONCLUSION
SUMMARIZE THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF THE
EXISTING BODY OF LITERATURE;
EVALUATE THE CURRENT STATE OF THE LITERATURE
REVIEWED;
IDENTIFY SIGNIFICANT FLAWS OR GAPS IN EXISTING
KNOWLEDGE;
OUTLINE AREAS FOR FUTURE STUDY;
LINK YOUR RESEARCH TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE.
KEY POINTS YOU SHOULD REMEMBER
IT IS NOT A BOOK BY BOOK AND ARTICLE BY ARTICLE
SUMMARY.
IT IS NOT A SURVEY OF EVERY SINGLE THING THAT’S
EVER BEEN WRITTEN ABOUT YOUR TOPIC.
IT MUST BE DEFINED BY A GUIDING CONCEPT I.E.
ESSAY QUESTION, RESEARCH PROJECT OR OBJECTIVE.
IT MUST TELL THE READER WHAT KNOWLEDGE AND
IDEAS HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED AND AGREED IN YOUR
AREA AND OUTLINE THEIR STRENGTHS AND
WEAKNESSES.
ETHICAL WRITING
IS WRITING THAT CLEARLY INDICATES (VIA
DOCUMENTATION) WHERE SOURCE MATERIAL HAS
BEEN INCORPORATED INTO ONE’S OWN WRITING.
ALSO,
ETHICAL WRITING IS ALSO WRITING THAT
ACKNOWLEDGES A RANGE OF PERSPECTIVES ON AN
ISSUE.
ETHICAL WRITING IS WRITING WITH A LEVEL OF
INCLUSION, RESPECT, AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF
DIVERSITY.
PLAGIARISM
PRESENTING WORK OR IDEAS FROM
ANOTHER SOURCE AS YOUR OWN, WITH
OR WITHOUT CONSENT OF THE
ORIGINAL AUTHOR, BY INCORPORATING
IT INTO YOUR WORK WITHOUT FULL
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT.
ETHICAL STANDARDS IN RRL WRITING:
DISCUSS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
FRANKLY.
BE CONSCIOUS OF MULTIPLE ROLES.
FOLLOW INFORMED CONSENT RULES.
RESPECT CONFIDENTIALITY AND
PRIVACY.
TAP INTO ETHICS RESOURCES.
SAMPLE OF AN ETHICS RESOURCE
BELMONT REPORT
APA ETHICS CODE
SAMPLE OF AN ETHICS RESOURCE
BELMONT REPORT
APA ETHICS CODE
TIKTOK AS A INSTRUCTIONAL
MATERIAL FOR TEACHERS.

TIKTOK AS A INSTRUCTIONAL
MATERIAL FOR TEACHERS.

FOR YOUR ASSIGNMENT, RESEARCH

LITERATURE THAT IS RELATED TO YOUR
STUDY THEN STATE WHY DID YOU
INCORPORATE THIS LITERATURE
TOWARDS YOUR STUDY, YOU MAY PUT IT
IN 1 WHOLE SHEET OF YELLOW PAPER.