Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Outline:
1. Introduction.
2. Who is Vladimir?
5. Conclusion.
Introduction:
Waiting for Godot by Samuel Beckett is a French play that sheds the light on two main
characters, Vladimir and Estragon, who spend their time having random conversations as they
wait for a character named Godot. Neither of the two guys know who this person is- nor does the
audience- but Vladimir counts on Godot’s arrival to carry on with hope and a purpose for living.
Many researches have been done trying to analyze the whole message behind the play.
However, one important theme that these researches are missing is the misrecognition of
humanity and how it affects the characters. This is very well reflected in Vladimir’s character
through his actions and words. We’ll go in depth with this topic in this essay.
Vladimir’s Character:
Vladimir, also referred to as Didi or Mr. Albert, is one of the two main characters of “Waiting
for Godot”, the other being his friend Estragon. In the play, Vladimir is the one in control of
most of what these two characters end up doing. That is because he is the more responsible and
Assi 3
mature one of the two characters (Gizem Balta, 3). Being the less intelligent side of the pair,
Estragon relies on whatever Vladimir tells him about in order to go on with his life. Vladimir is
the one with not only a better memory, but also a better intellectual level. This is very clear in
Act I, when he requests to listen to what Lucky has to say, whereas Estragon only wants to see
him dance. From here, it is clear Vladimir is in fact the more sophisticated, mature character in
the play.
Vladimir’s words and actions don’t just reflect how smart he is. They also show how much
pride he’s got and how much he values himself regardless of whether or not people acknowledge
his worth. This is what makes him different. In many scenes of the play, Vladimir’s thoughts are
so slept on by the rest of the characters. The fact that he remains unnoticed does trigger him
every now and then. For that, it is necessary to study and analyze this character very closely.
Throughout the play, many incidents occur in which Vladimir feels as if his existence does not
matter. Very frequently do we see that proved by Estragon, Vladimir’s closest friend and the
only person who matters to him. Unfortunately, though, Estragon’s memory is not the best. It’s
not that Vladimir does not matter to him, it’s just that he’s not always certain about what did and
did not happen. For that reason, he constantly forgets about the time he and Vladimir spend
together. We can see this situation in Act II of the play when Vladimir tries to remind Estragon
VLADIMIR: Yes of course it was there. Do you not remember? We nearly hanged
ESTRAGON: That's the way I am. Either I forget immediately or I never forget.
In addition to Estragon’s forgetfulness, one other thing about him that makes Vladimir feel
unwanted is Estragon’s suggestion that they part ways. This occurs more than once in Act II of
the play:
VLADIMIR: You must be happy too, deep down, if you only knew it.
Missing claims that it’s almost like Vladimir is the only one holding on to this friendship, even
though in many times, Estragon wouldn’t have survived without him. Despite that though,
Estragon repetitively suggests they split apart and carry on with their lives without one another
(18). Even when Estragon is straightforward about his opinion, Vladimir still finds a way to
prove him wrong and make it seem as if Estragon is the one that needs this friendship more than
he does. He never directly admits that the one that’s in desperate need of the other is in fact
himself. He convinces himself that it’s the other way around so that he doesn’t feel the bitterness
of being unwanted:
VLADIMIR: You always say that and you always come crawling back.
Other than Estragon, Vladimir is also forgotten by two more characters of the play: Pozzo and
the messenger boy. Pozzo is a wealthy man that Vladimir and Estragon meet in Act I. Although
Pozzo doesn’t recognize them, Vladimir claims that they’ve known each other before, and when
he fails to prove that, he once again uses the same mechanism he does to avoid the fact that he’s
Assi 5
unwanted and unnoticed: he convinces himself that Pozzo is just pretending that he’s forgotten
him:
VLADIMIR: We know them, I tell you. You forget everything. (Pause. To himself.)
VLADIMIR: That means nothing. I too pretended not to recognize them. And then
In that part of the play, Vladimir was the only one claiming he and Pozzo have met before.
Although none of the characters believe him, it didn’t bother him as much as it did later on in
Act II. When Pozzo reappears in Act II, he once again fails to recognize Vladimir and Estragon.
At first, Vladimir gets relieved knowing that it’s due to Pozzo’s blindness which he’s just found
out about. However, Pozzo then adds that he simply doesn’t remember anything about the
previous day, meaning that even if he were to see Vladimir, he still wouldn’t recognize him.
POZZO: I am blind.
POZZO: I don't remember having met anyone yesterday. But tomorrow I won't remember
This is what frustrates Vladimir, and could be the reason to why he hesitates to help Pozzo
One scene in Act II includes Pozzo who was struggling to get back up after stumbling along
with his helper, Lucky. Author Ciaran Ross analyzes the situation stating that “It is as if Pozzo is
being punished in the second act for his kind of insincere rhetoric repeated by Vladimir: ‘those
cries for help.’” (46). Pozzo’s repetitive miserable calls for help make Vladimir feel needed and
recognized for the first time since almost forever. That is why he goes back and forth deciding
whether or not they should help him. He was pleased by Pozzo’s desperate need for his help:
VLADIMIR: …It is not every day that we are needed. Not indeed that we personally are
needed. Others would meet the case equally well, if not better. To all mankind they were
addressed, those cries for help still ringing in our ears! But at this place, at this moment
of time, all mankind is us, whether we like it or not. Let us make the most of it, before it
is too late! Let us represent worthily for once the foul brood to which a cruel fate
consigned us!
Besides taking advantage of Pozzo’s helpless case, Vladimir also expresses his need to be
recognized by constantly waking Estragon up from his sleep because he “felt lonely” (9).
The entire theory of Vladimir’s longing to be recognized remains somewhat vague, until the very
last scenes of the play, more precisely, Vladimir’s last meeting with the messenger boy. When it
comes to dealing with the messenger boy in Act II, it becomes very clear that Vladimir is
seriously offended by the fact that people barely recognize him. Despite having met Vladimir in
Act I, the boy claims he’s never seen him before which stresses Vladimir out and causes him to
aggressively grab the little boy’s shoulders and yell at him. Vladimir finally ends his
conversation with the boy by saying, this time with a violent tone rather than a gentle request,
“…tell him you saw me and that …that you saw me. You're sure you saw me, you won't come
Conclusion:
After carefully studying Vladimir’s character and analyzing his actions, it is clear that out of all
the characters of “Waiting for Godot”, he is the one that mostly values dignity and humanity. He
refuses to remain unnoticed and ignored. Although at times, he might have overreacted to the
forgetfulness of other characters, this showed how much respect he has to himself. For that, it is
necessary to shed the light on this character since it perfectly embodies one of the most important
Works Cited
Balta, Gizem. "Character Analysis Waiting for Godot." Web. 19 Jan. 2021.
<https://www.academia.edu/43961815/Character_Analysis_Waiting_for_Godot>.
Beckett, Samuel. Waiting for Godot: Tragicomedy in 2 Acts. New York: Grove Press, 1954.
Missing, Lisa. " A Psychoanalytic Reading of Vladimir and Estragon.” 2007. Web. 18 Jan. 2021.
<https://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.diva-
portal.org/smash/get/diva2:518267/FULLTEXT01.pdf&usg=AFQjCNEphAwq3_31IbpGQQl
CVC2rQvRC4g>.
Ross, Ciaran. "“Where Do We Come In?” Responding to Otherness in Waiting for Godot",
Études anglaises, vol. volume 59, no. 1, 2006, pp. 75-90. 17 Jan. 2021.