SS016 – PHILIPPINE HISTORY

FINAL COURSE ASSESSMENT GRADING RUBRIC

Name of Student: _________________________________________________

Name of Group/ Groupmates: _______________________________________

Section: ___________ Date: _________

Total Score: /100

RUBRICS:

CRITERIA Unsatisfactory Fair Good Very Good SCORE

Organization Story of the local Story of the local Story of the local Story of the local
history not very history narrated history narrated history excellently
comprehensible. and a bit and a bit narrated, paragraphs
(0-4 point) comprehensible, comprehensible, are well-organized,
but lacks impact, but lacks impact. flow is continuous
and has lots of (10-14 points) and contributes to
grammatical comprehensibility.
errors. The report has a nice
(5-9 points) title.
(15-20 points)
Content The report is not The contents of The contents of Content-wise, the
a local history, the story is not the story can be report is meaty and
but a national well established as considered a local detailed. Names of
history or a a local history. It history. Names of people and places
folklore. There is has semblance of some key well-identified. It is a
no photograph of national history. characters and story not yet in
the interviewee. Names of some places may be history books. The
(0-19 points) key characters and identified. The story is a first-hand
places not story is just a account of the
identified. The second-hand interviewee. There is
story is just a account of the a photograph of the
second-hand interviewee. student and the
account of the There is a picture interviewee.
interviewee. There of the (40-50 points)
is no picture of the interviewee and
interviewee and the student. (30-
the student. (20-29 39 pts points)
points)

Reflection There is no There is a There is a The paper has a

 reflection part. reflection part, but reflection part, reflection part that is
(0-2 points) not in-depth and but just a bit in- in-depth and
not meaningful depth and just a meaningful.
(1-9 points) little bit (15-20 points)
meaningful
(10-14points)

Peer According to the According to the According to the According to the

Evaluation peer, the student peer, the student peer, the student peer, the student had
didn’t help at all. had unsatisfactory had satisfactory heavy inputs on the
(0 point) inputs. (1-5 points) inputs.(6-8 project.(9-10 points)
points)

TOTAL

MY SCORE: based on collected Part 4 entries of group mates

CRITERIA Average of the scores his/her group mates gave him/her: SCORE
Participation
10 POINTS

TOTAL

THE SCORE I GIVE TO MY GROUPMATES:

MY WHAT HE/SHE DID IN THE PROJECT SCORE

GROUPMATE(S (10 is the highest)

TOTAL
PART 5: WRITE YOUR REFLECTION PAPER HERE: (if space is not enough, write at the back of this sheet)

What have I learned in this course and in the making of the OBE project: