0% found this document useful (0 votes)
188 views10 pages

Automotive Risk Assessment Guide

The document describes criteria for ranking potential failure modes in a product or manufacturing process. Failure modes that affect safety or violate regulations are ranked 10. Loss of primary vehicle function is ranked 8. Loss of secondary or comfort functions is ranked 6. Appearance issues noticed by most customers are ranked 4. Detection likelihood is also considered, with no detection opportunity ranked 10 and error prevention through design ranked 1.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
188 views10 pages

Automotive Risk Assessment Guide

The document describes criteria for ranking potential failure modes in a product or manufacturing process. Failure modes that affect safety or violate regulations are ranked 10. Loss of primary vehicle function is ranked 8. Loss of secondary or comfort functions is ranked 6. Appearance issues noticed by most customers are ranked 4. Detection likelihood is also considered, with no detection opportunity ranked 10 and error prevention through design ranked 1.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Criteria:

Effect Severity of Effect on Product Rank Effect


(Customer Effect)

Potential failure mode affects safe vehicle


operation and/or involves noncompliance
10
with government regulations without
Failure to Meet warning. Failure to Meet
Safety and/or Safety and/or
Regulatory Regulatory
Requirements Requirements
Potential failure mode affects safe vehicle
operation and/or involves noncompliance 9
with government regulations with warning.

Loss of primary function (vehicle inoperable, Major


8
does not effect safe vehicle opertaion). Discruption
Loss or
Degradation of
Primary Function
Degradation of primary function (vehicle
Significant
operable, but at reduced level of 7
Discruption
performance).

Loss of secondary function (vehicle operable,


but comfort/convenience functions 6
inoperable).
Loss or
Degradation of Moderate
Secondary Discruption
Function
Degradation of secondary function (vehicle
operable, but comfort/convenience functions 5
at reduced level of performance).

Appearance or Audible Noise, vehicle


operable, item does not conform and noticed 4
by most customers (75%).
Moderate
Discruption
Appearance or Audible Noise, vehicle
Annoyance operable, item does not conform and noticed 3
by many customers (50%).

Appearance or Audible Noise, vehicle


Minor
operable, item does not conform and noticed 2
Discruption
by discriminating customers (<25%).
No eefect No discernible effect. 1 Not efefct
Criteria:
Severity of Effect on Product
(Manufacturing/Assembly Effect)

May endanger operator (machine or


assembly) without warning.

May endanger operator (machine or


assembly) with warning.

100% of product may have to be scrapped.


Line shutdown or stop ship.

A portion of the production run may have to


be scrapped. Deviation from primary process
including decreased libe speed or added
manpower.

100% of production run may have to be


reworked off line and accepted.

A portion of the production run may have to


be reworked off line and accepted.

100% of production run may have to be


reworked in station before it is processed.

A portion of the production run may have to


be reworked in-station before it is processed.

Slight inconvenience to process, operation,


or operator.
No discernible effect.
Likelihood of Criteria: Occurrence of Cause - PFMEA
Failure (Incidents per items/vehicles)
³ 100 per thousand
Very High
³ 1 in 10
50 per thousand
1 in 20
20 per thousand
High
1 in 50
10 per thousand
1 in 100
2 per thousand
1 in 500
.5 per thousand
Moderate
1 in 2,000
.1 per thousand
1 in 10,000
.01 per thousand
1 in 100,000
Low
³ 0.001 per thousand
1 in 1,000,000
Very Low Failure is eliminated through preventive control
Rank

10

1
Criteria:
Opportunity for
Detection
Likelihood of Detection by Process Control

No detection
No current process control; Cannot detect or is not analyzed.
opportunity

Not likely to detect at


Failure Mode and/or Error (Cause) is not easily detected (e.g., random audits).
any stage

Problem Detection Failure Mode detection post-processing by operator through


Post Processing visual/tactile/audible means.

Failure Mode detection at-station by operator through visual/tactile/audible


Problem Detection at
means or post-processing through use of attribute gauging (go/no-go, manual
Source
toque check/clicker wrench, etc).

Failure Mode detection post-processing by operator through use variable


Problem Detetcion
gauging or in-station by operator through use of attribute gauging (go/no-go,
Post Processing
manual toque check/clicker wrench, etc).

Failure Mode or Error (Cause) detection in-stationby operator through use


Problem Detection at variable gauging or by automated control in-station that will detect discrepant
Source part and notify operator (light, busser, tec.). Gauging performed on setup and
first-piece check (for set-up causes only).

Failure Mode detection post-processing by automated controls that will detect


Problem Detection
discrepant part and automatically lock part in station to prevent further
Post Processing
processing.

Problem Detection at Failure Mode detection in-station by automated controls that will detect
Source discrepant part and automatically lock part in station to prevent further
processing.

Error Detection
Error (Cause) detection in-station by automated controls that will detect error
and/or Problem
and prevent discrepant part from being made.
Prevention
Detection not Error (Cause) prevention as a result of fixture design, machine design or part
applicable; Error design. Discrepant parts cannot be made because item has been error-proofed
Prevention by process/product design.
Rank
Likelihood of
Detection

Almost
10 Impossible

9 Very Remote

8 Remote

7 Very Low

6 Low

5 Moderate

4 Moderate
High

3 High

2 Very High
Almost
1 Certain

You might also like