Professional Documents
Culture Documents
tt
+ Lightwave Technol.,vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1379-1386, 1990.
!i
T. Naito et al., “4 Gbit/s, 233-km optical fiber transmission
++ experiment using newly proposed direct-modulation PSK,” Elec-
+
tron. Lett., vol. 26, no. 20, pp. 1734-1736, 1990.
-I0 + B. Clesca et al., “Highly sensitive 565 Mb/s DPSK heterodyne
+ transmission experiment using direct current modulation of a DFB
-20 + laser transmitter,” ZEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., vol. 3, pp. 838-841,
j I -30
ab&& :$ooo,
++
+
0 0 000
171
[81
Sept. 1991.
G. Jacobsen, “Performance of heterodyne DM-DPSK systems with
tight IF filtering,” Electron. Lett., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 254-256, 1992.
B. Borchert et al., “High performance 1.55 p m QW-MCRW DFB
lasers,” Japan J . Appl. Phys., vol. 30, no. 9B, pp. L1650-L1652,
1991.
40 E. Meissner and H. Rodler, “Engineered 565 Mb/s DPSK hetero-
0 5 10 15 dyne receiver with a sensitivity of -53.5 dBm,” in Proc. EFOC-
forward p o w r CmWI + LAN 1992, paper 123.
1101 R. NoC, H. Heidrich, and D. Hoffmann, “Endless polarizaiton
Fig. 4. Reflections from transmission fiber with (0)and without (+) control systems for coherent optics,” J . Lightwave Technol., vol. 6,
DPSK modulation as a function of forward traveling power [milliwatts]. pp. 1199-1207, 1988.
L. J. Rysdale, “Method of overcoming finite-range limitation of
tolerance of PSK, DPSK, and CPFSK transmission to certain state of polarization control devices in automatic polariza-
tion control schemes,” Electron. Lett., vol. 22, pp. 100-102, 1986.
deviations of the modulation amplitude from its optimum N. G. Walker, and G. R. Walker, “Polarization control for coher-
is also discussed. ent communications,” J . Lightwave Technol., vol. 8, pp. 438-458,
1990.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT G. R. Walker and N. G. Walker, “Practical high-speed endless
polarization controller,” in Proc. 15th ECOC, 1989, vol. 1, pp.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions 535-538.
of J. Bauer, H. Albrecht, C. Wahl, J. Wittmann, and H. H. Shimizu et al., “Highly practical fiber squeezer polarization
Michel. controller,” J . Lightwave Technol., vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 1217-1224,
1991.
REFERENCES [15] R. Not et al., “Comparison of polarization handling methods in
coherent optical systems,” J . Lightwave Technol., vol. 9, no. 10,
[I] M. Shirasaki et al., “Fiber transmission properties of optical pulses pp., 1353-1366, 1991.
produced through direct phase modulation of DFB laser diode,” [16] F. Heismann and M. S. Whalen, “Fast automatic polarization
Electron. Lett., vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 487-488, 1988. control system,” ZEEE Photon. Technol Lett., vol. 4, pp. 503-505,
[2] R. S. Vodhanel et al., “5 Gb/s direct optical DPSK modulation of May 1992.
a 1530-nm DFB laser,” ZEEE Photon. Techn. Lett., vol. 1, pp. [17] T. Sugie et al., “CPFSK high power transmission over 350 km at
218-220, Aug. 1989. 2.5 Gb/s in the presence of stimulated Brillouin scattering,” in
[3] T. Chikama et al., “Modulation and demodulation techniques in Proc. ECOC ’90, vol. 1, pp. 69-72.
Abstract-High-speed, short distance data transmission over attenuation peaks of PMMA fiber can potentially introduce
all-plastic step-index fiber (POF) is normally considered to be mode partition noise. The bounds on practical laser characteris-
limited by intermodal dispersion. Theoretical calculations in tics and fiber lengths are explored; these results indicate that
this letter show that the baseband frequency response can be 530 Mb / s transmission over 100 m of 1 mm diameter POF is
significantly improved, using simple linear equalization. How- feasible, thus potentially satisfying a significant segment of
ever, as the fiber length is increased, the sharp absorption future computer interconnect applications.
medium and long distance data links, the position of silica Fig. 1 compares the exact and approximate impulse
fiber based schemes is unassailable. There is presently responses, after 25, 50, and 100 m, together with the
significant interest in understanding the potential of all- amplitude error between them plotted on the same ampli-
plastic optical fibers (POF) for the short distance data tude scale, for typical values of 1, = 36 m, 8, = 0.1, and
links that fall between these clear “copper” and “silica” 0, = 0.47 x 70%. As expected the error in the approxima-
domains, e.g., [l]; specifically, given the need of many data tion increases with length; nonetheless, it is predomi-
link applications to support lengths up to 100 m 121, what nantly at high frequencies ( w > w ; ) and remains small
is the maximum data rate that can be supported using over this range.
POF? In general, there will be an optimum equalizer that
Recent theoretical analysis [31 has shown the potential minimizes the sum AI‘,,,+, of the IS1 and excess noise
for standard digital transmission over POF, using a low penalty. Equation (1) and Fig. 1 suggest that a simple
numerical aperture (NA) launch. Kaiser et al’s results [41 equalizer, based on a differentiator network H , ( f ) = (1
-140 Mb/s transmission over 110 m of 1 mm diameter +
jf/rl B)/(l + j f / r 2 B), would be reasonable choice; it
step-index polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) POF-are has the practical advantage of being readily imple-
consistent with this analysis. mentable at high data rates, B.
This letter shows that simple linear equalization may be We can investigate the suitability of this choice by
used to improve the transmission potential of POF for assuming the noise power spectral density N(f)at the
short distance data link applications. However, the sharp receiver preamplifier output has the shape [61 N(f)a 1
absorption attenuation peaks of PMMA POF in the +
( f / p B ) * where p is a function of the input capaci-
600-800 nm region may introduce mode partition noise tance and other preamplifier parameters.
(MPN), over fiber lengths = 100 m; the scope of this Fig. 2 shows the variation in penalty, APIsI+, at lo-’’
potential limit is investigated. bit error ratio (BER), at the fiber channel standard (FCS)
rate of 530 Mb/s, with p = 0.5, 1, and 2, as a function of
11. EQUALIZATION the normalized equalizer break frequency, r, at L = 100
It is well known, e.g., [5], that decision feedback equal- m, with rz = 1.5. The results are for a Z5 - 1 pseudoran-
ization (DFE), including a forward filter, is an effective dom sequence, full-width rectangular transmitter pulses,
strategy for a channel with severe intersymbol interfer- the exact fiber response, with 1, = 36 m, 8, = 0.1, 6, =
ence (ISI); Kasper [6] has shown its effectiveness for a 0.47 X 70%, and a second order Butterworth response,
long length of multimode fiber, where the impulse re- H , ( f ) with f j d B = 0.7 x B for the receiver.
sponse becomes “Gaussian.” However, for short lengths, The inset eye diagrams are computed without and with
the impulse response tends to an ‘exponential’; in this an equalizer ( r , = 0.25, rz = 1.51, and illustrate its effec-
regime the advantage in performance gain between a tiveness in reducing the IS1 (note that noise is not in-
-
DFE and a linear one is much less [7], since the latter’s cluded in these diagrams). For p 2 0.75 there is an
noise enhancement is less, and it may not justify the more optimum equalizer high pass break frequency that mini-
complicated hardware required. In the following, we illus- mizes the penalty; for smaller p, the penalty is a decreas-
trate the validity of the ‘exponential’ impulse approxima- ing function of r , over the range shown, i.e., it ceases to
tion and show the effectiveness of a simple linear equal- have a practical minimum, since it would be unrealistic to
ization strategy. ignore the jitter that accompanies increasing rl. Fortu-
It has been shown [3] that Jeunhomme’s [81 expression nately, the penalty changes slowly in this region, so that
for the frequency response of a step-index multimode rI = 0.25 remains a good practical choice.
fiber H f ( w ) agrees well with published measurements for
POF. This expression may be expanded to yield a single 111. ATTENUATION-INDUCED MODEPARTITION NOISE
pole, low-pass filter approximation: The attenuation of PMMA POF in the region 600-800
1 nm is dominated by the C-H absorption [l]; there are
Hf(4= w (1) “stretching” harmonic peaks y5 and y6 at 736 and 627
1 + j y - O( w ’ ) nm, respectively and a smaller “stretching and bending”
WO harmonic peak y5 + 6 at around 675 nm. Fig. 3 shows the
where: differential wavelength attenuation in the 645-675 nm
region due to this absorption; the curve passes through
zero at 650 nm and tends towards a local minima around
+
the y5 6 peak.
In the following we show that, with the order of 100 m
/ “I/ ’
6 1 of PMMA POF, we can have sufficient wavelength-depen-
dent attenuation to introduce MPN noise.’
x = L/41,, L is the fiber length, 1, is the coupling length, Clarke [9] has analyzed a similar problem of laser noise,
c is the speed of light, no is the core refractive index and
8, and 0, are the launch and effective steady-state NA, ’ Hanson [2] has already shown that this attenuation must be ac-
respectively. counted for in LED spectral calculations.
1156 IEEE PHOTONICS TECHNOLOGY LETTERS, VOL. 4, NO. 10, OCTOBER 1992
10, , I
Time -lo' 645 6;O 655 hi60 665 6;O 675 '
Wavelength. nm
Fig. 1. Optical time domain response, comparing the exact formula
with the low-pass filter approximation; solid line-exact, dashed-ap- ~ i3, ~variation
, in differential attenuation of PMMA fiber with wave-
proximation, dotted line-amplitude difference; sets of curves for fiber length due to C-H absorption, x-axis label-wavelength, nm;
length, L = 25, 50, and 100 m, from top to bottom; fiber coupling length, label-Differential absorption attenuation, dB/km . nm.
I , = 36 m, launch NA, 8! = 0.1 and steady-state NA, 0, = 0.47 x 70%.
X-axis label-Time; Y-axis label-amplitude.
proach involves computing the cumulants K, of the sum
distribution.
Using Clarke's notation for the average laser spectrum
{Z!}and the wavelength-dependent attenuations { a , } these
,
cumulants can be expressed as
I
m
u2 + ~ f (-
1 a,)' r = 2
I= 1
K, = m (3)
( r - l)!Z:(l - a,), otherwise
1=1
’{,:
1-
:_I 1
08-
%
sions with Dr. S. D. Walker on aspects of equalization.
x
5 REFERENCES
W. Groh, J. E. Kuder, and J. Theis, “Prospects for the develop-
f ment and application of plastic optical fibers,” in Plastic Opt.
0.4
.~
,~ -..
. .....
Fibers, P I E , vol. 1592, 1991, pp. 20-30.
D. Hanson, “Wiring with plastic,” IEEE Lighiwave Telecommun.
0.2 Syst., vol. 3, pp. 34-39, Feb. 1992.
R. J. S. Batcs and S. D. Walker, “Evaluation of all-plastic optical
00
.1
645
..~.~ ,
I.
I.
650
,I
,I
Abstract-An intraboard chip-to-chip optical interconnect has from conventional through-hole and hybrid surface mount
been demonstrated as a compatible and potentially manufac- approaches to a family of denser, faster boards that have
turable last step in our conventional multichip module process.
Chip-to-chip optical communication at 1 Gb / s NRZ was become widely known as multichip modules (MCM) [l]. A
achieved using an edge emitting laser, a flip-chip p-i-n photode- potential next step in this evolution is the use of optics for
tector and a photodefined polymer optical waveguide. chip-to-chip interconnection [2], [3]. Optical transmission
media exhibit ultrahigh bandwidth, negligible electromag-
netic interference and optical noninteraction (whereby
INTRODUCTION physically intersecting optical waveguides can operate with
S system speed and complexity have increased, cir- negligible crosstalk 121). Because of these properties, opti-
A, uit board technology has experienced an evolution cal interconnects may assist conventional hardwire inter-
connects in the creation of faster, denser circuit boards,
Manuscript received May 15, 1992; revised August 4, 1992. requiring fewer substrate layers, with increased perfor-
The authors are with Motorola Corporate Manufacturing Research
Center, Schaumburg, IL 60196. mance and reduced cost.
IEEE Log Number 9203557. We have demonstrated a high speed chip-to-chip opti-