g

g
9 35kNm2 fatty
ox by

EI I 921g

42
q 72 9 3,069x Gy

35
9 3,069 7 8,62KNW
Gg 26,38KNm2
Max bending moments

MI 917
x Ird d d d dd
É 862472 17,6KNm

Im M qq.LI 35,2kt
3524dm y
K y
Ta GKNM
g Mt qy.lt 2 26,38 4
4 17,55kt
M gy.ly zy

35i1W
H f
e3yknm
117,55KNm

be
ox 09

F 9
14 I Egg

7
gg 4
5 9y 1,88 qx
9
35 12,15KNW
9 1,889 9
9g 22,85 KNIN
Max bending moments

X Mt 12,15
7424
24,8kt
12,15 71,2
M
51,04ns
511 151 Knm

24,8
Y Only positive moments

Mt 9g Ly 2485 448
45,741

I 45,7 UNM

fed 0,85 25 1,5 14,2MPa

ratio For 2 tag slab check Id for shorter span

g
direction

3
Y Interior span k 1,5 Po Rst 10 0,005 p
2
4 1,111 1,5 F 8985 3,27 5 27,75
00
1980 19105227,75 Ok
Reinforcement

X direction

Mrd 0,28 fed b É 928 14,2 1000

21002
1594dm

Zt i o
Mf 200 l 0,17
3 1.200 193,8 mon

ASI Mt 29 ios 344mm 5010 393mm

fga Zt ygg.gg
910201

46 106 566 7 6012 1678mn

As 435 11 0,174541.200
mm
012C

Ole
Controls Snax min I 250mm

Asmine 0,0013bd 260 mad ok

direction
g
dy
Mr 0,28 14,2 1000 2102 17TUNM

Ast 41 106 467 ma 5010 565mm

435 11 0,17 210
s
0106201

As 1159mm's 8914 1231mn

435 4 9,6 2 o
q14C

it As As min Sat Sas Sima

Control
I ratio
Look at mid pointofshorter span y direction

p Ast 2105
00
90027 Po 9005
dy's
0,0027 cats 6,005 assumed

As is smaller than assumed The concrete will in fact be

p
under even less stress and therefore the span is ok

it could in fact be longer

Rebar in bottom Rebar in top

A B
a

o O
4m 014 12517 you

1 0100200 p f o 0126150 I
o

A B
I I I I
7m 7m

10 O o o o o of
0120150
1014 150
no o o
od 8 Ho
A A B B