Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Squeeze Without Tool Engineering Risk Analysis

    Uploaded by

    Ibnu Hasan
    11 views2 pages
    This document outlines the risks associated with a squeeze cementing job without tools and proposed mitigation measures. Ten risks are identified: 1) insufficient determination of hole size, 2) cement contamination with mud, 3) insufficient plug length, 4) lack of support for the cement plug, 5) cement flash set, 6) incompatibility between oil-based mud and spacer, 7) getting the squeeze string stuck, 8) pulling out of hole too quickly after placing the plug, 9) residue of cement slurry inside the drill pipe, and 10) insufficient waiting on cement. Corresponding mitigation measures are proposed for each risk.

    Original Description:

    risk analysis

    Original Title

    4. squeeze without tool engineering risk analysis

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document outlines the risks associated with a squeeze cementing job without tools and proposed mitigation measures. Ten risks are identified: 1) insufficient determination of hole size, 2) cement contamination with mud, 3) insufficient plug length, 4) lack of support for the cement plug, 5) cement flash set, 6) incompatibility between oil-based mud and spacer, 7) getting the squeeze string stuck, 8) pulling out of hole too quickly after placing the plug, 9) residue of cement slurry inside the drill pipe, and 10) insufficient waiting on cement. Corresponding mitigation measures are proposed for each risk.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views2 pages

    Squeeze Without Tool Engineering Risk Analysis

    Uploaded by

    Ibnu Hasan
    This document outlines the risks associated with a squeeze cementing job without tools and proposed mitigation measures. Ten risks are identified: 1) insufficient determination of hole size, 2) cement contamination with mud, 3) insufficient plug length, 4) lack of support for the cement plug, 5) cement flash set, 6) incompatibility between oil-based mud and spacer, 7) getting the squeeze string stuck, 8) pulling out of hole too quickly after placing the plug, 9) residue of cement slurry inside the drill pipe, and 10) insufficient waiting on cement. Corresponding mitigation measures are proposed for each risk.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    Squeeze Job Risk Assessment( without tool )

    Job Type: squeeze Location: Date: NEW Yes REVISED

    Country: Client: Contractor: Prepared By:

    RISK CONSEQUENCE MITIGATION - REMARKS

    1. Hole size determination. Potential Insufficient cement column. Attempt to pump carbide.
    2. Cement contamination with mud. Cement plug failure. Pump spacer contain surfactants for oil based mud.
    1) Place minimum 60m plug length to allow plug
    3. Insufficient plug length Plug contamination. contamination.
    2) Perform pre-injection test.
    4. No support of cement plug. Resulting in poor plug placement or slumping. Spot a viscous pill as a base or use Cement Support Tool.

    1) Test Cl concentraton<500ppm.
    2) Thickening time safety margin 60~90min.
    5. Cement flash set. Resulting in lost well. 3) Test cement slurries as per temperature given by client
    with location water and wellsite chemicals batch number.
    4) Follow recipe to prepare mixing water in sequence.

    1) Provide lab testing to check compatibility between OBM


    6. Incompatibility between OBM and Spacer Flocculation or sludge was formed.
    and spacer and cement slurry.
    1) Reciprocate(1~3ft) and rotate cement string after cement
    come out of string.
    7. Squeeze string is stuck. Squeeze failure. And lost well.
    2) Control cement column maximum 300m. If workover rig,
    maximum 200m.
    8. POOH too quick after plug in place. Stripping plug and contamination. Pull tail pipe slowly (30 - 50 ft/min).
    9.Residue of cement slurry inside drill pipe. String contaminated with debris. Pull up 100ft above plug and circulate with high rate.

    1) wait until cement sample hard(put in water bath with


    10. Insufficient WOC. Squeeze failure.
    bottom hole temperature).
    ueeze Job Risk Assessment( without tool )

    MITIGATION - REMARKS

    Attempt to pump carbide.


    Pump spacer contain surfactants for oil based mud.
    1) Place minimum 60m plug length to allow plug
    contamination.
    2) Perform pre-injection test.
    Spot a viscous pill as a base or use Cement Support Tool.

    1) Test Cl concentraton<500ppm.
    2) Thickening time safety margin 60~90min.
    3) Test cement slurries as per temperature given by client
    with location water and wellsite chemicals batch number.
    4) Follow recipe to prepare mixing water in sequence.

    1) Provide lab testing to check compatibility between OBM


    and spacer and cement slurry.
    1) Reciprocate(1~3ft) and rotate cement string after cement
    come out of string.
    2) Control cement column maximum 300m. If workover rig,
    maximum 200m.
    Pull tail pipe slowly (30 - 50 ft/min).
    Pull up 100ft above plug and circulate with high rate.

    1) wait until cement sample hard(put in water bath with


    bottom hole temperature).

    You might also like