This document contains a rubric for evaluating miniature architectural models in a competition. It rates models on creativity, level of effort, environmental impact, originality, and overall appeal. For each category, it provides descriptors for excellent (20-16 points), good (15-11 points), and poor (10-1 points) scores. The highest scores are given to models that demonstrate exceptional creativity using recycled materials, significant effort leading to well-crafted designs, strong sustainability commitments, fresh designs with unique features, and lasting appeal.
This document contains a rubric for evaluating miniature architectural models in a competition. It rates models on creativity, level of effort, environmental impact, originality, and overall appeal. For each category, it provides descriptors for excellent (20-16 points), good (15-11 points), and poor (10-1 points) scores. The highest scores are given to models that demonstrate exceptional creativity using recycled materials, significant effort leading to well-crafted designs, strong sustainability commitments, fresh designs with unique features, and lasting appeal.
This document contains a rubric for evaluating miniature architectural models in a competition. It rates models on creativity, level of effort, environmental impact, originality, and overall appeal. For each category, it provides descriptors for excellent (20-16 points), good (15-11 points), and poor (10-1 points) scores. The highest scores are given to models that demonstrate exceptional creativity using recycled materials, significant effort leading to well-crafted designs, strong sustainability commitments, fresh designs with unique features, and lasting appeal.
CATEGORY EXCELLENT GOOD 15-11 POOR 10-1 POINTS 20-16 EARNED Creativity The The The architechtural Architechtural Architechtural maniature maniature maniature model model model lacks demonstrates demonstrates a creativity in the exceptionally good level of use of recycled unique and creativity in the materials and is creative use of usw of recycled not visually recycled materials, ineteresting or materials that resulting in a aesthetically is both visually visually pleasing. ineteresting imteresting and and aesthetically aesthetically pleasing pleasing design . design . Level of effort The creator put The creator put The creator did in a significant a good level of not put in amount of efforts and time sufficient effort effort and time into a design on time into the into the design and construction design and angld of the construction of construction of Architechtural the the maniature Architechtural acchitectural model, resulting maniature maniature in a well- model, resulting model , crafted design. a poorly crafted resulting in a design. well- crafted and attention - to - datail evident design. Environmental The The The Impact Architechtural Architechtural Architechtural maniature maniature model maniature model model demonstrates does not demonstrates some level of demonstrates a a strong commitment to commitment to commitment sustainability and sustainability or to reduces ways reducing ways sustainability through the use through the use and reduces of recycled of recycled ways through materials. materials . the use of recycled materials, and inspires others to the same . Originality The The The Architechtural Architechtural Architechtural maniature maniature model maniature model model offers a offers some lacks originality fresh take on originality in and does not maniature terms of design offer anything hows and function. new or designs , innovative. incorporating unique features and innovative solutions. Overall Appeal The The The Architechtural Architechtural Architechtural maniature maniature model maniature model model has an has some level of lacks overall overall Appeal, but may Appeal and does Appeal that not leave a not engage the engages the lasting viewer . Post viewer and impression. leaves a lasting impression. OVERALL TOTAL: