Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Organisational Behaviour Unit - 1
Organisational Behaviour Unit - 1
Man mode ls
4Economic man GrsDups
Social Man
*OrganísationalMan Human Oaninlior
|+ Selb-actualiiq man Behaviou eevaui ou
Complei man
Organisahonn
*ImplaiveMan Structure
Compulsive Man
Definition
StephenP Robbins defines Organisatiional behaviouy
a a fteld of study that inveat igala the impact that
1ndividuala, 270uups and structures have on be haviour
within Organisot ions for the
purpose of appuing Such
knoledge touwad impmving organisation'seectivena
an
relationxhip betwee
hunan behaviour as a
healing o« tveatment o
individual' health and e sparn frutration
Stremors -* Hyper tenaion.j
Cganl hational
Sational Behaviour:-
portance o Ovgani
tance liel in
lie io the
Orqanisaticna
behaviour's impor
that it helps orgai sat ions to
faet
. Dis cove and underatond beha viour
human
betteY
to perform
3.froperly motivat their employee
conducive iwovk cnvinommeqt to bring
ahoat
Cveath a
Technigues
bui lding
2 Re latton
3.Policyframing ool
behave
People sith ditevent cultural backqvunds
even at the work place
ditherently clah du lo dithevent behavioual
Cultuve Some times
pectatioma
2 Abilities
Abilities are capacities of individuals to perform
various activities tike phyai tal activities, Social activititz,
and
fntellectual activities, political activities, nuTAing
hospitality activities aod Spiritua activities
3 changig Geoder Poles number o women
he n a
world economies
and deve.loprnenl e
the
and
eploy ment oPpustunities
liviog
in Order to liai
Standarda othe wor ld Population.
of w0rkfovce :ppurtunlties
Need fo Managing DiverAity
and Challeogei
Diveraitred workforce bvings taleoti,skilla,knadedoe
that invariably bring core Compelincies,
and expertise
at time dfstinetive hich provides eompetitive advantogee
to the company: Divesai
has both pos:tive ad negative
Sides. MNCA Ahould
aspec tike every Coio hag -tw0 the positive
manage dive13ily io Ordey to manimi ze
aspec and mini mize the negative aspecl edveriq.
(6)
.
OPpurtunitie
Competite advaotage
challenge)
:Potential source of conflict
Multi- ethnic aoified . De lay in Deciso) maki7
Socities at workplace
3. Comnunication dutor tiony
Ejticient Jmplementation Misunderstanina and
OOgaoijattomal
Strat eies Pevceptual dithereoceg.
Kepeatz undesirable
uoity among employee
Dvety provicdes Competitive Advantage
. Attvact ion ot «ourt
Marketina Advantage
3 Pavblem Solvina sktlls
4 flexibili ly acd-capta bililg
Harmony
6. Cost Savina
. Creat ion and Tnnovatio)
8.-APPopriati Stratgies
Tndividual Behaviour and Gooup BehaviouY
Human Lehaviou N
257
35
5%
etiem
Pesitive ve esheive
Deqative
Aib
Dusmileri ties io individuali
the
wi th o
Todividuak di}er fom one anotheY
i
Capacities
bro ad Spectrum ouwing t ditf ereot braio
and minds
eiberetay
fac tovs t h a contribuli for individual
The
fncleude:hereditar4 enviranrneatal factor^, phukical,
factor
Socio Cultural, elonomùc, sitesational
Factors Alecting Jdividual dleveoces
Peal lie
The real notherood,
life is ohat one
actually is
Yea lte is the real charac risticg, values oaod
atti tudes ef ome
selt
ferce ption-
Coqnitiom and cognitive process preceode perception
Cogrtiom ic the act r knowing an tem of intormatio
cnitive PrDCeM is a
comple
involves the one a it
collection ot iotormati on from
many Sources and
tough dittereot ensory organs, Suppry this tnformatiom
to the Cognitive mediators, arrang:ng
in a Seuential order.
the intormation)
collec tion o 1nformation Surply o Arrana
fvm (souvce)Tmough Loformatiom ofovmatiom
to Mediators| io an Oroder
Eterna Semoy 0raans
tnvnonment
CEges, Eass, Prain
(outside the Nose, Mouth,
human wdy) Skin)
Intenal
tnvioonment
(thin the
human body)
Perception aunique 'hnterpre tat ion t h e situation,
o t an enact recovdin t
Detinitim:- ter
Luthans detines the term
perce ption a j a
Fred
Cognitive proces
that yíelds a uni gue
Very complex
picture that may be ui të
picture et the world,
a
as a proce
Pobbin defines pevception
Stephen P. and inter pret thei'r
se
in dividuals organi
by which Toaive meaninA t
to
SenAOry
eMions
mpr
i orde
thetr envir ommen
Pexceptual Pocex
Accovding tReitz, ferception ncludes all those
prmceKes by which an individual receives information
from his enviromment
Seetng, heaviog, tfeeling, tasting
and !ling The study o -these perceptual pvt eney
sme
Etexna factors
Selectton S i 2 e Contrast Pepeti bion
9ntensily
Motiom No vel Failiari
Lnt ernal Factors
Learning*MotivatioT* lerscnalits
Orqani8amensions oOrganisation
* figure Gou nd
Pevceptual Gouping (cimilanly ,closuwe,
Perceptual constaoe Continu ty, Pavsimii)
Perceptua Content
Perceptual Defense
-
ooanmnarawarn
iovitiaing Simplfing
nta rpe Factors
tation charactiristics o thu PerceiveY
Needs 4-Motives
Sel-Conept +Past
Eapevience PAgchological (Emotienal sta
. characüristia ot the Situation
Phyicol Organiaati onal Soual
Technical Natural t t i ickin g
repual
Ouukput
Jooivi dual
Bavio uf
inpuls inclade all stmuli
Pevceptua Inputs : - Pevceptual
tike clauoom,
that eriut in the eternal envirommeot
envinmment,TechnotoaiCal
aboratory, Socio- cultura
envinmeot, Ecomomic enviommeot, Pblitical (Phyaical
eoviovnment, 1oternatio) al enviovnment
and atural
envionnment (STEP IN)
Pevceptual Selection:
is based on the external
The Percepta Se lectivi y
and nte rnal envimment factors
Troups
Deiition: term govup a t o o o
stephen P. Fobbins defines the
individuals, 'nteracting and interdepeodent, oho
Come
more
togetheY to achieve par ticular objectives
Group is the Combination o two or more people
their
Hormed wth a purpoxe of achieving Con and
Shared goalk tough their inte va.c tive etfort.
Features:
.Combination o two or more individualu
Tndlividuals are motivated to Come closer phyieally
3 Thec Come c lo^er to achìeve thei CommoT). and shaved
4.Pevceive the eup as a unitied unit
5.
MembeT Contri but
dittevent iopulg tn ditterent
amounts towards the
a.chievement o q7oup a
Why u p s io Orgariationg:
Securi l
.Empow erme nt
ttvugh sharing of veousce
SBecoming a leader
4 Syner8Y
5 Goal Attaioneot
6. Status
Ttiliation rlecols
8. Sel esteem
T9Pes_o Goups
Diherent people join goups twi th various purpoe
Or du tthe forces o litferent factora.
ddterent 4yres ot govups are formed e y Conaeguently
are
. Fovmal Goup-wheo two or move individeuals jotn
together a a gwp du to the oti cial job strueture
and job relationship jo a0
organisation, Such a
qwup
Called forma 3Dup
Toforma Gooup:- Wheo two or more individuas joto
Eogether a a gpoup io order to Sat isy their Social
needs but not du tooficial job Structure ane
Organisaiona esivemeng Such a qvup is Calle ,
tnformal a7ups
8 mMagd
and hul her Gpup- Tt
is qDup o the superioY
a
Scuborolinaltj.
4laskGooup ople oorkina together io order o
actompliah a particular task form -tak
5.
Gavelp a
Normin
Durin
During thu Stage membeTs a r e clear o thei
and
leade, up hierarchy, parpose othe guup
DLP elationahlp^.
Se,So, membevs Start coepevattng aod collaboratin
with each other, develop close relationahip amon
among
them, erhtbit cohesive ne% aad preher lo identify
themselves oith the qoup during the normiog s ge
Members formulaa commen goals and erpeclatim
Mem berá
the goDp
Pevtorming-
t.CPoup nembers develop the elaticnships amorg
themselves io -the previous stage a ezplaioed easlier
G p members during thu stage ezest oll thet
and the
t he
erergiestowasds functioing pertorming
tasks io Oder to attaio the qrp goals:
3They share their ideas, skils and knouoledge and
Competence io Order to ecel io the organisational
activities forge ttirg their individual references
ad diterences
-Adjourniog
l.This qroop has beeo diibarded and adjouned imme-
honovative
novative and challengtnq work This is knoon as a
ig
high degree of coheaivenes
Gup Cohesivenem is the deree which
p member^ ave attvacted to each other and
are
ipived and motivated to
stay in the
qup
Group Co hesi veneM is hiah ohen
he
employees Spend more time for worklog togethe
The gDup Size ís Small
GTou members interact with each othe
closely and -feuently
Members aqree coi th common goals
There iCompetition oi-th othe 3vp
yhec_ott cohesivenew-
Cohesivenes influences poductiví l ,
CohCohesivenev along uith poAitive, ioduetion t h e
tothe work, Coods
employee eompaog, colleagee e
tb high Poductivity
2 Coheaiveney long with -ve ioduction leao 6
Pductivitu
3 cohe Si venes along with A Pevormana norns
Yeult in fovduckii
4 Cohe sivene along with pe r-fovmanece normA rejult
i
m o derat
Pvductiviig
5. cohesiveneen alon9 with N ferformaoce nornorms
ma leady
leads
to Pomduetivi ty
6. CohesiveneM alona with - ve inducbion vesulG io
Produetivi
Bilding Teama
Team: Team is tuoo or more people with Complmentos
8kll join together to work Enteractvely ay a Single
uoit and achieve a Commo) purpose for which all
all ot them hold tollective accountability
Ty Pes oTeamA_
types o teamns
There are Seveva
t.Work teams
R. Poject team
teams
3 High pevformance
4 mpovement teams
5Sel managed team
Secmi autonamoos teams
Vitual -teams
o
RuxpoAe
.To Set goalk o r Priorities -the work is perouo
To analysel allocai the a y is working ano
3 To erami ne -the Oat agDp
i poc ex
the relatiomahips amon Peopl
-To eiamine
work Dup
Rre dict individual behaviou w'thio the qDup
Predict Per formaoce o the gmuP
Poles
2Norms
3. Status
Si2e
. cohe^ivene
attributhd
Pou- behaviour atterns
A set of expectd Socal
aiven posi tion
io a
Co Some one OCcpina
unit. diverse sols
to play a number o
r e resuired role YeuiremesG
Poles Expectation -
H o others lbe.lieve a pevAo) should act in a
g'vo
Situatiom
Pole conflice -
ASituation in which an individual is Controotad
by divergent ole evpectationy.
Novms
Acceptable standards ot behaviour oithio agup
Hthat are hared by the 9roup member
clames oNorms
Perormance norm
Appeay ance. nor mA
Social Arrangeneat nosms
Allocation resources norms
Statuw- given o
vaok giveo
Yaok
A Socially detined position ov
Si2e:
Smaller qups are-asir at compluting task
input
Large qups are
good fogaioi9 divere
Cohesivenes
The degree t which a7Dpmembers are attracad
to each othev and are motivate d to Stay iothe gavUP
tgh Loo
Moderab
High Povduc tiviy
uduetiviy
Modevalk t
Louw
Rocuctivi y Low Poduc tivi