The importance of SBM can be seen in several key areas.

Firstly, it has been shown to have a positive

impact on student outcomes, including increased student achievement and graduation rates.
Additionally, SBM promotes transparency and accountability in the management of schools, as local
communities are more invested in ensuring that schools are meeting the needs of their students.
Moreover, it encourages community involvement in the education process, creating a sense of
ownership and responsibility for the success of local schools.

Advantages of SBM:

Local control: SBM allows schools to make decisions that are specific to their individual needs, rather
than being dictated by a centralized authority.

Flexibility: Schools have the ability to respond quickly to changes in student needs, community
demographics, and other factors that may impact student learning.

Increased stakeholder engagement: SBM encourages participation from a range of stakeholders,

including parents, teachers, and community members, which can lead to increased accountability and
support for the school.

Improved student outcomes: Research has shown that SBM can lead to improved academic
performance, attendance rates, and graduation rates.

Disadvantages of SBM:

Unequal distribution of resources: SBM can lead to inequities in resource allocation, particularly if
schools serving disadvantaged communities do not have the same level of resources as more affluent
schools.

Lack of expertise: Schools may not have the necessary expertise to make informed decisions on issues
such as budgeting or curriculum development.

Accountability concerns: Without strong oversight, there is a risk that schools may not be held
accountable for their decisions or performance.

Time and resource constraints: SBM requires significant time and resources to implement effectively,
which may not be feasible for all schools.