GROUP 1

Cordel, Gonzales, Hidalgo, Magdato, Ocampo, Profugo, Sabellano

Dilemma: You and your friend George were captured by the Nazis. You are interrogated and
tortured but you don’t know any information so you are let back into the jail cell. In the jail cell,
George tells you that he knows all the secrets of your military including where the base camps are,
which have hundreds of hiding soldiers. George tells you that he has a very low tolerance for pain
and will definitely tell the Nazis where the camp is if he is tortured. He asks you to kill him before he
goes for interrogation. Saving the life of your friend is right, and saving the lives of many soldiers is
right. And you can’t do both. What do you do?

Right vs Right values/Ethical Dilemma Paradigm evident in the Situation:

____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________

ALTERNATIVES/ OPTIONS/CHOICE CONSEQUENCE

1. Let him confess to the Nazis.

2. Kill him.

3.

Final Decision:
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________

What principle did you apply: (Ends-based, Rules-based, Care-based)

____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
GROUP 2
Dimatatac, Duron, Lancion, Mendoza, Merano, Prias, Reyes

Dilemma: You notice one of your students who failed the quizzes these past two weeks. One day,
you ask the student to talk with you after class. The student shared that he is having family problems
at home and his parents filed for an annulment. With this, he was unable to focus in class and that
made him fail the quizzes. The student asks you if you can give him some consideration and not fail
him in your subject. As a teacher, will you consider his situation or will you fail him to follow the
grading standards of the institution?

Right vs Right values/Ethical Dilemma Paradigm evident in the Situation:

____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________

ALTERNATIVES/ OPTIONS/CHOICE CONSEQUENCE

1. Fail him.

2. Give him consideration.

3.

Final Decision:
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________

What principle did you apply: (Ends-based, Rules-based, Care-based)

____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
GROUP 3
Alarcon, Antonio, Caling, Dela Peña, Fiesta, Geñalope

Dilemma: Barbie Barako is a single mother and a career woman. She is a teacher at a public
school and the one who provides for her only daughter and her parents. As a teacher, she
wants to earn a master's and doctoral degree so she can be promoted and start earning salary
grade 10. However, the tuition fee for this study is expensive. Once she studies, she will not be
able to provide for the needs of her daughter and family. But if she chooses to continue and
further her education, she can provide more than the needs of her family with the promotion of
her career. What should she do?

Right vs Right values/Ethical Dilemma Paradigm evident in the Situation:

____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________

ALTERNATIVES/ OPTIONS/CHOICE CONSEQUENCE

1. Continue her studies.

2. Focus on providing her family’s

needs.

3.

Final Decision:
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________

What principle did you apply: (Ends-based, Rules-based, Care-based)

____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
GROUP 4
Bautista, Cahilig, Gumpal, Panaligan, Pensica, Puriza

Dilemma: You are the leader of a rising pop group. You knew your co-member was dating a
person despite being on a dating ban. Rumors began spreading around and your manager
decided to ask you to confirm if the rumors are true or not. Your manager warned you that if he
caught you lying, your group will disband. However, if you snitched on your co-member, it may
cause friction in your relationship as a group. What will you say in this situation?

Right vs Right values/Ethical Dilemma Paradigm evident in the Situation:

____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________

ALTERNATIVES/ OPTIONS/CHOICE CONSEQUENCE

1. Tell the manager the truth.

2. Lie to your manager and tell him

it's just rumors.

3.

Final Decision:
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________

What principle did you apply: (Ends-based, Rules-based, Care-based)

____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
Rubric:

Area 3 2 1

30% The group demonstrated The group demonstrated The group made little
Knowledge a great understanding focus on the concepts reference to the concepts
and focus of the concepts discussed in providing their discussed in providing
discussed which served arguments and their arguments and
significantly in their justifications. At least two justifications. Limited
arguments and perspectives were laid out focus is given to
justifications. Various and explored. investigating different
perspectives are perspectives.
acknowledged, explored,
and effectively
differentiated.

30% The group excellently The group applied most of The group applied a few
Application applied all the relevant the relevant concepts of of the relevant concepts
of Concepts concepts of ethical ethical paradigms and of ethical paradigms and
paradigms and ethical ethical checkpoints ethical checkpoints
checkpoints correctly in correctly in their assigned correctly in their assigned
their assigned dilemma. dilemma. dilemma.

20% The group creatively The group explained their The group explained their
Delivery explained their work work almost clearly and work. Only a few
clearly and concisely. All concisely. Some answers questions were
questions were answered to the questions needed answered.
further explanation.

10% The group effectively The group completed the The group missed a few
Time completed the task within task within the given time. details about the task
the given time. within the given time.

10% All members of the group All members of the group Some members
Cooperation functioned exceptionally fairly participated to participated well to
well, listened to and complete the task. complete the task.
supported one another,
and exerted effort to
succeed in the task.