You are on page 1of 6

Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Materials Today: Proceedings


journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/matpr

Extraction of cellulosic fibers from the natural resources: A short review


Lalita Chopra, Manikanika
Department of Chemistry, UIS, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, 140301, Punjab, India

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: Cellulosic fiber or cellulosic biomass finds major role in the modern scientific era. The cellulosic fibers
Received 16 June 2021 were well utilized in today’s research due to the unique properties of cellulose such as its biocompatibil-
Received in revised form 2 August 2021 ity, biodegradability, non-toxic etc. Nature is the major sources of cellulose along with some minor
Accepted 20 August 2021
sources such as microbial cellulose (fungal, bacterial, algal etc.). One of the major research areas today
Available online xxxx
is to extract cellulose from natural resources abundant with us such as rice husk, wheat husk, maize husk,
pine needles, cotton, jute etc. Cellulose can be extract from these available sources by numerous chem-
Keywords:
icals, mechanical and green techniques. Cellulose extraction can be carried out at nano, micro or macro
Cellulosic fiber
Biodegradable
scale by the processes like alkalization, bleaching, acidic hydrolysis etc. Extracted cellulosic fiber was ana-
Natural resources lyzed by different analysis techniques such as X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infra-red (FTIR)
Extraction etc. The present review article represents the importance of the waste biomass to be a useful resource for
Environmental solutions the extraction of cellulose.
Copyright Ó 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the Symposium on Synth-
esis, Characterization & Processing of Inorganic, bio and nano Materials 2021

1. Introduction lution or smoke of approximate 12–60 percent parts per million


(ppm) concentration [14]. Burning of the agro residue is doubly
Extraction is a term that is used to define the transfer of any wasteful as the nutritious straw lost to the harmful pollution
compound from its original state such as solid or liquid to another flames [15,16]. There are various alternative ways to like produc-
phase. It can be understood as the separation of the compound tion of bioethanol, biogas/bio hydrogen papers and boards from
from a matrix [1,2]. It can be explained by various types such as wheat straw pulp, animal feed, yarns, fuels etc [17,18]. The whole-
liquid–liquid extraction, solid-phase extraction, acid-base extrac- some agro residue can be best used to extract the good quality cel-
tion, ultrasound-assisted extraction, heat reflux extraction, and so lulose biopolymer as good percentage of cellulose present in it
on [3,4]. R. M. Pangborn et al. reported that the flavour and colour [19,20]. Cellulose itself is bio renewable, biocompatible and non-
of tea are extracted by us from grounds and then boiling in water toxic biopolymer with number of hydroxyl functionalities which
[5].Fig. 1.Fig. 2.Fig. 3.Table 1. provide it uses in various enrichment and separation technologies
The current review article specially raises two major problems [21,22]. Secondly, the biomass also represents extreme potential to
world-wide; one is the decrease in the wastage of plant or agro be a renewable and green resource of bioactive polymeric materi-
residue and second is to convert this residue or waste into some als [23,24]. Bio feedstocks or its waste can be exhausted for the
useful material [6]. The suitable management of the remains will extraction of biologically active materials such as cellulose, lignin,
lead to maximum paybacks along with the lessening of the health dextrose, chitin and many more. Production of cellulosic fibre from
hazardous instigated by predominate traditional practices like the biomass is one of the important technical practice [25-27].
burning of the agro waste in the fields itself [7-9]. Agro waste con- This review article is based on the critical analysis and harvest-
sists of high contents of cellulose along with hemicellulose, lignin, ing of various chemical, green and technical methods of cellulose
xylose, ash and crude proteins along with other organic com- fibre extraction from available or waste biomass.
pounds. Burning of such a valuable agro residue is a harmful prac-
tice like in India and should be banned along with the cheap and
economical solution to the farmers [10-13]. The burning of the
agro residue is identified as major health hazardous leading to pol-

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.08.267
2214-7853/Copyright Ó 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the Symposium on Synthesis, Characterization & Processing of Inorganic, bio and nano Materials
2021

Please cite this article as: L. Chopra and Manikanika, Extraction of cellulosic fibers from the natural resources: A short review, Materials Today: Proceed-
ings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.08.267
L. Chopra and Manikanika Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx

Fig. 1. Sources of cellulose.

Fig. 2. Cellulose extraction from plant biomass.

2. Natural cellulosic resources [28-30]. Biomass, such as plant resources or agro waste are the
major sources of cellulosic fiber. Plant waste fibers like wood,
Cellulose is the most abundant biopolymer available on earth. rice husk, maize husk, banana peel, coffee bean husk, barley
The major sources of cellulose extraction are plants and bacteria husk etc. are major sources of cellulose. The degree of extraction

Fig. 3. Cellulose extraction from plant biomass.

2
L. Chopra and Manikanika Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx

Table 1
Different waste product of wheat and their composition.

S. No. Wheat waste Cellulose Hemicellulose Lignin References


1. Bran 24% 32% 46% [73]
2. Husk 36–39% 18–21% 16% [74]
3. Straw 33–45% 19–32%, 8–16% [75]

of the fiber varies from plant to plant and also varies in accor- 4. Cellulosic extraction
dance to the methodology utilized for the extraction [31-35].
In most of the plants as well in the agro residue or waste the Cellulosic fibre extraction can be attained in nano or micro
cellulose accompany with lignin and hemicelluloses and found forms by some chemical or mechanical techniques. There are mul-
in a composite form. These three are physically and chemically tiple number of ways to extract cellulose from the plant parts as
bound altogether [36-39]. Cellulose is chief fragment of a plant these are rich in cellulose. The three major steps in cellulosic fibre
structure whereas lignin act as adhesive to hold hemicellulose extraction are pre-hydrolysis, pulping and bleaching. Pre-
and cellulose together and hemicellulose, act as a medium to hydrolysis treatment is done with mineral acid or alkali so as to
link both cellulose and lignin together [40,41]. During the pro- open up the matrix [55,56]. Pulping is to cook the fibre done with
cess of extraction of cellulose to occur efficiently the removal the help of alkali such as NaOH. The bleaching being the final step
of the other counter parts such as lignin, hemicelluloses and to extract the pure bleached form of cellulose can be done with
additional filths should be properly managed and controlled. H2O2, sodium chlorite, ozone etc. and in order to increase the pur-
Microbial cellulose which also make a major quantity of cellu- ity of the obtained cellulose hydrolysis with H2SO4 under reflux
lose can be extracted from bacteria [25,42-44]. conditions can be carried out [57,58].
Cellulose can be extracted from various sources such as wood
pulp, rice husk, corn waste, wheat waste, coffee waste, banana
peel, sisal fibers, sugarcane bagasse (SCB) and many other sources.

3. Cellulosic properties
4.1. Extraction of cellulose from rice husk

Cellulose fibrous therefore it is unsolvable in water as well as in


Agro waste (rice husks) collected, dried and well ground. Dried
most common organic solvents. The deprived solubility is accred-
rice husk is dewaxed with organic solvent hexane/ethanol. Deligni-
ited mainly to the strong inter and intramolecular hydrogen bond-
fication of the extract was carried out with the help of aqueous
ing holding the individual chains. Cellulose is employed
NaOH at 121 °C in an autoclave. To remove lignin and hemicellu-
extensively in the wide local of applications instead of its poor sol-
lose from the extract, dispersion obtained was treated with the
ubility [45,46]. These areas include packing, paper, coatings, com-
ultrasound [59,60]. The pulp thus obtained was gone through the
posites etc. But the modification of the cellulose chemically hep to
bleaching process bleaching agent such as H2O2 at a particular
enhance its solubility, accessibility and also applications as well.
pH for specific time and temperature. The ration of liquid to pulp
The functional groups on the cellulose can be modified as per the
was treated with conc. HNO3 at a specific time and temperature.
requirements and hence specific application can be fulfilled with
The mother liquid was carefully drained out and the cellulose
increased performance [47,48]. Annually more than 180 million
obtained was washed subsequently with ethanol, water and then
tons of cellulose produced by the plants world-wide and it con-
again with ethanol. The obtained cellulose then dried in oven at
tributes to be the most abundant and renewable bioresources
an optimum temperature until it weighs constant. The total yield
available on earth. Cellulose present in plants as a primary struc-
obtained was calculated as weight percentage [61,62].
ture of cell wall and also in algae in oomycetes [49]. Cellulose itself
is polysaccharide form of carbohydrate with formula (C6H10O5)n. It
consists of linear chains of b (1–4) glycosidic linked D-glucose 4.2. Extraction of cellulose from wood pulp
units. It is tasteless, colorless polysaccharide and remain immisci-
ble in aqueous solvent and other organic ones. The presence of Cellulose extraction from wood pulp is a quit old practice as the
multiple –OH functional groups on it result in to interlinking of pulp is the rich source of natural cellulose. This can be achieved by
the chains by H-bonding due to which it is gaining fibrous proper- various practices such as ionic liquid co-solvent systems, the alcell
ties and high tensile strength as well. The presence of many –OH process, high sheer homogenization, mechanical treatment etc.
functional groups make it more viable for the chemical modifica- Conventionally, the extraction of cellulose from the wood pulp
tion by required functionalities. Cellulose is crystalline in nature was carried out by Kraft pulping process. The process involves
as compared to other polysaccharide like starch, dextrin which semi-chemical degradation of hemicellulose and lignin from the
are amorphous. Cotton fibers are purest form of natural cellulose matrix by treatment with NaOH and Na2S at the conditions of high
as 90% of it is glucose only [40]. Cellulose exists in many forms pressure and high temperature. In the delignification process caus-
such as Cellulose-I, Cellulose Ia. Cellulose Ib, Cellulose II, Cellulose tic soda can be added to increase pH whereas chemical pulping
III and Cellulose IV. Cellulose I obtained from plants and considered help to remove lignin to extract cellulose [63-65].
to be the natural cellulose whereas Cellulose Ib is mainly present in
higher plants. Cellulose Ia is mainly present in bacteria and algae 4.3. Extraction of cellulose from banana peel
[51]. Cellulose I can be converted into cellulose II and the process
is irreversible because of more stability of cellulose II over cellulose Banana represents one of the extensively consumed fruit world-
I Cellulose III and Cellulose IV can be produced from the cellulose I wide and finds 40% share in world fruit trait. Therefore, a lot of
by various chemical treatments of it. DOP of cellulose controls banana peel is thrown as waste and the factories producing
many physical properties of the cellulose such as strength, hard- banana-based food products produce huge banana peel waste
ness, crystallinity etc. [52-54]. which result into foul smell and also cause many human diseases.
3
L. Chopra and Manikanika Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx

Banana is factories produce a lot of banana peels, which can cause obtained was washed thoroughly with 95% ethanol, dried at opti-
an environmental problem such as a bad smell and become a mum temperature in hot air oven until constant weight was
source of human disease. It consists of 12.1% Cellulose and rest lig- obtained [77]
nin, hemicellulose, ash and moisture. In order to extract cellulose
from it, banana peel at maturity stage 7 that is yellow peel with lit- 4.7. Extraction of cellulose from sugarcane bagasse (SCB)
tle brown patches on it is collected and cut in to the small pieces on
around 0.3  2.5 cm dimensions. These pieces are then dried Sugarcane bagasse (SCB) powder was first subjected to deligni-
around 55 °C for about 10 h’ time to remove moisture from it, then fication with sodium chlorite in acidic conditions for 2 h contact
cool at room temperature. Peel then grounded into powder and time and temperature approximately 70 °C. After this treatment
kept in polythene in refrigerate at 4 °C. In maceration process the residue was filtered and washed with distilled water properly.
around 50 g of banana peel is mixed with ethanol/ toluene (1:1) It is then dried in hot air oven at optimum temperature [78].
solvent for 3 days. In the process of bleaching lignin was removed Extraction of holocellulose was carried out with alkali solution.
by using NaOCl at 80 °C with constant stirring. Hemicellulose was Residue obtained after the process is cellulose rich. It is filtered
removed from the pulp by treatment with NaOH at 60 °C. Extracted and washed with water to remove the chemical residues along
cellulose was washed with distilled water and ethanol. It is dried at with. Sample was dried and then weighed. The crude cellulose
optimum temperature until give constant weight [66,67]. material obtained here can be purified by the treatment with nitric
acid. The final sample obtained was washed with subsequent frac-
4.4. Extraction of cellulose from coffee husk tions of ethanol and water, dried and weighed until give a constant
weight [79,80].
Coffee is commonest beverage consumed word-wide. It is rich-
est source of anti-oxidants, stimulate brain and improve its func-
tioning. Coffee crop produces a momentous amount of waste in 5. Conclusion
the form of coffee husk which can be employed as a resource for
valuable products. Coffee husks is agro waste produced after de- The cellulose being the most abundant biopolymer present on
hulling the coffee cherries thru dry processing. Waste coffee husks earth was most exhausted one. The sources of natural cellulose
from coffee fields and industries based on coffee were collected are numerous, almost every kind of flora consists of a good amount
and well-grounded and dried for the moisture loss. Coffee husk of cellulose content in it. Cellulose in general present associated
constitutes approximately 57% of cellulose and 22% of lignin hence and well bound with hemicellulose and lignin. Cellulose can be
contributes to be a rich source of lignocellulosic materials. Differ- extracted from the natural resources for various purposes. During
ent process involved in cellulose extraction are Alkali treatment, the extraction of cellulose from any kind of plant or agro waste
bleaching treatment and acid hydrolysis. Alkali treatment was per- delignification and removal of hemicellulose is required. Bleaching
formed with NaOH solution for 3.0 contact time at reflux temper- was processed unless bleached cellulose material was obtained.
ature with incessant stirring. The solid obtained was filtered and There are huge number of renewable resources to extract cellulose
washed with distilled water many times until residual alkali was as discussed above. Most of these resources are agro waste, which
removed. The residual solid was bleached by treatment with equal if not treated well then can lead to pollution in the environment
portions of sodium chlorite, acetate buffer and water for 4 h at but if utilized for the extraction of the components whin it then
reflux temperature. The bleaching process will be removed number solves the dual problem. A lot of agro waste is exhausted by the
of times until product become white in color. The product obtained researchers for this purpose as well as many small-scale industries
then washed with water until all residual chemicals were removed. were working on the techniques. But the best solution can be
Acid hydrolysis of the product cellulose will be performed to pre- obtained if large scale local plants were installed with the quick
pare nanocrystalline cellulose [68-70]. extraction mechanism of the components of the waste so as to
make best of it in less time, less labor and less cost.
4.5. Extraction of cellulose from wheat straw
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Wheat (botanical name Triticum aestivum) is known as one of
the commonest, oldest, major consumed cereal in the whole world. Lalita Chopra: Writing – original draft. Manikanika: Writing -
Among wheat waste wheat bran, husk and straw are most com- review & editing.
mon. From the wheat plant cellulose can be extracted from the
bran, husk as well as from the straw [71,72]. The composition of
Declaration of Competing Interest
the different parts of wheat in terms of cellulose, hemicellulose
and lignin are given in table below:
The authors declare that they have no known competing finan-
cial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared
4.6. Extraction of cellulose from sisal fibers
to influence the work reported in this paper.
Literature survey revealed the employment of sisal fiber in the
cellulose extraction. Sisal fibers requires preconditioning before References
extraction of cellulose and for the purpose sisal fibers were washed
[1] S. Roy, J.W. Rhim, Fabrication of cellulose nanofiber-based functional color
multiple times with the distilled, dried in a hot air oven at around indicator film incorporated with shikonin extracted from Lithospermum
80 °C for whole one day. Fibers are then cut into small pieces of 5– erythrorhizon root, Food Hydrocolloids. 1 (2021) 114.
10 mm long [76]. Fibers then processed through the procedures [2] X. Wang, H. Li, Y. Cao, Q. Tang, Cellulose extraction from wood chip in an ionic
liquid 1-allyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride (AmimCl), Bioresource
like dewaxing carried out with the mixture of solvents toluene/
technology. 102 (17) (2011) 7959–7965.
ethanol (2:1 V/V) for 6 h in Soxhlet. Pre-treatment process is per- [3] N. Johar, I. Ahmad, A. Dufresne, Extraction, preparation and characterization of
formed with 0.1 M NaOH in 50% volume of ethanol for 3 contact cellulose fibres and nanocrystals from rice husk, Industrial Crops and Products.
hours at 45 °C for 3 h then treated with H2O2 at pH = 11.5 main- 37 (1) (2012) 93–99.
[4] R.M. Sheltami, I. Abdullah, I. Ahmad, A. Dufresne, H. Kargarzadeh, Extraction of
tained with buffer. Treated with NaOH and Naa2B4O710H2O with cellulose nanocrystals from mengkuang leaves (Pandanus tectorius),
nonstop agitation. The product the treated with HNO3. Solid Carbohydrate Polymers. 88 (2) (2012) 772–779.

4
L. Chopra and Manikanika Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx

[5] Pangborn RM, TRABUE IM, LITTLE AC. Analysis of coffee, tea and artificially [31] Z. Hussain, W. Sajjad, T. Khan, F. Wahid, Production of bacterial cellulose from
flavored drinks prepared from mineralized waters. Journal of Food Science. industrial wastes: a review, Cellulose. 26 (5) (2019) 2895–2911.
1971;36355-62. [32] A.J. Sayyed, N.A. Deshmukh, D.V. Pinjari, A critical review of manufacturing
[6] W.Y. Hamad, T.Q. Hu, Structure–process–yield interrelations in nanocrystalline processes used in regenerated cellulosic fibres: viscose, cellulose acetate,
cellulose extraction, The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering. 88 (2010) cuprammonium, LiCl/DMAc, ionic liquids, and NMMO based lyocell, Cellulose.
392–402. 26 (5) (2019) 2913–2940.
[7] R.P. John, G.S. Anisha, K.M. Nampoothiri, A. Pandey, Micro and macroalgal [33] A.H. Bhat, I. Khan, M.A. Usmani, R. Umapathi, S.M.Z. Al-Kindy, Cellulose an
biomass: a renewable source for bioethanol, Bioresource technology. 102 (1) ageless renewable green nanomaterial for medical applications: An overview
(2011) 186–193. of ionic liquids in extraction, separation and dissolution of cellulose,
[8] R.K. Srivastava, N.P. Shetti, K.R. Reddy, E.E. Kwon, M.N. Nadagouda, T.M. International journal of biological macromolecules. 129 (2019) 750–777.
Aminabhavi, Biomass utilization and production of biofuels from carbon [34] K. Ganguly, K.T. Lim, Nanocellulose-based polymer nanohybrids and
neutral materials, Environmental Pollution. 276 (2021) 116731, https://doi. nanocomposite applications, Multifunctional Hybrid Nanomaterials for
org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116731. Sustainable Agri-Food and Ecosystems. (2020) 485–504.
[9] S. Puri, S. Sharma, A. Kumari, M. Sharma, U. Sharma, S. Kumar, Extraction of [35] A. Vinod, M.R. Sanjay, S. Suchart, P. Jyotishkumar, Renewable and sustainable
lignocellulosic constituents from cow dung: preparation and characterisation biobased materials: An assessment on biofibers, biofilms, biopolymers and
of nanocellulose, Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. 26 (2020) 1. biocomposites, Journal of Cleaner Production. 258 (2020) 120978, https://doi.
[10] M.V. Madurwar, R.V. Ralegaonkar, S.A. Mandavgane, Application of agro-waste org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120978.
for sustainable construction materials: A review, Construction and Building [36] Y.G. Thyavihalli Girijappa, S. Mavinkere Rangappa, J. Parameswaranpillai, S.
materials. 38 (2013) 872–878. Siengchin, Natural fibers as sustainable and renewable resource for
[11] C.M. Ajila, S.K. Brar, M. Verma, U.J.S. Prasada Rao, in: Environmental Protection development of eco-friendly composites: a comprehensive review, Frontiers
Strategies for Sustainable Development, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, in Materials. 6 (2019) 226.
2012, pp. 65–109, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1591-2_3. [37] S. Gopi, P. Balakrishnan, D. Chandradhara, D. Poovathankandy, S. Thomas,
[12] A. Mirzaei-Aghsaghali, N. Maheri-Sis, Nutritive value of some agro-industrial General scenarios of cellulose and its use in the biomedical field, Materials
by-products for ruminants-A review, World J. Zool. 3 (2008) 40–46. Today Chemistry. 13 (2019) 59–78.
[13] B.S. Kauldhar, S.K. Yadav, Turning waste to wealth: A direct process for [38] J. Wang, X. Liu, T. Jin, H. He, L. Liu, Preparation of nanocellulose and its
recovery of nano-silica and lignin from paddy straw agro-waste, Journal of potential in reinforced composites: A review, Journal of Biomaterials Science.
Cleaner Production. 194 (2018) 158–166. 30 (11) (2019) 919–946.
[14] A. Gillespie, The long road to sustainability: The past, present, and future of [39] M. Ramesh, C. Deepa, L.R. Kumar, M.R. Sanjay, S. Siengchin, Life-cycle and
international environmental law and policy, Oxford University Press, 2018. environmental impact assessments on processing of plant fibres and its bio-
[15] B. Kumari, B.S. Chandel, P. Lal, An econometric analysis of optimality for composites: A critical review, Journal of Industrial Textiles. 21 (2020).
sustainable paddy production in India, Agricultural Economics Research [40] P. Jagadeesh, Y.G. Thyavihalli Girijappa, M. Puttegowda, S.M. Rangappa, S.
Review. 31 (2018) 139–145. Siengchin, Effect of natural filler materials on fiber reinforced hybrid polymer
[16] C.C. Launio, C.A. Asis, R.G. Manalili, E.F. Javier, Cost-effectiveness analysis of composites: An Overview, Journal of Natural Fibers. 21 (2020) 1–6.
farmers’ rice straw management practices considering CH4 and N2O [41] M.R. Sanjay, S. Siengchin, J. Parameswaranpillai, M. Jawaid, C.I. Pruncu, A.
emissions, Journal of environmental management. 183 (2016) 245–252. Khan, A comprehensive review of techniques for natural fibers as
[17] S. Chakma, A. Ranjan, H.A. Choudhury, P.K. Dikshit, V.S. Moholkar, Bioenergy reinforcement in composites: Preparation, processing and characterization,
from rice crop residues: role in developing economies, Clean Technologies & Carbohydrate polymers. 1 (207) (2019 Mar) 108–121.
Environmental Policy. 18 (2) (2016) 373–394. [42] S. Mahmud, K.M.F. Hasan, M.A. Jahid, K. Mohiuddin, R. Zhang, J. Zhu,
[18] J. Houghton, The science of global warming, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. Comprehensive review on plant fiber-reinforced polymeric biocomposites,
26 (4) (2001) 247–257. Journal of Materials Science. 56 (12) (2021) 7231–7264.
[19] M.R. Sanjay, S. Siengchin, Editorial corner-a personal view exploring the [43] H. Seddiqi E. Oliaei H. Honarkar J. Jin L.C. Geonzon R.G. Bacabac J. Klein-Nulend
applicability of natural fibers for the development of biocomposites. 15 (3) Klein-Nulend J 28 4 2021 1893 1931
(2021). [44] A. Pandit, R. Kumar, A Review on Production, Characterization and Application
[20] S.M. Rangappa, S. Siengchin, H.N. Dhakal, Green-composites: Ecofriendly and of Bacterial Cellulose and Its Biocomposites, Journal of Polymers and the
sustainability, Applied Science and Engineering Progress. 13 (3) (2020) 183– Environment. 1–8 (2021).
184. [45] H.S. Hafid, F.N. Omar, J. Zhu, M. Wakisaka, Enhanced crystallinity and thermal
[21] K.J. Nagarajan, N.R. Ramanujam, M.R. Sanjay, S. Siengchin, B. Surya Rajan, K. properties of cellulose from rice husk using acid hydrolysis treatment,
Sathick Basha, P. Madhu, G.R. Raghav, A comprehensive review on cellulose Carbohydrate Polymers. 260 (2021) 117789, https://doi.org/10.1016/
nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibers: Pretreatment, preparation, and j.carbpol.2021.117789.
characterization, Polymer Composites. 42 (4) (2021) 1588–1630. [46] P. Madhu, M. Jawid, Characterization and properties of natural fiber polymer
[22] G. Rajeshkumar, S. Arvindh Seshadri, G.L. Devnani, M.R. Sanjay, S. Siengchin, J. composites, J Clean Prod. 172 (2018) 566–581.
Prakash Maran, N.A. Al-Dhabi, P. Karuppiah, V.A. Mariadhas, N. Sivarajasekar, [47] D. Zhao, Y. Zhu, W. Cheng, W. Chen, Y. Wu, H. Yu, Cellulose-based flexible
A. Ronaldo Anuf, Environment friendly, renewable and sustainable poly lactic functional materials for emerging intelligent electronics, Advanced Materials.
acid (PLA) based natural fiber reinforced composites–A comprehensive review, 33 (28) (2021) 2000619, https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.v33.2810.1002/
Journal of Cleaner Production. 310 (2021) 127483, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. adma.202000619.
jclepro.2021.127483. [48] J. Yang, B. Medronho, B. Lindman, M. Norgren, Simple one pot preparation of
[23] A.R. Shahmoradi, N. Talebibahmanbigloo, A.A. Javidparvar, G. Bahlakeh, B. chemical hydrogels from cellulose dissolved in cold LiOH/urea, Polymers. 12
Ramezanzadeh, Studying the adsorption/inhibition impact of the cellulose and (2) (2020) 373, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12020373.
lignin compounds extracted from agricultural waste on the mild steel [49] K. Song, W. Zhu, X. Li, Z. Yu, A novel mechanical robust, self-healing and shape
corrosion in HCl solution, Journal of Molecular Liquids. 304 (2020) 112751, memory hydrogel based on PVA reinforced by cellulose nanocrystal, Materials
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.112751. Letters. 260 (2020) 126884, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.126884.
[24] S. Li, G. Chen, Agricultural waste-derived superabsorbent hydrogels: [50] S. Yook, H. Park, H. Park, S.-Y. Lee, J. Kwon, H.J. Youn, Barrier coatings with
Preparation, performance, and socioeconomic impacts, Journal of Cleaner various types of cellulose nanofibrils and their barrier properties, Cellulose. 27
Production. 251 (2020) 119669, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. (8) (2020) 4509–4523.
jclepro.2019.119669. [51] J.F. Matthews, M. Bergenstråhle, G.T. Beckham, M.E. Himmel, M.R. Nimlos, J.W.
[25] S. Ventura-Cruz, A. Tecante, | Nanocellulose and microcrystalline cellulose Brady, M.F. Crowley, High-temperature behavior of cellulose I, The Journal of
from agricultural waste: Review on isolation and application as reinforcement Physical Chemistry B. 115 (10) (2011) 2155–2166.
in polymeric matrices, Food Hydrocolloids. 118 (2021) 106771, https://doi. [52] A. Sarko, R. Muggli, Packing analysis of carbohydrates and polysaccharides. III.
org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106771. Valonia cellulose and cellulose II, Macromolecules. 7 (4) (1974) 486–494.
[26] M. Wakabayashi, S. Fujisawa, T. Saito, A. Isogai, Nanocellulose film properties [53] D. da Silva Perez, S. Montanari, M.R. Vignon, TEMPO-mediated oxidation of
tunable by controlling degree of fibrillation of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose, cellulose III, Biomacromolecules. 4 (5) (2003) 1417–1425.
Frontiers in chemistry. 8 (2020) 37. [54] A. Okiyama, M. Motoki, S. Yamanaka, Bacterial cellulose IV, Application to
[27] H. Doh, M.H. Lee, W.S. Whiteside, Physicochemical characteristics of cellulose processed foods. Food hydrocolloids. 6 (6) (1993) 503–511.
nanocrystals isolated from seaweed biomass, Food hydrocolloids. 102 (2020) [55] V. Poursorkhabi, M. Misra, A.K. Mohanty, Extraction of lignin from a coproduct
105542, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.105542. of the cellulosic ethanol industry and its thermal characterization,
[28] J.M. Rieland, B.J. Love, Ionic liquids: A milestone on the pathway to greener BioResources. 8 (2013) 5083–5101.
recycling of cellulose from biomass, Resources, Conservation and Recycling. [56] N. Kambli, S. Basak, K.K. Samanta, R.R. Deshmukh, Extraction of natural
155 (2020) 104678, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104678. cellulosic fibers from cornhusk and its physico-chemical properties, Fibers and
[29] G. Rajeshkumar, S.A. Seshadri, S. Ramakrishnan, M.R. Sanjay, S. Siengchin, Polymers. 17 (5) (2016) 687–694.
Nagaraja KC, Materials and technologies. Polymer Composites, A [57] V.P. Kommula, K.O. Reddy, M. Shukla, T. Marwala, E.V.S. Reddy, A.V. Rajulu,
comprehensive review on natural fiber/nano-clay reinforced hybrid Extraction, modification, and characterization of natural ligno-cellulosic fiber
polymeric composites, 2021, p. 13. strands from napier grass, International Journal of Polymer Analysis and
[30] G. Biliuta, S. Coseri, Cellulose: A ubiquitous platform for ecofriendly metal Characterization. 21 (1) (2016) 18–28.
nanoparticles preparation, Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 383 (2019) 155– [58] K.D. Kahawita, A.M. Samarasekara, Extraction and characterization of
173. cellulosic fibers from sawmill waste. (2016) 343–348.

5
L. Chopra and Manikanika Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx

[59] S. Collazo-Bigliardi, R. Ortega-Toro, A.C. Boix, Isolation and characterization of coffee husk and comparative study with rice husk, Carbohydrate polymers.
microcrystalline cellulose and cellulose nanocrystals from coffee husk and 191 (2018) 205–215.
comparative study with rice husk, Carbohydrate polymers. 191 (2018) 205– [70] S. Collazo-Bigliardi, R. Ortega-Toro, A. Chiralt, Improving properties of
215. thermoplastic starch films by incorporating active extracts and cellulose
[60] H. Kargarzadeh, N. Johar, I. Ahmad, Starch biocomposite film reinforced by fibres isolated from rice or coffee husk, Food Packaging and Shelf Life. 22
multiscale rice husk fiber, Composites Science and Technology. 151 (2017) (2019) 100383, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2019.100383.
147–155. [71] R. Liu, H. Yu, Y. Huang, Structure and morphology of cellulose in wheat straw,
[61] M.S. Islam, N. Kao, S.N. Bhattacharya, R. Gupta, P.K. Bhattacharjee, Effect of Cellulose. 12 (1) (2005) 25–34.
low-pressure alkaline delignification process on the production of [72] RunCang Sun, J. Tomkinson, Separation and characterization of cellulose from
nanocrystalline cellulose from rice husk, Journal of the Taiwan Institute of wheat straw, Separation science and technology. 39 (2) (2005) 391–411.
Chemical Engineers. 80 (2017) 820–834. [73] L. Stevenson F. Phillips K. O’sullivan J. Walton 63 8 2012 1001 1013.
[62] R.K. Sharma, R. Kumar, A.P. Singh, Extraction of cellulose micro-whiskers from [74] A.K. Bledzki, A.A. Mamun, J. Volk, Physical, chemical and surface properties of
rice husk: a greener approach, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology. 18 wheat husk, rye husk and soft wood and their polypropylene composites,
(5) (2018) 3702–3708. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 41 (4) (2010) 480–
[63] J. Dai, M. Chae, D. Beyene, C. Danumah, F. Tosto, D. Bressler, Co-production of 488.
cellulose nanocrystals and fermentable sugars assisted by endoglucanase [75] X. Wang, G. Yang, Y. Feng, G. Ren, X. Han, Optimizing feeding composition and
treatment of wood pulp, Materials. 11 (9) (2018) 1645, https://doi.org/ carbon–nitrogen ratios for improved methane yield during anaerobic co-
10.3390/ma11091645. digestion of dairy, chicken manure and wheat straw, Bioresource technology.
[64] M. Rajinipriya, M. Nagalakshmaiah, M. Robert, S. Elkoun, Importance of 120 (2012) 78–83.
agricultural and industrial waste in the field of nanocellulose and recent [76] J.I. Morán, V.A. Alvarez, V.P. Cyras, A. Vázquez, Extraction of cellulose and
industrial developments of wood based nanocellulose: a review, ACS preparation of nanocellulose from sisal fibers, Cellulose. 15 (1) (2008) 149–
Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 6 (3) (2018) 2807–2828. 159.
[65] C. Fechter, S. Fischer, F. Reimann, H. Brelid, T. Heinze, Influence of pulp [77] A. Pappu, M. Saxena, V.K. Thakur, A. Sharma, R. Haque, Facile extraction,
characteristics on the properties of alkali cellulose, Cellulose. 27 (12) (2020) processing and characterization of biorenewable sisal fibers for
7227–7241. multifunctional applications, Journal of Macromolecular Science, Part A. 53
[66] R. Singanusong, W. Tochampa, T. Kongbangkerd, C. Sodchit, Extraction and (7) (2016) 424–432.
properties of cellulose from banana peels, Suranaree Journal of Science and [78] K. Saelee, N. Yingkamhaeng, T. Nimchua, P. Sukyai, in: Extraction and
Technology. 21 (2014) 201–213. characterization of cellulose from sugarcane bagasse by using environmental
[67] K. Harini, K. Ramya, M. Sukumar, Extraction of nano cellulose fibers from the friendly method, Mae Fah Lunag University (School of Science), Thailand, 2014,
banana peel and bract for production of acetyl and lauroyl cellulose, pp. 26–29.
Carbohydrate polymers. 201 (2018) 329–339. [79] A. Mandal, D. Chakrabarty, Isolation of nanocellulose from waste sugarcane
[68] Bondesson E. A nutritional analysis on the by-product coffee husk and its bagasse (SCB) and its characterization, Carbohydrate Polymers. 86 (3) (2011)
potential utilization in food production. 2015 1291–1299.
[69] S. Collazo-Bigliardi, R. Ortega-Toro, A. Chiralt Boix, Isolation and [80] Y.-H. Feng, T.-Y. Cheng, W.-G. Yang, P.-T. Ma, H.-Z. He, X.-C. Yin, X.-X. Yu,
characterisation of microcrystalline cellulose and cellulose nanocrystals from Characteristics and environmentally friendly extraction of cellulose nanofibrils
from sugarcane bagasse, Industrial Crops and Products. 111 (2018) 285–291.

You might also like