MIT Art, Design and Technology University Pune, India.

a leap towards the world class education.

103-Teaching and Learning

Multiple Intelligence Inventory

Course In-charge: Dr. Divya Nair

Course: B.Ed. (2022-2023)

Subject code 21BED103

Name of the Student: ANJALI RATUDI
Contact: 7219479512
Email Id: anjaliratudi11@gmail.com

1
 INDEX

Serial Particulars Page

Number Number

1 Introduction: Concept of Multiple Intelligence 3-5

theory and acknowledgement

Process of Implementing the inventory with 6-15

2
details of Multiple Intelligence Inventory

3 Organization and presentation of data: 6-15

graphs and tables

Analysis of the data and interpretation with 6-15

4
the help of graphs and tables

5 Conclusion 16

2
 Introduction

Multiple intelligences are a theory first posited by Harvard developmental

psychologist Howard Gardner in 1983. Multiple Intelligence theory is the idea
that people are smart in different ways. Some people are good at music, others
are good at math, and still others are good at things like art, sports, or
understanding people's feelings.

This theory suggests human intelligence can be differentiated into the following
modalities: logical(mathematics), Musical (Rhythmic), Naturalist, Intrapersonal,
Existentialist, Visual (Spatial), Verbal (Linguistic to do with words), Kinesthetic
(Bodily), Interpersonal. In contrast to other notions of learning capabilities (for
example, the concept of a single IQ), the idea behind the theory of multiple
intelligences is that people learn in a variety of different ways. “I believe that
the brain has evolved over millions of years to be responsive to different kinds
of content in the world,” says Gardner.

Each person has their own unique combination of these intelligences, which
means that everyone is special and smart in their own way.

So, if you're good at playing an instrument, that means you have a strong
musical intelligence. And if you're good at solving puzzles or figuring out math
problems, that means you have a strong logical-mathematical intelligence. And
if you're good at understanding how things fit together in space, that means
you have a strong spatial intelligence.

The important thing to remember is that being smart isn't just about being
good at school subjects. It's about using your unique talents and abilities to
succeed and make a difference in the world.

Howard Gardner suggests that Multiple Intelligence can be differentiated into

nine modalities:

a. Logical (Mathematical)

Skills involved in scientific thinking and problem solving. Person

with this engage in abstract reasoning and can manipulate symbols

3
 to solve mathematical problems.
b. Linguistic (Verbal)

Skills involved in the production and use of language. It is the

capacity to use language fluently and flexibly to express one’s
thinking and understands others.
c. Spatial

Skills involved in forming visual images and patterns such as being

imaginative, creative, artistic and visually picture smart.
d. Musical

Sensitivity to musical rhythms and patterns, good sense of sound to

produce, create and manipulate musical patterns.
e. Bodily Kinaesthetic

Uses whole or portion of body flexibly and creatively like dancers,

athletes, actors, gymnasts, sportspersons and surgeons.
f. Existentialist

Sensitivity and capacity to tackle deep questions about human

existence, such as the meaning of life, why we die and how did we
get here.
g. Interpersonal

Sensitivity to subtle aspects of others behavior like the skill to

understand the motives, feeling and behavior of other people.
h. Intrapersonal

Awareness of one’s own feelings, motives and desires.

i. Naturalistic

Sensitivity to the features of the natural world involves complete

awareness of our relationship with the natural world

4
 Analysis of the data and Interpretation

The aim of the above inventory was to identify the dominant and recessive
Intelligence among the students. The sample population comprised of 10th
and 12th class students from Kendriya Vidyalaya National Defence
Academy. Consent to interact and conduct the questionnaire was taken.
The Questionnaire was given to the participants Kendriya Vidyalaya
National Defence Academy in hard copy. There was no time limit
mentioned and honest answers were encouraged and confidentiality was
assured.

5
Student 1: - Pranav Rawat.
Now carry forward your total from each section and multiply by 10 below:
Section # of 1’s Multiply Multiplied Score
1 6 x 10 60
2 7 x 10 70
3 6 x 10 60
4 5 x 10 50
5 5 x 10 50
6 8 x 10 80
7 4 x 10 40
8 8 x 10 80
9 7 x 10 70

Now plot your scores on the bar graph provided… colour in the blocks up to
the multiplied score.

100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Type of
Naturalistic Musical Logical Existential Interpersonal Kinesthetic Verbal Intrapersonal Visual
STRENGTH

6
Student 1: - Pranav Rawat.

As indicated from the above data, Student-1 has obtained a raw score of 80 in
Kinesthetic and intrapersonal, 70 in musical and visual, 60 in logical and naturalistic,
50 in Existential and Interpersonal and 40 in verbal.
This implies that Pranav has obtained higher score in Kinesthetic and intrapersonal.
He likes to play sports which is football and also, he’s the sports captain of his
school. Pranav is also a reserved person and often quite shy, he doesn’t like to share
his feelings to someone else.
His bottom score is in verbal which means he is not good at putting his feelings into
word in order to make other understand them. He doesn’t like reading, writing or
public speaking.
Pranav is good at math and working with numbers and he also likes to play game
which includes strategy. The academic record of the student is also very good with
respect to studies.
He is an outdoor person which means he understand better when he see’s those
things working like he has subject chemistry so he understands better when he sees
practically or doing it by himself not by listening.
He also stated that he likes lo-fi (low fidelity) music and gets distracted very easily
while listening to songs. He likes animated movies or dramatic play more than
music. He likes to do graphic designing. He also mentioned he likes going outdoor
instead of staying in home, he likes to go for hiking.
He also stated that he doesn’t likes to be in the ‘big picture’ he likes to work under
shadow. He likes to ask many questions about the work he learning or doing.
He also likes to interact with new peoples, enjoy chat rooms but he likes to his work
alone he can do his work better when he is alone.
With respect to the data provided, it can be concluded that student 1 may succeed in
Kinesthetic and intrapersonal and can successfully be a football player or coach or a
computer engineer.
7
Student 2: - Atharv Rawat.
Now carry forward your total from each section and multiply by 10 below:
Section # of 1’s Multiply Multiplied Score
1 8 x 10 80
2 7 x 10 70
3 9 x 10 90
4 9 x 10 90
5 7 x 10 70
6 7 x 10 70
7 4 x 10 40
8 8 x 10 80
9 7 x 10 70

Now plot your scores on the bar graph provided… colour in the blocks up to
the multiplied score.

100

90
80
70
60
50
40

30
20

10
Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Type of
STRENGTH Naturalistic Musical Logical Existential Interpersonal Kinesthetic Verbal Intrapersonal Visual

8
Student 2: - Atharv Rawat.

As indicated from the above data, Student-2 has obtained a raw score of 90 in logical
and existential, 80 in naturalistic and intrapersonal, 70 in musical, interpersonal,
visual and Kinesthetic and 40 in verbal.
This implies that Atharv has obtained higher score in logical and existential. The
academic record of the student is also very good with respect to studies. He is also a
sports player. He mentioned that he like problem solving questions and riddles.
Student 2 mentioned that he likes meditating and exercise. He is more of a religious
person. Atarva enjoys more outside rather than staying home.
His bottom score is in verbal which means he is not good at putting his feelings into
word in order to make other understand them. He doesn’t like reading, writing or
public speaking.
He is interested in nature and loves animal. Atharva also mentioned that he enjoys
going hiking with friends and loves gardening. He is aware about his feelings,
strengths and weakness, and if he sees something wrong happening, he always takes
a stand. He also mentioned that he likes to work alone most of the time.
Atharva is good at rhythm and music. He mentioned that he likes old songs. Student
2 has a good connection with his friends and likes extracurricular activities in his
school. Atharva also mentioned he likes sports as he is in school football team.
He also stated that he enjoys drawing, painting and the visual arts. From the above
information we also found out that he is not good at verbal he doesn’t live reading
books, debates or give speeches.
With respect to the data provided, it can be concluded that student 2 may succeed in
logical and existential and can successfully be a computer programmer or army
soldier.

9
Student 3: - Suraj Bhatt
Now carry forward your total from each section and multiply by 10 below:
Section # of 1’s Multiply Multiplied Score
1 4 x 10 40
2 7 x 10 70
3 4 x 10 40
4 5 x 10 50
5 5 x 10 50
6 7 x 10 70
7 3 x 10 30
8 5 x 10 50
9 6 x 10 60

Now plot your scores on the bar graph provided… colour in the blocks up to
the multiplied score.

100
90
80
70
60

50
40
30

20

10
Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Type of
STRENGTH Naturalistic Musical Logical Existential Interpersonal Kinesthetic Verbal Intrapersonal Visual

10
Student 3: - Suraj Bhatt
As indicated from the above data, Student-3 has obtained a raw score of 70 in
musical and Kinesthetic, 60 in visual, 50 in existential, interpersonal and
intrapersonal, 40 in naturalistic and logical and last 30 is verbal.
This implies that Suraj has obtained higher score in musical and Kinesthetic.
Based on the information provided, it can be concluded that Student-3, Suraj, has a
higher raw score in musical and Kinesthetic intelligence. He enjoys playing guitar
and outdoor games such as cricket and football. He also has an interest in coding and
is learning Python with his friend group. Suraj likes extracurricular activities in
school and has a good connection with his friends. He understands his own
motivations and feelings but is not good at self-reflection and logical analysis. He
enjoys hiking and camping and has a good connection with animals.
Considering his strengths in musical and Kinesthetic intelligence, Suraj may have a
successful career as a computer programmer or a guitarist. However, he needs to
work on his verbal intelligence as he got the lowest score in that category. With his
interest in learning foreign languages, he may benefit from improving his verbal
skills. Overall, Suraj has a well-rounded personality with a combination of strengths
and weaknesses, and he has the potential to excel in his chosen field with the right
training and guidance. Student 3 also mentioned he likes to play guitar as and he also
goes to guitar class. Suraj likes to read and write and draw art and painting. He has a
deep thought about life and death. Student 3 is in class 12th science and he likes
coding and also, he teaches and learn python language with his friend group. Student
3 got the lowest score in verbal as he mentioned he doesn’t like to read and keep
journals but can easily explain his ideas to others. He also mentioned that if he got a
chance to learn foreign language he will learn.
With respect to the data provided, it can be concluded that student 3 may succeed in
musical and Kinesthetic and can successfully be a computer programmer or a
guitarist.

11
Student 4: - Ubed Ali
Now carry forward your total from each section and multiply by 10 below:
Section # of 1’s Multiply Multiplied Score
1 4 x 10 40
2 6 x 10 60
3 6 x 10 60
4 3 x 10 30
5 2 x 10 20
6 5 x 10 50
7 5 x 10 50
8 7 x 10 70
9 7 x 10 70

Now plot your scores on the bar graph provided… colour in the blocks up to
the multiplied score.

100
90
80
70
60

50
40

30
20

10
Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section
0 1 2 3 40 5 6 7 8 9

Type of
STRENGTH Naturalistic Musical Logical Existential Interpersonal Kinesthetic Verbal Intrapersonal Visual

12
Student 4: - Ubed Ali
As indicated from the above data, Student-4 has obtained a raw score of 70 in
intrapersonal and visual, 60 in musical and logical, 50 in Kinesthetic and verbal, 40
in naturalistic, 30 in existential and last 20 in interpersonal.
Based on the data provided, it can be concluded that Ubed, or Student-4, has scored
highest in intrapersonal and visual intelligence, followed by musical and logical
intelligence. He has also demonstrated strengths in computer skills, puzzle solving,
and enjoys extracurricular activities like debate competitions and public speaking.
Additionally, Ubed values physical fitness, outdoor activities, and has an affinity for
animals. He prefers to work independently and is not talkative in the classroom, but
is able to effectively communicate his thoughts and ideas when necessary.
However, Ubed has lower scores in existential and interpersonal intelligence,
indicating that he may prefer to work alone rather than in a group setting. He also
does not have a desire to be in the spotlight or engage in activities that require him to
be in a big picture.
It is important to note that while multiple intelligence theory can provide insights
into an individual's strengths and preferences, it should not be used to limit or
stereotype individuals based on their intelligence profile. Ubed, like all individuals,
has unique qualities and talents that should be nurtured and supported in a holistic
manner. Student 4 is well aware about his feelings and emotions. Student 4 likes
three-dimensional games and puzzle. Overall, it seems that Ubed has the potential to
excel in fields that require visual and Kinesthetic skills, such as graphic design or
computer engineering. His strengths in intrapersonal intelligence may also be an
asset in these fields, allowing him to work independently and creatively.
With respect to the data provided, it can be concluded that student 4 may succeed in
musical and Kinesthetic and can successfully be a computer engineer or a graphic
designer.

13
Student 5: - Prithvi Bisht
Now carry forward your total from each section and multiply by 10 below:
Section # of 1’s Multiply Multiplied Score
1 4 x 10 40
2 3 x 10 30
3 6 x 10 60
4 6 x 10 60
5 6 x 10 60
6 5 x 10 50
7 3 x 10 30
8 9 x 10 90
9 4 x 10 40

Now plot your scores on the bar graph provided… colour in the blocks up to
the multiplied score.

100
90
80
70
60

50
40
30
20

10
Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section Section
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Type of
STRENGTH Naturalistic Musical Logical Existential Interpersonal Kinesthetic Verbal Intrapersonal Visual

14
Student 5: - Prithvi Bisht
As indicated from the above data, Student-5 has obtained a raw score of 90 in
intrapersonal, 60 in logical, existential and interpersonal, 50 in Kinesthetic, 40 in
naturalistic and visual and last 30 in musical and verbal. This implies that Prithvi has
obtained higher score in intrapersonal. I told him about the characteristics of
intrapersonal and he mentioned that he wants to become a scientist and would love
to go in research field. Student 5 also mentioned that he likes to works with group
but self-learning is also beneficial for him. Prithvi is school captain of his school, and
always have been in a big picture as he is a teacher’s son so now it is important for
him to be in a big picture. Based on the data provided, it can be concluded that
Prithvi, or Student-5, has scored highest in intrapersonal intelligence, followed by
logical, existential, and interpersonal intelligence. He has also demonstrated
strengths in mathematical ability, strategic thinking, and an interest in science and
research. Additionally, he values physical fitness and has an appreciation for
environmental issues. However, Prithvi has lower scores in musical and verbal
intelligence, which may make public speaking and certain types of communication
challenging for him. He also does not have a strong interest in artistic pursuits.
Overall, it seems that Prithvi has the potential to excel in scientific and research
fields, where his strengths in intrapersonal and logical intelligence could be valuable
assets. Additionally, his ability to work effectively in a team and his interest in
physical fitness may serve him well in various professional settings. As per the
conversation I also noticed that he asks a lot of question and before doing this
activity he was the only child who researched first about the activity and then came
to me. Prithvi is good at math and working with numbers and he also likes to play
game which includes strategy. The academic record of the student is also very good
with respect to studies. He comes under the topper list of his class.
With respect to the data provided, it can be concluded that student 3 may succeed in
musical and Kinesthetic and can successfully be a Scientist or researcher.

15
 Conclusion

Multiple Intelligence theory helps one to identify one’s weakness and strengths so
individualised instructions or special education needed for a student could be
recommended. The aim of the above inventory was to identify the dominant and
recessive Intelligence among the students. The sample population comprised of 10th
and 12th class students from Kendriya Vidyalaya National Defence Academy. The
participants were selected on the basis of convenient sampling and consisted of 10
participants. Consent to interact and conduct the questionnaire was taken.

Based on the data provided, it can be concluded that the sample population of 11th
and 12th class students from Kendriya Vidyalaya National Defence Academy had
varying levels of intelligence in different domains. The questionnaire results
indicated that some students had higher scores in certain domains, such as musical,
kinesthetic, logical and existential intelligence, while others had lower scores in those
domains.

Overall, the data suggests that each student has unique strengths and weaknesses in
different domains of intelligence. This information can be useful in guiding their
career paths and educational goals by helping them identify their strengths and areas
for improvement.

16