Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Soil & Subgrade: Lectures of 6. - 8. Week
Soil & Subgrade: Lectures of 6. - 8. Week
Lectures of 6. - 8. Week
2016
Internet sites for compaction and Soil Classification access Feb. 2016
http://www.naturalbuildhttp://www.uic.edu/classes/cemm/cemmlab/Experiment%209
Compaction.pdfingblog.com/proctor-soil-compaction-test/proctor-trest-graph/
http://www4.hcmut.edu.vn/~cnan/Principles%20of%20geotechnical%20engineering
%20%28Fifth%20Edition,%20Das%29/83-99.PDF
https://labmekanikatanah.wordpress.com/2013/10/29/field-test-rubber-balloon-•
method/
Prof. Dr. Eng Shafik Jendia
Introduction
Pavement Types
Road Surface Without Binder
(Untreated Road Surface)
Segmental Pavement
(Interlock or Concrete Block Pavement)
ّهي ٌُا تتؼح لٌا أُو٘ة التزبة فٖ إًشاء الطزقّ .عل٘هَ فنًهَ دبهن ههي
دراسة الوسائل الوتعلمة بالتزبةّ ،تفِن خظائظِا ّسلْكِا تحت تأح٘ز
الوههرحزاا الو٘ناً٘ن٘ههة ّ ال ْٗههة متههٔ ًههتوني هههي إًشههاء ؽههزق عال٘ههة
ال هههْدا طهههالحة لرنههههة مزكهههة الوهههزّر ّالٌمهههل بنفهههاءا ّأههههاى ّبألهههل
التنال٘ف.
ّلِذا فنًَ ٗتحهتن علٌ٘ها ٌُها أى ًتٌهاّخ الرظهائض التهٖ ٗ هر تْافزُها
فٖ التزبة ّالطزق الوتبعة ّالشائعة لتظٌ٘فِا كتزبة أسهاّ ،،للهم ههي
ّجِههة ً ههز ٌُنسههة الطههزق .أههها بالٌسههبة لاطههل ال ْ٘لههْجٖ للتزبههة،
ّتنٌِْٗا ّأًْاعِا فٖ بالدًا فنًٌا ًش٘ز ٌُا إلٔ الوزاجع الراطة بذلم.
:)d( 3
ms
d
V
ms
d
Va Vw Vs
:)s ( 4
ms
s
Vs
Prof. Dr. Eng Shafik Jendia
Soil Phases عناصر التربة
:)Void Ratio( 5
Vv
e
Vs
:)Porosity( 6
Vv
n 100
V
+ :)n ( 9
.
n na n w
:)Degree of saturation( 10
Vw nw
S S
Vv n
Prof. Dr. Eng Shafik Jendia
Relationships between Soil Phases
:)n(
Vv
n 100
V
:
s d
n
s
:S
nw
s
n
:
Prof. Dr. Eng Shafik Jendia
:S
Example: Relationships between soil phases
nw
s
n
:
s w d
nw d w s
s d
100%
S= 1
s w d
1
s d
s d s w d
d ( s w 1) s
s
d
w s 1
Prof. Dr. Eng Shafik Jendia
Example: Determining Soil Characteristics Using the
Three-Phase Principle
The wet weight of a specimen of soil is 340 g and the dried weight is 230 g. The
volume of the soil before drying is 210 cc. If the specific gravity of the soil
particles is 2.75, determine the void ratio, porosity, degree of saturation, and dry
density.
Solution: Since the weight of the air can be taken as zero, the weight of the
water is
w here is
equal m
حد السٌولة
Liquid
Limit
Test
Water Percentage ( w % )
حد السٌولة
35
Liquid
Limit Test 30
25
15 20 25 30 40
Blows No.(N)
حد اللدونة
Plastic Limit Test
Prof. Dr. Eng Shafik Jendia
Soil Tests
Atterberg Limit Tests (ASTM D4318)
Gravel - Sand
Clayey Sand
Gravel Clay
According to 2.36 8
2.0
2.8
2.0
2.8
2.0
2.8
2.0*
International 4.75 4
4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
5.0*
Specification 5.6
8.0
5.6
8.0
5.6
8.0 8.0*
9.5 3/8
11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2*
12.5 1/2
16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0*
19.0 3/4
25.0 1 22.4 22.4 22.4*
31.5 31.5 31.5*
45.0 45.0 45.0
50.0 2
56.0
63.0 2 1/2 63.0 63.0
Prof. Dr. Eng Shafik Jendia
90.0 90.0 90.0
125.0 125.0
)mm (
ASTM DIN
75 200 Boulders
- - 63 200 Cobbles
ر
200 0.002 Clay (C)
)0.074(
Prof. Dr. Eng Shafik Jendia
Soil Tests
Sieve Analysis (DIN----, ASTM -----)
تحلٌل الحجم
ًالحبٌب
Sieve
Analysis
30 g
60 g
75 g
125 g
150 g
150 g
100 g
150 g
50 g
0.063 60 g
50 g
Case 1 Case 2
Sieve retained passing sieve retained
mm g ret % % mm g ret % passing %
45 0 0.0 100.0 0 50 5.0 0
31.5 30 3.0 97.0 0.063 60 6.0 5.0
22.4 60 6.0 91.0 0.25 50 5.0 11.0
16 75 7.5 83.5 0.71 150 15.0 16.0
11.2 125 12.5 71.0 2 100 10.0 31.0
8 150 15.0 56.0 5 150 15.0 41.0
5 150 15.0 41.0 8 150 15.0 56.0
2 100 10.0 31.0 11.2 125 12.5 71.0
0.71 150 15.0 16.0 16 75 7.5 83.5
0.25 50 5.0 11.0 22.4 60 6.0 91.0
0.063 60 6.0 5.0 31.5 30 3.0 97.0
0 50 5.0 0.0 45 0 0.0 100.0
1000 1000
60
56
50
40 41
30 31
20
16
10 11
5
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
sieve size mm
Number of 3 5
Layers
Number of blows per layer x Number of layers x Weight of hammer x Height of drop hammer
Energy =
Volume of mold
Energy = (25 blows x 3 layers x 5.5 lb x 1.0 ft)/ (1/30)ft3 = 12,375 ft-lb/ft3
Energy = (56 blows x 5 layers x10.0 lb x 1.5ft)/(1/13.3)ft3 = 55,986 ft-lb/ft3
Prof. Dr. Eng Shafik Jendia
Soil Tests
Standard Proctor Compaction Test (ASTM D698, AASHTO T99)
10 cm
11.5 cm
mw
w
ms
s
3
1.6
s
pr = 1.5 g/cm
3
=2
1.5 .71
Clay g/c
wpr = 26% m3
5 10 15 20 25 30
Water-content w(%)
130
120
Standard Proctor
Modified Proctor
Zero Air Void Curve
115
110
105
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Moisture Content (%)
For the same type of soil, the modified Proctor yields a higher
maximum dry density and lower optimum moisture content.
Higher maximum dry density resulted when more compaction effort was applied.
Optimum moisture content was lower when more compaction effort was applied,
reflecting the reduced volume of void space between soil particles.
Prof. Dr. Eng Shafik Jendia
Gravel: Standard and Modified Proctors
150
145
135
120
differences in 110
3 4 5 6
Moisture Content (%)
7 8 9
densities. 125
Standard Proctor
120 Modified Proctor
Zero Air Void Curve
115
110
105
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Moisture Content (%)