*

examplesClarence
principles
ressed, City'
modification
Briain's s still Howard's
Garden
City. plan
comprising countryside
avoiding
the degradation Howard
Garden industrial urban
tothe toIntroduction . Principles
Planning
Legucies Garden
Ebenezer
Howard City Published
Kevwords: INFORMATION
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
May ARTICLE Nuzhat
Nabila *
"Lecturet,
Moreover, planning cities The The
visible of
inheritance planning Garden
of Perry; New a the City in online:
MayApril
Concept
Department
this of Garden increased the
cities movement and 23,
2021s0, o5,
the environment
principles
it in itdisadvantages
article
Howard's Towns United July 2021
necds.exploresphysical
andcontemporary capitalism.revolutionmethods City 202
where like City. 03, 1 www.seu.edu.bd/seuja
homepage:
Journal SEUJA,VOL.
rapidly, movement 202
of OfSoutheast
scovers connccts Act, This was Kingdom. Architecture,
garden Garden The
embedded 1
if form, It initiated
in Garden
The the explains ofHoward'
and tos
article England,
leading
Garden both.combine 1,
both city them Garden society
Neighbourhood structure city In is Southeast No.
City. in
explores
article
This the inone University 1,
positive
principles with investigates Howard' the s
environment intention City JUNE,
Discussing and City the tothe 19th 1898 of
city the sizes
principles
participating
diferent and principles
policies
relevance plannng environmental
Gardenprohibit the ABSTRACT1he
and main environmental
benefitsmigration University,
the what
principles century, due by couniry main And 2021,
and remarkable in safe
association, vision behind Ebenezer today's
have layout City
negative planning unit Garden kind elements circumstances housing, and principles afare planning Dhaka, PP.
can the to Its
while of rate in
strategies Movement Journal
are and the the still the
been few a
of city bethe I
by of services garden cities Relevancy
planning.community.
utilised relevant and principles Bangladesh.
of degradation
and ain city was
during
, aspects and approaches.
examining
published
form, qualitative
sectionMethodology 2.
cities incorporating contexts with to in
concept a of
exploring
whether
garden garden Jersey,
Kingdom; proceeds
studies- the
knowledge planning employment,individual' of
nciples.
lanning
porary This Moreover, contemporary the
s revolutionary nuzhat.nabila@seu.edu.bd Architecture
inheritance adjustments, Howard
with of industrial and in
structure explores article depending through This
city cityUSA;Canberra to Howard's capitalism 's Modern
principles inapproach
his
Howard's this Garden
the the Welwyn, evaluate about 1902, the enjovmentand article idea
concepts concept have case city revolution
of book
compares principles fine-tuning onarticlevarious
garden and Howard's in
, opportunities Suburbs, the the andwhere method. Garden the studies
planning. explores the due City
original scale argues and to City
has been
United Garden several layout 'Garden opportunities early inthewere
Garden the the where
been Ebenezer incity ofand prosperity, 19th
that
city inexamined
these main vision At modern This if90s, migration derived
Australia; of garden case the Howard' s Planning
concept appliedKingdomapproaches first, movement alteration
plot, Garden the century
City Gardencity article leaving
elements Cities studies for 'core' from
cities, and HHoward about seKS
Movement. the city city block of
to concept, socialising
city describes GardenEngland. SEU |ARC.
challengcs Letchworth,
in apeople the
and literature
Garden required
and s to of legacy
isthe recognize
their howthe that City. ofconcept of planning. and
planning planning urge
still Radburn, explained
To-morrow', of present-day
suburb heallhy from
article suggests and the City JThe to
planning. appeared thisWith the
Four in
relevjt city
review usng
to United articlephysical
2ides this the
apply New case by a
By as
in
 of rents.
advantages
promotes
the
enploy1nent
lands
Howard's
factory healthier
Securing Figure
Howard's amenities,
ownership
Collective beautiful
01). country',
as
alternative
Country
identified
instead Raise centralisation
visionThe
environment
a Literature
3.1.reViewNabila,
3. N
higher In
Garden workers
of the 01
primary
and
and
all Howard's The
Planning
Howard's
cooperation,healthy, in the Garden The - ToWN natural yet
PAC chance the plan
of the
Standard Town-Country'
bencfits town
Three preserving individual
Advantageplanning(ACT
private City of Cities environment are: in
Town-Country' principles
various
natural, ToNN-COUNTRY NAGNETS
THREE of
lifestyles The
Magnets. employment, firom Planningtownsnnain
introduced
freedom,surroundings of of THE the of
Three principles
individuals, favourable
the
Tomorrow.
life and both ofHoward's
objective was
grades, and fieshness city-life and
of magnet. and
Plate merged City
the Magnets' rescuing
natural
collective economic
high high emnbedded Land the
combining country-life components can and
magnet, (Howard, No. of
wages, CoUNT
wages, In Country Authority, Garden
bethen
which and the
from 1 enjoyed, thisdiagran, break
the to
lhealthy into in
ownership lives 1902) and Howard's City
Ebenezer (Figre
ensures and thHoward
e regular "Town a of 2008)
better such thirdboth
of and lhe
low best all

environnent. city natural

benefiting
classes the
transportation
community.
Central
surrounding he 32,000
Therefore,
attgrow.
restrictingthe cities
ten major
each railwaybetween
Moreover,
tramways to
proximity population Figure and
provide
miles limiting PermanentA
town principles people.
Limiting
growththe
control economic
Permanent
Providing 02
at one Railway
Transit
EasyRapid City GROUp whole
their
which the -
reaches a inthe the The beyond Howard's the belt capital
railway the accessibilitytown and growth,
of the growth comimrt city.
representing principlethDespite
e is green of
could
outer of cities cluster 32,000, 1902)
the (Howard,city SEUJA,
will !2.00
growth,
agricultural and
in high Howard' tos its diagran of belt
five
system (Figure green each SMOKEASS.s. Vol.
beits own inhabitants'
roads ring always ofanother is different
People
firom 1,
minutes accomplished most and Garden city is and of ensuring to No.
belt provided land
cities zone a develop
directly 02) 1,
in Garden
walkability similar stated
after
that connectingseries a June.
serve
twelve distant (Howard, preserve city limitsthe Cene
(Howard, accessible
is healthy
arounda healthypa 2021
will good of
between grouped satellite
to neighbour byCity. identity to
be the the
Centralminutes. a intention
predicted to
inter-municipal The are 1902). established with growth
1902). green reaching Central
garden
one around
the as
CityElectric distance
is of rapid
palour 20235O3% towns. belt one of of
from only the a
Pihu
 get land idea most
Community 03). such by
enclose environment are Cityare A 3.9. Nabila, N
Howard ampleHealth Industrial, few
la
involved. While in Tie yout
unavailability, for as segregated Figure Main
practice, of
Concentic
form
it Amenities
space
Open
Individuality
The the Central
with of
the
benefits
green 03 ONreNtri elements
Howard's
fundamental
intervening encouraged
- AR
N
a qulity
residential, Diagran
Following Howardlegaciesarchitectural
permanent space
Park of with Zoning
and rigs Garden of
of in natural the
provided
and (Figure the of structures
are the with tlhe individual
encountered architecture recreational and one ssten
City ph
government' a s the
Garden quality agricultural
environments
Grand avenues Land ward ysical
few o3).
Garden in in of form,
Use of
approaches taste
of a The the the Hord's
AIDAT
PINaM GtEt
City Avenue
financial andTomorrow.
whichPatterns
Garden AVENUE strructure
theprevailing
and lhierarchy
and Grden
City
Movement are garden green
unwillingness buildings.
preference and secure GTen
beltguaranteed City.
thatmovement's
difficulties, of (Source: Oty And
Sense (Figurefinally city spaces "VWard
shaped parks the
In at of is Howar,
to and
the ensre
Centre." vhh Tht vars
1902; dtace The
residents
alike.
the
equally are and
parallel,
prescribed
social and amenities ensureto burards eual
decentralisation
peopleininteraction.
characterising 20
Hierarchy
rnats
1 of
renamed 4.1 thetowns. At The Edited Plate also dirite
Association' fro
feet
acesibility
Howard inheritance
The tpleasant
he an divided byNo. murlopas -dieads
witth
Se0e te rattcn
Kor utilised
ine rvded
Town-Country like rarkets,
TNDHsTRAL
teasby
stby choolv enueg Bubeart ate tlhe the wide
to average Author) cntrong swYRiway of i
same frontage and
in Garden from and coal worshipoers et to centre
citv six
sanitary into encirinE plvrounds
Aestheeeem ees Weaitt
Cartat interconnertt SEUIA,
the reducing andQuter ethesRen Cerrat oeeer fot
or Housing
on Green separate into
194
founded of the time,housing growth
Enclosing the ame Ring ÂVenue
Grand he
uttet aty
alt magnifirent
to all
themigrate size six Ebenezer the and
Relt Nhtvartt ar exritat
cncert Vol
TCPA, City country of
conteods
whole ranged f ervnelt siR the rexident
as a of wards the
Green resevng l1S Garter the
it
arrangements town traffie indivtuat Winter I.
Garden concept
representing town rods r n Tes, nd enual
circumterence
20 Bett cresternts the ture No.
appreciates Howard's connecting ther ros zoning.via
ht
the the
of
which Association consistent feet
large
comyrsi heuringso
the
eccle boulevards
parts
of I,
lifestyle, which sites theatt internal the June.
Town enurtng ith
wrehouses,
iaes ar centte
promot gricutur wth auttortsed
x130 to ancirttng city
ty yn,g establishes
Garden spontaCineousl Garden chu or
main the v
re
of
created ensures rawN ntthi streets,
b warts COVer
and Movement: which the a(Howard, level feet tyrs estate tended I940
town Cities
beauty for
Country
the City can lifestyleaccess 1902). ofeach serving of
First encourage of housing
Association, to lot al
Planning nature safe is
Garden and
Jalpgun 230
By Pia g
 The.5
Figure worldwide, War Towns
New4.3
government's
formed campaign,
thplanning.
e regional
With Regional
Scale 49 and
campaigned
F.J.settlements
Letchworth City Nabila,N.
apartmetsSops &
Neighborhood
Unit The industrial
5 I Osborn, Country
enormously
congestion
The - in Ltd
especially 1937,
accelerated
Neighbourhood population's thePlanning and and and
distance 4
walkngtausC.kn Second
World
War The through
(Jones, involvement,
produced
street stimulated and leader a
initiated
revolutionWelwyn
2018) parks
$catered layout in
annilhilation Association).
the and the
unit Comwnty Figure of Great distribution the (Hardy,
Newcastle
Garden
successor the
the Barlow
persuasion
Osborn's
The for inter-war
in
by housing
Clarence garden-city
Britain. frst
apamests^hops &
04: upon
accompanying 1999).
Shops reportRoyal City of
(Hardy,
New Garden
Citiesin
Tyne,
Perry Briain's movement the standards
period The
Town UK, movements investigating Association
before
Commission,
1999). Association
World for
Structure the New (Town
into new
s

United affordable
city with 4. Planning;
proposed The
(Jones,
2018).
05)
perimeter
d.1. neighbourhood demonstrates
streets
the with
The street settlements,
Association's tor
In TCPA
1999). foundingconference
197G,
on In comprehensive
towns
c.g-Newcastle,
the new
Towns
ofhis Letchworth, hierarchy,features The in
layout Scale4.4
Kingdom, tlhe 1904, first along non-governmental International highcom1nunities
partner Neighbourhood (Source:
Jones,
2018) 1945the held with
housing of Act
Letchworth dedicatingandat Newcastle inember rise
with Garden the like the reconstruction an when
land
restricting scalewhichexhibition surrounding and a (1946)
perineter,influence human system UK
upon
for Barry tothe United thehigh-density
the area centring to of based led
35,000 Cities planTyne, (Jones,
Parker
working accelerated
organisations.
the United of to
in notion to unit the settlements and the
Kingdom local of UK, green a on SEUJA,
Hertfordshire,
people
parks designing the the Gs international
(Hardy, UN
level seminars nationwide 2018).
development
Howard's
planned of by Nations
housing
class, shopping Garden Committee belt Vol.
providing and least school, Clarence
the Thus in campaigning Osborn 1,
where at (Hardy, No.
Raymond open internal
network idea
the placing City Vancouver,
leading
held a of 1,
10% Garden they a
England, space areas Perry, parallel proposed
(Figure over June.
they first better Movement on 1999).
became
ofroads against of dozen a 2021
turned gardenUnwin, (Figure arterial
to human forum
1929 City the new the 04),
hotor One and the the
the in a
alpaiguri 2023 02
By Pihu
 designated
Welwyn
Act. th expressed
6.1. development
wiserved access
settlements
portrayed climate new Depressionportion
vehicular Sunlight cluster Town,
service life, 4.2. garden symmetric albeitplanned
it agricultural Howard's
5. England,has a did
TheWelwyn,protected SinceGarden the still Radburn,
generation scenic Figure not
second by to change grouping, was cities' the the
the of and Radburn
providing Although
as Garden
and promptly design vision
Howard'
principle
high-speedHoward's wide a onin
their 1980s, citycountryside 6 stalled
Radburn econonmicfounded next design town
greenbelt
portrayss a United landscapes corridors a compact - New
New
Garden challenges. of Letchworth pedestrian
human line. many(Figure in
range book Garden concept
TCPA DITTMAR, 2017) development City the the Garden into
Garden in Jersey, influence was the
Town Kingdom rail aftertown 'super-block'
was viability.
amenities 1928 of
City with of that
scale, principle, viewedthree-dimensional centre
alongside and r has
SiCities in morecentre Garden City, organic
06) 1300
under high-level
City people completedtraffic to USAgovernment
Welwyn clusters
other but Peteractively the (Hardy,
(Birch, The serve
of the Letchworth acres with
the in with to than and City separation. interior
(Hardy, Hall modern concept basicopen insteadHoward's
of the still address 10 is in the first 1999).
1946 was
transport services. campaigned years still
Hertfordslhire, 19so).before enclosing
the space,
coniplex
values settlements, fornm prefer and similarlayout American investment
subsequently
New 1999). adjacent parkland, of reality.
advantage Colin poverty time (Source: Only community as
links, of
They to the a substantial
Howard's
suchTowns several involved
to modern success, the
liveWard for to
as and all and the
Great a Port
tiny and New into city, They
- re of in

influence
utilisation
contribute garden (ACT fencing,
environmental of Canberra,
thesebuilding definingconsidered of of
planning
Government and suburbs
andbetween 6.9. (Figure
2018) only shopping
07). Welwyn employment
anddistance beautifül
that separatefor
promotes the theIn the In healthy The
Canberra Figure accessible
However, are cultural
Planning visible public the the the 20
defining Block
suburbs Street The process dwelling,three design affordable
of factory
the a
The landscaping, lines
dwellings are milescould amenities mixed-tenure
to alongside the garden not dwelling 07-The homes;
of healthy
amenities real1m activities
appearance
the a suburbs suburb' s only
introduced underpinned key Suburbs, fron unlike
not rapid
opportunities
healthy the quality providing
and on and sites
of where Morgan,
(Source:
9017) for
for city
as Canberra, in physical Garden become
transport strong in
property
porches, environment Land driveway,either with being layout London. different ainingsimilar
control character.movement, social
vehicular the the Australia Gardenwalking settlements SEUJA,
environment of of of
Authority, the the City local
individual pleasant suburban Gardenelements-the by self-sustaining
th e side gathering the
street of (Gardencitiesinstitute.com, and within income to to
terraces lin e Canberra, street, addressing of Letchworth; Vol.
the
verges, access the distance;
s cultural, community
City'stable
of the Welwyn 1,
building and of
housings
micro is with
environmental
2008). the the In the setting City spatial people;
easy No.
and
for the the
block and but the existing political
recreational
main
suburb. utility provisions at because and scenic 1,
the in
backyard street, land the street theelement.macrostreet, present development; June.
front ensuringthe aalso in commuting a festival
dwellers. the for between parameter
suburbs requiren1ent
2003. relationships integrated
principle, varle
subsequently services- systein. garde 2021
t on PS street The as has the it
residents setbacks, a element Canberra hall
garderns garden quality inACT block was and
guri 202305(0 182% place been the
The and front all the of of
nu
 Tallen, wil Welwyn,
challengesignificant
sustaining the garden
were Auckland,
(Schrader,provision instance,
localities behold
Australia, modern the
inTheincluded
theadvantagesvisibletheintensification
country
and opportunity,
underpinned
well-being workplace
also plenormous
angreenplanning that Planning
6.beautiful community.
landscape roof ensuring
maintaining
benefits community
depictsregulates Nabila,
be The dwellings, From It
Discussion By The
N.
side' s Land street, garden one for similar is pitch.,
2014; the designed the parks
evident controlling
in for suburb in Garden in city lifestyle large of DwellingThe (ACT
high
difference Uk,
as2015). ridges, New New Authority,
spirit in blocks the Canberra
the streets,aimed and design
natural social by Garden the
Hall,
modern-day parks. 1995, the and and to dwelling economie, partic1pation
per a in socialplanning of of city post-world
private objectives Land providing relationsh1p
Planning
visually the good era, parks, open Garden to fromn and
2014;
density many at Zealand,architect
However, the ample Zealand,
on United City planning of providing
and town
principle generous and interaction
Garden
with The Howard' s design street the emphasised constitute Authority,
environment scale, city
contested 2008). interaction open lands. tìndings
the solar
and ofcentre
Movenment
Kingdom, pleasingdwellings. and height, and
Safdie city the these civicproviding Canberra Canberra
lifestyle planning of City's case
public Reginald Europe, a access
spaces Howard'
war s materials, safe,soial,values with
space s Garden principles of public Walter house efticiency, Land as
planning&originalCity'similarly as
centre Therefore, beautiful a
objective,study 2008). and environmentaland
pleasant the the
Kohn, examples Maori and era onspacious
´city-beautiful' amenities Ireland, landscape The ´town-country'
portraying
through and at great blocks is Authority,
consumptionprinciple. to and broadHammond Asia has suburbs with the participation,
of to
Burley providing participation are Garden
neighbours,
(Duany, garden City is the Canberra'sthe Garden of texture,
1997). the a Land influenced it natural
fundamental proximity establislhed the
anNorth
d concept. achieving n front theconnectivity healthyCanberra
with
Canberra' s underpinned
dwellings
are case new avenues and ca(ACT benefitsgreat appreciation
city and
1990's City. Griftin's
picturesque articulation, and 2008). City
Therefore,
Roberts,which Here, notelements university atAfrica. successfully be setting
designed said
Planning magnet appropriate promoting
human housing
of to
suburbs city suburbs cultural principle
back urban which of
concept study generous alongOrakei, America, many
One self For as value civic. (ACT whilst
&isa of for the with 1912 withearly the
a a is of is of in
6

June No. Available

Movement. g018] thinking to Planning
Movement Inner andReferences Garden difficult and climate
process,Howard' demands
spersonal active houses
ncorporating the
thatdestructive
the According of
wereplanning
establish toGarden
and sOCiety.
garden
The Conclusion
environmental
7. visible
morrow,
wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Garden
https://commons.
Dittmar, Cities_of_To thelimiting advisable city this
need-some- garden-city - th inkin g-
21,Edwards, succeed 90993/ gardenci ty Birch,
_val ues.pdf s North ACT planners social countryside's
modern economic Al conceptarticle
https:/ www.cnu.org/pulicsquare/g017/01/10/garden-httotwnsp:/Coniwww.mons.plawnniikinn1edig.acta..ogrg.ov.au/_data/assetfilse/podf011/Principles-
2021, Association, city often
No. The E. Planning tothe
principles population, things
City in
The A. H. 1.png. and
change,
principle
connection liquidity,
flexibility to the to
from _l.png conceptanticipate
can growth could criticised Principles follow suggests
Town(1914). succeed.
(2017). Persistence(1980). more time, prosperity.
A. planning in
SouthDesign and nature'
beauty,
ands considered, andphysical
[Accessed 46(4), indeed and spread
desecrationTrystan
http:/ www.jstor.org/stablPlanning
e/ A Radburn Considerations Land in likeenvironmental challenges
social the that
Garden Canberra. an are
changesquite isregarding inthe the for of
Further [online]
[online]Pp.424-489. of high-density highly However,
acity are
balancemodel Canberra essenceform,rather SEUJA,
(2013). [Accessed Authority
an
adaptive work collective still
the themselvesEdwards,damaging
garden
Revie, 10 still it benefits
towns May for unimaginable. can
Criticism Idea. and [ebook] with in relevant the working such by relevant structure of than Vol.
Garden the way. future mobile recreating ofhas be the
44), CNU. need 2018]. Journal (2008).
11Residential environmentai costs city Garden firstthe inspired suburbs.
the ownership as
(Edwards, being the social, said for implying
concept 1,
CAccessed Available population. No.
312-318. of some Cities American May Canberra,
Garden strengthsurban in regimes,
that shortage values economy, in th e and
the of contemporary 1,
Available inconvenient. Garden
citiesenvironmental
cities modern that June.
of dwellers
20187. Development layout,
the to the
Although ofthe workforce countryside
4010007 Garden
garden City
come
Retrieved 31 Tomorro, American
Planning planning, planning of1914). lead Howard faclitat 209l
pp.1-15. Values of
land factors greater require
While being Garde
1 with that land, city tS
City May at: city at: at: the it or In to as
in is s
igut 29502-3
ihu
6ZWYKc Yourlocalweb.co.uk.
[online]
rical-nostalgic-pictures/CAccessed
Documentary. [Accessed Merseyside May[online]
Bebingtonin 2018]. photographs-wirral-7707439
2018. and1900s Available
photographs (2nd Faber,
Reprinted,
second Introductory Facts, Country
ccessed1 erpoolecho.co.uk/incoming/gallery/whoosh-amazing-historical
web.co.uk/merseyside/bebington/old
https://teara.govt.nz/en/city-planning/page- https://archpaper.com/2014/04/garden-suburb-of-good/s [Accessed
TCPA'cities/welwyn-garden-city
http://www.gardencitiesinstitute.com/resources/garden
Architect's International
YouTube.
(2015). Town Studios, Schrader, Design Jones, Holliday,
(9014). R. Howard,
ed.). Howard,
Harpendentaxis.net. Gunther,
Hardy,D. Gardencitiesinstitute.com. Nabila, N.
to edition [1946]): and
Available 1970s, P. London, Interesting
Planning First
31 and PLAN9068 edited 20
MayCountry H. (2018). of E. E.
May B. (1999). May
Hundred
P. Garden
(n.d.). (2015). lecture Wirral of 50-57,Essay (1902).
(1902). (2014).
20 2018]. Teara.govt.nz. UK:
To-morrow: Association, 2018.
at: with
18]. Suburbia by Tomorrow Newspaper:.
Old S. 188-147. Information. Cities
cpa.org.uk/our-history-1
Conline] The Planning 'CityUniversitynotes, Sonnenschein
from Garden lewis Gardena (2018). Garden
at: Ycars, [Accessed
Historical, planning [Accessed Preface
Garden History historical
Amazing
Whoosh!the (2018).
Institute.
City Association. and a Mumford. Cities Welwyn pp.1-28.
cities Suburb
Availableyour of peaceful Conline] and
Garden air. by Tomorrow:
1899-1999:the
- Sydney, and of 31Welwyn
20 20 & of the
Available local Town
Available Co.
to-morrouw F.
To-Morrow Garden Available of online]
May
May Nostalgic Theory May [online] patlh (London: Next... Good.
(n.d.). J. 2018].
planning delivered Cities
https://www.liv Osborn
2018]. web. [Accessed31 20181. to Garden
Our liverpoolecho. real City: Conline] Available
Urbanized Pictures of (being Faber Town
Conline] Principles (London,
history. emerges. Planning May reform) and History,
City |
at at: at: the and and The
of 16 an at: at:

SEUJA,

Vol.
1,
No.