Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Analysis
Filtering the air in aseptic process areas is critical to maintaining the cleanliness of the
production environment. Jesus Casas provides tips to ensure HEPA filters are fit for purpose
once installed in your facility
https://www.cleanroomtechnology.com/news/article_page/Integrity_testing_of_HEPA_filters_A_practical_approach/150453 1/11
23/05/23, 11.12 Integrity testing of HEPA filters: A practical approach
Manufacturers of high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters for cleanrooms and controlled
environments test their products for particle removal efficiency. Equally, once the unit is installed in
the user's production site, the test should be performed promptly to verify the integrity of the filter
as well as the installation. Typically, HEPA filters capture up to 99.97% of particles as small as 0.3
microns.
The dispersed oil particulate (DOP) scan testing, also known as filter integrity testing, or leak testing,
is one of the most quoted methods by industry standards. The test is recommended to be repeated at
regular time intervals to verify the continued efficiency of the filter. During the test, the filter is
challenged by introducing particulates and measuring the output.
The HEPA filter leak test is mandated in various international standards, including the FDA Guidance
for Industry: Sterile Drug Products Produced by Aseptic Processing – cGMP and the World Health
Organization Technical Report Series, No. 961. For cleanrooms, the ISO 14644-3 standard provides
further guidance.
The traditional aerosol photometry test method, used since the 1950s, is adequate for
measurements to 0.003% by DOP scan testing. To perform an accurate filter leak test, it is necessary
to make sure the challenge aerosol concentration is uniform over the entire upstream face of the
filter(s) being tested; this is called spatial uniformity. Otherwise, high or low local concentration may
cause the filter to incorrectly fail or pass the test. The ISO 14644-3 suggests that the variation in test
aerosol concentration through time should not exceed ±15%. The uniformity of the challenge
upstream of the filter should be verified.
https://www.cleanroomtechnology.com/news/article_page/Integrity_testing_of_HEPA_filters_A_practical_approach/150453 2/11
23/05/23, 11.12 Integrity testing of HEPA filters: A practical approach
If a cleanroom suite is the target of a test, the challenge aerosol is injected just after the air handling
unit (AHU). By the time the air gets to the filters, the test particles are well mixed within the air ducts
leading to an even concentration across the back of each terminal filter.
If the aerosol cannot be injected just after the AHU, it must be introduced into the ductwork system
at least 15 to 20 duct diameters from the filter.
The standard ISO 14664-3 suggests a penetration of 0.01% of the test challenge concentration but
allows alternative criteria to be agreed between customer and supplier. The FDA Guidance, however,
indicates that 0.01% penetration is a leak.
It is best to start scanning at the gasket area, rather than the filter face, so that any problem with
spillage of test particles from the gasket area and onto the filter face do not cause false reports of
leaks in the medium. After checking the gasket, it is probably best to move on to the sealing between
the filter medium and the casing, and then on to the filter face.
The first two are formed from oil-type liquids. Polystyrene latex (PSL) spheres are most commonly
used in microelectronic applications, while polyalphaolefin (PAO) in life sciences. The information in
Table 1 describes the typical challenge aerosols used for HEPA testing.
https://www.cleanroomtechnology.com/news/article_page/Integrity_testing_of_HEPA_filters_A_practical_approach/150453 3/11
23/05/23, 11.12 Integrity testing of HEPA filters: A practical approach
Before starting the filter scan, it is necessary to set the concentration of test aerosol particles
upstream of the filter. The ISO 14644-3 standard suggests a concentration ranging 10µg/l and
100µg/l should be used for the photometry test method. It also suggests that concentrations lower
than 20µg/l reduces sensitivity, and concentrations over 80µg/l give filter fouling. It is best to use the
lower recommended concentration to minimise the potential for blockage or a bleed-through event.
What is a leak?
Also important to understand is the scanning velocity of the probe across the filter face. If it is done
quickly over a filter leak, there may be insufficient time for it to pick up some of the aerosol challenge
coming from the leak and this will cause the value to drop below the designated rate.
The scanning velocity is associated with the depth of the probe size (see Figure 1). The smaller the
depth of the probe, the less time it is over the leak and therefore insufficient; fewer leaks will be
found in comparison with a deeper probe.
Following the ISO 14644-3, the scanning velocity is calculated by the following equation:
Here, w is the width of the probe that passes perpendicular to the direction of movement (cm).
For example, when using a 3cm x 3cm probe, the width of the probe passing perpendicular to the
direction of the scan is 3 cm, hence the scanning velocity can be calculated as follows:
https://www.cleanroomtechnology.com/news/article_page/Integrity_testing_of_HEPA_filters_A_practical_approach/150453 4/11
23/05/23, 11.12 Integrity testing of HEPA filters: A practical approach
https://www.cleanroomtechnology.com/news/article_page/Integrity_testing_of_HEPA_filters_A_practical_approach/150453 5/11
23/05/23, 11.12 Integrity testing of HEPA filters: A practical approach
In the case of a substantial gasket leak, it is possible to apply a particle-free air jet to the leak area to
clean out particles; even a few wafts of air from a plate can help.
Figure 3: A baffle used when scanning a filter with leakage coming from the gasket
If a leak is detected, it will be necessary to return to the face passing slowly over it and return slowly
again to determine the exact position. Removing the probe and using only the tube helps to identify
the location of the leak accurately. It may be necessary to pass slowly over the leak several times on
each axis to identify the exact position.
When there is a gasket leak, particles may spill over onto the filter face and leaks can erroneously be
reported as being on the filter face. It is, therefore, recommended to start the filter scanning at the
gasket area.
False readings can be largely overcome by using a baffle plate held on the filter face as the adjacent
filter face is scanned (see Figure 3).
https://www.cleanroomtechnology.com/news/article_page/Integrity_testing_of_HEPA_filters_A_practical_approach/150453 6/11
23/05/23, 11.12 Integrity testing of HEPA filters: A practical approach
Air entrainment is an issue when testing isolators in non-unidirectional cleanrooms if HEPA filters or
unidirectional workstations are being performed at the same time. Here, spillage of test challenge
can cause a significant particle concentration in the room.
https://www.cleanroomtechnology.com/news/article_page/Integrity_testing_of_HEPA_filters_A_practical_approach/150453 7/11
23/05/23, 11.12 Integrity testing of HEPA filters: A practical approach
Figure 4: Air entrainment. Contaminated air with particles of test aerosol onto the filter
These particles may be drawn to the space between the filter and frame, or spill over onto the filter
face, hence it is difficult to decide whether there is a leak and, if there is, whether the leak comes from
the casing, gasket or media filter (see Figure 4).
This problem may be minimised by use of an anti-entrainment wall. The wall is pushed against the
ceiling and the filter side of the wall being checked for a leak. A practical solution is to use the hood of
the balometer as a wall, covering the filter and then getting into the hood to test the HEPA filter (see
Figure 5).
Fixing a leak
A final word of wisdom: if a leak in the HEPA filter is found, the best way to fix it is by following the
recommended fill patching procedure. Various sections in the IEST RP-CC034.2 state: “Fill repair
should not block or restrict more than an additional 3% of the filter face area, and no single repair
should have a dimension exceeding 3.8 cm (1.5 in).” After the repair is complete and suitable cure
time has been allowed for the patch to set, check for leaks near the repair area.
https://www.cleanroomtechnology.com/news/article_page/Integrity_testing_of_HEPA_filters_A_practical_approach/150453 8/11
23/05/23, 11.12 Integrity testing of HEPA filters: A practical approach
Jesus Casas is a mechanical engineer based in Caracas, Venezuela. His career spans more than five
years of experience in the pharmaceutical sector. Casas specialises in the areas of validation,
qualification and metrology.
N.B. This article is featured in the January 2019 issue of Cleanroom Technology. The digital edition is
available now.
Companies
Espromed Bio
https://www.cleanroomtechnology.com/news/article_page/Integrity_testing_of_HEPA_filters_A_practical_approach/150453 9/11
23/05/23, 11.12 Integrity testing of HEPA filters: A practical approach
Featured Companies
Lighthouse Worldwide Solutions
Crowthorne Group
Cherwell Laboratories
Envair Technology
Vaisala Ltd
MTX Contracts
TSI Instruments
https://www.cleanroomtechnology.com/news/article_page/Integrity_testing_of_HEPA_filters_A_practical_approach/150453 10/11
23/05/23, 11.12 Integrity testing of HEPA filters: A practical approach
Wickham Micro
Pharmagraph
PCE Instruments
CMR Controls
https://www.cleanroomtechnology.com/news/article_page/Integrity_testing_of_HEPA_filters_A_practical_approach/150453 11/11