You are on page 1of 23

Simulation of bike

frame
Date: 05 November 2022
Designer: Shivashankarappa G, Gautam
Koliwad
Study name: Static 1
Analysis type: Static

Table of Contents
Description ............................................ 1
Assumptions .......................................... 2
Model Information ................................... 2
Study Properties ..................................... 9
Units ................................................... 9
Material Properties ................................ 10
Description Loads and Fixtures................................. 12
No Data
Connector Definitions ............................. 12
Contact Information ............................... 13
Mesh information .................................. 13
Sensor Details ...................................... 13
Resultant Forces ................................... 14
Beams ................................................ 15
Study Results ....................................... 21
Conclusion .......................................... 23

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of bike frame 1


Shivashankarappa G, Gautam Koliwad
05-11-2022

Assumptions

Model Information

Model name: bike frame


Current Configuration: Default<As Machined>
Beam Bodies:
Document Name and Document Path/Date
Formulation Properties
Reference Modified
Beam-1(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-
2.3(1)[4]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:254.662mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:3.48598e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.275392kg
Weight:2.69885N

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of bike frame 2


Shivashankarappa G, Gautam Koliwad
05-11-2022

Beam-2(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(1)[17]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:339.307mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:4.44657e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.351279kg
Weight:3.44254N

Beam-3(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(1)[11]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:114.203mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:1.52649e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.120592kg
Weight:1.1818N

Beam-4(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(1)[19]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:203.729mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:2.78878e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.220314kg
Weight:2.15908N

Beam-5(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(1)[3]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:203.729mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:2.78878e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.220314kg
Weight:2.15908N

Beam-6(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(1)[16]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:339.307mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:4.44685e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.351301kg
Weight:3.44275N

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of bike frame 3


Shivashankarappa G, Gautam Koliwad
05-11-2022

Beam-7(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(1)[1]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:527.171mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:7.12078e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.562541kg
Weight:5.51291N

Beam-8(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(1)[7]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:137.978mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:1.88943e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.149265kg
Weight:1.4628N

Beam-9(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(1)[14]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:136.297mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:1.81337e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.143257kg
Weight:1.40391N

Beam-10(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(1)[25]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:113.516mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:1.55955e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.123205kg
Weight:1.2074N

Beam-11(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(1)[24]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:74.3802mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:9.47161e-06m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.0748257kg
Weight:0.733292N

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of bike frame 4


Shivashankarappa G, Gautam Koliwad
05-11-2022

Beam-12(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(5)[4]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:171.435mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:2.3536e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.185934kg
Weight:1.82215N

Beam-13(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(5)[3]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:148.611mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:2.01488e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.159175kg
Weight:1.55992N

Beam-14(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(1)[27]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:74.3842mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:9.47097e-06m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.0748207kg
Weight:0.733243N

Beam-15(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(1)[15]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:371.598mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:5.07568e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.400979kg
Weight:3.92959N

Beam-16(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(5)[5]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:171.435mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:2.3536e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.185934kg
Weight:1.82215N

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of bike frame 5


Shivashankarappa G, Gautam Koliwad
05-11-2022

Beam-17(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(1)[2]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:526.773mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:7.12134e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.562586kg
Weight:5.51334N

Beam-18(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(1)[13]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:371.563mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:5.07561e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.400973kg
Weight:3.92954N

Beam-19(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(1)[21]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:203.729mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:2.78878e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.220314kg
Weight:2.15908N

Beam-20(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(1)[12]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:133.787mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:1.81348e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.143265kg
Weight:1.40399N

Beam-21(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(1)[23]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:146.254mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:1.8017e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.142335kg
Weight:1.39488N

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of bike frame 6


Shivashankarappa G, Gautam Koliwad
05-11-2022

Beam-22(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(1)[18]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:407.459mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:5.57757e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.440628kg
Weight:4.31815N

Beam-23(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(1)[20]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:407.459mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:5.57757e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.440628kg
Weight:4.31815N

Beam-24(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(1)[22]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:146.247mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:1.80163e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.142329kg
Weight:1.39482N

Beam-25(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(5)[1]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:152.4mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:2.09226e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.165289kg
Weight:1.61983N

Beam-26(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(1)[10]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:137.388mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:1.88987e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.1493kg
Weight:1.46314N

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of bike frame 7


Shivashankarappa G, Gautam Koliwad
05-11-2022

Beam-27(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(5)[2]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:148.613mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:2.0148e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.159169kg
Weight:1.55986N

Beam-28(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(1)[6]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:254.662mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:3.48598e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.275392kg
Weight:2.69885N

Beam-29(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(1)[26]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:113.516mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:1.55954e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.123203kg
Weight:1.20739N

Beam-30(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(1)[5]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:203.729mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:2.78878e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.220314kg
Weight:2.15908N

Beam-31(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(1)[8]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:127.331mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:1.74333e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.137723kg
Weight:1.34969N

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of bike frame 8


Shivashankarappa G, Gautam Koliwad
05-11-2022

Beam-32(Pipe 21.3 X Section Standard-


2.3(1)[9]) iso/pipe/21.3 x 2.3
Section Area:
0.000137288m^2
C:\Users\AMD\Desktop\bik
Length:254.662mm
Beam – Uniform C/S e frame.SLDPRT
Volume:3.48598e-05m^3
Nov 5 10:00:10 2022
Mass Density:7900kg/m^3
Mass:0.275392kg
Weight:2.69885N

Study Properties
Study name Static 1
Analysis type Static
Mesh type Beam Mesh
Solver type Direct sparse solver
Inplane Effect: Off
Soft Spring: Off
Inertial Relief: Off
Incompatible bonding options Automatic
Large displacement Off
Compute free body forces On
Result folder SOLIDWORKS document (C:\Users\AMD\Desktop)

Units
Unit system: SI (MKS)
Length/Displacement mm
Temperature Kelvin
Angular velocity Rad/sec
Pressure/Stress N/m^2

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of bike frame 9


Shivashankarappa G, Gautam Koliwad
05-11-2022

Material Properties
Model Reference Properties Components
Name: AISI 1020 SolidBody 1(Pipe 21.3 X
Model type: Linear Elastic Isotropic 2.3(1)[4])(bike frame),
Default failure Max von Mises Stress SolidBody 2(Pipe 21.3 X
criterion: 2.3(1)[17])(bike frame),
Yield strength: 3.51571e+08 N/m^2 SolidBody 3(Pipe 21.3 X
Tensile strength: 4.20507e+08 N/m^2 2.3(1)[11])(bike frame),
Elastic modulus: 2e+11 N/m^2 SolidBody 4(Pipe 21.3 X
Poisson's ratio: 0.29 2.3(1)[19])(bike frame),
Mass density: 7900 kg/m^3 SolidBody 5(Pipe 21.3 X
Shear modulus: 7.7e+10 N/m^2 2.3(1)[3])(bike frame),
Thermal expansion 1.5e-05 /Kelvin SolidBody 6(Pipe 21.3 X
coefficient: 2.3(1)[16])(bike frame),
SolidBody 7(Pipe 21.3 X
2.3(1)[1])(bike frame),
SolidBody 8(Pipe 21.3 X
2.3(1)[7])(bike frame),
SolidBody 9(Pipe 21.3 X
2.3(1)[14])(bike frame),
SolidBody 10(Pipe 21.3 X
2.3(1)[25])(bike frame),
SolidBody 11(Pipe 21.3 X
2.3(1)[24])(bike frame),
SolidBody 12(Pipe 21.3 X
2.3(5)[4])(bike frame),
SolidBody 13(Pipe 21.3 X
2.3(5)[3])(bike frame),
SolidBody 14(Pipe 21.3 X
2.3(1)[27])(bike frame),
SolidBody 15(Pipe 21.3 X
2.3(1)[15])(bike frame),
SolidBody 16(Pipe 21.3 X
2.3(5)[5])(bike frame),
SolidBody 17(Pipe 21.3 X
2.3(1)[2])(bike frame),
SolidBody 18(Pipe 21.3 X
2.3(1)[13])(bike frame),
SolidBody 19(Pipe 21.3 X
2.3(1)[21])(bike frame),
SolidBody 20(Pipe 21.3 X
2.3(1)[12])(bike frame),
SolidBody 21(Pipe 21.3 X
2.3(1)[23])(bike frame),
SolidBody 22(Pipe 21.3 X
2.3(1)[18])(bike frame),
SolidBody 23(Pipe 21.3 X
2.3(1)[20])(bike frame),
SolidBody 24(Pipe 21.3 X
2.3(1)[22])(bike frame),
SolidBody 25(Pipe 21.3 X
2.3(5)[1])(bike frame),

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of bike frame 10


Shivashankarappa G, Gautam Koliwad
05-11-2022

SolidBody 26(Pipe 21.3 X


2.3(1)[10])(bike frame),
SolidBody 27(Pipe 21.3 X
2.3(5)[2])(bike frame),
SolidBody 28(Pipe 21.3 X
2.3(1)[6])(bike frame),
SolidBody 29(Pipe 21.3 X
2.3(1)[26])(bike frame),
SolidBody 30(Pipe 21.3 X
2.3(1)[5])(bike frame),
SolidBody 31(Pipe 21.3 X
2.3(1)[8])(bike frame),
SolidBody 32(Pipe 21.3 X
2.3(1)[9])(bike frame)
Curve Data:N/A

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of bike frame 11


Shivashankarappa G, Gautam Koliwad
05-11-2022

Loads and Fixtures


Fixture name Fixture Image Fixture Details
Entities: 3 Joint(s)
Type: Fixed Geometry

Fixed-1

Load name Load Image Load Details


Entities: 1 plane(s), 1 Beam (s)
Reference: Right Plane
Type: Apply force
Values: ---, ---, -2000 N
Force-1 Moments: ---, ---, --- N.m

Entities: 1 plane(s), 4 Beam (s)


Reference: Top Plane
Type: Apply force
Values: ---, ---, -1962 N
Force-2 Moments: ---, ---, --- N.m

Connector Definitions
No Data

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of bike frame 12


Shivashankarappa G, Gautam Koliwad
05-11-2022

Contact Information
No Data

Mesh information
Mesh type Beam Mesh

Mesh information - Details


Total Nodes 418
Total Elements 398
Time to complete mesh(hh;mm;ss): 00:00:04
Computer name:

Sensor Details
No Data

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of bike frame 13


Shivashankarappa G, Gautam Koliwad
05-11-2022

Resultant Forces
Reaction forces
Selection set Units Sum X Sum Y Sum Z Resultant
Entire Model N 2000 7848 0 8098.83

Reaction Moments
Selection set Units Sum X Sum Y Sum Z Resultant
Entire Model N.m 1.08097 0.13847 -2587.96 2587.96

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of bike frame 14


Shivashankarappa G, Gautam Koliwad
05-11-2022

Beams
Beam Forces
Beam Joint Shear1(N Shear2(N Moment1(N.m Moment2(N.m Torque(N.m
Axial(N)
Name s ) ) ) ) )
Beam- 1 -430.442 -1.07537 -2.61856 -4.00431 2.18235 -1.5268
1(Pipe
21.3 X 2 430.442 1.07501 2.61856 3.33746 -1.90854 1.52681
2.3(1)[4])
Beam- 1 -3422.87 296.434 -21.2461 5.40219 -131.55 -4.9749
2(Pipe 2 -4463.75 -1099.64 124.644 14.9109 25.1509 -2.33966
21.3 X
2.3(1)[17] 3 4463.75 1099.65 -124.644 6.45749 163.367 2.33966
)
Beam- 1 100.757 -1.80794 -2654.35 -450.668 0.117706 0.21364
3(Pipe
21.3 X
2 -100.766 1.80794 2654.34 113.566 0.111902 -0.21364
2.3(1)[11]
)
Beam- 1 -49.5133 -0.658559 984.127 14.4768 -8.04531 -0.0699354
4(Pipe
21.3 X
2 49.5133 0.662121 977.873 -13.8397 8.17984 0.0699501
2.3(1)[19]
)
Beam- 1 1386.39 45.3749 3650.13 -456.107 3.80975 10.4639
5(Pipe
21.3 X 2 -1386.99 -20.0187 -3650.13 -286.462 0.726539 -3.34152
2.3(1)[3])
Beam- 1 -4481.62 -1099.1 -122.146 -15.0303 24.6678 2.19919
6(Pipe 2 -3429.74 267.912 23.6985 -5.11636 -127.686 4.81539
21.3 X
2.3(1)[16] 3 4481.62 1099.11 122.147 -5.90999 163.758 -2.1992
)
Beam- 1 3524.14 1029.64 -73.0168 -11.2909 -281.874 -2.89654
7(Pipe
21.3 X 2 -3524.15 -1029.64 73.0168 -27.2015 -260.922 2.89654
2.3(1)[1])
Beam- 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
8(Pipe
21.3 X 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
2.3(1)[7])
Beam- 1 7531.45 -230.144 -1396.47 -373.098 -18.2105 -1.09544
9(Pipe
21.3 X
2 -7540.38 109.387 1362.56 564.652 -18.7099 -8.85553
2.3(1)[14]
)
Beam- 1 -69.4208 -30.6148 -15.6019 -8.3517 -2.73451 4.2903
10(Pipe
21.3 X
2 69.4209 30.6146 15.6019 6.58065 6.20977 -4.29028
2.3(1)[25]
)
Beam- 1 -0.3129 0.184364 77.4584 7.1559 0.0286924 9.67815

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of bike frame 15


Shivashankarappa G, Gautam Koliwad
05-11-2022

11(Pipe
21.3 X
2 0.430012 -0.34406 -77.4573 -1.40247 -0.0541282 -9.67808
2.3(1)[24]
)
Beam- 1 997.779 -1414.52 -6.41323 3.32552 -106.595 -0.752956
12(Pipe
21.3 X 2 -997.78 1414.52 6.41366 -2.22601 -135.904 0.752968
2.3(5)[4])
Beam- 1 1625.86 -80.948 1.52061 -2.53562 -6.19629 1.43573
13(Pipe
21.3 X 2 -1625.86 80.9478 -1.52061 2.29976 -6.35955 -1.43573
2.3(5)[3])
Beam- 1 -0.3129 0.184364 -77.4584 7.21929 -0.0286928 9.71561
14(Pipe
21.3 X
2 0.3129 -0.184364 77.4584 -1.45761 0.0424066 -9.71561
2.3(1)[27]
)
Beam- 1 5425.68 -1332.35 189.091 -24.9414 -289.034 6.21915
15(Pipe
21.3 X
2 -5415.14 1387.27 25.55 7.10717 -241.71 -1.59484
2.3(1)[15]
)
Beam- 1 1028.76 -1412.57 7.85213 -3.26479 -106.06 0.716244
16(Pipe
21.3 X 2 -1028.76 1412.57 -7.85256 1.91861 -136.104 -0.716256
2.3(5)[5])
Beam- 1 3481.64 1033.51 74.3279 11.6014 -282.47 2.60395
17(Pipe
21.3 X 2 -3481.64 -1033.51 -74.3279 27.5526 -261.957 -2.60396
2.3(1)[2])
Beam- 1 5473.8 -1446.12 25.9873 -2.78022 -292.596 -1.54634
18(Pipe
21.3 X
2 -5481.51 1416.59 -27.206 -7.48646 -244.358 1.47593
2.3(1)[13]
)
Beam- 1 -285.673 0.770012 981.488 -21.3353 3.08982 -0.347979
19(Pipe
21.3 X
2 285.673 -0.766873 980.512 21.2362 -2.93367 0.34799
2.3(1)[21]
)
Beam- 1 7569.77 264.685 -1417.54 -372.208 9.40756 1.40484
20(Pipe
21.3 X
2 -7575.44 -251.723 1389.32 567.254 21.3599 -1.57032
2.3(1)[12]
)
Beam- 1 -2091.1 95.4556 50.0351 -9.97968 -156.246 20.5728
21(Pipe
21.3 X
2 0 0 0 0 0 0
2.3(1)[23]
)
Beam- 1 -0.48103 126.968 -984.444 1.72389 6.76723 2.17896
22(Pipe 2 3545.83 83.2149 -890.618 120.136 6.20531 -1.02603
21.3 X
2.3(1)[18] 3 3545.83 83.2189 -2.15231 37.6522 -9.17163 -1.0261
)

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of bike frame 16


Shivashankarappa G, Gautam Koliwad
05-11-2022

Beam- 1 3534.82 -79.4029 882.992 119.458 5.98848 0.873139


23(Pipe -
21.3 X 2 126.971 -977.557 -1.52189 -6.86586 1.48522
0.481988
2.3(1)[20]
) 3 -3534.82 79.4045 5.46351 -38.3825 8.68391 -0.873158
Beam- 1 -2124.62 106.174 -83.0777 3.713 -157.144 -17.828
24(Pipe
21.3 X
2 2124.62 -106.173 83.0786 8.43689 172.672 17.8279
2.3(1)[22]
)
-
2.48429e- -8.52651e-
1 4.39584e 5.02265e-13 1.26397e-09 -6.8523e-13
06 14
Beam- -07
25(Pipe -
2.48721e- 4.40536e-
21.3 X 2 4.39584e 4.98268e-13 -1.91585e-09 -6.84786e-13
06 13
2.3(5)[1]) -07
-8.52651e-
3 340.493 668.255 -2.43983e-12 -19.0954 3.42615e-12
14
Beam- 1 337.04 -40.8458 2321.73 -209.655 3.63685 25.32
26(Pipe
21.3 X
2 -337.033 40.8458 -2321.73 503.907 1.5398 -25.32
2.3(1)[10]
)
Beam- 1 -1625.16 -99.9589 -1.52061 1.91682 6.61527 1.65075
27(Pipe
21.3 X 2 1626.19 81.4314 1.52061 -2.13351 6.35955 -1.67282
2.3(5)[2])
Beam- 1 1231.61 -17.5641 -0.497896 -3.69594 0.271413 0.17229
28(Pipe
21.3 X 2 -1231.74 -0.895811 0.497896 3.56647 -0.169289 -0.227527
2.3(1)[6])
Beam- 1 -69.2071 30.7947 16.1866 -6.53473 -6.20517 -4.36646
29(Pipe
21.3 X
2 69.3402 -30.683 -15.825 8.41095 2.64576 4.33307
2.3(1)[26]
)
Beam- 1 -1364.28 45.8346 3614.33 449.242 -3.90905 10.3673
30(Pipe
21.3 X 2 1364.88 -21.3298 -3614.33 285.076 -0.872585 -3.48373
2.3(1)[5])
Beam- 1 314.787 35.4675 -2288.39 -500.878 -1.37865 -33.3024
31(Pipe
21.3 X 2 -314.079 -41.326 2288.38 211.399 -3.75571 24.7147
2.3(1)[8])
Beam- 1 113.878 -48.7708 -1329.42 -92.7403 1.16657 -56.9196
32(Pipe 2 -113.152 50.4435 1329.42 -52.7478 4.1704 56.5009
21.3 X
2.3(1)[9]) 3 114.877 53.7332 1324.92 52.4052 -4.46955 56.2216

Beam Stresses
Upper bound
Beam Bending Bending Torsional
Joints Axial(N/m^2) axial and
Name Dir1(N/m^2) Dir2(N/m^2) (N/m^2)
bending(N/m^2)

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of bike frame 17


Shivashankarappa G, Gautam Koliwad
05-11-2022

Beam-1(Pipe -
1 -3.13533e+06 -6.78439e+06 -3.6975e+06 1.08619e+07
21.3 X 1.29341e+06
2.3(1)[4]) 2 -3.13533e+06 -5.65456e+06 -3.23359e+06 1.29341e+06 9.64918e+06
-
1 -2.49321e+07 9.15279e+06 2.22882e+08 2.48002e+08
Beam-2(Pipe 4.21442e+06
21.3 X -
2 -3.25139e+07 2.52632e+07 -4.26125e+07 8.20523e+07
2.3(1)[17]) 1.98201e+06
3 -3.25139e+07 -1.09407e+07 2.76788e+08 1.98201e+06 3.09518e+08
Beam-3(Pipe 1 733912 -7.63554e+08 -199426 180982 7.64288e+08
21.3 X
2 733976 -1.92411e+08 189592 -180982 1.93145e+08
2.3(1)[11])
Beam-4(Pipe 1 -360654 2.45277e+07 1.3631e+07 -59244.8 2.84215e+07
21.3 X
2 -360654 2.34482e+07 1.38589e+07 59257.3 2.75983e+07
2.3(1)[19])
Beam-5(Pipe 1 -1.00985e+07 7.72769e+08 6.45475e+06 8.86433e+06 7.82895e+08
21.3 X -
2 -1.01028e+07 -4.85344e+08 -1.23096e+06 4.95448e+08
2.3(1)[3]) 2.83072e+06
1 -3.2644e+07 -2.54654e+07 -4.17939e+07 1.86302e+06 8.1585e+07
Beam-6(Pipe
2 -2.49822e+07 -8.66851e+06 2.16336e+08 4.0793e+06 2.41491e+08
21.3 X
2.3(1)[16]) -
3 -3.2644e+07 1.00131e+07 2.77451e+08 3.10276e+08
1.86302e+06
Beam-7(Pipe -
1 2.56698e+07 -1.91298e+07 4.77572e+08 5.03625e+08
21.3 X 2.45377e+06
2.3(1)[1]) 2 2.56698e+07 4.60868e+07 -4.42073e+08 2.45376e+06 4.70138e+08
Beam-8(Pipe 1 0 0 0 0 0
21.3 X
2 0 0 0 0 0
2.3(1)[7])
Beam-9(Pipe 1 -5.48589e+07 6.32129e+08 -3.08535e+07 -927990 6.8774e+08
21.3 X -
2 -5.4924e+07 9.56674e+08 3.16997e+07 1.01212e+09
2.3(1)[14]) 7.50184e+06
Beam- 1 -505660 -1.41501e+07 4.63301e+06 3.63447e+06 1.53949e+07
10(Pipe 21.3
-
X 2 -505661 -1.11494e+07 1.0521e+07 1.58354e+07
3.63445e+06
2.3(1)[25])
Beam- 1 -2279.16 1.2124e+07 -48612.7 8.19872e+06 1.21264e+07
11(Pipe 21.3
-
X 2 -3132.2 2.37616e+06 -91707.8 2.38106e+06
8.19865e+06
2.3(1)[24])
Beam- 1 -7.2678e+06 -5.63433e+06 -1.80601e+08 -637856 1.87957e+08
12(Pipe 21.3
2 -7.26781e+06 -3.77147e+06 2.30258e+08 637866 2.37557e+08
X 2.3(5)[4])
Beam- 1 -1.18427e+07 4.29603e+06 -1.04982e+07 1.21626e+06 2.31859e+07
13(Pipe 21.3 -
2 -1.18427e+07 3.89641e+06 1.07748e+07 2.33004e+07
X 2.3(5)[3]) 1.21626e+06
Beam- 1 2279.16 -1.22314e+07 -48613.4 8.23045e+06 1.22338e+07
14(Pipe 21.3
-
X 2 2279.16 -2.46958e+06 -71848.3 2.47291e+06
8.23045e+06
2.3(1)[27])
Beam- 1 -3.95206e+07 4.22575e+07 -4.89702e+08 5.26847e+06 5.31043e+08
15(Pipe 21.3
-
X 2 -3.94438e+07 1.20415e+07 4.09523e+08 4.49144e+08
1.35105e+06
2.3(1)[15])
Beam- 1 -7.49344e+06 5.53145e+06 -1.79695e+08 606757 1.87273e+08

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of bike frame 18


Shivashankarappa G, Gautam Koliwad
05-11-2022

16(Pipe 21.3
2 -7.49344e+06 3.25065e+06 2.30598e+08 -606767 2.38114e+08
X 2.3(5)[5])
Beam- 1 2.53602e+07 1.96559e+07 4.78581e+08 2.2059e+06 5.04345e+08
17(Pipe 21.3 -
2 2.53602e+07 -4.66816e+07 -4.43826e+08 4.71634e+08
X 2.3(1)[2]) 2.20591e+06
Beam- -
1 -3.98711e+07 4.71045e+06 -4.95737e+08 5.3563e+08
18(Pipe 21.3 1.30996e+06
X
2 -3.99272e+07 -1.26841e+07 4.14009e+08 1.25032e+06 4.54131e+08
2.3(1)[13])
Beam- 1 2.08084e+06 3.61479e+07 5.23499e+06 -294786 3.86058e+07
19(Pipe 21.3
X 2 2.08084e+06 3.59799e+07 4.97044e+06 294795 3.84024e+07
2.3(1)[21])
Beam- 1 -5.5138e+07 6.30622e+08 1.5939e+07 1.19009e+06 6.85961e+08
20(Pipe 21.3
-
X 2 -5.51794e+07 9.61083e+08 -3.61895e+07 1.01694e+09
1.33028e+06
2.3(1)[12])
Beam- 1 1.52316e+07 1.69083e+07 -2.64723e+08 1.7428e+07 2.80494e+08
21(Pipe 21.3
X 2 0 0 0 0 0
2.3(1)[23])
Beam- 1 3503.81 -2.92074e+06 1.14655e+07 1.84588e+06 1.18352e+07
22(Pipe 21.3 2 2.58278e+07 2.03543e+08 -1.05135e+07 -869189 2.29642e+08
X
2.3(1)[18]) 3 2.58278e+07 6.37931e+07 1.55392e+07 -869244 9.14861e+07
Beam- 1 2.57475e+07 2.02394e+08 -1.01461e+07 739667 2.28396e+08
23(Pipe 21.3 2 -3510.79 -2.57849e+06 1.16326e+07 1.25819e+06 1.19185e+07
X
2.3(1)[20]) 3 2.57475e+07 6.50304e+07 1.47129e+07 -739684 9.24215e+07
Beam- -
1 1.54757e+07 -6.29084e+06 -2.66246e+08 2.81795e+08
24(Pipe 21.3 1.51027e+07
X
2 1.54757e+07 1.42944e+07 -2.92554e+08 1.51027e+07 3.08378e+08
2.3(1)[22])
Beam- 1 0.00320192 -8.50973e-07 0.00214151 -5.80483e-07 0.00534343
25(Pipe 21.3 2 -0.00320192 8.44202e-07 0.00324597 -5.80107e-07 0.0064479
X 2.3(5)[1]) 3 2.48015e+06 -4.13373e-06 3.23528e+07 2.90241e-06 3.48329e+07
Beam- 1 2.45499e+06 -3.55213e+08 -6.16181e+06 2.14495e+07 3.57721e+08
26(Pipe 21.3
-
X 2 2.45494e+06 -8.53756e+08 2.60884e+06 8.56215e+08
2.14495e+07
2.3(1)[10])
Beam- 1 -1.18376e+07 3.24762e+06 -1.12081e+07 1.39841e+06 2.35067e+07
27(Pipe 21.3
2 -1.18452e+07 3.61475e+06 1.07748e+07 -1.4171e+06 2.32102e+07
X 2.3(5)[2])
Beam- 1 8.97105e+06 -6.26192e+06 -459848 145953 1.52498e+07
28(Pipe 21.3
2 8.97196e+06 -6.04258e+06 -286822 -192747 1.50213e+07
X 2.3(1)[6])
Beam- -
1 -504103 -1.10716e+07 1.05132e+07 1.5772e+07
29(Pipe 21.3 3.69898e+06
X
2 -505073 -1.42504e+07 4.48265e+06 3.6707e+06 1.54439e+07
2.3(1)[26])
Beam- 1 -9.93739e+06 7.61137e+08 6.623e+06 8.78251e+06 7.71104e+08
30(Pipe 21.3
2 -9.94178e+06 -4.82997e+08 -1.4784e+06 -2.9512e+06 4.92941e+08
X 2.3(1)[5])

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of bike frame 19


Shivashankarappa G, Gautam Koliwad
05-11-2022

Beam- -
1 2.29291e+06 -8.48624e+08 2.3358e+06 8.5092e+08
31(Pipe 21.3 2.82117e+07
X 2.3(1)[8]) 2 2.28775e+06 -3.58168e+08 -6.3632e+06 2.09368e+07 3.60512e+08
-
Beam- 1 829484 -1.57127e+08 -1.97649e+06 1.57969e+08
4.82186e+07
32(Pipe 21.3
2 824193 8.93692e+07 7.06579e+06 4.7864e+07 9.04723e+07
X 2.3(1)[9])
3 836761 8.87887e+07 7.57264e+06 4.76273e+07 8.99478e+07

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of bike frame 20


Shivashankarappa G, Gautam Koliwad
05-11-2022

Study Results

Name Type Min Max


Stress1 Upper bound axial and bending 0.000 N/m^2 1,016,943,872.000N/m^
Element: 109 2
Element: 251

bike frame-Static 1-Stress-Stress1

Name Type Min Max


Displacement1 URES: Resultant Displacement 0.000e+00 mm 5.090e+01 mm
Node: 42 Node: 129

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of bike frame 21


Shivashankarappa G, Gautam Koliwad
05-11-2022

bike frame-Static 1-Displacement-Displacement1

Name Type
Displacement1{1} Deformed shape

bike frame-Static 1-Displacement-Displacement1{1}

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of bike frame 22


Shivashankarappa G, Gautam Koliwad
05-11-2022

Name Type Min Max


Factor of Safety1 Automatic 0.346 3.000
Node: 257 Node: 1

bike frame-Static 1-Factor of Safety-Factor of Safety1

Conclusion

Analyzed with SOLIDWORKS Simulation Simulation of bike frame 23

You might also like