You are on page 1of 1

To sum up, the two major threads in this discussion about power, the Weberian and the Parsonian,

both
suffer from major problems of definition (Martin, 1971: 244). These are just two instances of how power
discussion attracts intense debates and disagreements. The purpose of this short discussion is to
emphasize that power is one of the most central and problematic concepts in social science. Despite
widespread use, there is little agreement upon basic definitions, with individual theorists proposing their
own idiosyncratic terminologies of power (Bierstedt, 1950). Gallie (1956) confirms that due to the
existence of competing theories and meanings, power is essentially a contested subject.

Soft Power in International Relations


Soft power in international relations is a form of power that has an attractiveness or allure to other
states. It is based upon shared values, culture, and diplomacy. The resources that soft powers utilise
are usually economic power, relational power and historical relationships.

Unlike the way in which hard power uses economic power to impose punishments, soft power states
use their strong economic position to appear desirable to other nations.

You might also like