Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sara Ahmed
Ola Gabr
English
“Great literature is simply language charged with meaning to the utmost possible degree”
(Pound). “1984” is a novel written by George Orwell in 1948 as a prediction and warning against
the ruling of a totalitarian regime in the future. In the novel, people are under constant
surveillance and are brainwashed with facts that make them blindly obedient to the Party. This
system helps in achieving absolute control which the Party is originally striving for. With the
existence of this motivation in the novel along with Orwell’s vision coming to life in the real
world, readers all over the world have read “1984” and have been amazed by it. To this day,
countless references of the novel are still being made in movies, podcasts, and newspapers. With
its increasing popularity, the book had many different interpretations. These interpretations rely
on trying to understand the meaning behind a literary work and thoroughly searching for
important events which would help the reader formulate his or her opinion about it. Following
that, 1984’s worldwide readers have developed many different insights on and interpretations of
First, the upbringing of a person in a place and culture that differs from what he or she is
introduced to in a literary work affects the way the person analyzes and forms his or her opinions
on the writing. For instance, if an American citizen were to read “1984”, he would not have a
normal reaction to it. In fact, he would be shocked by the dictatorial, authoritarian rule presented
in the book. Since Americans live under a democratic government and have the rights of freedom
Abdelwahed 2
issued in the First Amendment, for them, life under a dictator is a life of horror and dread. Even
though some could disagree and state that Americans were put under an authoritarian ruler
during Trump’s presidency, this situation was nothing compared to a country that was
experiencing real oppression from rulers like Stalin, Putin and much more. Moreover, throughout
Trump’s time, the judiciary and social media were available and free. On the other hand, in
countries like Turkey and China, people could entirely relate to the events of “1984” as they are
unfortunately experiencing them daily. Like “1984”’s citizens, Turkish people do not have
freedom of speech or freedom of thought; their president Recep Tayyip Erdogan does not allow
them to access the internet and share news with the rest of the world, imitating the novel’s three
states; Oceania, Eastasia and Eurasia, who cannot communicate with each other. Erdogan also
bans people’s thoughts by jailing, executing, firing and forgetting them, which is typically
mentioned in the novel as well. So people who were fortunate enough to live a life in a
democratic country would definitely have different meanings in the back of their minds on the
Furthermore, the time period in which the reader decides to read the book can affect the
reader’s understanding as well. For example, a person who read the book once it was published
would not think of its meaning in the same way that a person who read the book after centuries
of its publication. As many reviewers claim that Orwell’s intention for writing the novel was to
educate people and warn them against the dangers of a totalitarian society, his goal was achieved
but only when people believed that they live in this type of society, which was in the future. A
person who read “1984” in the past could not relate to its events and could not grasp the meaning
behind it since it was just a warning back then, unlike a person who reads it today knowing for
certain the existence of such a society in multiple countries today. In addition to that,
Abdelwahed 3
technological advancement over time is considered a vital tool that has helped readers and
affected their way of thinking. This improvement over time provided future generations a better
chance at communicating with countries all around the world and helped them to stay updated
about each country’s government status with its changes every year. Thus, a reader from the
future will have much more knowledge about the book’s themes, analysis, and plots which will
help him reach a greater explanation of the book’s hidden gems, when compared to a reader from
the past, who was not exposed as much to many sources that would help him form a stronger
meaning.
In addition, the morals of a person affect his reading widely. If a child was raised on
being kind, thoughtful, and obedient, he would not have the same interpretations as that of a
child who was neglected and raised on being judgemental and hurtful. These children would
eventually have either good morals or bad morals. Depending on that, the person develops his
identity which specifies his way of thinking. When a well-raised person reads “1984”, he would
react with shock and would be inevitably disturbed. A person of good morals is characterized by
having a sense of humanity which would make him sympathize with the people of “1984”. The
tortures that the novel’s characters faced and the cruelty of people like O’Brien present, would
make the person’s interpretation more sophisticated and meaningful as they are reflecting on
something that is extremely different from what they are usually exposed to. Whereas a person
with bad morals wouldn’t find the novel to be that brutal or inhumane, as he knows that deep
inside, the characteristics in the novel and the characteristics of himself share similarities.
To conclude, people all over the world are created with different mindsets which rely on
divergent cultures, different time periods ranging from the past to the future and the main
principles or morals which a reader learns from an early age. Due to this wide range of
Abdelwahed 4
personalities with multiple mindsets, interpretation is considered a broad word that is always
changeable. With “1984”’s dystopia taking place in real life, readers are becoming innumerable,
Works Cited
7 Things You Need to Know About the First Amendment | the Free Speech Center. www.mt-
su.edu/first-amendment/page/things-you-need.
Cetingulec, Tulay. “Orwell’s 1984 Comes to Life in Erdogan’s 2015 Turkey.” Al-Monitor: Inde-
nals/2015/08/turkey-erdogan-intelligence-support-from-headmen.html.
ture-is-simply-language-charged-with-meaning-to-the#:~:text=%E2%80%9CGreat
%20literature%20is%20simply%20language%20charged%20with,to%20the%20utmost
%20possible%20degree.%E2%80%9D.
Rubin, Michael. “Which Country Today Is Most Like Orwell’s 1984 Authoritarian Nightmare?”
thoritarian-nightmare-636478.