PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Contractor: Clark Antiquiera

Status: Department: Web LOS:
Team Leader/Evaluator: Kim
Logronio
Reason for evaluation:

Direction: Place your rating on the box provided which you consider as the most appropriate description
for the work performance

I. Job Knowledge
Consider the knowledge of contractor for the area of specific responsibility he/she is assigned. Is the
she/he competent and well experienced? Does he know the details of his/ her job and the different
task related to it?

5 - Has excellent knowledge of his/ her job and all its details. Knows all the different tasks related to
it as well as all the methods and techniques in the performance of such tasks.
4 - Has very good knowledge of his/her job and most methods in the performance of different tasks.
3 - Has more than adequate knowledge of his/her job and knows many of the methods in the
performance of the tasks.
2 - Has adequate knowledge of his job and some related methods necessary in the performance of
1 - Has little knowledge of his /her job and often requires much direction.

Self-rating:

Supervisor’s rating: 4

II. Quality of Work

Consider the accuracy and thoroughness of the contractor’s work. Does he/she accomplish his/her
job without error? Does he/she demonstrate quality in his/her work outputs?

5 - Quality of work is excellent, always accurate and complete with all the details.
4 - Quality of work is very good, very rarely commits errors, most often accurate and thorough.
3 - Quality of work is good, sometimes commits errors; usually accurate and thorough.
2 - Quality of work is poor; requires substantial direction.
1 - Quality of work is very poor; commits frequent mistakes; is disorderly or inaccurate.

Self-rating:

Supervisor’s rating: 4
 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
III. Work Efficiency
Consider the amount of work accomplished by the contractor and the promptness it is completed
given a specified work schedule. How much does he/she accomplish?

5 - Work efficiency is excellent. Accomplishes work very much ahead of scheduled time. Very Often
handles other assignments
4 - Work efficiency is very good. Accomplishes assigned work before specified time. Handles other
assignments beyond normal job function.
3 - Work efficiency is good. Always accomplishes work according to specified time.
2 - Works efficiency is poor. Accomplishes work but sometimes does not meet target dates.
1 - Work efficiency is very poor; work output is minimal. Often lags behind work schedule.

Self-rating:

Supervisor’s rating: 4

IV. Flexibility
Consider the contractor’s ability and willingness to perform work under varying conditions,
requirements or methods. Does he/she adapt well to them and related tasks? Does he/she perceive
and use creative approaches appropriately in work? Does he perceive and use creative approaches
appropriately in work?

5 - Has exceptional degree of flexibility; always adapts perfectly well to all work assignments.
Demonstrate an excellent level of creativity with practical approaches to work
4 - Very god degree of flexibility. Very willing to adapt even under varying work conditions and
requirements. Good level of creativity.
3 - Good degree of flexibility. Willing to adapt even under some varying work conditions. Good level
of creativity.
2 - Satisfactory degree of flexibility and creativity. Adapts to some varying conditions.
1 - Prefers to work the same work routine. Lacks flexibility and creativity.

Self-rating:

Supervisor’s rating: 3
 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
V. Attendance
Consider the contractor’s regularity of attendance in work and other activities. Whenever absent,
does he take efforts to notify particularly his superior(s) in advance? Does he/she take time out from
his/her work for minor reasons, or only when truly necessary?

5pts - Perfect attendance in the work and in other school. Always give more than adequate
allowance in informing about necessary absence that is only in case of a true emergency or
necessity.
4pts - Very good attendance. Rarely absent. Adequate allowance for any necessary absences.
3pts - Good attendance. Gives allowance for absence.
2pts - Occasionally absent for work.
1pt - Very irregular in his attendance - frequently absent. Leaves his job during working hours.

Self-rating:

Supervisor’s rating: 4

VI. Motivation
Consider the attitude of the contractor about work and his/her job. Is he interested in his/her work?
Does he/she inspire others to be more productive?

5pts - Shows utmost interest in his/her job always; has a very high regard for it. Always inspires
others to work productively. His excellent work attitude is worth emulating.
4pts - Shows a lot of enthusiasm and pride in his/her job. His interest and attitude towards work are
evidently very positive most of the time.
3pts - Shows good interest and pride in his/her job and the work assigned to him/her. Has very good
attitude toward work.
2pts - Shows some interest in his/her job and the work assigned to him.
1pts – Shows little interest in his/her job; occasionally indifferent to his/her work assignment

Self-rating:

Supervisor’s rating: 3
 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
VII. Cooperativeness
Consider the contractor’s willingness to follow instructions. How well does he/she take critical
guidance and direction from superior?

5pts - Always takes direction and guidance from superiors openly and very positively. Serve as an
excellent example to others.
4pts - Takes direction and guidance from superiors very positively and well. Serves as a very good
example to others.
3pts - Takes direction and guidance from superiors well. Serves as a good example to others.
2pts - Rarely misses to follow direction and guidance from superiors.
1pts - Sometimes reacts negatively to direction and guidance from superiors.

Self-rating:

Supervisor’s rating: 4

VIII. Commitment
Consider the reliability of the contractor. Is he/she fully committed to the school and its objectives?

5pts - Can always be depended upon. Always weight decisions in the light and good of the total
institution. Has an exceptional sense of commitment to the school and all its objectives.
4pts - Very highly dependable. Puts his/her efforts to fulfill his/her responsibilities. Fully committed
to the school and its objectives.
3pts - Very dependable. Puts his/her efforts to fulfill his/her responsibilities. Committed to the
school and its objectives.
2pts - Fails occasionally to give his/her best and to devote full –time effort and attention to his/her
duties and responsibilities.
1pt - Indifferent towards his/her duties and responsibilities. Cannot be depended upon.

Self-rating:

Supervisor’s rating: 3
 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
IX. Integrity and Honesty
Consider how the contractor deals with superiors in terms of honesty. Is he/she very truthful? Does
he/she uphold values of honesty and integrity? Can he/she be trusted?

5) Honesty, trustworthiness, integrity, and sincerity are unquestionable. Always work perfectly well
with Minimum guidance.
4) Is very honest and trustworthy. Demonstrates a very high degree of integrity and sincerely. Works
very well with minimum guidance.
3) Is honest and trustworthy. Relates with integrity and sincerity. Works well with minimum
guidance.
2) Level of honesty and integrity is satisfactory but needs some direction.
1) Honesty and Trustworthiness are sometime questionable. Needs very close and constant
supervision.

Self-rating:

Supervisor’s rating: 4

X. Communication Skills
Consider the ability of the contractor to communicate clearly and understandably in both written
and spoken forms. Does she/he communicate promptly and accurately whenever necessary?

5) Has exceptional skills in both oral and written forms of communication. Always follows all proper
communication procedures. Influences others on the importance of proper and prompt observance
of communication procedures.
4) Always follows proper communication procedure very well. Takes extra efforts to communicate
properly to all other contractors
3) Follows the proper communication procedure very well. Makes himself/herself well understood
verbally and in writing.
2) Finds difficulty communicating properly to co-contractor’s and superiors. Needs constant
reminders and guidance to follow proper communication procedures.
1) Fails to communicate properly to co-contractor’s and superiors. Fails to convey his/her thoughts
and ideas orally or in writing.

Self-rating:

Supervisor’s rating: 4
 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
RECAPTULATION:
Self Supervisor
I. Job Knowledge 4
II. Quality of Work 4
III. Work Efficiency 4
IV. Flexibility 3
V. Attendance 4
VI. Motivation 3
VII. Cooperativeness 4
VIII. Commitment 4
IX. Integrity and Honesty 4
X. Communication Skills 4
TOTAL 38
DESCRIPTIVE RATING 44-35
44
Descriptive Rating

50 – 45 - Outstanding: Consistently conspicuous, distinguished performance/ displays initiative and

creativity. Has substantially enhanced departmental and/or effectiveness.
44 – 35 - Above Satisfactory: performance surpasses job requirements.
34 – 25 - Satisfactory: Employee is performing as required and expected in a satisfactory manner.
24 – 15 - Needs Improvement: Performance does not fully meet job requirements as indicated
above.
14 – 10 - Unsatisfactory: Performance is inadequate and must be corrected

Contractor’s Comment
Strength: Weakness:

Evaluator’s Comment
Strength: No need further instructions in handling Weakness: Some unable to contact or do
tasks and a good follower. urgent tasks.
 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Please check one of the following.

[✔ ] - I understand the evaluation and agree

with. [ ] - I understand the evaluation.
[ ] - I understand the evaluation, but I disagree with a portion of it and will pursue the next steps
available as explained in the program’s evaluation policy.

Please specify areas of disagreement:

[]–I [ ] – VI
[ ] - II [ ] – VII
[ ] – III [ ] – VIII
[ ] – IV [ ] – IX
[]–V []–X

Signing this form verifies that the evaluation has been discussed with you, and that you have received a copy.

Contractor’s Signature Date Signed

Evaluator’s Signature Date Signed