FMEA (Failure Modes and Effect

Want more tools and templates? Visit https://upboard.io/

The FMEA (Failure Modes and Effects Analysis) is a step-by-step approach first developed by the U.S. military in the 1940s t
provides a systematic, proactive method for analyzing and evaluating processes to identify how they might fail and then we
effectively identify parts of the process that are most in need of adjustment or change. The FMEA (Failure Modes and Effec
identify and quantify the influence and importance of possible failure points within a business process or system. Possible r

1. Occurrence (frequency of specific types of failure and causes of that failure)

2. Severity (impact of failure on the outcome of the project or the business overall)
3. Detection (ability of key stakeholders within the business to detect failure in the process)

After filling out the FMEA Template, business leaders are better able to prioritize which failures should be addressed first an
further risk of failure.

Process / Product Name Celda de manufactura ·45 - Prepared By

Soldadura TIG
Responsible Alejandro SS FMEA Date (Original)

OCCURRENCE (1 - 10)
Riegos Efectos causados por Caussas
SEVERITY (1 - 10)

Proceso Entrada
potenciales riesgos potenciales potenciales

What causes the

In what ways could What is the impact on the
What is the process step, change step, change or
the step, change or customer if this failure is
or feature under investigation? feature to go wrong?
feature go wrong? not prevented or corrected?
(how could it occur?)

Falta de
Falta de Mal funcionamiento conocimiento
Simulacion fallida 10 7
capacitación en producto final. de uso del
software
 Perdida de Redondear
Piezas mal modeladas Planos con
confianza en valores que
para la creación del medidas 9 6
clientes y futuros deben ser
ensamble erróneas
clientes exactos

Falta de
comunicación Emitir datos
Uso de softwares para Confusión a la hora falsos,
inadecuados para las establecer un de leer y analizar 10 provocando 7
simulaciones software para datos o planos errores en el
las producto final
actividades

Estructura Desinteres de
Relaciones de
Piezas mal ensambladas poco querer trabajar con
10 posición mal 5
previo a simulaciones resistente a nuestro equipo de
utilizadas
esfuerzos trabajo

Parámetros
Disgusto en clientes
iniciales mal Destrucción
Pruebas / simulaciónes hasta que las
colocados o 9 parcial o total 5
destructivas del producto purebas sean
ensamble del producto
satisfactorias
imperfecto

Ineficiencia de Falta de
Estancamiento del
identificar Perdida de interés innovación,
proyecto (no hay mejoras
áreas de de clientes a largo 10 competidores 6
a ningun plazo del
oportunidad plazo toman ventaja
producto)
del producto sobre nosotros
des and Effects Analysis) Template

ed by the U.S. military in the 1940s to identify possible failures in design or errors in manufacturing processes. FMEA
tify how they might fail and then weigh the impact of different failures. This enables business leaders to more
The FMEA (Failure Modes and Effects Analysis) Template provides business leaders and managers with a tool to
siness process or system. Possible risk areas and failure points are defined and analyzed using three criteria:

ess)

failures should be addressed first and where there are opportunities to show outsized improvement and prevent

Prepared By
PAPANTLA AEROSPACE
FMEA Date (Original) 27/01/22 Revised Saracho Sandin

OCCURRENCE (1 - 10)
Risk Priority Number

Control de riesgos accion acciones a

DETECTION (1 - 10)

DETECTION (1 - 10)
SEVERITY (1 - 10)
respuesta
actual. recomendada tomar
(RPN)

What are the

recommended actions Who is responsible What actions were
What controls exist that
for reducing the for making sure the completed (and
either prevent or detect the
occurrence of the actions are when) with respect
failure?
cause or improving completed? to the RPN?
detection?

Impartición
Capacitar al de cursos de
No hay información 9 630 personal en el Edwin Maza software 10 5 5
software (CAD) solidworks y
ansys
 Asignar a un 2 personas
miembro con hacen double
experiencia en check en las
No hay información 10 540 ISO 9001:2016 y Uriel Jiménez piezas 8 4 4
trabajar con modeladas
todos los (medidas y
decimales tolerancias)

Proponer y Solidworks y
establecer un Ansys
solo software establecidos
No hay información 10 700 Gabriel Barajas 7 3 6
para modelar y como
otro para simular softwares a
desde el inicio usar

Analizar
Delegar actividad
previo a la
a un miembro del
asignación de
equipo con altos
la actividad
conocimientos Miguel
No hay información 9 450 quien esta 5 3 5
en Solidworks y Alcantarilla
mas
buen uso de
capacitado
relaciones de
para
posición
realizarla

Planos
revisados por
miembros
Corroborar datos con
de simulación y experiencia
No hay información 9 405 Pablo Salas 9 4 6
de cada piezas en ISO 9001 y
por separado simulacion
limitada a
límites
establecidos

Modelo Lean
Manufacturin
g aplicado al
Aplicar
producto
No hay información 10 600 metodología Gabriel Barajas 7 5 5
para reducir
Lean SIx Sigma
tareas que no
aporten valor
al proceso
 acho Sandin
Risk Priority Number

250
(RPN)
128

126

75

216

175
 Severity Scale

Effect Severity of Effect Score

Hazardous -
May expose client to loss or harm without warning. 10
Without Warning
Hazardous -
May expose client to loss or harm with some warning. 9
With Warning
Will cause major disruption of service directly affecting
Very High 8
a client.

High Minor disruption of service directly affecting a client. 7

Major disruption of service not involving a client

Moderate 6
directly.

Low Minor disruption of service not involving a client. 5

Minor disruption of service involving client that

Very Low 4
doesn't require reworking or inconvenience to client.
Minor disruption of service not involving client that
Minor 3
doesn't require reworking or inconvenience to client.
No disruption of service noticed by client, no rework
Very Minor 2
necessary.

None No Effect 1
 Detection Scale

Likelihood of detecting failure with current

Chance of Detection Score
processes in place

Nearly impossible No current way to detect failure 10

Very Remote Very remote likelihood of detecting failure. 9

Remote Remote likelihood of detecting failure. 8

Very Low Very low likelihood of detecting failure. 7

Low Low likelihood of detecting failure. 6

Moderate Moderate likelihood of detecting failure. 5

Moderately High Moderately high likelihood of detecting failure. 4

High High likelihood of detecting failure. 3

Very High Very high likelihood of detecting failure. 2

Nearly Certain Near certain likelihood of detecting failure. 1

 Occurence Scale

Probability of Failure Time Period Per Item Failure Rate Score

More than once per day > 1 in 2 10

Very High
Once every 3-4 days 1 in 3000 9

Once every week 1 in 8 8

High
Once every month 1 in 20 7

Once every 3 months 1 in 800 6

Moderate Once every 6 months 1 in 400 5

Once a year 1 in 800 4

Low Once every 1 - 3 years 1 in 1500 3

Very Low Once every 3 - 6 years 1 in 3000 2

Remote Once Every 7+ Years 1 in 6000 1