Price Quality Method (PQM) of Tender Evalaution

PHYSICAL WORKS CONTRACTS

Evaluation of Suppliers (non-price attributes)
Criteria Organisational Performance Resource Strategy Methodology Value Adding
Strategies

Weight 4 11 13 2
Tenderer Grade Index Grade Index Grade Index Grade
Builder 1 3.75 3.00 4.00 8.80 4.00 10.40 4
Builder 2 3.00 2.40 3.50 7.70 3.50 9.10 3
Builder 3 4.25 3.40 4.50 9.90 4.50 11.70 4

Estimate - excluding 50,000,000.00

any amount fixed by
the tendering
authority (dollars)

Notes:
1 Weighted Score for each criterion = Criterion score (0-5)/5 x weighting (0-30)
2 Weighted Sum = sum of all Weighted Scores
3 Weighted Sum Margin = Tenderers Weighted Sum – lowest Tenderers Weighted Sum
4 Quality Premium for each tender = tender estimate x Weighted Sum Margin / 70
5 For the purposes of the tender evaluation only, the Quality Premium thus established
 Determination of Supplier
Value Adding Quality Premium
Weighted (SQP)
WS margin Supplier
Strategies sum of the (WS - Quality
non-price lowest Premium
attribute WS) (SQP)
grades (dollars)
(WS)

30 70
Index Grade Index Grade Index
1.60 0.00 0.00 23.80 3.40 2,428,571.43
1.20 0.00 0.00 20.40 0.00 0.00
1.60 0.00 0.00 26.60 6.20 4,428,571.43

0.00 blank blank blank

Lowest 20.40
WS

5)/5 x weighting (0-30)

west Tenderers Weighted Sum

eighted Sum Margin / 70
ality Premium thus established for each tender will be subtracted from the tendered price of that tender and the tenders compared accor
 30
Evaluation of Alternatives (alternative Determination
Check the products)
Premium Premium Premium Premium Premium Sum of Alternative
of Alternative
sum of all (alternative (alternative (alternative (alternative (alternative individual
Tender Tender
weights product product product product product premiums Premium
item 1) item 2) item 3) item 4) item 5) Premium(ATP)
(dollars)
(dollars) (dollars) (dollars) (dollars) (dollars) (ATP) (dollars)

100

0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00

blank blank

Sum of all Lowest 0.00

weights sum of
must equal individual
100 premiums

d the tenders compared accordingly

Determination of Preferred
Tender
(SQP + ATP) Tender prices Tender price
for each tender (dollars) less (SQP +
(dollars) ATP) (dollars)

Ranking
2,428,571.43 52,000,000.00 49,571,428.57 1
0.00 51,000,000.00 51,000,000.00 3
4,428,571.43 55,000,000.00 50,571,428.57 2

blank blank

Lowest tender 49,571,428.57

price less (SQP
+ ATP)
Price Quality Method (PQM) of Tender Evalaution
PHYSICAL WORKS CONTRACTS
Evaluation of Suppliers (non-price attributes)
Criteria

Weight
Tenderer Grade Index Grade Index Grade Index Grade Index
Builder 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Builder 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Builder 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Estimate -
excluding
any
amount
fixed by
the
tendering
authority
(dollars)
 0
Determination of
SupplierWS
Weighted Quality
margin Supplier Check the
sum of
Premiumthe (WS -
(SQP) Quality sum of all
non-price lowest Premium weights
attribute WS) (SQP)
grades (dollars)
(WS)

0 100 100
Grade Index Grade Index
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 blank blank blank

Lowest 0.00 Sum of all

WS weights
must equal
100
Evaluation of Alternatives (alternative Determination Determination of Preferre
products)
Premium Premium Premium Premium Premium Sum of Alternative
of Alternative (SQP +
(alternative (alternative (alternative (alternative (alternative individual
Tender Tender ATP) for
product product product product product premiums Premium each tender
item 1) item 2) item 3) item 4) item 5) Premium(ATP)
(dollars) (dollars)
(dollars) (dollars) (dollars) (dollars) (dollars) (ATP) (dollars)

0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00

blank blank blank

Lowest 0.00
sum of
individual
premiums
Determination of Preferred Tender
Tender prices Tender price less
(dollars) (SQP + ATP)
(dollars)

Ranking
0.00 1
0.00 1
0.00 1

blank

Lowest tender 0.00

price less (SQP +
ATP)