Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Early View Publication; these are NOT the final page numbers, use DOI for citation !!
Macromolecular
Materials and Engineering M. Hu et al.
www.mme-journal.de
of boron-cross-linked GO/polyvinyl alcohol (B-GO/PVA) introduced and uniformly dispersed into PVA hydrogel by
hydrogels. Different from common chemical and physical the reducibility of C-dot, which greatly enhanced its anti-
hydrogels, PVA hydrogel is usually prepared by freeze– bacterial property, and in turn enlarged the application
thaw method, which forms PVA crystal nuclei to act as prospect of PVA hydrogel in medical field.
physical cross-linking points (because there are strong
hydrogen bonding interactions in PVA crystal nuclei) in
PVA hydrogel.[10–13,21,22] Therefore, the number and distri- 2. Experimental Section
bution of PVA crystal nuclei have great influence on the
mechanical properties of PVA hydrogel.[23,24] As we know, 2.1. Materials
proper nucleating agent can help form much more crystal
PVA (AH-26, alcoholysis degree: 97%–98.8%, polymeriza-
nuclei with uniform dispersion. Therefore, the addition of tion degree: 2600) was purchased from Sinopharm Shanghai
appropriate nucleating agent into PVA hydrogel could help Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. (China). β-Cyclodextrin was obtained
form a denser and more uniform cross-linked network in from Aladin Ltd. (China). Hydrochloric acid (HCl) was pro-
PVA hydrogel, which could also enhance the mechanical vided by Guangzhou Chemical Factory (China). Here, PVA, HCl,
properties of PVA hydrogel. In PVA hydrogel, the crystal and β-cyclodextrin were analytical grade and used as received
nuclei are usually smaller than 10 nm,[24,25] thus the ideal without further purification. Pure water was produced by deioni-
nucleating agent of PVA should also be smaller than zation and filtration using a Millipore apparatus (resisteivity ≥
10 nm, and can strongly interact with PVA chains. Consid- 18.2 MΩ cm).
ering the above factors, most of nanomaterials including
the above-mentioned GO and HA are not the appropriate 2.2. Preparation of C-Dots
nucleating agents for the formation of PVA hydrogels. The
strong physical interaction between PVA and GO/HA, and C-dots were prepared according to a previously reported
method.[32] Briefly, 5 g β-cyclodextrin was dissolved in 30 mL
the stress transferred from PVA chains to stiff GO/HA is the
concentrated HCl (18–19 wt%), followed by keeping the mixed
main factor for the enhancement of mechanical properties
solution at 70 °C for 4 h to obtain a brown C-dot suspension. Then,
of GO/PVA or HA/PVA hydrogels.[18] most of HCl and water were removed by a rotary evaporation
Carbon nanodot (C-dot) as a newly discovered nanoma- (60 °C), and adjusted the pH to 7–8 with Na2CO3 (2.5 mol L−1). After
terial with many exceptional properties, such as low cyto- that, the neutral brown suspension was centrifuged at 15 000 rpm
toxicity, very good biocompatibility, high fluorescence for 25 min to separate big particles, and the supernatant was
quantum yield, stable aqueous dispersion, outstanding further dialyzed with a dialysis bag (retained molecular weight:
reducibility, and excellent chemical stability[26–30] has 500 Da) for 24 h to purify the C-dots. Finally, the pure C-dot power
already been widely studied in many fields, such as drug was obtained by freeze-drying the purified C-dot suspension.
delivery, cell imaging, sensing, optoelectronic materials,
and catalysis.[29,31–35] Notably, as a kind of new nano- 2.3. Preparation of PVA/C-Dot Hydrogels
material with plenty of functional groups (similar to GO
and HA), C-dot could also form strong physical interac- The PVA/C-dot hydrogel was prepared using the freezing–
tion with PVA chains, and thus enhance the mechanical thawing method. The C-dots were dispersed with deionized water
to a desired concentration (0.05 g mL−1). Here, the PVA/C-dot
properties of PVA hydrogel. Besides, the size of majority
hydrogel with 20 wt% PVA (WPVA/Wall) and different C-dot con-
C-dot is smaller than 5 nm. As a result, compared to other
tents had been prepared. Taking the PVA/C-dot hydrogel with
nanomaterials (GO and HA), C-dot also acted as nucle- 4 wt% (WC-dot/WPVA) C-dot content as an example, 24 g of PVA
ating agent in PVA hydrogel, which can further improve power and 19.2 mL of C-dot aqueous dispersion (0.05 g mL−1) were
its mechanical properties. Furthermore, the addition of mixed into 76.8 mL pure water and stirred continuously at 45 °C
C-dots into PVA hydrogel could endow the PVA hydrogel for 0.5 h, followed by dissolving PVA at 95 °C and 200 r min−1
with some new properties, such as fluorescence and stirring for 2 h to obtain a transparent homogeneous PVA/C-dot
reducibility, which could enlarge the application poten- suspension. Then, the homogeneous PVA/C-dot suspension was
tial of PVA hydrogel. Moreover, to the best of our knowl- sealed and kept at 40 °C for removal of air bubbles, and then
edge, the incorporation of C-dots into PVA hydrogel were poured between glass slides with 1 mm space. Finally, after
has not been reported yet. In this study, the PVA/C-dot subjecting the PVA/C-dot suspension to repeated freeze–thaw
cycles (a freezing step for 18 h at −18 °C followed by a thawing
hydrogels were successfully prepared by simply freezing
step for 6 h at room temperature), the PVA/C-dot hydrogels were
and thawing the mixture aqueous suspension of PVA
obtained. In this work, the hybrid hydrogels were denoted as
and C-dots. The morphology, structure, and mechanical PVA/Cn, where C for C-dots, and the subscript n for the weight
properties of PVA/C-dot hydrogels were comprehensively ratio of PVA/C-dot. The concentration of monomer PVA was fixed
investigated. According to the test results, the probably at 20 wt%. For example, PVA/C1 meant that the gel consisted of
reinforcing mechanism of PVA/C-dot hydrogels was pro- 7.98 g water, 2 g PVA, and 0.02 g C-dots. Without special illustra-
posed. Furthermore, the Ag nanoparticles were simply tion, PVA/Cn had through seven freeze–thaw cycles.
Early View Publication; these are NOT the final page numbers, use DOI for citation !!
Macromolecular
PVA/Carbon Dot Nanocomposite Hydrogels for Simple Introduction of Ag Nanoparticles . . . Materials and Engineering
www.mme-journal.de
www.mme-journal.de
Intensity (%)
25 that C-dot would not influence the
20 crystal structure of PVA. From the XRD
15 curves, the crystallinity (Xc) of PVA and
10 PVA/C-dot hydrogels could be calcu-
5
lated. As shown in Figure 2c, the crystal-
50 nm 0
1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 linity of C-dot/PVA hydrogel was higher
Size (nm) than pure PVA hydrogel, and increased
Figure 1. a) TEM image and b) size histogram (counting at least 100 particles) of synthe- along with the increase in the C-dot
sized C-dots. The inset in (a) is the high-resolution TEM image of C-dot. content, indicating that the addition of
C-dots into PVA hydrogel could increase
the concentration of PVA aqueous solution was as high the crystallinity of PVA.
as 20 wt%, 4 wt% C-dot could be well dispersed in PVA To illuminate the interaction between C-dots and PVA
aqueous solution and form a kind of uniform and trans- chains, FTIR spectra of C-dot, dried PVA hydrogel, and the
parent mixture suspension. Moreover, the mixture suspen- dried PVA/C-dot composites hydrogel were measured. As
sion could emit 520 nm green fluorescence under 365 nm shown in Figure 3 and Figure S3 (Supporting Informa-
(Figure S1d,e, Supporting Information), further demon- tion), the spectra of C-dots exhibited strong OH, CO
strating that the C-dots could uniformly disperse in PVA stretching vibrations and CO (in the COC group)
aqueous solution without agglomeration. symmetric stretching vibrations peaks at 3365, 1641, and
Different from other carbon material composite hydro- 1028 cm−1, respectively, which indicated that there were
gels which exhibited opaque black when the content of
carbon materials is higher than 1%,[21–23] the PVA/C-dot
hydrogels prepared by the freeze–thaw method were a
semitransparent, even the content of C-dot was as high
Intensiy (a.u.)
PVA/C4
as 4%. Figure S2a,b (Supporting Information) showed
PVA/C2
that the transmittance of PVA/C-dot hydrogels was still PVA/C1
more than 40% after seven times freeze–thaw, which 26.8 PVA/C0.5
was nearly the same as pure PVA hydrogel, proving that 41 PVA
18.6 19.6 C-dot
C-dots were dispersed very well in PVA hydrogel, and did
not influence the transmittance of PVA hydrogel. Besides, 0 20 40 60 80
2 θ (Degree)
owing to the degree of crystalline in hydrogels increased
b 19.6
along with freeze–thaw times, the light scattering of the
hydrogel would increase. As a result, the transmittance of 40.7 PVA/C4
Intensiy (a.u.)
44
were very clearly observed, but the crystallization peak
of PVA at 19.6° was not obvious. This could be ascribed to 42
the overlap of strong water signals and weak PVA crystal
signals at the low content of polymer.[23] Hence, in this 40
experiment, the crystallinity of PVA and PVA/C-dot hydro-
gels was estimated from the corresponding dried hydro- 38
0 1 2 3 4
gels instead. Figure 2b showed that the dried PVA and C-dot (Wt %)
PVA/C-dot hydrogels appeared the same characteristic Figure 2. The XRD patterns of a) as-prepared and b) dried PVA and
peak of the crystal at 2θ, 19.6° (strongest), 22.9°, and 40.8° PVA/C-dot hydrogels; c) crystallinity of dried PVA and PVA/C-dot
corresponding to the (101), (200), and (102) planes of PVA hydrogels.
Early View Publication; these are NOT the final page numbers, use DOI for citation !!
Macromolecular
PVA/Carbon Dot Nanocomposite Hydrogels for Simple Introduction of Ag Nanoparticles . . . Materials and Engineering
www.mme-journal.de
C-dots
a
PVA 1641
1028 PVA
Intensity (a.u.)
3365 PVA/C1
PVA/C0.5
PVA/C2 1657
PVA/C1
3285
Endo
1653
PVA/C2
3274 PVA/C4
3272
Endo
PVA/C4
shifted to lower wavenumbers for the dried PVA/C-dot
hydrogel (at 3272 and 3274 cm−1), suggesting that the
strong hydrogen bonds were formed between PVA chains
and C-dots. Furthermore, for the dried PVA/C-dot hydrogel 150 175 200 225 250
with 2 and 4 wt% C-dot contents, the CO stretching Temperature (o C)
vibrations peak at 1641 cm−1 of C-dot shifted to 1657 Figure 4. DSC curves of PVA and PVA/C-dot hydrogels: a) glass
and 1653 cm−1, respectively, which indicated the forma- transition temperature (Tg) and b) melting point (Tm).
tion of hydrogen bonding between the carboxyl groups
of C-dot surface and the hydroxyl groups of PVA. All the hydrogels. Figure 4b showed only one strong endothermic
results confirmed the presence of the strong hydrogen or exothermic peak for both dried pure PVA and PVA/
bonds between the hydroxyl groups of PVA chains and the C-dot composite hydrogels in the range between 180 and
oxygen-containing groups (hydroxyl and carboxyl groups) 240 °C, indicating that the addition of C-dot nanoparticles
of C-dot surface in PVA/C-dot hydrogels. would not affect the crystal of PVA hydrogels, which was
To investigate the glass transition temperature (Tg) and consistent with the XRD test result (Figure 2). However,
further analyze the crystallization behavior of PVA/C-dot the melting point (Tm) of PVA/C-dot composite hydrogels
hydrogels, the DSC analysis of dried pure PVA and PVA/ was lower than that of the dried pure PVA hydrogel, and
C-dot composites hydrogels was performed. As shown decreased along with the increase of C-dot content. For
in Figure 4 and Table 1, the Tg of pure PVA hydrogel was example, the Tm of PVA/C4 was just about 215.4 °C, which
about 62.7 °C, while that of the dried PVA/C-dot com- was lower (4.5 °C) than that of dried pure PVA hydrogel
posite hydrogels was much lower. For example, the Tg of (Table 1). This phenomenon was similar to other nano-
PVA/C-dot hydrogel prepared with 4 wt% C-dot content particle/PVA composite film,[43] because the crystals
(PVA/C4) was just about 55.8 °C, which was 6.9 °C lower formed on C-dots were defective, leading to the decrease
than that of dried pure PVA hydrogel. This phenomenon of Tm. Moreover, the crystallinity (Xc) of all samples could
was different from the previously reported nanoparticle/ be calculated from the endothermic or exothermic peak
polymer composite hydrogels, whose glass transition of DSC with Equation (3)
temperature (Tg) was almost independent of the nano-
particle content.[21–23,45] This maybe because the spherical Table 1. Parameters obtained from DSC curves of pure PVA and
C-dot was more flexible than the flake (such as clay and the PVA/Cn hydrogels.
graphene) and linear (such as nanocellulose) nanopar-
ticles in hydrogel networks, which could bring larger Sample Enthalpy Melting point XPVA Tg
space for free movement of PVA chains. Therefore, the [J g−1] [°C] [%] [°C]
PVA chains in PVA/C-dot composite hydrogel were free, PVA 56.51 219.9 40.8 62.7
high flexible, and took on nearly random conformations PVA/C0.5 59.75 218.5 43.1 62.3
around the C-dots. Here, Tg decreased obviously along
PVA/C1 62.15 216.2 44.8 59.8
with the increase of C-dot content, fully demonstrating
that the addition of C-dot nanoparticles greatly improved PVA/C2 63.36 217.4 45.7 57.6
the mobility and flexibility of PVA chains in the PVA/C-dot PVA/C4 59.62 215.4 43 55.8
www.mme-journal.de
Figure 5. Mechanical properties of PVA and PVA/C-dot composite hydrogels: a) tensile strength, b) elongation at break, c) Young’s modulus,
and d) fracture energy as a function of freeze–thaw cycle time.
Early View Publication; these are NOT the final page numbers, use DOI for citation !!
Macromolecular
PVA/Carbon Dot Nanocomposite Hydrogels for Simple Introduction of Ag Nanoparticles . . . Materials and Engineering
www.mme-journal.de
Table 2. Mechanical properties of the as-prepared PVA and PVA/C-dot hydrogels after seven freeze–thaw cycle times.
Sample (PVA/Cn) Tensile strength Elongation at break Young’s modulus Fracture energy
[MPa] [%] [KPa] [J m−2]
PVA 0.56 ± 0.034 271 ± 21 113 ± 8 733 ± 71
PVA/C0.5 0.67 ± 0.080 315 ± 28 101 ± 6 808 ± 106
PVA/C1 0.75 ± 0.034 310 ± 15 108 ± 8 926 ± 68
PVA/C2 0.82 ± 0.045 321 ± 24 105 ± 9 1052 ± 112
PVA/C4 0.65 ± 0.060 305 ± 22 108 ± 7 840 ± 89
(Supporting Information), and Table 2, similar to the PVA hydrogel, the PVA chains were cross-linked by PVA
common PVA hydrogel prepared by freeze–thaw method, crystal nuclei and finally formed intact 3D network.[24]
the tensile strength, Young’s modulus, and fracture energy Therefore, the degree of crystallinity and the distribu-
of the as-prepared PVA and PVA/C-dot composite hydrogels tion of PVA crystal nuclei had a significant impact on the
increased along with the increase in freeze–thaw cycles. mechanical properties of PVA hydrogels.[26] The uniform
After seven freeze–thaw cycles, the optimal mechanical distribution of the denser crystal nuclei (cross-linking
properties of the as-prepared PVA and PVA/C-dot hydro- points) could lead to better mechanical properties of PVA
gels were obtained. And the mechanical properties of the hydrogel. According to the test results of XRD and DSC,
PVA/C-dot composite hydrogel remarkably increased with C-dots could act as an ideal nucleating agent to greatly
the addition of C-dots. As shown in Table 2, after seven increase the crystallinity (denser crystal nucleus) of
freeze–thaw cycles, the PVA/C-dot hydrogel prepared with PVA/C-dot hydrogels. Therefore, we speculated that the
2 wt% C-dot content (PVA/C2) showed a tensile strength of enhancement of the mechanical properties of PVA/C-
0.82 ± 0.045 MPa, which was about 46.4% higher than that dot hydrogel was mainly ascribed to the fact that the
of pure PVA hydrogel (0.56 ± 0.034 MPa). Besides, the elon- denser crystal nuclei (cross-link points) of PVA increased
gation at break of PVA/C2 was 321 ± 24%, which was about with the addition of C-dots. After the PVA solution was
18.5% higher than that of pure PVA hydrogel. And because mixed with C-dots, many PVA chains would be adsorbed
of the increase of tensile strength and elongation at and arranged on C-dot surfaces because of the strong
break, the fracture energy of PVA/C2 (1052 ± 112 J m2) was hydrogen bonding interaction, which was in favor of
also about 43.5% higher than that of pure PVA hydrogel PVA crystallization. More important, the proper nano-
(733 ± 71 J m2). All above mechanical test results suggested size of C-dot could be used as an ideal nucleating agent
that the addition of C-dots could effectively reinforce the for PVA. In freeze–thaw process, some C-dots would act
mechanical properties of PVA hydrogel. as nucleating agent of PVA to assist in forming more
Some literature have reported that the addition of PVA crystal nuclei, and uniformly distributed in PVA/C-
nanomaterials, such as GO and carbon nanotubes (NTs), dot hydrogel (Figure 6), which improved the mechan-
can greatly improve the mechanical properties of PVA ical properties of PVA/C-dot hydrogel. Moreover, C-dots
hydrogels.[21,47,48] And for those hybrid hydrogels, the could also act as lubricant in stretching process, which
mechanical properties were mainly enhanced due to the led to the increase in the elongation at break of PVA/C-
following two aspects: first, the high tensile modulus dot hydrogel.[49]
and strength of nanomaterials could
endure high load; second, the strong
hydrogen bonds present between PVA
chains and nanomaterials. The load
could be effectively transferred from
the PVA matrix to the nanomaterials,
which enhanced the mechanical prop-
erties of PVA hydrogels.[21,47,48] How-
ever, different from NTs and GO, C-dots
did not possess extremely high ten-
sile modulus and strength,[47,48] which
meant the main factor for the enhance-
ment of the mechanical properties
in PVA/C-dot hydrogel was not load
transfer. As we mentioned above, in Figure 6. The schematic forming model of PVA/C-dot hydrogels.
www.mme-journal.de
0.1M
decrease in the swelling ratio of PVA/C-dot.
0.25M
0.5M
3.3. Introduction of Ag Nanoparticles
Early View Publication; these are NOT the final page numbers, use DOI for citation !!
Macromolecular
PVA/Carbon Dot Nanocomposite Hydrogels for Simple Introduction of Ag Nanoparticles . . . Materials and Engineering
www.mme-journal.de
www.mme-journal.de
Supporting Information
Received: May 25, 2016; Revised: July 19, 2016; Published online: ;
DOI: 10.1002/mame.201600248
Early View Publication; these are NOT the final page numbers, use DOI for citation !!
Macromolecular
PVA/Carbon Dot Nanocomposite Hydrogels for Simple Introduction of Ag Nanoparticles . . . Materials and Engineering
www.mme-journal.de
[17] T. H. Kim, D. B. An, S. H. Oh, M. K. Kang, H. H. Song, J. H. Lee, [35] L. Zhou, Y. H. Lin, Z. Z. Huang, J. S. Ren, X. G. Qu, Chem.
Biomaterials 2015, 40, 51. Commun. 2012, 48, 1147.
[18] L. Zhang, Z. P. Wang, C. Xu, Y. Li, J. P. Gao, W. Wang, Y. Liu, [36] Z. J. Fan, B. Liu, J. Q. Wang, S. Y. Zhang, Q. Q. Lin, P. W. Gong,
J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 10399. L. M. Ma, S. R. Yang, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 3933.
[19] Y. S. Pan, D. S. Xiong, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. 2009, 20, [37] S. W. Zou, Z. J. Wei, Y. Hu, Y. H. Deng, Z. Tong, C. Y. Wang,
1291. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 4227.
[20] Y. F. Huang, M. Q. Zhang, W. H. Ruan, J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, [38] N. A. Peppas, P. J. Hansen, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1982, 27, 4787.
2, 10508. [39] R. Ricciardi, F. Auriemma, C. D. Rosa, F. Laupretre,
[21] C. Chen, Y. H. Zhu, H. Bao, P. Zhao, H. L. Jiang, L. M. Peng, Macromolecules 2004, 37, 1921.
X. L. Yang, C. Z. Li, Soft Matter 2011, 7, 915. [40] R. Ricciardi, G. Mangiapia, F. L. Celso, L. Paduano, R. Triolo,
[22] J. K. Wu, X. L. Gong, Y. C. Fan, H. S. Xia, Soft Matter 2011, 7, F. Auriemma, C. D. Rosa, F. Lauprétre, Chem Mater. 2005, 17,
6205. 1183.
[23] J. L. Holloway, A. M. Lowman, G. R. Palmese, Soft Matter [41] C. L. Shao, H. Y. Kim, J. Gong, B. Ding, D. R. Lee, S. J. Park,
2013, 9, 826. Mater. Lett. 2003, 57, 1579.
[24] E. Otsuka, S. Komiya, S. Sasaki, J. W. Xing, Y. Bando, [42] M. Peng, G. H. Xiao, X. L. Tang, Y. Zhou, Macromolecules
Y. Hirashima, M. Sugiyama, A. Suzuki, Soft Matter 2012, 8, 2014, 47, 8411.
8129. [43] K. E. Strawhecker, E. Manias, Macromolecules 2001, 34,
[25] H. Q. Hong, H. Y. Liao, S. J. Chen, H. Y. Zhang, Mater. Lett. 8475.
2014, 122, 227. [44] J. J. Liang, Y. Huang, L. Zhang, Y. Wang, Y. F. Ma, T. Y. Guo,
[26] J. H. Shen, Y. H. Zhu, X. L. Yang, C. Z. Li, Chem. Commun. 2012, Y. S. Chen, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009, 19, 2297.
48, 3686. [45] J. X. Su, Q. Wang, R. Su, K. Wang, Q. Zhang, Q. Fu, J. Appl.
[27] X. Xu, R. Ray, Y. Gu, H. J. Ploehn, L. Gearheart, K. Raker, Polym. Sci. 2008, 107, 4070.
W. A. Scrivens, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 12736. [46] S. Morimune, M. Kotera, T. Nishino, K. Goto, K. Hata,
[28] L. Cao, M. J. Meziani, S. Sahu, Y. P. Sun, Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, Macromolecules 2011, 44, 4415.
46, 171. [47] M. J. McAllister, J. L. Li, D. H. Adamson, H. C. Schniepp,
[29] M. Hu, Y. Yang, X. Y. Gu, Y. Hu, J. Huang, C. Y. Wang, RSC Adv. A. A. Abdala, J. Liu, M. Herrera-Alonso, D. L. Milius, R. Car,
2014, 4, 62446. R. K. Prud’homme, I. A. Aksay, Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 4396.
[30] J. Wang, C. F. Wang, S. Chen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, [48] J. T. Paci, T. Belytschko, G. C. Schatz, J. Phys. Chem. C 2007,
9297. 111, 18099.
[31] C. J. Liu, P. Zhang, X. Y. Zhai, F. Tian, W. C. Li, J. H. Yang, Y. Liu, [49] M. Hu, Y. Yang, X. Y. Gu, Y. Hu, Z. S. Du, C. Y. Wang, Macromol.
H. B. Wang, W. Wang, W. G. Liu, Biomaterials 2012, 33, Mater. Eng. 2015, 300, 1043.
3604. [50] J. S. Gonzalez, L. N. Ludueña, A. Ponce, V. A. Alvarez, Mater.
[32] F. Wang, Z. Xie, H. Zhang, C. Y. Liu, Y. G. Zhang, Adv. Funct. Sci. Eng., C 2014, 34, 54.
Mater. 2011, 21, 1027. [51] Z. Tai, J. Yang, Y. Qi, X. Yan, Q. Xue, RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 12751.
[33] H. C. Zhang, H. Huang, H. Ming, H. T. Li, L. L. Zhang, Y. Liu, [52] J. Ma, J. Zhang, Z. Xiong, Y. Yong, X. S. Zhao, J. Mater. Chem.
Z. H. Kang, J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 10501. 2011, 21, 3350.
[34] X. Y. Zhang, S. Q. Wang, M. Y. Liu, B. Yang, L. Feng, Y. Ji, L. Tao, [53] S. K. Li, Y. X. Yan, J. L. Wang, S. H. Yu, Nanoscale 2013, 5,
Y. Wei, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 19013. 12616.