Professional Documents
Culture Documents
v.
Plaintiff David Pinkert (“Plaintiff”), through his counsel, Fairfield and Woods, P.C.,
submits the following Complaint and alleges as follows:
THE PARTIES
3. By virtue of the facts alleged herein, this Court has personal and subject matter
jurisdiction over the parties and claims to this Complaint.
4. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to Rule 98 of the Colorado Rules of Civil
Procedure.
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
7. Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, Mr. Pinkert was hired to serve as the Chief
Operating Officer and Secretary. Employment Agreement, § 1(a), at 1.
8. In exchange for his service, Mr. Pinkert was to receive an annual base salary of
$240,000 per year through December 31, 2016, which base salary would increase to $300,000 per
year beginning January 1, 2017. Employment Agreement, § 2(a), at 2. In addition to his annual
salary, Mr. Pinkert was eligible to earn an annual bonus, paid leave, as well as certain fringe
benefits. Id., §§ 2(b), 3, 4, at 2.
9. The term of the Employment Agreement was for an initial period of three years,
which term would automatically renew for one year periods unless earlier terminated pursuant to
the terms of the Employment Agreement. Employment Agreement, § 5(a), at 3.
10. The Employment Agreement provided that Mr. Pinkert’s employment with the
company could be terminated in certain enumerated ways: (i) Termination by Consent; (ii)
Termination by the Executive; (iii) Termination by the Company for Cause; (iv) Termination by
the Company without Cause; and (v) Termination by Death or Disability. Employment
Agreement, § 5, at 3–5.
11. As relevant to this lawsuit, Section 5(e) of the Employment Agreement defined
“Termination by Company without Cause” as follows:
The Company may terminate the Executive’s employment without Cause at any
time on 60 days’ advance written notice to Executive, with the Company’s only
obligations being the payment of accrued salary, accrued benefits and accrued,
unused vacation compensation earned as of the date of termination and the
applicable Restrictive Covenant Benefits. For the avoidance of doubt, non-renewal
2
of this Agreement by the Company pursuant to Section 5(a) shall be [sic] constitute
a termination without Cause.
12. Section 6(f) of the Employment Covenant set forth the “Restrictive Covenant
Benefits” to which Mr. Pinkert is entitled in the event his employment with the company was
terminated without cause pursuant to Section 5(e) of the Employment Agreement:
3
13. In order for Mr. Pinkert to be eligible to receive any of the Restrictive Covenant
Benefits, he was required to execute and not revoke a release of claims as well as remain in
compliance with certain restrictive covenants in the Employment Agreement. Employment
Agreement, § 6(f), at 10.
14. The Employment Agreement specifically provides that it shall bind, and inure to
the benefit of, the company’s successors and assigns. Employment Agreement, § 7, at 11.
15. Pursuant to Section 8 of the Employment Agreement, “[i]n any dispute involving
this Agreement, the prevailing party (or substantially prevailing party) shall be entitled to recover
its reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses from the non-prevailing party (or substantially non-
prevailing party).” Employment Agreement, § 8, at 12.
16. Mr. Pinkert’s employment transferred from Melody Health Insurance, Inc. to
Friday Health Plans.
17. On or about November 18, 2022, Friday Health Plans informed Mr. Pinkert by letter
that his employment with the company was terminated without cause pursuant to Section 5(e) of
the Employment Agreement (“Notice of Termination”).
18. The Notice of Termination identified Mr. Pinkert’s effective termination date as
January 13, 2023 (the “Termination Date”) and specifically addressed Mr. Pinkert’s entitlement to
receive the Restrictive Covenant Benefits:
Between now and the Termination Date you will continue to receive your
compensation and benefits in accordance with Section 5.e. of the Employment
Agreement and following the Termination Date will be eligible to receive the
Restrictive Covenant Benefits pursuant to the terms of the Employment Agreement.
20. In the Separation and Release Agreement, Friday Health Plans acknowledged that
it would pay Mr. Pinkert certain benefits that were contingent upon Mr. Pinkert executing a release.
21. Specifically, the Separation and Release Agreement provided that, upon executing
and not revoking the agreement, Mr. Pinkert “shall receive the Restrictive Covenant Benefits
4
described in Section 6.f. of the Employment Agreement, subject to and in accordance with the
terms of the Employment Agreement.” Separation and Release Agreement, § 2(b), at 2.
22. Section 10 of the Separation and Release Agreement provides that “[i]n any action
to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing party (or substantially prevailing party) will be entitled
to recover costs, expert witness fees, and attorneys’ fees.” Separation and Release Agreement, §
10, at 5.
23. On January 12, 2023, Friday Health Plans provided Mr. Pinkert a termination letter,
which terminated his employment effective January 13, 2023 and further provided information
regarding benefits and unemployment options.
24. On February 8, 2023, Mr. Pinkert reached out by email to Chelsey Moore at Friday
Health Plans regarding the status of his severance payment, which had not arrived by February 3,
2023 (the date he expected to receive the first check).
25. Notwithstanding Mr. Pinkert’s compliance at all times with his obligations under
the Employment Agreement and Separation and Release Agreement, Friday Health Plans informed
Mr. Pinkert by letter dated February 7, 2023 (“Notice of Non-Payment”) that he would not be
receiving any severance payments under the Separation and Release Agreement:
26. Although the Notice of Non-Payment was dated February 7, 2023, Mr. Pinkert had
not received it as of the date of his February 8, 2023 email, calling into question the whether the
Notice of Non-Payment was backdated. Indeed, the shipping label on the envelope reveals it was
mailed on February 9, 2023.
27. Contrary to Friday Health Plans’ position, neither the Employment Agreement nor
the Separation and Release Agreement permit Friday Health Plans to terminate the Restrictive
Covenant Benefits “due to liquidity concerns.”
28. Moreover, upon information and belief, the Chief Financial Officer received one or
more severance payments from Friday Health Plans. Such payments call into question the veracity
of Friday Health Plans purported basis for refusing to pay Mr. Pinkert’s Restrictive Covenant
Benefits.
5
Mr. Pinkert’s Demand for Payment
29. On or about February 13, 2023, counsel for Mr. Pinkert sent a letter demanding
payment of all amounts due under the Employment Agreement and Separation and Release
Agreement.
30. Friday Health Plans refused to provide Mr. Pinkert or his counsel the courtesy of a
response to the February 13, 2023 Demand letter.
31. On May 10, 2023, Mr. Pinkert reached out to Beth Bierbower, the current CEO of
Friday Health Plans, regarding his severance. Ms. Bierbower referred Mr. Pinkert to Friday Health
Plans’ legal counsel.
32. Thus, notwithstanding multiple efforts, Friday Health Plans has failed to pay Mr.
Pinkert the Restrictive Covenant Benefits to which he is entitled under the Employment Agreement
and Separation and Release Agreement.
33. All conditions precedent to the enforcement of the Employment Agreement and
Separation and Release Agreement have been satisfied, have occurred, or have been waived.
34. Mr. Pinkert incorporates by reference the allegations contained in the foregoing
paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.
35. The Employment Agreement and Separation and Release Agreement constitute
binding and enforceable contracts between Mr. Pinkert and Friday Health Plans.
36. Friday Health Plans breached the Employment Agreement and Separation and
Release Agreement by, among other things, failing to pay Mr. Pinkert amounts due upon his
separation from the company.
37. Mr. Pinkert fulfilled all of his obligations and duties under the Employment
Agreement and Separation and Release Agreement.
38. As a result of Friday Health Plans’ breaches, Mr. Pinkert has been damaged in an
amount to be determined at trial, plus attorney fees, interest and costs as allowed under Colorado
law.
39. In the alternative to his First Claim for Relief, Mr. Pinkert incorporates by reference
the allegations contained in the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.
6
40. Mr. Pinkert conferred a benefit upon Friday Health Plans, which benefit was
accepted and appreciated by it.
41. Mr. Pinkert reasonably expected Friday Health Plans to pay amounts due upon his
separation from the company.
42. The acceptance and retention by Friday Health Plans of the benefit conferred by
Mr. Pinkert would be inequitable under the circumstances unless Friday Health Plans compensates
Mr. Pinkert for the value of the benefit conferred.
43. Friday Health Plans, by retaining the benefit and not compensating Mr. Pinkert, has
been and continues to be unjustly enriched at Mr. Pinkert’s expense. Mr. Pinkert has been
damaged in an amount to be proven at trial.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff David Pinkert, requests judgment in his favor and against
Defendant, Friday Health Plans Management Services Company, Inc., for the following:
A. All present and future damages, pre- and post-judgment interest, attorneys’ fees and
costs as allowed by law and under the Employment Agreement and the Separation and Release
Agreement, and other amounts due; and
B. Such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
Plaintiff’s Address:
1188 South Sherman Street
Denver, CO 80210