Origin of the model Areas of specialization Moderators used in the

where the model was model from similar

used studies

Based on the Theory of Reasoned Medicine,Education,Ga Voluntariness,Task/

Action, Davis (1989) develops the ming,Social Profession,Purpose,Compl
Technology Acceptance Model to find Networking,Business,In exity.Intellectual
out what factors cause people to formation Technology capablity,gender,age,exper
accept or reject an information ience,cultural background
technology . He suggests that and individual/group
perceived usefulness and perceived
ease of use are the two most
important individual beliefs about
using an information technology

Li, L. (2010). A critical review of Sun, H., & Zhang, P.

technology acceptance literature. (2006). The role of
Referred Research Paper, 4. moderating factors in user
technology acceptance.
International journal of
human-computer studies,
64(2), 53-78.

Chismar, W. G., &

Wiley-Patton, S. (2003,
January). Does the
extended technology
acceptance model
apply to physicians. In
36th Annual Hawaii
International
Conference on System
Sciences, 2003.
Proceedings of the (pp.
8-pp). IEEE.
Koufaris, M. (2002).
Applying the
technology acceptance
model and flow theory
to online consumer
behavior. Information
systems research,
13(2), 205-223.

Arumugam, R. (2011).
The usage of
technology among
education students in
University Utara
Malaysia: An
application of
extended Technology
Acceptance Model.
International journal of
education and
development using ICT,
7(3), 4-17.

Neil Charness, Walter

R. Boot, in Handbook
of the Psychology of
Aging (Eighth Edition),
2016
Mediators used in Strengths of the model Limitations of the model
the model from
similar studies

Training,beliefs, The strength of TAM is that
attitude and understanding technology
intention acceptance will lead to better
prediction of the use of new
information resources. This shows
that confidence in the use of
technology can lead to increased
personal control, flexibility and
competent use of information.
Therefore, increased knowledge can
lead to better productivity.
Limitations in the methodology used for
testing the TAM model.One of the main
criticisms for studies on the TAM model is
that self-reported use data are used to
measure system use instead of real actual
use data. Limitations in the variables and
relationships present within the TAM model.
Limitations in the theoretical foundation for
the TAM model. Bagozzi {2007) highlighted
the poor theoretical relationship that was
formulated among the different constructs
formulated in TAM. One of the limitations of
the TAM concerns the variable
whichpertains to the behavior of users,
which is inevitably evaluated through
subjective means such as behavioral
intention (BI) such as interpersonal
influence.

Burton-Jones, A., & Durodolu, O. O. (2016). Technology Chuttur, M. Y. (2009). Overview of the
Hubona, G. S. (2006). acceptance model as a predictor of technology acceptance model: Origins,
The mediation of using information system'to acquire developments and future directions.
external variables in information literacy skills. Library Working Papers on Information Systems,
the technology Philosophy and Practice. 9(37), 9-37.
acceptance model.
Information &
management, 43(6),
706-717.
Ajibade, P. (2018). Technology acceptance
model limitations and criticisms: Exploring
the practical applications and use in
technology-related studies, mixed-method,
and qualitative researches. Library
Philosophy and Practice.
Possible constructs similar or Competing theories or Complementary theories or models to
synonymous to those in the models to the model used the model used in the reference
model in the reference

Perceived User Resources. Task NA The Theory of Reasoned Action

requirements,Tool experience (Fishbein et al., 1975), the Unified
and Task requirements Theory of Acceptance and Use of
Technology (UTAUT) (Venkatesh et al.,
2003), the Motivational Model (Davis,
et al, 1992), the Theory of Planned
Behavior (Ajzen, 1991), the model
combining TAM and the Theory of
Planned Behavior (Taylor and Todd,
1995), the Model of PC Utilization
(Thompson, et al, 1991), the Innovation
Diffusion Theory (Rogers, 1995) and the
Social Cognitive Theory (Bandura,
1986).

Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., & Li, L. (2010). A critical review of

Chin, W. W. (2001). Extending technology acceptance literature.
the technology acceptance Referred Research Paper, 4.
model: the influence of
perceived user resources. ACM
SIGMIS Database: the
DATABASE for Advances in
Information Systems, 32(3), 86-
112.
Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M.
(1999). Extending the
technology acceptance model
with task–technology fit
constructs. Information &
management, 36(1), 9-21.
Tests used to establish
the robustness of the
model

Fast Form Scale

Chin, W. W., Johnson, N.,

& Schwarz, A. (2008). A
fast form approach to
measuring technology
acceptance and other
constructs. MIS
Quarterly, 687-703.